It's nice to know someone has attempted to prioritize the actions of this administration. I, myself, am in a dither wondering how to list them.

As for what might be a true and honest element, I can't find a favorable thing to say. Can you?

She must be senile. Unless the USA is directly attacked we have no business attacking another country.
The US government is insane. If we want to totally screw things up for our kids we will attack another country . only if we are directly attacked can we defend ourselves violently.
besides where the heck will you get the troops?
Bush ,cheney, Rummy etc...have broken the US military and dangerously weakened the US militaries ability to do the job of defending us from REAL threats.
Allbright is dim and a sell out like Hillary.

Madeleine Albright must be ruled out. Out with the Perle's, and Kissinger's, where they may be arrested as war criminals.

Sorry for the spelling and grammer errors.

Will this hostile war saber rattling garbage ever stop? The US people deserve a much better government than the one we have now. No, a socialist Democratic welfare Party replacement is not needed either.

The posted topic comment by Madeline Albright is a shot across the bow of Iran's independence as viable nation. It is a trail balloon to continue to push public opinion towards another unwarranted invasion. That means that the military and state department planning for a new Iran war has been in planning for a long time and that now is the time to sell the plans to the public. Here is your kool-aid.

Perhaps this is the Bottom Line GOP based war machinery perspective: Iran will not play by US or Israeli demands therefore they must be evil, so we must punish them and take away their power by bombing them until their oil and government is under the same UA control as Iraq is now. Plans for military bases in Iran have have already been drafted. We will just have to deal with the blowback and OPEC later.

Before attacking her, read what she said: "The last resort can never be given up completely" is NOT sabre-rattling, war-mongering or any such. It is merely pragmatic: While I'm opposed to the occupation of Iraq and think that an attack on Iran borders on isanity (If it doesn't actually cross that border), I recognize that ALL governments keep military options available. It seems to me that Albright's comment is just a similar recognition

There is another story today about the Iranian president speaking at an Iranian university. Many students protested what they called their "dictator" while inside hand picked students that supported the President were in the crowd. Sounds just like in the United States. He is their Bush. Two peas in a pod. They will fix their problem just like we will fix ours.

Will this hostile war sabre rattling garbage ever stop? The US people deserve a much better government than the onw we have now. No a socialist Democratic welfare Party replacement is not needed either.

The comment is a shot across the bow of Iran's sovernty. It is a trail balloon to continue to push public openion towards another unwarrented invasion. That means that the planning for the new Iran war has been in planning for a long time and that now is the time to sell the plans to the public.

Perhaps the Botton Line GOP based war machinery perspecive: Iran will not play by US or Israili demand therefore they must be evil, so "we" must punish them and take away their power by bombing them until their oil and government is under the same control as Iraq is now. We will just have to deal with OPEC later.