Justice Dept Under Gonzales Issued Secret Opinion Authorizing 'Harsh CIA Interrogations'

New York Times   |  SCOTT SHANE, DAVID JOHNSTON and JAMES RISEN   |   October 3, 2007 09:12 PM


stumbleupon :Justice Dept Under Gonzales Issued Secret Opinion Authorizing 'Harsh CIA Interrogations'   digg: Justice Dept Under Gonzales Issued Secret Opinion Authorizing 'Harsh CIA Interrogations'   reddit: Justice Dept Under Gonzales Issued Secret Opinion Authorizing 'Harsh CIA Interrogations'   del.icio.us: Justice Dept Under Gonzales Issued Secret Opinion Authorizing 'Harsh CIA Interrogations'

When the Justice Department publicly declared torture "abhorrent" in a legal opinion in December 2004, the Bush administration appeared to have abandoned its assertion of nearly unlimited presidential authority to order brutal interrogations.

But soon after Alberto R. Gonzales's arrival as attorney general in February 2005, the Justice Department issued another opinion, this one in secret. It was a very different document, according to officials briefed on it, an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
1515
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (24 pages total)
- alfrede See Profile I'm a Fan of alfrede permalink

Hi,

It is pretty disgusting that the President and Vice President would go back in history to see what the Nazis and Stalin and other "bad guys" did in their concentration camps and prisons so that "we" (the United States) could copy them!

Who would have thunk?

The world went to war against the Nazis and what they were doing and these guys want to emulate them?

The United States won WW II without resorting to torturing the prisoners we captured.

Perhaps out present administration have forgotten that (an inconvenient truth).

What do U think?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 AM on 10/05/2007
- CAskeptic See Profile I'm a Fan of CAskeptic permalink

What doesn't matter?

Somehow we all missed the full lesson from Father Dick about what doesn't matter.

We all heard that deficits don't matter.

What Dick knew but didn't tell us is:

Congress doesn't matter.
The Constitution doesn't matter.
The Courts don't matter.
Geneva Convention doesn't matter (shit, you should have known that just by the name.).
American public opinion doesn't matter.
Iraqi civilian deaths don't matter (of course you remember collateral damage. Thank you Blackwater.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 10/05/2007
- ghostsofamerica See Profile I'm a Fan of ghostsofamerica permalink

"Who Killed John O' Neill" video on a new free video library dense website along with the PBS doc "The Man Who Knew" and many others I find key to piecemealing this madness/information warfare - http://in-formation.us

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 10/05/2007
- jrfunkenstein See Profile I'm a Fan of jrfunkenstein permalink

Did anyone see that Stepford Whitehouse spokeswench Fran Townsend on the Shituation room tonight, answering Blitzer on this issue?

She had a condescending smirk on her pasty faced mug that made me want to puke.

Why does the Bush administration hate America?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 10/04/2007
- coyote4 See Profile I'm a Fan of coyote4 permalink

comment icon You said
Reply to this comment:
Logged in as coyote4 (Not you? Log out)
expand collapse coyote4 (See profile | I'm a fan of coyote4)

.
proof that Bush is off the cocaine wagon.

Reply | Parent | posted 09:23 pm on 10/04/2007

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 10/04/2007
- amerdiaspora See Profile I'm a Fan of amerdiaspora permalink

order of business
impeach and publish everones name that voted aginst remove from office one way plane ticket to the hague

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 10/04/2007
- planetfotheApes See Profile I'm a Fan of planetfotheApes permalink

It is the same old elite scam, used throughout history. Play both sides to move the agenda along without causing a revolt.

Bush and Cheney are THE terrorists and they are also the ones designated to "protect" us. Funny how all their "protections" destroy our freedom, privacy, bring us dictatorship and enrich the terrorist "protectors" Bush and Cheney.

The elite are using this scam so much these days that it may actually stop working. Same with Hillary. She is by her actions a Necon. Funny how all the "top tier" Republican candidates align themselves with Bush just enough to ensure they absolutely will not be elected. This ensures a Clinton victory and the continuation of the Neocon agenda. There is great deceit taking place.

Same thing happened with Bush and his cousin and fellow Bonesman Kerry. Funny, with all that vote corruption, he did not challenge the election. I wonder why?

Similar manipulation with the Democrats. The party line propaganda focuses on social issues but everything they touch becomes worse. Then, the Democratic leaders offer new "solutions" that worsen things further. The Solutions always involves weakening the middle class (the real threat to the elite) with taxes and passing legislation that pushes America to communism (central elite control).

Let's see, one side pushes towards dictatorship and one side towards communism. Can you say brutal communist dictatorship? Can you see there is really only one side. Do you remember the movie the matrix? How do you bend the spoon with you mind? You must realize there is no spoon.

The dark side of the Force now controls much of the Legislature, Executive and Judicial branches. Not everyone, just enough. We will fall in to darkness if you don't smarten up. We only need to expose this scam and it will be defeated. Give you children the gift of freedom. Start with Ron Paul.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 10/04/2007
- PollM See Profile I'm a Fan of PollM permalink



Bush should not have the right to authorize such unusual measures more fitting of a gang of criminal thugs than a civilized government. This hurts, rather than protect, America in the long run. Express your rage: Does the President have the right to approve harsh interrogation practices? -----------> http://youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=635

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 10/04/2007
- project See Profile I'm a Fan of project permalink

I don't know what to say. These people are the worst people I have seen not to be in prison.
I mean bush/chenny these people remind you of charles manson, or jeffery dahmer, or any of a list of crazy murdering gouls, but like i said they eventually ended up in prison. Of course those people did not have all the money that everyone in the bush adminstration has stolen from the treasury!
With the trillions that bushco has stolen they can afford more justice than you and I can!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 10/04/2007
- raker See Profile I'm a Fan of raker permalink

If one of these Latin-mass Catholics were to show up in St. Louis on a Sunday, would the Cardinal give him communion?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 10/04/2007
- HumeSkeptic See Profile I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic permalink

GO! Dems.

------------------
House OKs bill to prosecute contractors By ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer
17 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The House passed a bill Thursday that would make all private contractors working in Iraq and other combat zones subject to prosecution by U.S. courts. It was the first major legislation of its kind to pass since a deadly shootout last month involving Blackwater employees.


Democrats called the 389-30 vote an indictment of the shooting incident there that left at least 13 Iraqis dead. Senate Democratic leaders said they planned to follow suit with similar legislation and send a bill to President Bush as soon as possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 10/04/2007
- GH See Profile I'm a Fan of GH permalink

Seems like a continuing path. Did not the Clinton administration approve torture when it requested the CIA to establish the policy of extraordinary rendition. The idea was that suspected terrorists could be whisked off to Egypt - where, we know what can happen there.

Yes, under Bush and the times, one could safely assume that this path has accelerated.

The question to ponder is: do we hold only one accountable, while giving the other a pass? Or/ do we debate the topic and expect future occupants of the WH to be also held accountable?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 10/04/2007
- project See Profile I'm a Fan of project permalink

Clinton did many things that I didn't like and none of them had anything to do with monica.
fact is I said it many times before alan greenspan said it.
Bill clinton was the best republican president we ever had.
But as republicans go none of them are good enough to lick the sweat from a good demos balls!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 10/04/2007
- repubesnivel See Profile I'm a Fan of repubesnivel permalink

No shit, GH?

Do you have a link, so we can ascertain that you are not just trying to spread the blame for this filth around, and take the heat off those putrid sons of bitches who allowed this to happen on GWBushit's watch?

Well, do ya?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 10/04/2007
- GH See Profile I'm a Fan of GH permalink

repubesnivel - no problem..This is not a secret, by the way. but you must understand, as with almost everything else -- unless you cared during the 90's, and read the far left (such as The Nation, Mother Jones, etc., or the far right (they both despised Clinton) you just never would have been exposed to much - as our main media - protected Bill Clinton, as they do all Democrats, every step of the way. I bet you did not know that Jimmy Carter and Nelson Mandela condemned Clinton over Kosovo. The Democrats have been made to be fools by the mainsteam media. What do you know about Raidy??

Here ya go: The procedure was developed by Central Intelligence Agency officials in the mid-1990s who were trying to track down and dismantle militant Islamic organizations in the Middle East, particularly Al Qaeda

According to Clinton Administration official Richard Clarke...

" 'extraordinary renditions', were operations to apprehend terrorists abroad, usually without the knowledge of and almost always without public acknowledgement of the host government¦. The first time I proposed a snatch, in 1993, the White House Counsel, Lloyd Cutler, demanded a meeting with the President to explain how it violated international law. Clinton had seemed to be siding with Cutler until Al Gore belatedly joined the meeting, having just flown overnight from South Africa. Clinton recapped the arguments on both sides for Gore: Lloyd says this. Dick says that. Gore laughed and said, 'That's a no-brainer. Of course it's a violation of international law, that's why it's a covert action. The guy is a terrorist. Go grab his ass.'

Thereafter, with the approval of President Clinton and a presidential directive (PDD 39), the CIA instead elected to send suspects to Egypt, where they were turned over to the Egyptian mukhabarat.
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd39.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 10/05/2007
- LindaSmart50 See Profile I'm a Fan of LindaSmart50 permalink

Professor says Bush revealed National Guard favoritism

NEW YORK (CNN) -- A business school professor who taught George W. Bush at Harvard University in the early 1970s says the future president told him that family friends had pulled strings to get him into the Texas Air National Guard.

Yoshi Tsurumi, in his first on-camera interview on the subject, told CNN that Bush confided in him during an after-class hallway conversation during the 1973-74 school year.

"He admitted to me that to avoid the Vietnam draft, he had his dad -- he said 'Dad's friends' -- skip him through the long waiting list to get him into the Texas National Guard," Tsurumi said. "He thought that was a smart thing to do."

While the campaign has not responded directly to Tsurumi's allegations, White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett said last week, "Every time President Bush gets near another election, all the innuendo and rumors about President Bush's service in the National Guard come to the forefront."

Bush has said in the past that neither he nor his father sought special treatment for him. "Any allegation that my dad asked for special favors is simply not true," he said in 1999.

Tsurumi said Vietnam was a top topic among the 85 students in his class, when he was a visiting associate professor at Harvard from 1972 to 1976. He now teaches at Baruch College in New York.

"What I couldn't stand -- and I told him -- he was all for the U.S. to continue with the Vietnam War. That means he was all for other people, Americans, to keep on fighting and dying."

B
Tsurumi said he remembers Bush because every teacher remembers their best and worst students, and Bush was in the latter group.

"Lazy. He didn't come to my class prepared," Tsurumi said. "He did very badly."

"Somehow I found him totally devoid of compassion, social responsibility, and good study discipline," Tsurumi said. "What I remember most about him was all the kind of

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 10/04/2007
- kwright See Profile I'm a Fan of kwright permalink

as i read this article i was sickened. with each turn of the page it gets worse. impeachment is absolutely indicated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 10/04/2007
- Doug See Profile I'm a Fan of Doug permalink

What's the problem?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 10/04/2007
- TakeBackAmerica See Profile I'm a Fan of TakeBackAmerica permalink

A quote from a CONSERVATIVE:

"It's perhaps worth reminding some readers that my first response to reports of abuse and torture at Gitmo was to accuse the accusers of exaggeration or deliberate deception. I simply didn't believe America would do those things. I'd also endorsed Bush in 2000, believed it necessary to give the president the benefit of the doubt in wartime, and knew Rumsfeld as a friend. It struck me as a no-brainer that this stuff was being invented by the far-left or was part of al Qaeda propaganda. After all, they train captives to lie about this stuff. Bottom line: I trusted this president in a time of war to obey the rule of law that we were and are defending. And then I was forced to confront the evidence. He betrayed all of us. He lied. He authorized torture in secret, and then, when busted after Abu Ghraib, blamed it on low-level grunts. This was not a mistake. It was a betrayal."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 10/04/2007
- imusintheevening See Profile I'm a Fan of imusintheevening permalink

tell us something we don't know already, better yet what will be done to those who serially flout established laws?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 10/04/2007
- Doug See Profile I'm a Fan of Doug permalink

What law in which countries? There cannot be US laws on conduct outside of US borders. So you must be talking about the laws in the nations in which the CIA are performing operations. So what laws are you talking about? Islamic law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 10/04/2007
- JeffDeVore See Profile I'm a Fan of JeffDeVore permalink

How many Republicans does it take to screw up a nation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/04/2007
- repubesnivel See Profile I'm a Fan of repubesnivel permalink

All of them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 10/04/2007
- Ammobob See Profile I'm a Fan of Ammobob permalink

The DEFEATOCRATS 'cave' once again!

Senate Democrats Cave on Intelligence Bill
It"s No Longer Just Reid"s Failure; It"s the Entire Democrat Caucus

By Mark I

Yesterday, the Senate unanimously approved the FY 2008 Intelligence Authorization Act. The bill authorizes all expenditures for intelligence related activities and gives Congressional approval to all of it"s heretofore most controversial programs.

By agreeing to the bill, unanimously, which cannot be stressed enough, Senate Democrats had to swallow some bitter pills. One, they had to drop their demand that the White House turn over all Presidential Daily Briefs between 1997 and 2003. So much for Bush Lied!„¢. Two, they had to agree to drop a provision that would have required the Director of National Intelligence to assess the impact of climate change on US national security. Sorry, Mr. Gore.

But worst of all for Democrats is the fact that they have now given their assent to the Bush Administration"s most hated intelligence programs by throwing money at them. Warrantless wiretapping, it"s funded. Rendition, funded. Aggressive interrogations, ca-ching! In other words, they"re no longer the president"s "torture interrogations," They"re the Senate"s as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/04/2007
- BWonka See Profile I'm a Fan of BWonka permalink


Boob - seek help. Your paranoia is going to destroy you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 10/04/2007
- innerpeace See Profile I'm a Fan of innerpeace permalink

ammobob-Your lack of logic is hysterical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 10/04/2007
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (24 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in