Jennifer Aniston Is Top-Selling Celeb Face For Mags

Forbes   |  Lacey Rose   |   October 3, 2007 03:39 PM


stumbleupon :Jennifer Aniston Is Top-Selling Celeb Face For Mags   digg: Jennifer Aniston Is Top-Selling Celeb Face For Mags   reddit: Jennifer Aniston Is Top-Selling Celeb Face For Mags   del.icio.us: Jennifer Aniston Is Top-Selling Celeb Face For Mags

With newsstands heavy on celebrity titles, consumers often devote mere seconds to each before making their selection. Will it be "Angelina's Shrinking Waistline" or "Britney's Gone Bald"? Or perhaps another "Jen's Post-Pitt Hopeful" spread?

But who's the best bet? Jennifer Aniston, according to Forbes' first-ever analysis of the top-selling celebrity faces.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
11
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

She's the girl next door, that is her appeal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 10/04/2007

Her mother (Barbara Streisand) has made sure she's on every cover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 AM on 10/04/2007

It's the hair. Is that a wig?
That head of hair could star in a movie all by itself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 10/04/2007

It's not aniston, per se, its that people like finding solace in another's public dumping. She is relatable to the "average" woman - she battles image issues, apparently tries (but fails) not to be hung up on shallowness (such as this topic)- and seemed to have it all when Pitt was on her arm. People want to know the details now about how cold it is in that long shadow formed by the divine pairing of Brangelina. This morbid nosiness is harder to quench - but given the amount of airplay the young hollywood trainwrecks get from the media - I'm sure it too has its digestible limits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 10/04/2007

ICK! She's still around?????
oh well. keeps her from having to work at Macky D's I guess. She's a looser. I dunno about this info, whenever I see her on a mag, I look for another one.
She cannot now and never could act, rode on the cast of Friends and has gone nowhere but downhill since.
ONE MORE TIME,
She's a looser, needs to retire, get out of the cam, stay far far away from us!
siri

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 10/03/2007

Jennifer Aniston is a scorned woman. She used her divorce to gain that much needed sympathy to win the hearts of her fans. It's a popularity contest against Angelina Jolie. But you can only push "sympathy" that far.
.
She opted to pursue her A-list status rather that start a family. That was her choice, and we can't fault her for that. Many women have the same problem. It was tough to be always in the shadow of Brad Pitt. Unfortunately, she can't make a decent film, nor a block buster movie to retain that status. She is a credible actor. In fact, she was very good on "Friends" and "The Good Girl". But post Friends, Aniston films were all bust..
.
Of course there is life after Brad. If she regains her composure, she'll be back in the A-list in no time. She has to gain that confident, and not rely on the "sympathy act". She has been degraded and knock down, and left for another woman. So what ? Get up, and make you own niche without Brad.
.
And most importantly - Stop blaming Angelina Jolie.
.
Beauty wise, her is not a classic face, but she is very pretty. Any imperfection can be corrected. She has all the money in the world to pay for plastic surgery, like her nose and breast revisions.
.
Of late, she has not been seen as A-list. Instead, these mags writes about her series of fake boyfriends. That lessen her credibility.
With La Diva Oprah's help, her face had been plastered in these sleazy mags.
.
Forbes decision to bill Aniston as a top celebrity is a token for La Diva. That makes sense because Aniston is a very good friend.
.
It's tacky. Best on relying on your own credit. You can do it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 10/03/2007

Brad who? She's got natural beauty women would die for and men stand around slack-jawed and drooling over. Pulease. Jennifer call me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 10/03/2007

Brad Pitt - here's just an Intro. For full bio - try to be more resourceful. Use the Internet.

Here is a man who found the true meaning of love - passion to get involved, voice of the forgotten victims in New Orleans, a man so passionate about his woman. He honors and credits her for bringing attention to unpopular but honorable issues, and incentive to do worthwhile deeds for the forgotten ones -a far more loftier goal.
.
The MAN upstairs blessed him with an ANGEL - a Woman of Substance. Together they raise a family of nation.
.
On his own - he is a well accomplished actor,
Humanitarian and deserving of an OSCAR. And yes, he is sooooo hot and sexy. Fifty of my immediate friends were lined up to see Troy. We had the same hope for him - that he finds a woman of substance.
.
And there was Angelina - Brad and Angelina - perfect together.
.
And, who might you be, 5yrsof and where have you been in the last 10 years or so. Oh, I get it, from the planet Imb-Ecil. That makes sense !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 10/04/2007

This is just more MSM propaganda and BS, I've seen more mags with Oprah's picture on the cover in one week than I'v seen of this brawd in a year.
Question! Who in the hell do they think they WE SHOULD BELIEVE, their faux reality or our own eyes? Or is this just another case of faux news and fabricated reality that we are suppose to swallow along with the MSM'S polluted coolaid.
I wish these people would catch a clue and stop trying to insult our intellegence with their disengenuous BS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 10/03/2007

AcelnTheHole - chill out !!!!!!. That quite a rhetoric !
.
Not every news is up for the Peabody Award. Yes, it was probably a slow news day, but hey, enjoy some entertainment as well. I blog on very serious issues, but I take notice of lighter news too. The original article appeared in Forbes Mags, and the real story behind this is how "sleazy mags" helped the receding publishing/newspaper industry. The readership has reached rock bottom because of the Internet. Also, statistics cited by the article suggest that "sleaze mags" have a higher readership, more than the "intellectual or serious mags". The piece was sugar coated with Aniston by-line to lure readership. That's all.
.
Regardless, if you have a Brain, and I sure hope you do, then filter the BS and soak up with the the real substance of the article. ergo --"How these celebs rescued the receding newspaper business". Ordinary people, intellectuals etc, have varied interest. The difference is how they are put in perspective. That analyses should be easy for a genius like you to absorb. Right ? Do I hear a Yes ?
.
And Oh, by the way - since you want to be respected for your "intelligence" (meaning acuity), and disingenuous (foxy), spelled with "i".
.
Now, Scoot and stop being an Elitist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 10/04/2007

It's not her face as so much as it is the fact that she was once married to Brad Pitt.

She should actually thank Brad for her fame because if it were not for him, there would not be any interest in her whatsoever.

You don't see Lisa Kudrow or Courtney Cox the way you do Aniston...and they are both prettier and more talented.

If it were either of the others that were married to Brad, then you can bet your bottom dollar they would be the one with their name in the title of this article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 10/03/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com