Congress Again Extends Abstinence-Only Funding

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Congress Again Extends Abstinence-Only Funding stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10- 1-07 10:33 AM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
2007-10-01-abstinence.jpg

Washington Times:

Congress again has extended funding for a core abstinence-education program, sparking protests from sex-education advocates who want Democrats to pull the plug on such programs.

"Their actions defy logic and common sense," said James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth.

First, Congress funds what Mr. Wagoner called unproven abstinence programs. Then it commissions a study that shows they don't work, but lawmakers ignore those results and continue to fund the programs.

"Teens deserve better policies. We all deserve better leaders," said Mr. Wagoner, whose organization stresses rights, respect and responsibility in sex education.

Read the whole story: Washington Times

Filed by Nico Pitney  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
200
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (7 pages total)
- LeftLeaner I'm a Fan of LeftLeaner 24 fans permalink
photo

I think the DEMS have a Death Wish.

1. The program has proven to be ineffective.

2. It is a right-wing program promoted to please THEIR constitutents.

THE DEMS NO LONGER REPRESENT ME - I KNOW THAT FOR A FACT.

But, what I'd like to know WHO ARE THEY trying to please?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 10/01/2007

Politics aside, how is underage kids abstaining from sex a bad thing, if you can get them to?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 10/01/2007
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 629 fans permalink
photo

You can't get them to, maybe we should fit every kid with a chastity belt ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 10/01/2007

NCDog, it's not that abstaining is a bad thing, it's that it's not the fairest use of taxpayer dollars to give those dollars to religious organizations to teach abstinence. Besides, isn't that the duty of parents? No one ever gave me any taxpayer dollars when I was teaching (actually scaring) my kids into not having sex until they were at least old enough to accept the consequences of having sex.

Religious organizations shouldn't be getting taxpayer dollars - PERIOD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 10/01/2007

It would be better spent on Larry the Cucumber cartoons. You could put a condom on Larry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 10/01/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect