AP: "The Decision Not To Charge Karl Rove Shows There Often Are No Consequences For Misleading The Public"...

Associated Press   |  Pete Yost   |   June 13, 2006 09:55 PM

Read More: Breaking Home News
stumbleupon :AP: "The Decision Not To Charge Karl Rove Shows There Often Are No Consequences For Misleading The Public"...   digg: AP: "The Decision Not To Charge Karl Rove Shows There Often Are No Consequences For Misleading The Public"...   reddit: AP: "The Decision Not To Charge Karl Rove Shows There Often Are No Consequences For Misleading The Public"...   del.icio.us: AP: "The Decision Not To Charge Karl Rove Shows There Often Are No Consequences For Misleading The Public"...

The decision not to charge Karl Rove shows there often are no consequences for misleading the public.

In 2003, while Rove allowed the White House to tell the news media that he had no role in leaking
Valerie Plame's CIA identity, the presidential aide was secretly telling the FBI the truth.

Breaking Home News

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com