Bill Clinton Shouts Down 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists

Former President Bill Clinton responded aggressively on Tuesday when his speech at a fundraiser for his wife's campaign was interrupted by 9/11 conspiracy protesters.

"A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, responding to one of the hecklers as the audience cheered. "I'll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and let me talk." Another protester yelled that the attacks were an "inside job."

"An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to give Minnesota a bad reputation."

Watch the video:

From WJLA-DC (ABC)

Comments

[TJTelecaster]

Bill Clinton has to cover for his fellow Tri-Lateralist associates that's first and foremost...QED..

[coyote4]

.

It was MinneapolisMike, our own Huffpost hero.

[repubesnivel]

You all should write a nice thank you note to Huffpo for allowing this gathering of nuts for the winter.

Holy crap, you people have totally whacked out...

Have fun, and when nurse Ratchett comes by take your meds like good little mental cases.

[coyote4]

Absolutely!

----------­----------
Arianna is a godess
----------­----------
.

[CBBrooklyn]

Newton's 3rd Law of Motion: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Aluminum airplanes with plastic nosecones don't glide through steel and concrete buildings. And airplanes don't make cookie-cutout airplane shapes in steel girders and concrete slabs.

Even Peter Jennings at ABC knew this, as we can see from this news clip. Note his nervousness when they play the "plane" video back in slow motion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

Every video is archived here, and shows the same impossible physics:
http://kil­ltown.911r­eview.org/­2nd-hit.ht­ml

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=no_planer_resigns

A new analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews (as published in the New York Times) has been performed to determine the number of First Responders who reported airplanes. The number of First Responders who reported seeing airplanes is surprisingly low. Even more, the number who reported HEARING commercial airplanes is even lower, despite the 120dB level those planes would have had at that altitude. However, many First Responders did report hearing the fighter jets later on:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=134&Itemid=60

TV-Fakery evidence is not limited to the airplanes:

The Spinning WTC
http://www.livevideo.com/video/killtown/3C65FB10DF0D48259F652B0FF1C29AB7/the-spinning-wtc.aspx

The Incredible Moving Bridge
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EiYUGzUUg64

Technology Review Magazine Discusses How the Military and TV Networks Can Insert Prerecorded Images Into Live News Feed to Alter World Politics in their July/August 2000 Article "Lying With Pixels":
http://www­.911resear­chers.com/­node/174

[GoodwithWood]

Oh, cool. These guys are good. They precisely placed explosives in the side of the building to “Cookie cut” an airplane hole.

[CBBrooklyn]

It's much more probable that those holes were made with precision directed energy weapons. Whichever way though, they certainly weren't made by airplanes.

[SupremeIdiot]

One curious thing about your assertions about planes not being able to go through steel and concrete is that the WTC did not have any reinforced concrete in it's structural weight-supportng members and that it's wind bearing outer shell was made of aluminum.

Of course the plane weighing hundreds of thousands of pounds and having all that mass probably would defy the laws of physics and bounce off the building.

dumbass

[CBBrooklyn]

Dear dumbass:

Sorry, but you're...... wrong.

Directly behind the aluminum cladding in each tower were girders of structural steel:

WTC Construction Video Clip - Perimeter columns of structural steel:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v228812FdPt5ZBB

Steel-reinforced concrete floors:
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/cnn.jpg

Half in, half out. No break in building between engines and fuselage.
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/impact.jpg

CARTOON:
http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5541/spiegelxl1.gif

Airliners are made of lightweight aluminum alloy. 767s have plastic composite nosecones. These airplanes don't "bounce", they break apart:
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/1.jpg

[AntiFascistMajority]

CBBrooklyn--Thank you for all the excellent resources. Only a cop could study the kind of information you have provided and continue to insist that 9/11 was caused by "Osama & the 19 Muslims." Quite clearly an operation of the magnitude of 9/11 required cooperation by intelligence operatives and the media.

[AntiFascistMajority]

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ~William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

[CBBrooklyn]

Dr Morgan Reynolds, the former Chief Economist of the US Department of Labor, is suing private contractors alleging they defrauded the US government by supplying bogus analyses for the official 9/11 NIST Report of an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone gliding into a steel/concrete building.

Dr Reynolds is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart, is demanding a Trial By Jury, and deserves our full support.

See Dr Reynolds site for info and the Court Document PDF:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case

[CBBrooklyn]

Here's some evidence that directed energy weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center:

**Let's take this Vertical Cut on WTC 4 as an example.
The building material on the other side of the cut is "missing".
Where'd it go?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/Image194Resized.jpg

**Has anyone noticed... the WTC 4 cut is in the same path as the South Tower's north wall?
The South Tower is also "missing".
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/Image271Resized.gif

**How about these Cylindrical Holes in WTC 5 & WTC 6?
What, if not a beam weapon, could make these?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/Image140Resized.jpg

**How about this video of the Steel Core Turning to Dust and trickling down?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ

**What type of weapon could destroy car engine blocks, yet leave unexploded gas tanks?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/ZoominGJS-WTC105_toasted.jpg

**This police car looks too weird.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image172.jpg

**These cleanup workers certainly look puzzled.
What happened here?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/WeirdSerpentBeams.jpg

**About 20 minutes before the South Tower is destroyed, the FAA orders all aircraft to land.
Two minutes after the North Tower is destroyed, the FAA allows military craft back up.
Why?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/FAAOrdersResized.jpg

One must wonder... where did the towers go?

Look at these comparisons. What happened?

http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/Massive-Energy-Releases.jpg
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/HTR-combine.jpg
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/WTC6-WTC7-Verizon.jpg

Dr Judy Wood has filed legal challenges (see my other posts), which provides an excellent opportunity for a new investigation.
She deserves our full support.

[GoodwithWood]

Must be some sort of particle laser focused through a flux capacitor that galvanizes gama rays, X-rays and dark matter into a beam located in a top secrecy earth orbiting device.

[CBBrooklyn]

One of the Defendants in Drs Wood/Reynolds' cases, Applied Research Associates (ARA), is a manufacturer of directed energy weapons:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

ARA is also a Silver Level Founding Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS). Founded in 1999, DEPS put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11, containing the following excerpt:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf

Dr Wood has also discovered that the "Capabilities - National Defense and Aerospace" section of ARA's website contains an image depicting a simulation with the following characteristics:

1. A building (in the foreground) having damage similar to that of WTC 6 and the Murrah Building in OK City.

2. A building (behind the red building) with the same cosmetic design as WTC 3.

3. A building (in the background) turning to dust similar to the Twin Towers.

Here's the image:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/pics/defens1_poof_l.jpg

See pages 3 and 4 of Dr Wood’s Appeal to NIST for information regarding that photo:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Here are pages 3 and 4:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg

[themainpoint]

What a turn-off that Bill Clinton would be so irrational as to act surprised that a citizen would question Anything with respect to this out-of-control government.

Come on! This government has lied about many things--including WMD's in Iraq. They outed a CIA agent whose husband exposed one of their lies. They can't agree to do anything about healthcare, education, Social Security, import safety, protecting the borders, etc. (but can agree to drain the treasury of billions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars, for a war). And now they are recycling the old WMD lie again as an excuse for a war with Iran (a country that doesn't yet even have the capability for a nuclear weapon).

When people are lied to enough, it is predictible that some would question whether 911 was a lie, too. (It's not such a shock, Bill)

What kind of public servant would try to shame citizens away from questioning their government? Questioning government is essential to the fabric of a healthy American Democracy. How dare Bill Clinton try to shame someone who has been led to distrust this government.

[repubesnivel]

OMG, a conspiracy nutcase says Bill Clinton is irrational.

Hellooooooo out there, you people are craaaaaazy!

[demsrnuts]

So it's rational for a married president to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office ?? Or for a highly educated person not to know the meaning of the word "is" ??

[kevinabt]

I agree. The refusal of the establishment to enter into any serious debate or consider the wide range of evidence that 9/11 Truth presents should be a BIG red flag. Even without looking at the facts either way you have to admit, that behavior is very very suspicious.

[FogBelter]

"An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job," Clinton said.

As we all know ... if Bill Clinton says it ...

It MUST be true.

[dobberdoss]

Well said!

[CBBrooklyn]

In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:

"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."

MP3 Clip:
http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show:
http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3

Dr Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University, is suing private contractors hired by the government and is claiming evidence for Directed Energy Weapons at the World Trade Center. Read the court case here:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

[AntiFascistMajority]

Hear it from an eyewitness


For those with a sincere interest in learning what really happened on Sept. 11, 2001, I recommend attending a speech by William Rodriguez, who was working as a custodian at the World Trade Center at the time, helped evacuate hundreds of people using his master key, and happens to be a powerful speaker. He is on tour and you can find a list of his speaking engagements at his website:

http://www­.911keymas­ter.com/in­dex.html

Rodriguez reports that the collapse of the towers was proceeded by a series of powerful explosions. He and others inside the North Tower thought at first that it was an earthquake.
.

[AntiFascistMajority]

Oops--excuse my error--The collapse of the towers was PRECEDED by a series of powerful explosions.

[coyote4]

Hello raise, sweetie

[SupremeIdiot]

Your poof is the expert word of a CUSTODIAN?

http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion1.htm

Here's a link to how a demolition actually works.

Section 2 on detonators and dynamite tells you that the main supports are cut through to insure the charges or properly. This makes the building EXTREMELY unstable. The buildings would have collapsed with the initial impact of the aircraft and not after an hour of intense fire.

The custodian probably heard the main supports fail due to fire impingement weakening them after being compromised in the initial impact.

[SupremeIdiot]

"charges WORK properly"

[TheIndependenceParty]

You are truly a SupremeIdiot. The charges were not set off before the impacts, ... but I suspect you knew that well before you wrote your nonsense. Someone probably took a chainsaw to the base of the building, ... But no one noticed, ... right?

[AntiFascistMajority]

Regarding SupremeIdiot:

Centcom cybercops patrol internet


Recent scientific polls that show around 84% don't believe the government's explanation behind 9/11 and others confirming the fact that support for the war in Iraq is at an all time low have led the Bush administration to sharpen their knives against the new breed of perceived =enemy propagandists,= bloggers, journalists and online activists who dissent against the =war on terror.=

CENTCOM announced earlier this year that a team of employees would be =[engaging] bloggers who are posting inaccurate or untrue information, as well as bloggers who are posting incomplete information.=

So when you're wasting your time arguing the finer points of the collapse of Building 7 or the quagmire in Iraq with someone who seems unable to grasp basic principles, your foe could well be sitting behind a plush U.S. government desk in a uniform.

--Paul Joseph Watson, =Government Targets American Bloggers=, 10-17-06

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/171006enemypropagandists.htm
.

[paige]

As we all know by now. When the govt. says something and the people question it in public this is what happens. I have all along believed it and this only helps to confirm it for me. The paid hacks come out in droves to sites like this to try their best to have the people believe the govt. Go ahead if you want. I will believe my truth. There is no reasoning of why this govt. got rid of all the evidence before it could be evaluated. Anyone want to answer that one with some kind of intellligence? Whenever there's been a plane disaster there has been an immediate investigation. Not a mindset to get rid of all the evidence to China.

Think for yourselves people and do the research just to make sure you are correct. The only evidence you know is what the govt. told you. That isn't evidence in my book. Never was and never will be.

Some of the information is garbage because they wanted it to be garbage so they could show you how silly it was. They wanted to throw you off the trace for the truth IMO. Actually I don't care what any of you believe but I believe what my eyes have read of all the "dots". They fit much more than the conspiracy the govt. gave us. Like it or not, I don't care but I am apalled Bill Clinton would say that. How dare him!!!

[AntiFascistMajority]

William Rodriguez speaks next Nov. 1 in Oakland, California, along with Cindy Sheehan and Peter Dale Scott. Let me try again to post a usable link to his website:

http://www.william911.com/
.

[coyote4]

Careful of Pixie-dust, kids.

[coyote4]

Have you read my thesis? too scared to admit?

America is being murdered by fear.
oh yah. those with darker skins will win. Suck it up; Mother Nature is a bitch.
.

[JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin]

Clinton will never waste an opportunity to chastise a liberal/left leaning Democrat when he's in front of a camera. He's been doing it his whole career (the Sister Souljah thing is a good example, and his buddying around with Bush 41)...

He would never say "how dare you" to a Republican heckler. He would say "we need to come together and work together. What do you want me to do?".

[Swift2]

For God's sake, there is absolutely nothing "left" about a crazy conspiracist. Oh, by the way, I think we should have a panel look into the real facts behind Bigfoot.

[NightOwlCafe]

what proof does pres. clinton have that it was not an inside job? how about criminal negligence? incompetence, real or planned, seems to be a constant theme (along with lying) in this administration. pnac, no one in the media questions that group. there are more questions than there have been answers so far. we still have the right to question our government and if the 4th estate bothered to do their job we might get a few answers. how dare congress not demand a proper investigation and how dare those spineless men leave that task to the jersey girls.

[Swift2]

No, no, no. YOU prove the theory that YOU have. You can't, of course, so you say, "More inquiry."

[Ramirez]

"what proof does pres. clinton have that it was not an inside job?"
***

Sorry Owl, but it doesn't work that way. One cannot prove a negative. Swift2 is correct. It is up to the Truthers to prove their theory is stronger. Once they agree on what their theory is, of course.

Have you heard the one about "directed energy weapons"?

[steamboat]

Probably those two jets flying into the buildings. That the whole world saw.

[kristin]

In my opinion, it takes maybe 100 to 200 hours minimum to read all the best evidence, all the statements by highly credible people and at least some of the disinformation to feel comfortable that one’s intake of information is sufficient to draw a reasonably solid conclusion that this was an inside job. For example, it takes quite a while to read the whole of Physicist Steven Jones, essay, carefully view the photos, read the footnotes on his theory of controlled demolition using thermite. It took me a while to come across the fact that Able Danger military exercises were being run at the same time and were programmed to simulate almost exactly happened. So people who do not have that kind of time can understandably be swayed back and forth by solid evidence then by disinforma­tion--neve­rmind geting all the (lack of) information and disinformation from.

However, for someone who has a couple of hours, i recomment googling >9/11truth.org A Quick Course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
> Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11th, 2001

[kristin]

For extensive and in depth information,try this Site.

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

110+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
240+ Engineers and Architects
60+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
160+ Professors Question 9/11
190+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
100+ Entertainment and Media Professionals

[kristin]

Apology for the typos. While I was trying to correct them, somehow it posted.

[genericart]

If we're serious about what we say/stand for in public,then our freedom of speech should not be abused by anyone. There are numerous possibilities for everyone to express his/her views, so why don't you find the right time and right place to express your views on the alleged 9/11 conspiracy? Of course your discourse tells a lot more about you than anybody else. Bill Maher and Bill Clinton had every right to remind you of this as citizens of this country.

[TheIndependenceParty]

Then Maher and Clinton, who can ask for and receive a commitment of public broadcast time to allow an airing of the studies from professionals should do that, ... request the time, ... vet the numerous engineering, physics, fire, metallurgical, and forensic professionals who have studied 9/11.

They won't however, ... because a review of the handling and evidence from 9/11 is radioactive to professional politicians and broadcasters.

Fifty years from now, few will care, just as with JFK and RFK, and MLK's Assassinations, ... and even the aftermath of Pearl Harbor. And that is why the archives are closed, ... the film tucked away, and the testimony sequestered.

But some of us who admire FDR, still believe he had advance warning that an attack would occur against the US mainland by Imperial Japan. Do you truly believe the Japanese blindsided us? Think again! Read about the Tet Offensive! And then listen to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

If you believe the government of the United States guards over you at night when you sleep, ... you are a fool. In broad daylight, the men who still control our government today allowed the largest city in our nation to be attacked, unchallenged, in broad daylight. It is either the most egregious case of Executive incompetence, or the most atrocious case of Executive Treason this nation has ever suffered.

In either case, George W Bush should be Impeached, Convicted and imprisoned for treason or incompetence.

We all witnessed 9/11. To excuse it after so many years of denial, is a preposterous notion, and one that can not stand in American History.

[LightningJoe]

And a not so gentle reminder concerning free speech...

Who are you, to tell someone else what the "right time and right place" are, to express themselves?

Just be ready for me or someone else to sweep in with the same advice for you, when you finally get a chance to be heard for your views.

The crisis in free speech these days is not so much that people can't say what they want to, but that people shut their ears and dis them for speaking out -- as if patriotism were not about taking the reigns of the democratic process in hand, and having the courage to present honest opinions in the face of those who would prefer not to have their reality questioned.

----------
Kill your TV, and free your mind.

[midtown]

Guess that means that sycophantic wife of his wont be allowing anyone to question 911 either.

[Swift2]

Question away.

[cuomofied]

I'm actually thankful this happened. I think it will draw a lot of merit to the movement because there's a handful of the American people who will believe EXACTLY the opposite of Clinton just out of pure ignorance and spite.


Which, in this case, is a good thing.

I am torn on the issue of stunts like this though.

One one end it gives the media a chance to call it(the movement) crazy. But on the other hand, I am really starting to see the seeds of rebellion creeping into the populace. I tend to think that consistantly shoving this into the media and the country's face is only going to make people more and more curious and thus more educated on the issue.


I don't know. Thoughts? Feedback?

[coyote4]

"I am really starting to see the seeds of rebellion creeping into the populace. "

Amen

[BarryChamplain]

"I am really starting to see the seeds of rebellion creeping into the populace. "

If you're seeing that, there must be something to it, right? Just one question:

Do you honestly think the Cheney administration is not prepared for this?

Do you think "the people" are just going to rise up, demand their government back, and the M-I complex/neocons will just grumble a bit and go, "Dang it, we almost had it!"?

Do you really think that the wholesale rewriting of Constitutional law and its interpretation... the Patriot Act... habeas corpus... "signing statements"... a slew of detention camps and super-prisons, built and run by "private contractors" (etc.)... were meant for dark-skinned, Muslim nutjobs with box cutters?




You do? Really?

[Swift2]

You're nuts. Give it up. Go out and help the poor. Learn to grow vegetables. Get a girlfriend.

[coyote4]

meow