If who funded Bill Clinton's library is your highest priority....REALLY get a hobby, like painting Civil War reinactment lead soldiers....the More lead the better.

Exactly WHO has been staying up nights pondering the list of Clinton's Library donars?

That ranks somewhere between Reagan's favorite color and LBJ's waist size in my curiosity list.

Bill not giving up anything. Rat out george soreass/ drug dealers and the rest. No gays he got them so good in 92 they hate him. Mexico may have with the sweetheart deals he gave them. Anyway the clintons drity money list go's on and on.

well put. those who pursue this issue are trying to deflect attention from the crimes of this administration. take note of who screams loudest, they'll have the most to hide or be deepest in denial.

Bill isn't running for anything so why should his financial records be an issue?

This will go along with Hillary Clinton being "surprised and shocked" to learn that she received millions from Norman Hsu.

And her being "surprised and shocked" to learn of missing files.

And her being "surprised and shocked" to learn of Chinese money being donated to her husband's campaign during the 1990's.

And her being "surprised and shocked" to learn of her husband's extra marital affairs which took place in the Oval Office.

The Clintons, who are claimed by liberals to be "extremely intelligent" are always so "surprised and shocked". Oh, and very secretive when it comes to finances.

But, those same liberals always claim President Bush is a "moron", yet he was able to dupe the "extremely intelligent" Hillary Clinton who was, of course, "surprised and shocked".

God bless the troops.

I have just one simple question.

HAVE WE HAD ENOUGH OF THE CLINTONS YET?

I mean, really.

Is this pair of politically savvy scumbuckets the best we can do?

Is there no one more WORTHY of sitting in the big chair out there?

Do we really need ANOTHER eight years of sleaze and skeeze?

And please...before you say DENNIS KUCINICH, it's got to be someone ELECTABLE.

Right now there are a bunch of other dems who are. None of them is perfect, but all of them are light years ahead of the Clintons in terms of having a moral center.

This isn't ONLY about Billary's failure to recant her support of Bush in 2003. It goes way past that. She, and he, and the people they attract are just like a cartoon from THE HEART OF DARKNESS.

They're so morally compromised...so given to the easy lie...that even David Geffen barfed a lung, finally.

I just don't get why dems would rally around the MOST corrupt, and the MOST risky, of the field.

Disclose the records and let's not play the non-disclosure game.

BILL,
RELEASE YOUR DONOR LIST WHEN BUSH RELEASES HIS DONOR LIST FOR BOTH ELECTION CAMPAIGNS!
Release you donors list when Bush gives congress the WHITE HOUSE EMAILS.

You go Bill!

It's a right wing non-issue as usual! Iraq burns, Afghanistan is a fiasco, Middle East is unraveling, Darfur is going nuts, the economy sucks, global warming, oil prices, Health Care, so-many-children-left-behind in no-child-left-behind, Housing crises, dollar tumbling, the Military and the Justice department politicized, hate crimes on the rise, infrasturcture crumbling, Geneva Conventions and the American Constitution in tatters ...

So? Let's make it a Clinton issue again! The only thing the right wing nuts and the Nader-herd have not blamed Clinton for is the Tsunami in December 2004!