HUFFPOST=MAINSTREAM MEDIA

OBAMA 08

I was for Obama because I thought Hillary was too stiff and inauthentic, even though as a New Yorker I think she's done a great job in the Senate. However, anyone paying an iota of attention to the debates and to her speaking in general should see what an incredible improvement she has made at articulating herself, communicating a clear message and vision, and even warmth.. Sorry folks, but she is beating Edwards and Obama on real merit.

This non story is just like the Edwards non story earlier.

What's happening is here at Huffpo?

The MIC owned MSM is behind the continuance of the Bush/Clinton single party facade.

The only cure for this cabal by corporate fascism is a fast rebirth of American Populism!

Stop the War! Vote Change! Vote Obama!

I don't think Michelle Obama has been the most productive spokesperson for her husband's campaign. I think it's time to step out of the limelight.

For my part, I don't like to see both Obama and Edwards running against Hillary in the primary. I'd like to see a clear choice between Edwards and Clinton. I like Barak, but I think his turn will come in the future. I don't want to see a split anti-Hillary vote that gives her the nomination. I don't support her vision. I'd like to see an alternative vision have a clean shot at winning the nomination.

The populace will listen and respond. If Obama is underwhelming, to others than his inner circle, he will not move forward. If Edwards is overwhelming he will move forward. Can either Edwards or Obama trump Hillary and the old school, it is doubtful. The netizens do not hold the power they believe they have. However, they can do more than is being done now. They can get to Obama and avise him:
Every gaffe that the Repugnants make should be jumped on by Obama. Take the Larry Craig denial of hate crimes being done against Gays. Take the ridiculous spending by Bush and his Cronies. Take the lies about Iraq and now Iran. If Obama wants to win, he has to leave the current Dems cowardice of revealing these things and get on with it. Hillary can win with the middle of the road. Obama could win with the truth. Dare he speak it, or will he too submit or fall victim to the doublespeak standard?
Personally, I would rather lose after giving a good fight, than lose for dancing with my opponent.

Utter bullsh*t.

The MSM has been deliberately misquoting both Obama and Michelle lately. His campaign, by all on-the-ground reports, is motivated, organized, and in great position.

This is the kind of deliberate misquoting they did to Al Gore.

The only thing that will stop The swapping of another Clinton for another Bush,

ultimately bringing America to JeeeBush, is a unity ticket of Edwards/Obama

BEFORE the big states vote in February.

Get smart guys! Hillary will win unless you unite soon, to defeat her!

Let's only vote for someone who was wrong on the war.. (When most people in the world were not)

Barak is caput...good riddance....

Goodbye Senator, he did awaken some in America.Yes you're the voice and agent of change.But history tells us that America and Americana resist change.The majority is not nor will they ever be ready for you.This country has too many problems for a decent, fair minded,man as Senator Obama to represent this nation.This is a sad fact about America, we had our chance and blew it.Ignorance and fear still trumps in America.

At this point, the only candidate who can lose Iowa and still beat Hillary is Al Gore.

Of course, he would win Iowa in a landslide (see: 85% approval rating among Democrats. Yes, 85%.)

And, of course, he hasn't announced.

Has it become the new popular thing to say you were "underwhelmed by Barack?" I see a lot of people using that exact phrasing as though it's somehow clever or insightful. If you want to claim from your positions of brilliance how disappointed you are in Obama, how about some specifics. How about you give us a list of at least three things other than his being tepid during a debate. I have yet to see any of you underwhelmers talk about what he is saying.

Welcoming a third party candidate is the mark of true genius. While we can all see the results of the highest third party voter turn-out in recent history (2000), we still have people threatening to vote the republicans right back into office by replaying that dreadful event. It is nothing short of childish to throw around threats of independence as ersatz intelligence. If the progressive voters out there would rather see a republican in the white house than vote for a candidate who doesn't support every demand we have, we deserve exactly what we get--we deserve the war, the privatized education system, healthcare for only the rich, global warming and concentrated acid rain.

Actually I believe it is already over...:)