NY Times, LA Times Editors On Publishing Secrets: "If The Freedom Of The Press Makes Some Americans Uneasy, It Is Anathema To The Ideologists Of Terror"...

New York Times   |  DEAN BAQUET and BILL KELLER   |   July 1, 2006 10:06 AM


Read More: Breaking Home News
stumbleupon :<i>NY Times</i>, <i>LA Times</i> Editors On Publishing Secrets: "If The Freedom Of The Press Makes Some Americans Uneasy, It Is Anathema To The Ideologists Of Terror"...   digg: <i>NY Times</i>, <i>LA Times</i> Editors On Publishing Secrets: "If The Freedom Of The Press Makes Some Americans Uneasy, It Is Anathema To The Ideologists Of Terror"...   reddit: <i>NY Times</i>, <i>LA Times</i> Editors On Publishing Secrets: "If The Freedom Of The Press Makes Some Americans Uneasy, It Is Anathema To The Ideologists Of Terror"...   del.icio.us: <i>NY Times</i>, <i>LA Times</i> Editors On Publishing Secrets: "If The Freedom Of The Press Makes Some Americans Uneasy, It Is Anathema To The Ideologists Of Terror"...

SINCE Sept. 11, 2001, newspaper editors have faced excruciating choices in covering the government's efforts to protect the country from terrorist agents. Each of us has, on a number of occasions, withheld information because we were convinced that publishing it could put lives at risk. On other occasions, each of us has decided to publish classified information over strong objections from our government.

Last week our newspapers disclosed a secret Bush administration program to monitor international banking transactions. We did so after appeals from senior administration officials to hold the story. Our reports -- like earlier press disclosures of secret measures to combat terrorism -- revived an emotional national debate, featuring angry calls of "treason" and proposals that journalists be jailed along with much genuine concern and confusion about the role of the press in times like these.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com