Bill Clinton Shouts Down 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists

Former President Bill Clinton responded aggressively on Tuesday when his speech at a fundraiser for his wife's campaign was interrupted by 9/11 conspiracy protesters.

"A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, responding to one of the hecklers as the audience cheered. "I'll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and let me talk." Another protester yelled that the attacks were an "inside job."

"An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to give Minnesota a bad reputation."

Watch the video:

From WJLA-DC (ABC)

Comments

[EtJ]

"Passing the Capital building and trying to avoid hearing the deals being made on a regular basis between the same members of Congress entrusted with the well-being of America and the various Jewish groups steeped in treachery such as AIPAC, JINSA, WJC and all the others responsible for dragging this once-Christian nation into the gutter of fighting Israel’s dirty wars was like trying to pretend that all was silent during a thunderstorm. It–meaning the treachery–was real, something you could feel, hear, see, smell, and as tangible as if you had inadvertently grabbed two bare electric wires."
My Weekend with the Survivors of the USS Liberty–Pt 1
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/my-weekend-with-the-survivors-of-the-uss-liberty/

[TheIndependenceParty]

"How dare you?", President Clinton asks. How dare we not, I retort, ... if the question is whether a thorough independent investigation needs to be performed at long last of all the evidence. Of course it does, ... for 3000 Americans were murdered. Bush had arranged months before 9/11 to illegally spy on Americans, and Cheney repeatedly ordered the Armed Forces to stand down when advised that a flight was continuing inbound toward the Pentagon, according to eyewitness accounts from the White House Situation Room.

Does he think setting his jaw and tossing a questioner from the audience will still the debate. I respect Bill Clinton, but I resent his talking down the "heckler", and contending that questioning the perpetrators of 9/11 will somehow bring shame on Minnesota. Not investigating this crime adequately has already brought shame upon America!

We can calculate how a Shuttle will orbit into exact proximity to the Space Station, ... essentially a controlled "fall" toward the earth with a forward velocity precisely timed to effect an"orbit". But we can not get the government to produce credible descriptions of how three buildings went into free fall, all three on the same day, in defiance of the same laws of physics and thermodynamics?

Not everyone can be fooled so easily, Mr. Clinton. Shame on you for reinforcing the lies this Administration has fed America about 9/11. I had thought better of you!

[ADVOCATE4ZPG]

Conspiracy theorists consistently underestimate the banality of evil and evil doers. At the same time, the grossly overestimate the 'intelligence' necessary to pull off a gambit like the destruction of the Trade Towers et al. Just witness the hundreds of unsolved murders in the U.S. and millions of unsolved thefts. It's only through a general respect for some ethics as well as general prosperity that crime levels are even higher. A cascade of laxity allowed '9/11' to be planned and executed--wishful thinking that 'history' would not be visited on the U.S.

[stayleft]

"A broad? No, it wasn't a broad," Clinton said, responding to one of the hecklers as the audience cheered. "I'll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and blow me." Another protester yelled that the attacks were a "blow job."

"A blow job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not a blow job," Clinton said.

"You guys have got to be careful, you're going to give the Democrats a bad reputation."

[speckitis]

Why are wingnuts so obbsessed with blow jobs?

[geobushono]

For those of you that love a little abuse,......I give you clinton redux........this time they eviserate the (chuckle), white collar jobs.

Vote for John Edwards.....He asks CORPORATIONS..How dare you?"

[ariuszme]

people like you just don't get it, and it's sad, really sad.

John Edwards ran for president b4 and didn't get the nod. He ran as VP and didn't even win his state. His wife is dying *yes, DYING of cancer. Americans will NEVER vote Edwards into ofc and after seeing the nutjob he hired for his campaign mgr, I wouldn't even trust him in an ofc where he has so little politically experience.

We need a Dem who can win and NOT appoint conservative Supreme Court Justices. Edwards cannot win a national campaign. end of story.

[VitriolAndAngst]

They've been doing some research polling on the candidates.

Hillary Clinton gets about 4% of Gulliani (the front-runner for the Republicans if you don't count Ron Paul in the straw polls).
Edwards gets about 14-20% lead over Gulliani. In fact, Edwards has the greatest lead when rated against Republicans.

Things aren't true because you say; "end of story."

If the Media is going to continue to pick our candidates --even when they aren't preferred, I don't know why I'm going to bother voting for a Democrat, just to see them act like a Republican. This country is going down the tubes -- so it might as well see Republicans be there to take the blame.

Hillary is not much different from a Republican -- so what is the point?

Amongst Progressives, I mostly hear about Edwards and Kucinich. Edwards at times has disappointed me -- but he seems to be attempting to be "practical" to get elected.

[NickfromCali]

I will not jump on the conspiracy bandwagon just yet, but there are some unanswered questions:

1.Building 7 falling
2.The "cleanliness" of the Twin Towers falling
3.The cellphone conversations from the airplane passengers...

[tcpgh]

What do you mean by number 3 -- the cellphone conversations? Thanks!

[lip11]

Cell phones don't work on airplanes while they are flying even at very low altitudes. Try it sometime. You don't actually have to try to make a call. The signal bars go dead a few seconds after takeoff.

[lip11]

Keep looking NickfromCali. It won't take you long to find at least 40-50 unanswered anomalies.

How about this: why is there not one single photo or video of Flight 77 over Wash DC or hitting the pentagon, arguably the most protected building in the world. It alleged flew over a metropolis of millions at 9:30am, and not one person or camera caught it.

Now something definitely hit the pentagon - I just don't think it was Flight 77 as advertised.

[MaxTaylor1]

Tell that to the victims of flight 77.
BTW, there was over 420ish (forgot the exact #) certified witnesses to the Pentagon attacks THAT WERE NOT IN THE ARMED FORCES. Next "theory".

[freeloader]

Bush almost got Rummy with that one...lol.

[VitriolAndAngst]

The Government confiscated a convenience store security video that is aimed right at the area of the Pentagon where it impacted -- they have yet to release it.

It's really annoying that the Truth movement is required to tie up the entire story when we don't have much facts to go on. I hate debating about the Pentagon, beyond just mentioning that THEY HAVE TO HAVE MORE INFO than what they have given. If they have nothing to hide -- why are they hiding everything?

The WTC is a better area to speculate on, because we have SOME video. By merely pointing out the impossible physics, the "pancake" theory doesn't make sense. I remember speculating that a burning plane could drop one floor on another and Pancake the WTC in 1999 when I visited. Because I was thinking about the "bridge-like" construction where each floor hung on the center core and the curtain wall. If two floors pounded into the next -- the pinions couldn't hold the weight of three -- it would cause all the floors to smash down. That is entirely possible, and I should get credit for figuring this out before it happened (but I only have a home video of me touring afterwards -- darn the luck).

Anywho, here is what is wrong with the Government pancake theory;
1) It happens too quickly. The force of the level above needs time to overwhelm the floor below. It would take 60 to 90 seconds to pancake a building with 80 stories. In the video, the next floor disintegrates AS the floor above is falling. There is no reaction time.
2) If you are breaking off the pinions that support the floors -- what the heck is pulling down the "core" of the building? If the supports are strong enough to rip the core apart -- why do they fall? You can't have BOTH a pancaking floor AND a crumbling of the supports -- it would tear AWAY.

>>> Continued >>>

[MaxTaylor1]

you forgot one...
4.) Your "happy" pills missing from the medicine cabinet.

[ohiomark]

Read this link:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

[lip11]

Popular Mechanics is a cheesy fantasyland magazine owned by Hearst Corp, who also publishes such fine documents like Teen, Seventeen, Redbook, etc...
Considering it to be accurate or unbiased is silly.

[IkeChicago]

When is Bill Clinton own up to the fact that his lack of foresight and preparedness caused the 9-11 attack on the World Trade Center. All of Al Queda’s attacks came under the Clinton administration and the planning for the 9-11 attack was hatched under his term – face it Hillary and Bill, 9-11 came under your watch.

[ariuszme]

TYPICAL BUSH SHEEP IDIOT POST, VERY TYPICAL. BLAME CLINTON FOR 9/11 WHEN BUSH WAS ON DUTY, BUSH IGNORED THE SECURITY INFO THAT WAS HANDED TO HIM ABOUT PENDING AL QAEDA ATTACKS..HE IGNORED IT! BUSH TOOK 11 TRIPS BACK TO HIS RANCH FOR "VACATION" IN HIS FIRST 8 MONTHS OF OFFICE.

YEH, KEEP BLAMING CLINTON FOR BUSH'S INCOMPETENCY AND CORRUPTION THAT SHOULD HAVE PUT HIM IN A PRISON CELL BY NOW.

PATHETIC THE IGNORANCE

[repubesnivel]

Total and utter bullshit. You know it, I know it and those who just read your idiocy know it.

[VitriolAndAngst]

The FIRST attack was from another group -- about two weeks after Clinton took office.

HE took responsibility for that one -- but apparently Bush cannot be responsible for something that happened 6 months into his term, with 72 serious warnings.

Yes, the Decider isn't responsible for anything. You are one of those parents we've heard about who will let their kid get away with everything.

[speckitis]

When the WTC was bombed in 93, the perpetrators were hunted down, apprehended, and now rot in prison.

6 years after 9/11, now that there is NO DOUBT about Al Quedas capabilities, OBL still roams free.

Ike, you are an utter and complete moron.

[ryanjones2006]

Anyone who thinks the government planned and carried out the events of September 11 2001 is a fool who doesn't deserve the freedoms of America- even the freedom of speech.

[cricket]

do you have one now ?

[MaxTaylor1]

your writing your crap on here, aren't ya?

[Jesusinasidecar]

Ryan, I agree it's hard to believe, but you must resign yourself to accept the fact that 19 young, mostly Saudi Arabian men with little to no flight experience could fly a near perfect, extremely difficult flight path, and that the resultant crashes not only were responsible for the collapse of two, no three, over-safety-engineered buildings, but turned everything to dust. Don't you think it's just a little too suspicious, especially now that we know how this administration lies and keeps everything secret, to say anyone who does not believe the lie is a fool?

[MaxTaylor1]

I could use your same logic. How did such a bright, outstanding citizen like yourself make such idiotic, and childish comments?
Answer: Crack.

[speckitis]

As incredible as it may seem, crashing an aircraft requires almost no skill WHATSOEVER...!

[VitriolAndAngst]

He can blog can't he?

Just don't get Rowdy at a political photo-op, Ryan.

I believe it was an Inside Job. Have you seen any evidence of truth-telling, or integrity in the Bush administration so far? Please, I'd like to hear this evidence of some faith we can have in glorious leader.

[PhantomAviator]

Not that I follow the 911-Truth nuts, but the MALE Klin-ton ROBOT did not really provide responsive answers to the guys nut-ball conspiracy theory.

The MALE Klin-ton ROBOT deflected the moment with a "snappy" (not-so-snappy) comeback.

I love that:
The MALE Klin-ton ROBOT and the FE-MALE Klin-ton ROBOT.

Gonna have it TRADEMARKED.

[BreadandRoses]

Of course you love it---you're in the fifth grade.

[EtJ]

Your kissinger blow-up doll is calling bullshit&roses.

[ariuszme]

^^^ life compatible to theirs by sitting in a forum bitching. typical

[MaxTaylor1]

Ummmm, you prolly are a proud owner of a pet rock, huh?

[repubesnivel]

The pantdumbabbatoir, the pantdumbabbatoir..

the MALE/FEMALE PANTDUMABBATOIR did not post any evidence or links to prive his conspiracy idiocy.

I love that.

Gonna have it BALLWASHED..pantdumbabbatoir, nice moniker, PANTDUMBABBATOIR

[VitriolAndAngst]

Hey, Clinton isn't alone here.

There isn't ANYONE who will take on the 911 Truth movement. They and Thom Hartmann and various other people have an open invitation to discuss the matter.

The Government "EXPERTS" are content to bloviate on a News Station without rebuttal. They get to repeat the same nonsense without anyone there to say; "No, that is not correct and here is why."

Why is all the steel recycled from the WTC in China, when a company in New Jersey was offering more money for it? You know, questions like that are hard for shills to answer.

[SOMEDUDESKY]

Actually Yellowdoginredcounty the entire quote is just as telling. Keep doing your homework kid. Then come back and talk to me about the other quotes you so conveniently ignored to address.

[T.Roll]

There are moonbats and then there are it's sub species troofbats.

[totalliberal]

Did someone just turn on a loon magnet.

900 posts and still going.

Cookoo-ka-cook-akoocaloo.

[totalliberal]

Did someone just turn on a loon magnet.

900 posts and still going.

Cookoo-ka-cook-akoocaloo.

[totalliberal]

Did someone just turn on a loon magnet.

900 posts and still going.

Cookoo-ka-cook-akoocaloo.

[wmbear]

DID SOMEONE JUST KEEP REPOSTING THE SAME POST...

Because they were too big an idiot to wait until they saw the first one "take"?

[sword]

Clinton proved he was the enemy of the poeple when he was president.

He is proving it now.

..Unless he has a trick up his sleeve.

911 was an inside job. Too many inconsistencies. There is simply no way. Lemme think...

No way.

They say the inconsistencies don't mean anything; but when things really don't mean anything and it disfavors them and favors you, inconsistencies like this are fodder indeed.

In-fuckin'-deed!

[mbaty]

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! That's right, the one with the detonator, because I don't have proof--after all, I'm just a commentator, a blog reader who has no sway in political office--but I saw those towers fall--no pancake effect, no resistance. It was at least partially an inside job--just google it. I know it sucks, and it's hard to believe, but it's true. We don't want to see it because it's such a betrayal of trust.