Hillary has be anointed and she will be your candidate ....and you will all vote for her.

Who gives a rat's ass who raised more money? I'm more interested in what these candidates have to say about what their philosophies are. How will they lead? What do they want to accomplish? I'm sick to death of reporting on political process.

"The only numbers that matter"...political donations?Aare you all nuts? The only numbers that matter are those figures counted after a real primary or election.

It's the same symbiotic relationship that bacteria have in our digestive system, or remora fish clinging to the underside of a shark.

Matt who?

It seems to me that on some level HRC is actually indebted to Matt Drudge for helping her with her political career: after he broke Hillarygate, the outpouring of sympathy and subsequent approval ratings helped her to win the senate seat.

How and Why else would someone 'woo' an individual who could have, and seemingly attempted to, ruin your husband's career, and perhaps more importantly at that juncture, his legacy AND your own political aspirations?

Further, the bonding, relationship between these two (Hillary and Drudge) and clearly mutual respect and perhaps even budding frienship, further demonstrates she's far too close for comfort to bed of the GOP establishment & Co.

I agree - the Political Donor Class knows that the GOP cannot win the White House next year (do the electoral college math, it's easy!)...

So the election will be decided in the Dem primary, and it's between Obama and Clinton...

So these are your choices Americans:

CLINTON: RIGHT WING PRO WAR DLC MORE OF SAME CANDIDATE

OBAMA: THE CLOSEST CHANCE TO PROGRESS WE HAVE.

(BTW - does anyone know ANYONE who is passionate about a Hillary Clinton Presidency? Anyone met someone passionate about an Obama Presidency?
BOTTOM LINE: Hillary won't win. Her so-called "momentum" is PR bullshit!)

"But he fails to mention that Drudge was fed deceptive information and promoted an entirely misleading headline -- "AMERICA LOVES HILLARY -- TOP FUNDRAISER FOR ROUND ONE: $36 MILLION" - when in fact the big news of the first quarter fundraising was that Obama actually beat Hillary in the only number that mattered: primary donations."

And you miss the equally important point that Obama's donations are plumetting like a brick. More anti-HRC/pro-GOP-proxy spin from the Nader herd.

Lay down with dogs, wake up with fleas.

One thing Drudge always has been, is biased against Democrats. But he's also smart, and knows that there's no way a Republican is going to win. So, he'll put his stock in the most conservative, nearly Republican Democrat he can find.

Just like...most of the mainstream media? How many people come away from a debate feeling that Sen. Clinton was trumped on the issues, and playing a game of catch-up with the other candidates, only to hear the media say "she looked very presidential" afterward. And the insane fervor of her fans to demand everyone call her "Senator Clinton", as if everyone must be reminded that she is a Senator, is priceless. Most folks all call Obama, Obama...and Edwards, Edwards. If she needs to be called "Senator Clinton", then she probably isn't taking this whole thing very seriously. At some point, when a person is interviewing for a new job, they've got to separate themselves from the old one.

http://www.alternet.org/story/65596 hillary"s mystery money men"same as bush"s"who"d a thunk it?
If you're semi-intelligent and informed, you already know that the pig Rupert Murdoch is funding and advising Shillary--read the above article and see who else is buying the election for that traitor

in other news--the Dems won't act for the American people, but Ron Paul has introduced a bill to strike down the horrible Military Commission's Act
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/231007Commissions.htm Paul introduces bill to rid us of the Military Commissions Act

Why do I never see/hear a good rant favoring Joseph Biden? I like him. But that's not a very good rant. LOL.

Similarly, HuffPo praises Obama's every move and we "coincidentally" see Obama banners all over the site.

The editorial/advertising separation is no clearer here than at Drudge.

Matt means nothing...and so does this clear Obama puff piece...face it...what has he done to make it clear he will win? Endorse radical evangelists who want to "cure" gays? That's a real sign he wants the Democratic nomination! And many will make sure that never happens. I will personally work to that end.

Who Cares About Matt Drudge? His site is awful; it's worse than awful, it's cheesy-looking, and he never has any news on it anyway. Sheesh. Matt Drudge is boring.

Drudge features this "front page" so-called "investigation" of him on his website - without a bit of irony. Doesnt he realize that he has become a puppet of all those who feed him and court him?

The only subjects that get more attention from Matt than these manipulators, are those young British princes Harry and William. (giggle)