HILLARY DID RUN THE CLINTON MAFIA (HILLARY'S CELL PHONE SPYING)
Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:42 PM

HILLARY QUOTE: "I have a million ideas but you can't afford them all."

HILLARY SPIED ON AMERICAN CELL PHONE CONVERSATIONS(Newsmax)
Queen Comrade Hillary listened to a secretly recorded conversation between political opponents. Former New York Times investigative reporter Jeff Gerth and Times investigative reporter Don Van Natta Jr. wrote that during Bill Clinton"s 1992 presidential campaign, "Hillary"s defense activities ranged from the inspirational to the microscopic to the down and dirty. She received memos about the status of various press inquiries, she vetted senior campaign aides; and she listened to a secretly recorded audiotape of a phone conversation of Clinton critics plotting their next attack."

SMOTHERING BILL CLINTON'S AFFAIRS
Newsmax reported in June, "The tape contained discussions of another woman who might surface with allegations about an affair with Bill. Bill's (and Hillary"s) supporters monitored frequencies used by cell phones, and the tape was made during one of those monitoring sessions."

HILLARY'S ILLEGAL ACTTIVITIES
Mickey Kaus at Slate magazine noted: "Isn't [secret phone monitoring] not so legal? ¦ Several legal experts told The Hill newspaper that it was illegal to intercept cell phone messages in 1992.

FLIP-FLOPPING HILLARY HYPOCRISY?
In August, Clinton voted against an emergency law that temporarily expanded the government"s power to conduct surveillance on American soil without a warrant. A month earlier, she outlined her privacy bill of rights, which includes the right to sue when privacy rules have been violated. "Hillary Clinton"s campaign hypocrisy continues to know no bounds. It is¦unbelievable that Clinton would listen in to conversations being conducted by political opponents, but refuse(s) to allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us.

SneakyLiberalHillarismIsNotAFamilyValue

I don't think the FundRace search engine is very accurate.

It couldn't possibly be true that Arianna Huffington hasn't contributed to any candidate???

Ug, again the cries from unknowing inconciderate idiots "Entertainers are stupid, why should we listen to them?". Get off it. Do you think that all the hard work the people mentioned in the article did to get where the are has somehow drained them of the same brain cells you and I have for political contemplation? Are they somehow less worthy of being citizens of this country than anyone else? (ok, so Theron isn't, but she has a stake here).

And what of the celebrity of politics? The celebrity of Limbaugh, Hanity, or the minor Boortz, and whats his name... Ann Coulter?

They are all entertainers, and say so regularly, all are idiots, but where are the cries that "Entertainers are stupid" in their context?

We live in a society that is overly interested in celebrity, so get over it.

Frankly, I haven't given a dime to any candidate yet. And neither will I until it makes sense to do so. It is my personal protest, and when called on it, I let the DNC caller know, "No, I will not give you my money, because you are not doing what we put you in office to do".

But after Arianna's interview with Pelosi, I think I will start giving to Cindi Sheehan.

Impeach
Convict
Imprison

Who gives a crap about these Hollywood types? Why should any clear thinking human care what some overpaid, self-centered hypocrite thinks. These nitwits make a living pretending to be someone their not for God's sake. Then they stand in line to pat each other on the back to feel good about themselves. These shallow people are the most insecure humans on the planet.

If you've ever seen her show "My Life on the D-list" you'd know that Kathy Griffin HAS no money.

And she lacks the social conscious to donate to a candidate anyway.

i'm thinking there is more than a bit of amusement by those who present this sort of drivel. most everything i read, whether who gives the most, who's in the lead, who said what to whom and pissed off a floating armada of sea urchin is no more than fodder to extract the dinero. most of what is posted here is political fluff. arrianna huffington has no platform or agenda passed her own self-serving interest: money (mainly), and the glamour associated with rubbing elbows with the rest of the hacks here. impeachment? end the war? raise new orleans from the swamp? fuck that! she needs all of those "beautiful" people to contribute their screeds, quid pro quo of the worst kind: still no one representing the common person.

If we think there is too much emphasis on celebrity behavior in the news, why is Huffington Post spending so much time with their opinions and donations? It seems wrongheaded.

Personally, I think Hollywood should support NO candidate. Washington will always try and screw the entertainment industry no matter what they do. Artists/entertainers are such an easy target for both the Republicans (who bash them mercilessly, unless they're Republican), and Democrats (the Clintons, the PMRC Gore, and the Lieberman types).

"Third quarter contributions are out, and perhaps more noteworthy than the celebrities who have given are the many who have not."

No, what is noteworthy is that liberals are looking to celebrity contributions to decide on which horse to back.

Pathetic on the highest level! Hilarious!