EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Bill Clinton Slams GOP Leaders For Snubbing Black Voter Forum

First Posted: 9/26/07 Updated: 5/25/11

Former President Bill Clinton has sharply criticized the Republican presidential frontrunners for snubbing an African-American voter forum this week.

"This says more about the evolution of the Republican party than anything," Clinton told Tavis Smiley on his Public Radio International show, which will air this Friday. "Keep in mind that Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president and Theodore Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington to the White House. And after Theodore Roosevelt, the parties began to switch places."

Clinton is the latest figure to criticize GOP candidates for brushing off the forum at Morgan State University, a historically black college in Baltimore. Even President Bush, who rarely wades into the Republican presidential race, last week urged candidates in his party to do more to reach out to African-American voters.

During Smiley's show, Clinton said he regretted that the GOP was alienating blacks and Latinos. "I said openly when I was president that I look forward to the day when no party could claim 90 percent of any voting group again."

He added, "I think our side looks pretty good coming into the next election."

Even as Clinton was speaking out about the forum, at least one Republican candidate who had dropped out of the event decided to participate. Tavis Smiley told the Huffington Post that Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO), who has cornered the issue of immigration in his primary campaign, has reversed his earlier decision to sit out the forum.

A scheduler from Tancredo's campaign confirmed the news with the Huffington Post, but his campaign was unwilling to comment on why he changed his position.

Smiley himself wasn't sure why the change of heart had occurred.

"I don't understand why he changed his mind, all I can assume is that some people do the right things because they see the light, and sometimes they feel heat," Smiley said late on Wednesday afternoon. "I'm not altogether sure how Tancredo came to his new decision, whether he saw the light or felt the heat, but I'm delighted he's the first of the five to change his decision. I am hopeful that other four will do likewise."

A partial, unedited transcript of Clinton's remarks is below.

***

This says more about the evolution of the Republican party than anything. Keep in mind that Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president and Theodore Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington to the White House. And after Theodore Roosevelt, the parties began to switch places. America's basically had throughout its history one generally more progressive party and one generally more conservative...when although the issues have been different. But the Republican party was the party of national unity and using the power of the federal government to advance that unity. "A more perfect union" on the social issues and on the economic issues from Abraham Lincoln through Theodore Roosevelt.

When Theodore Roosevelt left office his selected choice to succeed him William Howard Taft basically moved the party to the right. And then after President Wilson was in office, there were 12 years of Republican rule which moved the party further to the right. But still it was a reasonably moderate party. When Kennedy ran against Nixon for president in 1960, Kennedy got about 65% of the African-American vote and then only because he called Corretta King when Martin Luther King was in jail. Otherwise the vote would have been about 60-40. The Democrats didn't get a majority of the African-American vote until Franklin Roosevelt became president. Because of Eleanor Roosevelt's passionate committment to equal opportunity and Franklink Roosevelt's committment to give African-Americans places to contribute in The New Deal Recovery Jobs Program and in the military.

But it still was about a 60-40 deal. And Kennedy took it up to 65-35, then Johnson in signing The Voting Rights Act and The Civil Rights Act, got it higher. Then, the sea change came in 1980 decided to solidify - meanwhile the Democrats were getting more African-American voters, the Republicans were getting more White Southerners and they decided they liked it; and (future president) President Reagan declared for president in 1980 in Philadelphia, MS...talking about states' rights where the three civil rights workers (Chaney, Goodman, Shwerner) had been murdered just sixteen years earlier. And I remember the mainstream media seemed to think that was perfectly alright.

That 1980 moment captured a switching of the parties that basically began with the end of Theodore Roosevelt's presidency; picked up steam under FDR. Took off like a rocket because of President Kennedy's integration of the colleges and President Johnson's actions. But Eisenhower's courageous decision simply to implement the Supreme Court decision (of Brown v. Board of Education) showed that in his presidency in the 1950s, neither party had a monopoly on either support of African-Americans voters...or far more important, their own convictions about what the role of the national government should be to advance equal opportunity and bring us together.

In other words, an African-American voter could be voting in the 50s, with nowhere near the rights and other economic options you have today; but you could still look at both these parties and say 'there might be somebody in both these parties that when the chips were down would really stick up for me, that would wake up every morning and go to the White House wantin' to do the right thing for me. And I can be just like any other American. I can listen to these arguments and pick the party and the person that's best for me.'

This switch, while it occurred as I said over the entire 20th century, really picked up steam because...and Johnson knew it. Johnson said when he signed The Voting Rights Act after The Civil Rights Act that he had probably consigned the Democratic party to minority status in the South for a long time because he knew that White Southerners would move away. But White Southerners were getting more progressive on race.

So since the 1980s, there have been lots of other issues. Anyway, that's basically what happened. And what I was hoping would happen...I said openly when I was president that 'I look forward to the day when no party could claim 90 percent of any voting group again.' Because I thought it would be better for America if both parties were reaching out to every single group.

Yes Blacks, but Hispanics and others. And the Republicans made a little headway on Hispanics and then decided there was too much juice in the immigration issue...and so, you know...I think our side looks pretty good, coming into the next election.

John McCain, I don't think he has a racist bone in his body. I disagree with him profoundly on Iraq and on other things, but I think he's a profoundly good man who paid an enormous price for this country. Governor Huckabee, our former governor here...I have a very good relationship with him. I like him personally very much. We disagree on a lot of things, (but) I don't think he's a racist.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
  • Comments
  • 146
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:45 AM on 09/28/2007
From what I could gather from his presidency­, Bill Clinton never gave a damn about black or Oriental people. If they were given a bad shake....h­e did nothing to change it.
02:57 AM on 09/28/2007
"Hope is the only good god remaining among mankind;
the others have left and gone to Olympus.

Trust, a mighty god has gone,
Restraint has gone from men,
and the Graces,
my friend,
have abandoned the earth.

Men's judicial oaths are no longer to be trusted,
nor does anyone revere the immortal gods;
the race of pious men has perished
and men no longer recognize
the rules of conduct
nor acts of pity."

~ Theognis of Nicaea
wijg posted 01:23 am on 09/25/2007
01:11 AM on 09/28/2007
Only those Republican­s that have absolutely no chance at the nomination would show up. Why waste your resources on voters that have no intention of voting for you?
12:47 AM on 09/28/2007
Marrob:
Money got G. W. into the whitehouse­.....this man is not even capable of keeping a single toilet bathroom clean if he was not president of the unoted states....­...just shows you how low the U.S. has sunk....ma­kes one wonder if it can ever recover from this rip-off by this administra­tion.
12:40 AM on 09/28/2007
Bill Clinton and Bush 43 are polar opposites.
Everyone who listened to Clinton thought he cared about them. No one listening to Bush thinks he cares about them.
12:40 AM on 09/28/2007
Bill Clinton had his chance to do something with the black's [not for them]. He blew his chance....­.time to shut the Fu_ _ up big boy.
photo
thankulord13
Allow for no distractions!
06:59 PM on 09/27/2007
"The proof of fear mongering is when ever anyone tries to have a rational debate about race and if one ever questions pro-minori­ty racist policies, they are labeled as KKK. Tell me. Is the KKK even relevant anymore? A couple dozen dumb fat white guys with a 5 grade education is hardly going to oppress 14% of the population­."

Funny you say that because whenever anyone disagrees with Bush and His war we are labeled anti American and we don't support the troops. Fear mongoring has been a Conservati­ve tactic for the past twenty-sev­en years. In fact the best one to date was Saddam was connected to Osama and WMD... As far as Clinton exploiting the Black community.­.. if he is he is doing a great job of bring to light a lot of things that have been in the dark...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
10:19 PM on 09/27/2007
14% of the population­?
That is about the same as the BLACK POPULATION­.
06:09 PM on 09/27/2007
Clinton 42's opinion should carry a lot of weight, especially since he was the first black President.
04:00 PM on 09/27/2007
What are you complainin­g about ? The democrats did the exact same thing to Native Americans a couple of months ago ! Clinton, Obama and Edwards refused to participat­e in the Native American version. I am a Native American and would never vote democrat because they always deny us a voice.
Boomerwoman
Momma said there'd be days like this
07:32 PM on 09/27/2007
And the Republican­s do give you a voice?
08:09 PM on 09/27/2007
No, of course not, but they are who they are. Democrats pretend to be an inclusive party, they obviously are not. I don't expect everyone to believe as I do, just don't lie about it.
11:17 PM on 09/27/2007
That is not correct. Edwards did meet with members of the Creek Nation In Oklahoma.
01:13 AM on 09/28/2007
The Native American presidenti­al debate was in Southern California this summer, Clinton, Obama and Edwards were a no show. Please get your facts straight. They were invited and declined to attend. Bill Richardson attended. Mr. Richardson to me is a man of his word, in my opinion the others are biggots and liars.
02:59 PM on 09/27/2007
I'm a Black Man who would like to know ,Who are the bad guy's!! the white people of the Rep Party that can't stand the site of us or the white people of the Dem Party who would love to see Black Women as head of house hold[Welfa­re] until the Black Man is killed off?I don't think White Folks will ever fight that battle over us again North Vs South.
02:37 PM on 09/27/2007
This shouldn't surprise anyone with a brain. Any republican who is african american is basically crazy. What exactly has the republican party done for african americas? Ken Melhman must be shaking his gay little head, all that work in the black churches and universiti­es goes up in flames.
11:30 AM on 09/27/2007
All I can say as a lily white Canadian, I declare any black insane if voting for a Republican­.
Republican have no shame!!!! Disgusting white trash thats what they are.
10:01 AM on 09/27/2007
... and President Clinton would be right on the money!

http://Osi­Speaks.com or http://Osi­Speaks.org
08:49 AM on 09/27/2007
Oh Bill Clinton, who claims to have seen non-existe­nt black churches burn, now wants to chime in on whether or not people have to participat­e in the racist debate.
08:36 AM on 09/27/2007
Still no outrage at the Dems avoiding the debate sponsored by the Congressio­nal Black Caucus. Oh, it's because Fox News is racist. Bullshit. Fucking hypocrits.
10:25 AM on 09/27/2007
No, it's because Fox News is imbalanced and it wasn't an official debate sanctioned by the Democratic Party. I call bullshit to your call of bullshit.
06:53 PM on 09/27/2007
Not balanced like PBS?
02:33 PM on 09/27/2007
AND EXACTLY HOW MANY AFRICAN AMERICANS OR EVEN WOMEN ARE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT FOR THE REPUBLICAN­S??
06:52 PM on 09/27/2007
What does that have to do with anything? How many Mormans or ex-mayors of NYC are running for the Dems? Idiot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:45 AM on 09/27/2007
Reading the transcript of Clinton is enough to make a grown person cry. I am reminded once again of how important it is to have a good person, and an intelligen­t person, in the White House.
A transcript of what Clinton said should be printed in every newspaper, read on every talk show, and discussed in every classroom.
The contrast between Clinton and Bush is so starkly vast that it boggles the mind. It is not only that they are in different political parties, because, as Mr. Clinton said, it is possible for people of different politics to get along. The contrast between the two men is so great because one is a great man, despite his human frailties, and the other is a very, very little man, because of his human failings.
Pres. Clinton made some mistakes while in office, but at least he is intelligen­t (and competent in English), and was a good, if boring, administra­tor.
And he never invaded the wrong country.
10:26 AM on 09/27/2007
Bush probably couldn't even name the party affiliatio­ns of the historical presidents Clinton spoke of, let alone detail their actual influence.