Why do all these people keep omitting the word "illegal"??
Huffington is didshonest with this headline. These people aren't immigrants, the are ILLEGAL immigrants- that is lawbreakers.

The ONLY entitlement illegal aliens have is a choice between a firing squad and deportation. Feinstein, et. al., talk but do not actually do anything positive about the invasion of terrorists and other illegals and the sleeper cells awaiting orders to murder hundreds of thousand of Americans on American soil. It only takes $25K to a Mexican coyote for a MiddleEastern to enter our country across the fenceless souther border. We Americans demand Senators shut up and get to work securing our borders and deporting illegal aliens. Feinstein and others want to bring in even more illegals with their anti-American D.R.E.A.M. act and the so-called AgJobs act. Enough of this sort of back-door AMNESTY!

Well, it must be hell to be healthy, eh? I betcha those people who make these good business decisions don't feel the pain of cancer eating through you. They don't feel the panic of an impending, horrible death.

And I betcha they go to church on sundays, some of them at least, don't they.

Feck'em.

Ugh.

--UB.

What about soylent green?

The immorality of the unchristlike Republican right is testimony to the fact that they have lost their souls to the devil. Their unholy greed, crulety and inhumanity to their fellow men and women are precisely the sins Jesus Christ spoke out against and was crucified for. The political bastardization and exploitation of religion by faux religious Republicans is a mortal sin and a societal nightmare. That anyone who says he or she believes in the teachings of Jesus Christ and follows and or supports such wholly unchristlike actions isn't simply a political hyprocrisy, it is a moral hyprocrisy beyond redemption. Why do these people go to church on Sunday? What moral values are they espousing? What are they teaching their children? Where is the god they claim to worship and love in their everyday lives? Bigotry and avarice are not compatible with Christianity. They are an anathema!

all you haters out there, your life is worth
less than anyone you would allow to die
because they do not have the means to take
care of themselves.

nuts

go to my site if you waqnt to see hillary clinton exposed as a liar and a murderer!!!!!!!!!!!!1

http://youtube.com/user/kmccaskill

If Bush does not rot in hell, then there is no hell.

They've already got the top spot in Hell reserved. They can stop the evil nonsense now.

Every man is guilty of all the good he didn't do.
~ Voltaire

I am a natural born citizen. I have a job, I pay taxes--social security and medicaid etc--I have no criminal record and don't do anything illegal. I have no health insurance and I couldn't get chemotherapy either. Hard for me to sympathize in light of this.

Good Old American Hospitality is still strong and going.

BUT tell me how you would be as far as hospitality if you came home and there were seven people in your house demanding your food, your bed and your clothes.

Would it be different if those same 7 people showed up at the front door and politely asked for help?

YOUR DAMNED STRAIGHT IT WOULD!

Americans will give you the shirt off their backs if you ask, but when you demand don't be surprised at the reaction.

What happened to good old American hospitality? Oh right, it was outsourced to China.

No one ever mentions how health care at that fancy-schmancy "state of the art" hospital in Iraq will be paid for. Given all the other total-capitalist schemes forced on the country, it's a safe bet that ONLY those who can afford to pay or can afford to buy obscenely expensive health insurance will be accepted for treatment - the poor will just have to die in the gutters the way they always have.

"Compassionate conservatism", my Aunt Fanny.

It seems that GW and Laura Bush wanted to build a state-of-the-art children's hospital (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/28/world/middleeast/28basra.html?_r=1&n=Top/News/World/Countries%20and%20Territories/Iraq&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin)in Iraq, but want to deny coverage to cancer victims here at home. Why is that?