Clinton's Iran Vote Prompts Harsh Back-And-Forth With Iowan

This vote,just goes to prove that H.Clinton is just a sock-puppet for LIE-berman

Well at least we can now see the self-delusional rationalizations that led Ms. Clinton to support the Iraq war and will lead to her justifying other major acts of aggressions committed by our Chimp in Chief. This is a woman who is either clever by half or a woman easily duped by the men in her life.

Scary prospect for a Presidential candidate.

Huffers are going to have a real dilemma on their hands after Hillary wins the Democrat Nomination. What are they going to do? I'm interested in hearinng a response.

Hillary never gives a straight answer. She's both for and against the war.

Maybe the reason that HRC heard this question so often is not that it was a Republican plant but rather because Democrats want to understand how she can accuse Bush of having misused Congress's vote as an authorization for war back in 2003 and then vote to support legislation that he could conceivably misuse in the same way to shock and awe the Iranians. Damn it, where is her learning curve?

Hillary is a TOOL, and every activist I know, knows it.
I am convinced that the bulk of her supposed support is coming from Repukes that know how to game the system ( something they are extremely good at...cheating ).

As a sidebar, does anyone ever audit the polltakers? Seems to me there should be a grading system where anyone could track their accuracy or lack of it.
I guess those Enron accountants had to go somewhere.

A nice glimpse at Hitlery.

I bet she can't wait to be President so she can screen out free thinking Americans from all of her speaking engagements.
Those damn pesky citizens with their god damned peaceful objectives must be put in their place.

This disgusting display by Hillary should be viewed in the context that the DLC rulers of the once great Democratic party, want her to win. They are forcing a three way race on us and marginalizing good decent people like Kucinich and Richardson.

The Democratic party is broken.

This is one move for people who are (painfully) facing reality. The Democratic party lives on in name only. War-mongers like Hillary and the DLC run the show so what should we do?

http://www.gp.org/

Pretending that Democrats will save the nation make help you sleep better at night, but it is a false hope. Work for Kucinich and let us hope for a miracle where he is concerned. Once the DLC bounces him from the race, the Green party is the best move.

Peace.

Now i know the White folks in the dem party will buy off Black Leaders like Jesse and Al and some Black Pastor's[saw media report's] so the vote goes to white canidates who will do nothing for the avg Black Person but talk!I sent this bill or i was part of a bill!Black Folk do as White Folk Do! Vote For Your Own Kind What It's Goning To Cost Us?OBAMA 08 or just another White person running for office who talks threw puppet's like sold out black leaders who are looking out for themselves!!

While this is prompting the usual discussion about Hillary which is Hillary's double speak this brings out another important character flaw of Hillary that the media is not covering: LACK Of TEMPERAMENT

When she is really pressed to explain difficult issues her response is trying to muzzle her questioners by accusing them either they are part of THE VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY or the person is SENT (planted) by another campaign instead of formulating a convincing response.

This is a legitimate question. Does she have the appropriate TEMPERAMENT?

Will Arianna and the gifted blog columnists raise this important issue about Hillary?(Because the corporate media won't)

Does she have the right TEMPERAMENT to be an effective leader?

"She offered a detailed description of the resolution, which she said stressed robust diplomacy that could lead to imposing sanctions against Iran..."

Where have we heard THAT before?

Has she ever apologized for that other vote?

Hasn't she been saying she's learned from her mistakes?

Kevin Phillips in his book "American Dynasty" voices his concerns about anointing another family(the Clintons) as political heir apparent in this country. If we do not seek real change we will have to hunker down and get the changes incrementally as reality forces our government to change its course or worse decides again on a reactive posture.

The threads that continue this pattern is our extreme discomfort of depending on other nations for our fate. We are going to have to make up our mind if we can broaden our horizons to develop trust with other countries rather than belligerency. Ms. Clinton continues to think we must quietly threaten weaker Sovereignties who most theoretically could do harm in order to bring a peaceful world. Do we buy it? If so, you will be voting for her. If not someone else will get your vote.

Further to date there is no credible evidence that Iranian special forces are responsible for the attacks in Iraq directly or indirectly.

To say the least I'm perplexed with the results of polls and the money trail. I thought people are looking for a President who is adamantly against the war and the engagement of Iran. So are polls wrong or are people throwing their vote towards the most likely candidate. Why would you support a candidate that is not truly against the war and potentially expanding the war into Iran? Do you support Hillary Clinton's position regarding the War and Iran? ------>

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=658

.