Romney & Giuliani's troubles on the abortion just go to show how unsustainable the ProLife stance is in America--with the majority against them, and the realities of economic difficulties of the average American family--in contrast to the high-blown 'moral' theorizing that pleases the Religious Right base of the GOP. But they still try to play the game.

He hasn't switched positions. He has made tis same point months ago. If Roe v Wade is overturned, (which would be the next logical step for the pro life side) than abortion goes back to each individual state to decide. Mitt is still for a Life amendment but once it reverts to the states all the president can do is support a life amendment. He can't start the process toward an amendment, that is up to the legislative branch. Read your constitution Libs. Romney is pro Life and will continue to be so. He is just expressing (a little sloppily) the political realities of the issue.

Welcom to Mitt ROMNEY'S WAFFLE HAUS.

I love this.

I love every time one of these idiots go on and on and on until they themselves are so friggin' confused and mesmerized by the trail of contradictory horse shit that's plopped out of their flaps,they can't tell you what they mean or think or know.

It is becoming painfully obvious that to be Republican is to be,well,retarded.

This reminds me of the YouTube video "Kissing
Hanks Ass". This is not a change of
position this is merely a clarification of
his previous position. With Romney's background
there is no such thing as a change of position.
There is a smile, a statement, another smile,
a restatement of the question, momentum, reaction,
push the limits of credibility, start again.

That is SUCH a Dr. Dolittle Moment....anyone good with Photoshop?

http://blogs.sun.com/factotum/resource/pushmepullyou.jpg

The "Reich-Ving" blogwhores are NOT having a good day today...aside from spewing racism, anti-semitisim, and mysoginy, they've kept expressly away from clearly half, today's news. My bet is that as soon as there's news they can spin, they'll be bac as if nothing had happened, earning their measly Scaife change.

http://www.germes-online.com/catalog/69/74/254/page8/251878/flip_flop.html

I'm still hung up on the rabbit shooting thing...

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_robert_s_070823_hare_splitting_3f_romn.htm

Boy, the Repubs have offered us a SAD bunch of candidates. Several working BOTH sides of the street on every issue--one who can't decide to run--one who can't run his own campaign--one using a national tragedy to prop up his own character flaws--and a few running on one issue only. This is what happens when you're interviewing for the position of 'more of the same' and front man for a 3rd Bush term.

Romney, as a Mormon neocon Ken doll, wants women to live as second-class citizens without access to reproductive health care.

He wishes all women, everywhere, could wear his secret Mormon Magic underpants that protect the wearer from Satan. That is the birth control method he approves of.

Repubs always use "states rights" as a smokescreen for misogyny and racism. It is one of their insider codewords, like "school vouchers".

Mitt's favorite quote: "I agree with you. (Pregnant Pause)

And I agree with him too."

.
Poor Mitt!
He can't help it
He feels strongly both ways!
[Laugh]
.

The guy is a mental midget. I couldn't figure out how this guy made a dime. Then I remembered that he is a member of the Lucky Sperm Club, having had the good sense to have his successful father born ahead of him.

There's always such an issue on changing your opinon in the Presidential race. I personlly (I'm not a Romeny guy) would find it refreshing if a candidate would change their mind with reason and explain it rationally. I think being quick to point these kinds of fingers tend to discourage that. Meaning to say I don't know why this is the headline story. I mean abortion!? Is that really the biggest issue now? I would like to know why no debates or candidates are bringing up the issue of the government spying on amercians? Why isn't this issue involved in the debate?