Conason: If It's Not Torture, Rudy Should Try Waterboarding Himself

Salon   |   October 26, 2007 11:20 AM


stumbleupon :Conason: If It's Not Torture, Rudy Should Try Waterboarding Himself   digg: Conason: If It's Not Torture, Rudy Should Try Waterboarding Himself   reddit: Conason: If It's Not Torture, Rudy Should Try Waterboarding Himself   del.icio.us: Conason: If It's Not Torture, Rudy Should Try Waterboarding Himself

Echoing Michael Mukasey, his friend and associate who likely will soon be the next attorney general, Republican presidential front-runner Rudolph Giuliani claimed Wednesday that he doesn't know whether waterboarding is torture. Having become accustomed long ago to making the most absurd declarations without fear of challenge, Giuliani went further than Mukasey's hesitant demurral.

"I don't know what is involved in the technique," Mukasey replied during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, when Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., a former prosecutor, asked whether Mukasey thinks waterboarding constitutes torture and is therefore illegal as well as unconstitutional. Perhaps Mukasey (and Giuliani) should be subjected to the technique for strictly educational purposes so that they will become aware that it involves reclining the victim on a bench or table, covering his face with a cloth and then pouring water over his nose and mouth to make him feel as if he is drowning.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
Comments
33
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Joe: Thanks for the excellent post. I miss hearing you on Al's radio show.....you were/are my favorite voice of reason.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 10/26/2007

Why not waterboard him while he's in drag?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/26/2007

Israel has tortured thousands of jailed Palestinians. Doesn't that make it alright for us putzes too?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 10/26/2007
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping permalink

Let's be fair...Rudy said,

"I think the way it"s been defined in the media, it shouldn"t be done. The way in which they have described it, particularly in the liberal media. So I would say, if that"s the description of it, then I can agree, that it shouldn"t be done."

Read the story first. And Salon is a piece of sh*t.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

So Fox is the Liberal Media according to Rudi?

The only thing I've seen about Waterboarding was a piece on Fox where one of their presenters was unable to go through with it after two rounds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

Hey P, Rudy said "The way in which they have described it, particularly in the liberal media" As if anything the "liberal" media is somehow indapable of describing anything realistically. He is indefensible. How else can you describe it sir? And he said, " if that"s the description of it,", what in fuck does he mean by "if". Of course it's torture when someone is repeatedly brought to the brink of death never knowing if this is it, I'm going to die only to be revived and tortured again and again..

How can you defend his "if's" and buts? He is devoid of honor. He is replete with disgrace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 10/27/2007

Don't really care if terrorists get wet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 10/26/2007

You mean you don't care if you accidentally drown or kill people not charged with any crime

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

Willing to try it out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

There should have been a ? at the end of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 10/26/2007

Don't really care about American values, do you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 10/26/2007

Don't really care if racists get hung.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 10/26/2007

Fine. Who should go first, Sharpton or Jackson?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 10/26/2007

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Why, some terrorists later become prime ministers. Menachem Begin comes to mind:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menachem_Begin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 10/26/2007

Ghouliani's 9/11 commission testimony leaked by the Village Voice. This was supposed to be kept sealed until after the '08 elections.


This is pretty damning information, and the MSM seems to be ignoring it.

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0743,barrett,78158,6.html

Runnin' Scared
Rudy's Pants On Fire
Secret testimony shows that Rudy's stump speech is inflated, at best
by Wayne Barrett
October 23rd, 2007 9:25 PM

In a recent broadside deriding the Clinton administration's response to Al Qaeda, Rudy Giuliani told an audience at Pat Robertson's Regent University: "Bin Laden declared war on us. We didn't hear it. I thought it was pretty clear at the time, but a lot of people didn't see it, couldn't see it." Other tenets of his standard stump speech include the assertion that he's been "studying terrorism" for more than 30 years, and that "the thing that distinguishes me on terrorism is that I have more experience in dealing with it" than the other presidential candidates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 10/26/2007

However, in private testimony before the 9/11 Commission in 2004, Rudy gave a very different version of how much he knew about terrorism when the World Trade Center was attacked. That testimony isn't scheduled to be released publicly until after the 2008 presidential election, but the Voice has obtained a copy of it. And it reveals a New York mayor who was anything but an "expert on terrorism."

A 15-page "memorandum for the record," prepared by a commission counsel and dated April 20, 2004, quotes Giuliani conceding that it wasn't until "after 9/11" that "we brought in people to brief us on al Qaeda." According to the memorandum, Giuliani told two commission members and five staffers: "But we had nothing like this pre 9/11, which was a mistake, because if experts share a lot of info," there would be a "better chance of someone making heads and tails" of the "situation." (Such memoranda are not verbatim transcripts of the confidential commission interviews, but are described on the cover page as "100 percent accurate" notes taken by staffers, stamped "commission sensitive/unclassified" on the top of each page.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 10/26/2007

Asked about the "flow of information about al Qaeda threats from 1998-2001," Giuliani said: "At the time, I wasn"t told it was al Qaeda, but now that I look back at it, I think it was al Qaeda." He also said that as part of one of his post-9/11 briefings, "we had in Bodansky, who had written a book on bin Laden." Giuliani was referring to Yossef Bodanksy, the author of Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America, which was published in 1999 and predicted "spectacular terrorist strikes in Washington and/or New York." Giuliani wrote in his own book, Leadership, that Judi Nathan got him a copy of Bodansky"s prophetic work "shortly after 9/11," and that he covered it in "highlighter and notes," citing his study of it as an example of how he "mastered a subject." Apparently, he also invited Bodansky to address key members of his staff.

Giuliani attributed his pre-9/11 shortcomings in part to the FBI, which was run by his close friend (and current endorser) Louis Freeh, and to the Joint Terrorism Task Force, an FBI-directed partnership with the NYPD. "We already had JTTF, and got flow information no one else got," he explained. "But did we get the flow of information we wanted? No. We would be told about a threat, but not about the underlying nature of the threat. I wanted all the same information the FBI had, and we didn't get that until after 9/11. Immediately after 9/11, we were made a complete partner." He added: "Without 9/11, I never would have been able to send an adviser to FBI briefings."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 10/26/2007

Why is this man even considered for a position in any capacity, let alone President?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

*

"pizzmoe (See profile | I'm a fan of pizzmoe)
Why is this man even considered for a position in any capacity, let alone President?"
=========================

Simply because there are still some 23-27% Morons living in this country who will vote for people like him!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 10/26/2007

I'd love to see the Colbert Report do an interview with Mukasey in which Mukasey is waterboarded, so he could speak knowledgeably in the future. Or how about a reality show in which Bush-worshipping yahoos prove their allegiance to their Prez by showing that our interrogation tactics are really no more serious than frat boy pranks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

*

Let's do it backward on Rudy!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

Cover his face with water and then pour cloth onto it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 10/26/2007

Backward waterboarding? You mean give Rudy Kazootie an emema?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

Let me waterboard the motherfucker myself. I'll make him wish he'd never opened his mouth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 10/26/2007
photo

*

"Felicty
Let me waterboard the motherfucker myself. I'll make him wish he'd never opened his mouth."
=====================

He is all yours!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 10/26/2007

Dress 'em both in wet suits and dildoes and waterboard away. It's good, clean Republican fun!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 10/26/2007

I suggested yesterday that Mukasey ought to visit the CIA and take a spin on the waterboard! I hope some of these people get a chance to explain some of their actions/inactions at the Hague one day!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 10/26/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect