To His Dismay, Ron Paul Becoming Magnet For White Supremacists

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - To His Dismay, Ron Paul Becoming Magnet For White Supremacists stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-15-07 09:30 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Through no fault of his own, Rep. Ron Paul's anti-globalist, anti-government campaign for the Republican presidential nomination has become a magnet in neo-Nazi networks, pulling in activists and supporters from the fringe white nationalist community where anti-Semitism, anti-black and anti-immigrant views are commonplace.

In some cases, these internet-based activists acknowledge that even though the Paul campaign does not have a racist or anti-Semitic agenda, it can serve as a vehicle to find sympathizers and to recruit new loyalists drawn to the Republican congressman's opposition to international trade agreements, federal police authority and to the income tax.

Such web-based organizations as Stormfront (motto: "White Pride, World Wide"), Vanguard News Network ("No Jews. Just Right.") and the Nationalist Coalition ("working to create the relationships that will lay the foundation for the White community that is necessary to our survival") have become sources of support for Paul's bid for the Republican nomination, and in some cases have set up separate Ron Paul discussion groups.

The Paul campaign dismissed the pro-Paul activities among these groups. "We don't know who these people are," said Jesse Benton, Paul's communications director. Their support has "nothing to do with Ron Paul, and what he stands for....His message of freedom, peace and prosperity - that's why people support him."

Paul has not made racist or anti-Semitic appeals to the controversial organizations and their members. Instead, their support is based on Paul's libertarian opposition to government generally, including the IRS and the powers granted to the federal government under the Patriot Act - views that are shared by many on the conservative fringe of the spectrum.

In the 2000 campaign, Patrick J. ("Pat") Buchanan appealed to many similar individuals and organizations. Buchanan had a history of expressing views that were often interpreted as anti-Semitic.

Writing on the Vanguard News Network, "White Will" argued that "folks, get involved in the Ron Paul 'revolution' and work with political activists in your communities who are attracted to his anti-globalist message.... Most of you would be surprised at how many good people can be exposed to a, let's say, 'pro-majority' message among the remarkable groundswell of fed up, mostly White Ron Paul supporters -- many, early on, from the 9/11 truth movement. They are finding their backbones as they are exposed to more and more hidden truths, especially about the hidden hand of Jewry behind every foul venture."

Among those backing Paul this year is John J. Ubele, the National Coalition's Operations Manager. In an emailed reply to an inquiry, Ubele said, "I know that Ron Paul is not a white separatist or a white nationalist. However, he is the most honest and responsible of all the presidential candidates and that is why I support his candidacy."

The National Coalition is one of a number of splinter groups that formed after the death of William Luther Pierce, author of The Turner Diaries, and founder of the now fractured National Alliance. The Turner Diaries were considered crucial to the thinking of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

On a Stormfront discussion thread on the Paul Campaign - "The Ron Paul Revolution" -- one contributor wrote in:

"Not standing up for Ron Paul against the un-American Jewish media and neo-cons who will do anything to stop his nomination is like not standing up to the efforts to force integration, to encourage mass non-White immigration, or to the attack on the USS Liberty."

"Ron Paul is NOT a White Nationalist. His Libertarian policies will also conflict with National Socialism, something that a good number of Stormfront members support. However, he is the least toxic candidate by leaps and bounds," wrote a contributor identified as "Concerned Human."

A minority of the contributors to white nationalist web sites insist on rigid adherence to their racial views. "Anything less than ALL is NOTHING. If anythings priority is not 100% the survival of the White Race, than it is a problem and not a solution. Ron Paul's priority is not 100% the survival of the white race, so he is an enemy and a burden just as much as any jew," wrote "comJo, Pan-Aryan Insurgent."

The white nationalist and anti-Semitic support flowing to the Paul campaign reflects one of the difficulties facing candidates who do not fall into the midstream: that often their views on less controversial subjects like trade and the power of the federal government to take property through eminent domain also appeal to extremist groups.

Report Corrections
 
Comments
723
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)

Dr. Ron Paul takes politics to a higher standard.

Ron Paul is a principled leader, medical doctor, Vietnam veteran, married to the same women for 50 years, does not participate in the government pension program, and not controlled by special interest groups.

What is Ron Paul’s reward? Well its negative articles like this one by Tom Edsall.

Dr. Ron Paul is NO RACIST! In the very fine print of the article, “the Paul campaign does not have a racist or anti-Semitic agenda” GREAT HAY IS MADE TO BENEFIT TOM EDSALL. This is a low life article and its probably Tom’s best work.

Every campaign has the same problem with political supporters; they all are all recruited from the human race. The targeting of Ron Paul is no new story. Like kids lining up to sit on Santa’s lap, political hacks like Tom Edsall line up to further undermine America. The real story is the SCUM that the Tom Edsall’s of the world will not expose and keep beating that drum!

Rudy is selling American soil through his law firm for the SUPERHIGHWAY to profit while running for president. Here is a patriotic American. Where is the press? A global agenda reeks through Washington on the backs of legal taxpayers. Shhhhhh! Clinton has more dirty money than the entire mob put together. Speaking on political positions; Mitt has had more positions than Anna Nichole. Most every campaign has real scandals shoe tapping, and a revolving door of the best loyal supporters money can buy.

America should be outraged that Dr. Ron Paul is the focus among the sea of corruption. People like Tom, and there are many of them in the media, should look in the mirror prior to submitting crap like this. It is ironic, and insulting the media is being paid to issue these types of articles on discrimination and racism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 10/16/2007

Paul may be, and is I believe, as pure as snow. But that doesn't stop him being an enabler! He is all for states rights, so that means the Rosa Parks of the world can count on going back to the back of the bus!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 10/16/2007

..."it can serve as a vehicle to find sympathizers and to recruit new loyalists drawn to the Republican congressman's opposition to international trade agreements, federal police authority and to the income tax."

Come now, is that the best you got? I would say that the Democrat Party would be a better avenue for "groups" who hope to divide the Nation. The message of Dr. Paul is one of freedom and its protection by our government. Why does that scare the establishment? Wake up America, before we go the way of the USSR or Nazi Germany.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 10/16/2007
- mellene I'm a Fan of mellene 10 fans permalink

I think this is a way for Romney, Giuliani and McCain to help smear Ron Paul's name as they see him as a threat to one of them being nominated. The public is fed up with their bias towards the war and fueling "big government".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 10/16/2007
- janmarie I'm a Fan of janmarie 11 fans permalink

What I love about RP is you can tell he isn't lying and he isn't pandering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 10/16/2007
- janmarie I'm a Fan of janmarie 11 fans permalink

He isn't racist. If those groups like him it is for other reasons besides hatred, racism, antisemitism etc. Actually I went to storm-front's web site and some members wrote they don't like RP because he ignores race.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 10/16/2007
- nihilon x I'm a Fan of nihilon x 39 fans permalink

"If those groups like him it is for other reasons besides hatred, racism, antisemitism etc."

That's exactly what this article points out.

Most of the people here complaining about this story aren't even acknowledging the fact that it makes it very clear that Ron Paul is not directly associated with these groups.

I've gone to Stormfront as well and I saw many there promoting Ron Paul prior to this article.

I always have wondered about this, and I'm glad to see someone addressing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 10/16/2007
- Win1 I'm a Fan of Win1 permalink

He also is attracting retired schoolteachers, stamp collectors, tv repairmen and dog groomers. Sheesh! Freedom is everyones right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 10/16/2007

I live in his district. He is loved here. He is no racist. He has no morally incorrect ties.
He believes in simple freedoms and corrective constitutional government....Something that has been lost.
If the people only knew he views his job to be their will.
He will never go against the people.
UNLESS asked to do something unconstitutional.
This he will not do.
He argues he took an oath.
He argues what has happened is we have stepped away from our own laws that regulate our ideas and values.
He believes 80% of legislation we currently have is constitutionally unprotected and wants to rectify this.
By either placing said issues back into state court where they currently(according to the constitution) belong.
or amend the constitution to make these laws legal.

It is simple, yet people try Distraction tactics.
They try lying or misleading.
People have the right to their opinion but they dont have the right to smear a fierce defender of their rights and someone who has brought more legislation to the table than any other house rep and does this consistently.
He works for US.
He knows this.
This is what we need.
Someone who listens to us!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 10/16/2007
- gopindrag I'm a Fan of gopindrag 3 fans permalink

How about we do away with taxation, period. How about we abolish nation, state and municipal. How about we stop funding, libraries, standing armies, public transportation. How about we live like God meant us to live, each family self sustaining and independent of any other family.
Why are we united for the common good? What is the common good?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 10/16/2007
photo

"The Reagan-Bush years are often viewed as the first triumph of the New Right, its obtainment of state power, which led to the diminution of federal power and programs to help blacks. The recent reelection of George W. Bush is the consolidation of that power, assisted by his base of mostly white Christian evangelicals (who probably attend all-white churches). While some cited gay rights and abortion as evidence of lack of morality in America, a fair amount of them began voting GOP when the Democrats assisted blacks in obtaining their rights to vote and full rights of citizenship during the 1960s."

http://www.thebrooklynrail.org/express/may05/redemptionsong.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 10/16/2007

Buchanan had a history of expressing views that were often interpreted as anti-Semitic.

I think this is pussyfooting. Even Pat's friends, including William F. Buckley have said that he IS an anti-semite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 10/16/2007
photo

I've heard Buchanan to be critical of Israel, but I've never heard him say anything against Jews. Can there be a difference or are they both one in the same?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 10/16/2007
- Rand I'm a Fan of Rand 58 fans permalink

It had to do with his speech at the RNC convention in which he spoke of a "religious war", combined with the fact that during his campaign, whenever he spoke against "international bankers", he never seemed to recall the name of any bank which wasn't Jewish-owned or, at least, had a "Jewish-sounding" name

Apparently, he never heard of Chase Manhattan!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 10/16/2007

I see they took out my post about Thomas Edsall's black mammy. Edsall grew up in New Rochelle where his idea of blacks were servants he looked down on
How dare call anyone else a racist.

"I asked our housekeeper, Sophie, what the word meant. Sophie explained that race was a way to describe the color of your skin.

She belonged to the "Negro race" because her skin was black. I belonged to the white race because my skin was white,

I said I though race meant whoever runs faster wins, and Sophie matter-of-factly replied that black people and white people were in a race, and the white people were winning" Edsal

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 10/16/2007

I see they took out my post about Thomas Edsall's black mammy. Edsall grew up in New Rochelle where his idea of blacks were servants he looked down on
How dare call anyone else a racist.

"I asked our housekeeper, Sophie, what the word meant. Sophie explained that race was a way to describe the color of your skin.

She belonged to the "Negro race" because her skin was black. I belonged to the white race because my skin was white,

I said I though race meant whoever runs faster wins, and Sophie matter-of-factly replied that black people and white people were in a race, and the white people were winning" Edsall

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 10/16/2007

They did take it out....It was one of the first I read this morning...It was very informative....
I cant believe they can just delete truths and leave lies in is place as filler here at huffpo.
These DEMBOTS see what is happening.
The author being one of them.
They see their base flooding through the exit gates and who are they running to?

A self made Texas conservative congressman who is using thier own ideas and so called values to beat them...

How funny!
:)

Dont worry, I read it cliff. I did not have prior knowledge of what you wrote.
At the very least you did inform one person.
Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 10/16/2007
- JohnJames I'm a Fan of JohnJames 120 fans permalink

If you preach libertarianism, which necessarily would withdraw the government protections that allow all citizens to participate equally in our society, you shouldn't be surprised if you become a hero to the haters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 10/16/2007

He would withdraw "federal government protections" that are unconstitutioanal and put them in state court where they can enjoy the protections of our constitution and the vote of the people.
As it is right now this is unconstitutional to have these programs.
Either amend the constitution or throw these issues into state courts where they constitutionally belong.

I wonder how many child molesters are for Hillary...

I wonder how jesus became lord with all these "undesirables" calling him lord.

C'mon. would someone please make sense and show a bettercandidate with a better voting record who has a better foreign policy that is electable?
Please, someone tell me who they are...
Hillary?
Obama?
Rudi?
Who?
Who has a better voting record.
Who has a better foreign policy?
who?
who?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 10/16/2007
- Balloonman I'm a Fan of Balloonman 13 fans permalink
photo

Galvistonians
Oh, please. For just one legislator. KUCINICh leaps out. His vote record is always for the peoples interests. So are his many resolutions. Plus he is a true democrat, little d.

He won't dismantle Federal Government protections. Sure, the Fed is historically often wrong but to put peoples rights into State Courts for jurisdiction balkanizes the whole NATION's interests. Remember Civil Rights? If the South States had their way Rosa Parks would be riding the back of the bus or not riding at all. There is always that fight for a balance between Stetes Rights and Federal. This is another form of check and balance at work.

Attorney General John Ashcroft's attempt to deny Oregon their peoples voted affirmation of the right for the terminal ill to euthenasia under supervision is example of Fed interference with State Law. Legalization of Medical Pot and the Feds raiding dispensaries is another example of Fed interference with State law. Again, according to agendas, State/Federal, there is often conflict of interests. In the end Fed wins out, as it must be, in a nation of states, but one influencing the other, monitoring/checking the other, is healthy in the long term. Things weed out. Considering that, hopefully, ultimately the majority vote, the Federal, is bottomline just and sensitive to the diversity of agendas of the commonweal of States.

True, some of our protections are unconstutional. Telling us what we have to wear, helmuts. Buckle up. No smoking in the car with kids or on the balcony of your home. No abortions. But, I don't get it, put those issues into our State Courts to adjucate them unconstitutional? All 50 States state courts individually do we go to for this kind of reasonable interpretation? Or just Wyoming?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 10/16/2007

Kucinich has a better record.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 10/16/2007

Dr. Ron Paul takes politics to a higher standard.

Ron Paul is a principled leader, medical doctor, Vietnam veteran, married to the same women for 50 years, does not participate in the government pension program, and not controlled by special interest groups.

What is Ron Paul’s reward? Well its negative articles like this one by Tom Edsall.

Dr. Ron Paul is NO RACIST! In the very fine print of the article, “the Paul campaign does not have a racist or anti-Semitic agenda” GREAT HAY IS MADE TO BENEFIT TOM EDSALL. This is a low life article and its probably Tom’s best work.

Every campaign has the same problem with political supporters; they all are all recruited from the human race. The targeting of Ron Paul is no new story. Like kids lining up to sit on Santa’s lap, political hacks like Tom Edsall line up to further undermine America. The real story is the SCUM that the Tom Edsall’s of the world will not expose and keep beating that drum!

Rudy is selling American soil through his law firm for the SUPERHIGHWAY to profit while running for president. Here is a patriotic American. Where is the press? A global agenda reeks through Washington on the backs of legal taxpayers. Shhhhhh! Clinton has more dirty money than the entire mob put together. Speaking on political positions; Mitt has had more positions than Anna Nichole. Most every campaign has real scandals shoe tapping, and a revolving door of the best loyal supporters money can buy.

America should be outraged that Dr. Ron Paul is the focus among the sea of corruption. People like Tom, and there are many of them in the media, should look in the mirror prior to submitting crap like this. It is ironic, and insulting the media is being paid to issue these types of articles on discrimination and racism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 10/16/2007

Birchers in meltdown is not a pretty sight!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 10/16/2007

Just what, pray tell, would be considered a pretty sight for you?
I couldnt even imagine this according to your comments.
You enjoy this too much sarcastic nini.

You cause trouble and never debate the issues.

Please name me a better candidate with a better voting record and a better foreign policy that is electable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 10/16/2007

Au contraire, Birchers in meltdown is a wonderful sight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 10/16/2007

Smear, smear, smear

That is all the MSM and posters like Feminazi and so on have

Real people out there who care about America should check out Dr Paul's message of freedom--nothing else matters, if we no longer have our Constitution as the Law of the land--NOTHING ELSE MATTERS!

The neocons hate Dr Paul as do the corporate political parties--both the Repugs and the Dems--this should tell you something

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/091007_b_bloggers.htm right wing bloggers hate ron paul the most

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/101007Highlights.htm highlights on ron paul in Oct 9 debate


http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/280907_ron_paul_drug_war.html paul calls for end to war on drugs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 10/16/2007

DO NOT FORGET THE OTHER SMEAR PATRONS.

RANT
M16(IQ)TROLL
FUMESEPTIC
DATAGUYLASTNIGHT

AND OTHERS...
THESE PAID DEMBOTS MUST STOP THEIR LIES OR FACE THEIR SAME MEDICINE.
IM NOT A CHICKEN SHIT, I SMEAR THEM WITH THEIR OWN WORDS AND STUPIDITIES, THEY ONLY THROW LIES AND USELESS RANTS...
OH LOOK! HERE COMES ONE NOW!

LOOK OUT!

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results/

BTW; have you seen his latest numbers?
Lets not get distracted. this is what they are PAID TO DO.
They want us mad and going off topic.
This can not happen.
Their party is dissolving and so is the current republican disgrace.
Watch them get mad and smear.
watch them squirm as hundreds and thousands every day see Dr. Pauls message and embrace it.
Watch while they wake up and peel away from their failed leaders.
YOU JUST WATCH!

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec07/paul_10-12.html

Go Ron Paul

Ron Paul r3VOLution

:)

BTW you drew first blood today RANT!

RANT WROTE:
B-b-but GalvestoniansforRuPaul said I was making this up!
Reply | Favorite| Flag as abusive | posted 08:46 am on 10/16/2007

YOU SHOULD LEARN TO KEEP YOUR BIG TRAP SHUT ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE
SISSY.
This would only happen over a computer, because you would not even consider a challenge with me educationally or physically on the pavement.

Go write your fictional, questionable, book and stop the RANTS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 10/16/2007

RANT:

BTW.... I am still waiting for a better candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 10/16/2007
- Rand I'm a Fan of Rand 58 fans permalink

I hadn'y noticed this nonsense befor

Sissy??? Are you a twelve-year old?

You're right about this only happening on the internet. In real life, people don't make physical threats quite so easily. But EVERYBODY's a big, tough guy on-line. I've never threatened anyone unless it was face-to-face and, since I began to need a cane to walk, I don't do much of that anymore, either. I leave internet fist-fights to "real bruisers" like you, tough guy!

I never engage in a battle of wits with the unarmed

As to my book: I couldn't possibly care less what you think!

Oh... And you don't get to decide who posts or what they post

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 10/16/2007

I would consider both.

What is your education?

How fast are you at drawing a weapon, sighting and firing?

Perhaps you would not consider such a contest with me. Show your agreement by not responding.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 10/17/2007

Dont listen to these paid pundits on HUFFPo.

LOOK for yourself.

Listen to this recent interview from a so called racist.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec07/paul_10-12.html

Go Ron Paul

Look at these straw poll results!

No wonder they are attacking.
He has formed a campaign not seen in 40 years..

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 10/16/2007

40 years. Are you referring to the disastrous campaign Goldwater ran in 1964?

Goldwater later admitted that he knew he had lost the minute he teamed up with the Birchers.

deja vu all over again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 10/16/2007

I have picked a candidate who I support.

Can you offer one with a better voting record and a better foreign policy that is electable?

Or, more likely, are you a paid pundit for this site who is not allowed to do so.

I think the later.

Please I ask you Oh USELESS comment writer, do you have one better?( a candidate that is)

If not, than
STFU!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 10/16/2007

The article you refer to has no discussion of race in it. Why post it???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 10/16/2007

Those polls are small and unscientific.

Here is a better poll:

Ron Paul is not electable.

For the seven days ending October 14, 2007 show that Rudy Giuliani earns 29% of the vote while Fred Thompson attracts 19%. Mitt Romney has slipped a point and is supported by 14%. John McCain is now the favorite for just 10% and Mike Huckabee is at 7%. Sam Brownback is at 2%, Ron Paul at 1%, and two other candidates each round up to 1%. Sixteen percent (16%) are undecided.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/2008_republican_presiden

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 10/16/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect