Ballmer: I Will Buy 20 Web Companies A Year

Wired   |   October 19, 2007 03:25 PM


stumbleupon :Ballmer: I Will Buy 20 Web Companies A Year   digg: Ballmer: I Will Buy 20 Web Companies A Year   reddit: Ballmer: I Will Buy 20 Web Companies A Year   del.icio.us: Ballmer: I Will Buy 20 Web Companies A Year

Start your engines, entrepreneurs. Or, if they're already started ... take off the parking brake. If Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer is to be believed, then it's a good time to flip a startup. During his Q&A at the Web 2.0 Summit yesterday he made the ballsy claim that the company is prepared to purchase 20 companies a year, for the next five years.

However juicy the proposition may sound, one should still take heed. One thing Ballmer didn't state in his froth was a solid direction for all these purchases. He merely went on to say that the buys will be "good acquisitions . . .and they're of strategic importance." If we're keeping score, that potentially means that Microsoft is prepared to spend a lot of money over a five year stretch on companies that it hasn't seen yet, that will ultimately provide services or products that it hasn't identified yet.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
26
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- MikeyG See Profile I'm a Fan of MikeyG permalink

If there is ever a sequel to "Young Frankenstein" Ballmer would look great with bolts sticking out of his neck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 10/22/2007
- godlessclif See Profile I'm a Fan of godlessclif permalink

Hold onto XP as long as you can
Vista is a downgrade not an upgrade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 10/21/2007
- realitytrumpsbull See Profile I'm a Fan of realitytrumpsbull permalink

Um, what kind of 'strategy' would that be, exactly? Multimedia monopoly, 24/7/365 cohesive
propaganda.com? Hmmm....the nice thing ABOUT
the internet is that there's a bunch of
small-timers, diverse viewpoints on a lot of
stuff, not all wholly-owned subsidiaries of
Bullshit Industries, Inc., LLC., etc...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 10/21/2007
- ajax2 See Profile I'm a Fan of ajax2 permalink

Balmer is not the brightest techie around. During a Government monopoly case he insisted MS wasn't squeezing out competitor X. When the government produced emails showing they were, Balmer acted like he didn't know what emails were.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 10/20/2007
- godlessclif See Profile I'm a Fan of godlessclif permalink

Microsoft is a monopoly and should not be allowed to buy out competitors.
Microsoft should broken up not allowed to grow. b

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 10/20/2007
- Lasthorseman See Profile I'm a Fan of Lasthorseman permalink

Website Takedown Report!

www.hillcap.org
www.peterfpaul.com

Both, yesterday anyway, featured movies of Hillary Clinton grossly and intentionally flaunting campaign finance laws and then using all three branches of government to cover it all up. It was and is priceless!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 10/20/2007
- OilWarsDotCom See Profile I'm a Fan of OilWarsDotCom permalink

Hey, I will let oilwars.com go for 3 million - everyone has his price..........axe gw bush and his pals

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 10/20/2007
- RealSoft See Profile I'm a Fan of RealSoft permalink

The web is changing from web 2.0 to web 3.0. That may even make most of what microsoft and google has all irrelevant.

Hope Balmer recognizes the move to Web 3.0 before it is too late. There are some awesome companies out there that are moving away from the software models of the last 15 years of disparate wordprocessor/spreadsheet/presentation models.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 10/20/2007
- BlueLogic See Profile I'm a Fan of BlueLogic permalink

Yes I see the madness just beyond his eyes.

Check out this shaved ape in his FULL glory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc4MzqBFxZE

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 10/20/2007
- TimtheDemocrat See Profile I'm a Fan of TimtheDemocrat permalink

Hilarious photo!




kudos

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 AM on 10/20/2007
- ErnestineBass See Profile I'm a Fan of ErnestineBass permalink

TimtheDemocrat

If I saw that guy walking the halls of my office building, I'd be inclined to call Security!
Where's his squeegee and shopping cart?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 10/20/2007
- Ginzaman See Profile I'm a Fan of Ginzaman permalink

Can you spell world domination?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 10/20/2007
- buddhistMonkey See Profile I'm a Fan of buddhistMonkey permalink

Basically, what Ballmer is saying is that he has no faith in his own company to come up with the "next big thing," so he's going to buy up 100 little companies in the hopes that one of them will light a fire under an ice-cold Microsoft. If I were one of Ballmer's employees, I'd be both dejected and embarrassed. The Good Ship Microsoft is steaming ahead at full speed, but the rudder is broken, and there's a madman at the helm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 10/20/2007
- leftLibertarian See Profile I'm a Fan of leftLibertarian permalink

I'll sell ya www.pets.com for 346 million.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 10/19/2007
- yukoner1 See Profile I'm a Fan of yukoner1 permalink

Damn good thing Bill Gates has the money to buy himself a good reputation because that Ballmer is one scary motherfucker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 10/19/2007
- HamletsMill See Profile I'm a Fan of HamletsMill permalink

As General Douglas MacArthur said "Defeat in battle is two little words...'too late'"

It is now "too late" for Microsoft. The long run from the dumb luck of Gary Kildall not being karma ready for his potential high end fate...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall

... and Tom Patterson having written "Quick and Dirty DOS" (Q-DOS) for the two fetch Intel 80286 at Seattle Computer in 1980 ... so Bill Gates could buy it for $50,000 ... is finally over.

Sure. They have lots of money. But the jig is up. "Parties over...out of time." They don't have the chops now to do anything original and important. There are many other FREE software technologies now that are going to take over the digital future of the world.

But I do salute and fully admire Bill Gates for giving a lot of that money back to society now after the rain.

After all, the taxpayers of the United States in the 1950's, 1960's, and 1970's paid for ALL the R&D that created MOSFET technology in weapons guidance systems research that eventually gave the long ride to Intel after the initial shakeout, and then Wintel. The rest was history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 10/19/2007
- NoCalDrummer See Profile I'm a Fan of NoCalDrummer permalink

"But I do salute and fully admire Bill Gates for giving a lot of that money back to society now after the rain."

First, the "giving" didn't happen until he married. I give far more credit to Melinda than to Bill on that one.
Second, there's a LOT of strings attached to that giving - check the benevolence again. Either the money is to be spent on "American" products (are there REALLY any left?), or worse. What's worse? The gifted "money" isn't really money, it's Microsoft products. Is giving a copy of MS Vista REALLY worth $400? It's a nice tax break, but it doesn't really cost Mr. Gates or Microsoft $400 to do so - more like $0.40 for the materials.
Microsoft is out to destroy the free, open-source software industry. See what they've done to try to stop Open Document, the International Standards Organization, Linux, and anyone else who gets in their way. It's criminal, and we're virtually powerless here in the U.S. to do anything. Thank God the Europeans are more savvy about Microsoft's shenanigans.
Those who received "free" software from Microsoft would be better off tossing it in the garbage and getting truly free software.
Those who (as a result of anti-trust violations) received "vouchers" for discounts on the purchase of new Microsoft software really got screwed on that deal. Toss the software AND the voucher out, legally download software that is free and open, and break the shackles of the Monopoly - it works at least as well, doesn't cost to "upgrade", and follows internationally recognized standards, not the fluid "standards" that Microsoft may dream up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 10/20/2007
- jake106 See Profile I'm a Fan of jake106 permalink

I'm sorry to tell you, Microsoft is never going to be taken over my free software technologies. Almost every computer in almost every company in the world is ran by Microsoft products. It ain't going anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 10/20/2007
- sedum See Profile I'm a Fan of sedum permalink

Like Ford, Chevvie and Dodge I guess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 10/20/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL