Hillary Goes For The Kill

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Hillary Goes For The Kill stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-27-07 04:44 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The decision of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign to send 100 or more new staffers into Iowa demonstrates that she and her aides have determined to their own satisfaction that she can cripple Barack Obama in the first-in-the-nation caucus.

2007-10-27-hil.jpgIowa is the only state where current surveys show Obama to be within shooting distance of Clinton. In late August, Clinton took a small lead of 5.2 percent in a poll of likely Democratic caucus goers. That lead, the smallest Clinton holds in any early primary or caucus state, has held up through seven of the eight most recent polls, increasing the willingness of the Clinton team to gamble on a new offensive.

The Obama campaign has already described the January 3 Iowa contest as a must-win event. Clinton's burst of hiring is a declaration that she intends to go for a knockout punch.


There clearly is some risk for Clinton in this strategy: if her campaign is perceived as laying down the gauntlet in Iowa, a defeat would become all the more damaging. Clinton aides remain unwilling to discuss the significance of the upgraded Iowa staffing, resolved to dodge high expectations.

Until now, Clinton has pointedly maintained a comparatively low-key Iowa operation, spending substantially less money than Obama on in-state television, and maintaining a smaller contingent of local campaign workers.

Clinton's calculatedly discreet Iowa staffing commitment was designed to provide the candidate with cover in the event of a loss. Her slim advantage in Iowa polls now allows her to adopt a more aggressive strategy. The campaign hopes to do much of the new hiring on Sunday and Monday.

As recently as a month ago, Obama's campaign acknowledged publicly that Iowa would be crucial to the viability of the Illinois Senator's drive for the White House. "Iowa will make the difference," Michelle Obama said campaigning in Davenport on September 26. "If Barack doesn't win Iowa, it's just a dream, but if we win Iowa, then we can move the world as it should be."

Likewise, Obama's manager, David Plouffe, told the New Republic, "Iowa: that's the whole shebang."

Now, in the spin wars, Obama operatives contend that Clinton is the candidate who cannot afford to lose.

Story continues below

"She's in a tough spot, she needs to win Iowa, and every state, or her aura of inevitability is shattered," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.

At the moment, Clinton holds double-digit leads in every state that hosts an early caucus or primary -- except Iowa. There, an average of the five latest polls shows her with 28.8 percent to Obama's 23.6 percent and John Edwards' 21.2 percent -- just over 5 points in her favor.

Since the start of summer, both Clinton and Obama have made gains against the former Iowa frontrunner, John Edwards, who throughout last spring held first place in the state and who hoped a good showing in Iowa would turn his campaign around.

As Edwards' standing in Iowa nosedived over the summer and fall, his staff investment has also been eclipsed by Obama. In an October analysis of third-quarter reports to the Federal Election Commission, the Des Moines Register reported that Obama had more staffers in Iowa - 145 - than any of his competitors, with Edwards at 130 and Clinton at 117. Clinton's new hiring is likely to eradicate Obama's personnel advantage.

The emphasis on Iowa this year -- and the plowing-in of resources -- marks the third election in a row in which the Hawkeye state is playing a key role in the Democratic nomination process. It has not always been this way. The salience of the Iowa caucuses has varied from election to election.

Since 1972, when Iowa first became a critical test of strength in a presidential race, the caucus has at times been key to the outcome, and at other times irrelevant.

In 1976, 2000 and 2004, Iowa victories by Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and John Kerry put them on the path to becoming the party's nominee. In 1972, 1988 and 1992, victories by Edmund Muskie, Richard Gephardt, and Tom Harkin proved to have zero lasting value. On the GOP side, Gerald Ford, Bob Dole (1996), George W. Bush (2000) won in Iowa and won their party's nomination. It is worth noting, however, that over the past 25 years, of the 13 winners of contested Iowa caucuses, eight won the nomination, but only two - Carter and George W. Bush - went on to win the White House.

Report Corrections
 
Comments
271
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1681 fans permalink
photo

Here is my ranking of Democratic candidate based on issues I consider the most important (foreign policy, healthcare, environment, education, poverty):

1. Kucinich
2. Edwards
3. Gravel, Dodds
5. Obama
6. Richardson
7. Biden
8. Clinton

At this point, I am inclined to drop Clinton from my list altogether because of her recent vote on Iran. That would mean that if she gets the nomination, I stay home on election day or write in Kucinich.

I would have loved to vote for her because she is a woman, but a near-NeoCon would be disastrous for our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 10/28/2007

HumeSkeptic; All candidates have issues that appeal to a portion of the voters. But we need to remember that in a constitutional government CONGRESS makes the laws and CONGRESS is the body that can control the president.

As CONGRESS has not seen fit to do this in years Then any candidate that gets in office will just be another tin horn dictator, if Bush does not declare martial law.

Any person can say" I will do this or I will do that " But remember CONGRESS is the MAIN body of this government. ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS MUST WORK TOGETHER IN ORDER FOR ANY THING TO BE DONE. Every thing else is just rhetoric. For those who do not know what rhetoric is it means B.S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 10/28/2007
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1681 fans permalink
photo

So, then, should I just randomly choose someone to support and just go vote for him/her? How do I do it, eeny meeny miny mo?

Re: "ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS MUST WORK TOGETHER IN ORDER FOR ANY THING TO BE DONE."

Really?

I thought we had two political parties. And I thought it is essential to the success of our system of government that there be a debate between the two.

Another thing, if we don't go by what the candidates say they would try to do, what should we go by? Any thoughts? And that goes for Congressional candidates as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 10/28/2007
- ltyr2002 I'm a Fan of ltyr2002 15 fans permalink

Why is it that Hillary running a strong campaign is somehow viewed by people as a sign of her evil-ness? Why is it that she's "going for the kill" instead of stepping up her campaing in Iowa to...win the campaign in Iowa?

Should she just lay down and let her opponents walk over her, so everyone will realize how nice she is?
I remember the years of the Clinton presidency , when America was respected and strong. The economy was healthy, and aside from the political right hatchet jobs our national mood was positive.
I can't understand all the hetrs out there. Hillary is the sharpest candidate the Dems have right now, and she makes that clear with every debate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 10/28/2007
- EvSmith I'm a Fan of EvSmith 7 fans permalink

Her campaign is Rove distortion. It is obvious to anyone that has watched it unfold.

If America was not chocked full of politically ignorant people than she would never stand a chance.

The DLC has nothing but ill intentions for the future of this country.

She has lied consistently, in the debates and at many of her public speeches.

She lies about Iraq everytime the subject is brought up.

Get informed before you misplace your trust in the Clinton DLC and throw away a perfectly good vote.

Denial is a vible option for some, but not for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 10/28/2007
- Tshober I'm a Fan of Tshober 2 fans permalink

"Why is it that Hillary running a strong campaign is somehow viewed by people as a sign of her evil-ness?"

Cause they don't like her?

I started out this election cycle pretty neutral toward Clinton and the rest of the Dem candidates. I really did not care all that much which one wins, so long as we get rid of the GOP criminals and get our country back on the path to a decent future. I was content to let them persuade me. But as I visited some of the big lefty blogs (DKos and HuffPo mostly), I was amazed by the incredible hatred I saw in many of the posts for Senator Clinton. Far more hatred for her than for Bush or Cheney, in many cases.

Much to my surprise, I found myself defending her from these vicious attacks because I don't like to see any loyal Democrat slimed with half truths and outright lies and that's what almost all of this crap was. As time went by and I continued to defend her against a shit-storm of the most irrational hatred you can imagine, I found myself becoming more and more a supporter of Senator Clinton. Now I proudly contribute money to her campaign and continue to defend her on the blogs when the attacks are unwarranted, which is most of the time.

I don't agree with every position she has taken but there will never be a candidate that I always agree with, unless I run myself. But I do believe there is a world of difference between her and the criminal cabal that is in charge now and I think she has the best chance to clean up the mess. So I pretty much owe my support of Senator Clinton to the Hillary haters who post on DKos and HuffPo every day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 AM on 10/29/2007

This Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dummer act by Hillary
and Obama to keep their boring Republican Lite campaign in the news is really boring.

Through the Looking Glass
Chapter four:

Do I look very pale?' said Tweedledum, coming up to have his helmet tied on. (He called it a helmet, though it certainly looked much more like a saucepan.)
`Well--yes--a little,' Alice replied gently.
`I'm very brave, generally,' he went on in a low voice: `only to-day I happen to have a headache.'
`And I've got a toothache!' said Tweedledee, who had overheard the remark. `I'm far worse than you!'
`Then you'd better not fight to-day,' said Alice, thinking it a good opportunity to make peace.
`We must have a bit of a fight, but I don't care about going on long,' said Tweedledum.
`What's the time now?'
Tweedledee looked at his watch, and said `Half-past four.' `Let's fight till six, and then have dinner,' said Tweedledum

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 10/28/2007
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

Is HuffPo going tabloid? If so, I'm outta here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 10/28/2007

Take her down at the knees? He couldn't if he wanted to. That's like me saying I'm not going to beat up Jackie Chan too bad. Sad thing is this is the only press he gets--attacking, 'drawing distinctions' (lol), whatever. He's trying to tap into Hillary Hatred -- but it makes him look small and impotent.

Is Hillary Hatred the foundation of the Obama campaign?

It's starting to look like it, as he self-destructs on command of his anti-Hillary cult base. They are not even interested in winning, just using Obama as a tool to vent their blind, drooling hatred of Hillary.

The smart move for Obama is to run a positive campaign, win or lose in Iowa, and position for the future. Right now he flounders from one limp attack to another, gets exposed as a hypocrite (like on Kyl-Lieberman), then makes himself look silly. Perfect example: 'Yes I did vote to designate Iran a terrorist state. The distinction between me and Hillary is I think we shouldn't do anything when Iran sponsors attacks on American soldiers in Iraq.' Just who is that supposed to win over?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 10/28/2007
- MPeter I'm a Fan of MPeter 25 fans permalink

No, it is not. But I see Obama's mistake. Unlike Hillary, Obama is assuming that Americans are smart people, capable of noticing sense when it comes along. Big mistake. These are the same people that elected Bush twice. They have been fed so much bool over the years, they could drink urine and not even notice. The genius of HRC is that she understood this so early and so well, she has been dishing out to them in buckets and it goes down so fast! Wake up Senator Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 10/28/2007

Because Arianna will never post it

Livni behind closed doors: Iran nukes pose little threat to Israel

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/916758.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

Edsall is a whirling dervish spinning for Hillary. She's sending 100 staffers to Iowa to give Obama a death blow? Don't make me laugh.

Hillary is sending 100 staffers to Iowa because she's about to lose the state and her "status" as "inevitable." Iowa is the ONLY state that has given Hillary a close look along with other candidates. They know Obama and Edwards too, and its a CLOSE three-way race. IF Hillary is so confident, where is her 47 percent in Iowa?

So, Hillary sends 100 staffers to Iowa and spends her hard earnded campaign funds on the early voting. hmmmm. So she'll need to sell more influence to health care, drug, defense, and banking industries to fill her coffers again. Sounds a lot more reactive than strategic.

Hillary looks like she's running SCARED in Iowa, no matter how hard Edsall tries to spin it to look good for her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 10/28/2007

You are so ever right Partyofone.
Obama08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 10/28/2007

Edsall is a whirling dervish spinning for Hillary. She's sending 100 staffers to Iowa to give Obama a death blow? Don't make me laugh.

Are they armed staffers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 10/28/2007
- arethabaez I'm a Fan of arethabaez 3 fans permalink

IOWA is tuff to dominate. All the candidates are running non-stop TV adds there (Iowa rates are cheap) and they're available for every birthday party, barbeque, and pinic.
It's a little harder for a power candidate to brush the underdogs aside.
The IOWA Dems tend to be on the left too, making Hillary's inescapable victory there a bit more challenging, but inevitable just the same.
This is a strong field of Dems no doubt, all the more impressive that Hil is still the Boss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 10/28/2007

Hillary has shocked the socks off the other side in particular when you spoke in Congress Re Your Healthcare Program. Her delivery was strong and flawless, and identified as a very formidable force to the other side one to be stopped at all costs. Their personal attacks that were put into motion then and have picked up a thousand more times by all the operators from the other side who are insidiously everywhere and in every possible area of communications (including preachers doctors callers whom are plants to further assassinate your character (a good case in point CSpan).
Journalism Panel on Media Bliss and Family, Hyrna Blyth, author of “Spin Sisters” is a good example as well, as an absolute assassin to you and most especially her clear attempt to influence women and children against Hillary) her take on your appearance on the “View” is insidiously effective.
Assume the persona that has scared the hell out of the other side. Her strength is her natural self delivery strong reliable impenetrable Most decent people have trouble believing in the bluntness of their ugly”value voters”.
Take back your familiar persona—Hillary Keep up your personal appearance it leaves room for too much attack as well
You are too mild too many Democrats are looking for and needing to see you fight fire with fire, the congress must do something immediately to show strength and stick to it regardless of what they fear may be the outcome. We must see you Win You are going for stakes that have been held by men only (your fight has got to be a 1000 times stronger than the men you are up against including those in your own party but also all of the few hundred million people that are under the perpetual Pavlov Dogs and Svengalied of their handlers. attack the value voters, with all the fearlessness that can be conjured up, don’t wait any longer to launch an attach back or you will loose your momentum, the congress must help you Get In Sync And On The Same Page Now.
MS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 10/28/2007

Hillary isn't going for the kill, she smells defeat in her Iran vote. Why would the frontrunner, sitting on a twenty point lead start attacking her opponnent? Because history shows that most people in Iowa don't make their final decision until two weeks before the caucus, that is what happened in 04, with Kerry's win. And NH has about 45% of independents probably voting Democratic and no one is polling them except for the campaigns themselves. Clinton doesn't have any crossover appeal. Check out what Obama said about Clinton's lead: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtwS6-K0X1I.

It's worth to note, Clinton doesn't do local press in the early primary states and the press isn't that good for her campaign. Remember, all politics is local.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 10/28/2007

She smells defeat? Listen, if Obama didn't vote for or against this "sense of the senate" resolution, he should close his face about Hillary's vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 10/28/2007
- Zhonni I'm a Fan of Zhonni 15 fans permalink
photo

"Close his face"? It is not Obama that voted to keep troops in Iraq.

Obama was present at the set vote date for the Kyl-Lib resolution but it was suspended indefinately.

He left to campaign and it was brought to the floor. There is no secret who Reid supports but to try to hurt another democratic candidate is not what we want in the leader of the senate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

Good analysis. Edsall and the Hillary drumbeat crowd forget, it takes VOTES to be the nominee and elected president. National polls don't count.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 10/28/2007

I second that Edsall and party.
Yes she smells of death.
Not only her defeat for the nominee, but also for the thousands of deaths of our military men and women, as well as the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians that her vote lead to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 10/28/2007

If Obama falters, look for Gore to get into the race!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 10/28/2007
- beck I'm a Fan of beck 3 fans permalink

Let's face it. There are two Democratic parites, one run by the DLC (Repub lite) and the grassroots party.

I don't know any grassroots people who are for Hillary. We need to face the fact that the American people are be triangulated and bamboozled by the DLC into thinking Hillary is a choice. She isn't. She only Bush in a skirt with that wide eyed (some consultant must have said "Open you eyes") and "I expect to be president" look on her face.

The sooner the American people get this through their heads the closer we will be to taking back our democracy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 10/28/2007
- Jain I'm a Fan of Jain permalink

The progam of Rendition began under Clinton in 1995. A vote for Hillary is a vote for torture. Grassroots get it to the media...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 10/28/2007

"Ancient and Unteachable, abide —- abide the Trumpets!
Once again the Trumpets, for the shuddering ground-swell brings
Clamour over ocean of the harsh, pursuing Trumpets -—
Trumpets of the Vanguard that have sworn no truce with Kings!"...Kipling

"In 1972, 1988 and 1992, victories by Edmund Muskie, Richard Gephardt, and Tom Harkin proved to have zero lasting value."...Edsall

What these three men have in common is they are
pro-labor traditional Democrats in the mold of Harry Truman. What Edsall is telling the grass roots of the Democratic Party is "Resistance is futile".

Unlike the astroturf roots of Republican and Republican lite, we can't be bought, manufactured or swayed by funny hats.
http://anthropology.usf.edu/women/rosebud/Rosebud.html

We are grass roots and we just grow or die.

Edwards, Kucinich, Ron Paul!!!! or of need by Ralph Nader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 10/28/2007

Listen Jain, if you make a statement like that you better have something to back it up.

Otherwise, you are just a troll on a mission. You're doing Rove's schtick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 10/28/2007
- Tshober I'm a Fan of Tshober 2 fans permalink

Bullshit!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 10/29/2007
- ipitombi I'm a Fan of ipitombi 3 fans permalink

"She only Bush in a skirt..."? Have you ever seen Hillary is a skirt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 10/28/2007
- ipitombi I'm a Fan of ipitombi 3 fans permalink

"She only Bush in a skirt..."? Have you ever seen Hillary IN a skirt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 10/28/2007

That is the truth. The DLC was organized with the help of the Clintons and Shrum. It is just another right wing organization. They have sent me requests for donations and I am an Independent, and have sent them back empty of cash and only a note telling them to take me off their mailing list.
The grass roots is what makes the party, and unfortunatley these pol.s have forgotten that, because they are so deep in debt to their corporate lobbyist.
So they think we do not exist nor matter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 10/28/2007
- arethabaez I'm a Fan of arethabaez 3 fans permalink

You mean:the closer you get to giving it back to the Rebubbas. I don't like the Clintons either but they know how to win. Nobody I have ever WANTED has won. Put your liberal heart into activism with various organizations and your vote with a moderate who can beat a Rebubba.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 10/28/2007
photo

A recent Zogby Poll suggests that the GOP is salivating for a Hillary nomination:

http://www.zogby.com/news/readnews.dbm?ID=1376

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 10/28/2007

You're exactly right. She's the only real contender in the Democrat Party and has plenty of negatives that turn people off, not the least Billy Boy. Once again, Hillary shows why she is dominating the the rest of the Dems. She has the organization that knows what to do and when to do it. Everyone else is reacting to her moves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

Of course the Republicans want Hillary nominated. Then they have TWO corporate-owned, war-mongering nominees, one from each party. If she wins by some razor-edge, electoral college fluke, or Supreme Court decision, nothing will change for the Republicans... they love the current status quo. Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. Hillary now, Jeb next. It's scary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 10/28/2007
- arethabaez I'm a Fan of arethabaez 3 fans permalink

If one of the other DEM Candidates wins, watch out for the Republican attack. Edwards with his slip and fall lawyer history and Barack's uncovered dirt....OMG. The anti- Hill sentiment has had 20 yrs to build up and it's maxed out. Watch the Jack and the Beanstalk growth of hate that will soar for any other DEM victor, the second he gets the nomination. Obama's minister etc.. The Repubs are scared SH--less of HC, that's why they try to build up the unelectibily factor BS constantly. The Repubs would LOVE to run against BO OR JE. Compromise and get behind Boss Clinton! Bill was better than either George.
GROW UP:
PRESIDENTS ARE NOT IDEALISTS THEY'RE THE ONES WHOM GET ELECTED.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 10/28/2007

"Hillary Goes for The Kill". Oh brother! I tell you, you publicists, if it weren't for you, Hillary would be nowhere as you've all driven her poll numbers. All these propaganda and brainwashing articles intended to put into the minds of the American people your Clinton mission -accomplished.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 10/28/2007

Amen to that!

The media has gone wild with a "Hillary, Rudy" race, and are shoving it down our throats. The majority of dems don't want Hillary, and the majority of republicans don't want Rudy, or Mitt, or any of those running. The dems have a great chance to win the whitehouse, but if Hillary gets the nomination, then every republican in the country will come out, hold their nose and vote for whoever the republican nominee is, just to keep Hillary out of the Whitehouse!

Now maybe the leaders in the dem party want Hillary, becuase they want their cut of the money now that they are in charge, and Hillary is being backed by the same money that backed Bush. The money knows that Hillary has a lot of baggage, and her chances aren't that good in a general, but they also know that if by some chance she did pull it off, they won't have to worry. Sure she may make a few minor changes, but in the long run the corporations will still win. After all, who was it that gave us NAFTA?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 10/28/2007
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 165 fans permalink

Shillary Clinton. Corporatist, DLC and triangular maximus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 10/28/2007
- CharlesMac I'm a Fan of CharlesMac 15 fans permalink

Clinton has much less risk of downside than the return on the potential upside. There is little reason for her to not exercise her position as juggernaut.

In Iowa, she has the unusual opportunity to be both the leader (overall) and the underdog (Iowa specific).

The current mental set is that Iowa ain't her state. So if she just makes a stronger than expected showing, she spins the press that she has achieved a "victory". "Once people really listen to my message.... blah, blah, blah" etc.

Any candidate she comes close to is finished. The MSM will peddle that outcome, early and often. The only negative inertia working on Clinton right now is the combined efforts of Obama and Edwards. If she ruins one, then the other becomes the sole target for her machine and they go into high gear.

She wants a one-on-one. And as soon as possible.

If(when) she gets the nomination, I'm voting for my favorite pet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 10/28/2007
- arethabaez I'm a Fan of arethabaez 3 fans permalink

WHICH PET? ruff-ruff rudy, rat-fink romney, or Bush's mockingbird mccain?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 10/28/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect