Hillary Goes For The Kill

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Hillary Goes For The Kill stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-27-07 04:44 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The decision of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign to send 100 or more new staffers into Iowa demonstrates that she and her aides have determined to their own satisfaction that she can cripple Barack Obama in the first-in-the-nation caucus.

2007-10-27-hil.jpgIowa is the only state where current surveys show Obama to be within shooting distance of Clinton. In late August, Clinton took a small lead of 5.2 percent in a poll of likely Democratic caucus goers. That lead, the smallest Clinton holds in any early primary or caucus state, has held up through seven of the eight most recent polls, increasing the willingness of the Clinton team to gamble on a new offensive.

The Obama campaign has already described the January 3 Iowa contest as a must-win event. Clinton's burst of hiring is a declaration that she intends to go for a knockout punch.


There clearly is some risk for Clinton in this strategy: if her campaign is perceived as laying down the gauntlet in Iowa, a defeat would become all the more damaging. Clinton aides remain unwilling to discuss the significance of the upgraded Iowa staffing, resolved to dodge high expectations.

Until now, Clinton has pointedly maintained a comparatively low-key Iowa operation, spending substantially less money than Obama on in-state television, and maintaining a smaller contingent of local campaign workers.

Clinton's calculatedly discreet Iowa staffing commitment was designed to provide the candidate with cover in the event of a loss. Her slim advantage in Iowa polls now allows her to adopt a more aggressive strategy. The campaign hopes to do much of the new hiring on Sunday and Monday.

As recently as a month ago, Obama's campaign acknowledged publicly that Iowa would be crucial to the viability of the Illinois Senator's drive for the White House. "Iowa will make the difference," Michelle Obama said campaigning in Davenport on September 26. "If Barack doesn't win Iowa, it's just a dream, but if we win Iowa, then we can move the world as it should be."

Likewise, Obama's manager, David Plouffe, told the New Republic, "Iowa: that's the whole shebang."

Now, in the spin wars, Obama operatives contend that Clinton is the candidate who cannot afford to lose.

Story continues below

"She's in a tough spot, she needs to win Iowa, and every state, or her aura of inevitability is shattered," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.

At the moment, Clinton holds double-digit leads in every state that hosts an early caucus or primary -- except Iowa. There, an average of the five latest polls shows her with 28.8 percent to Obama's 23.6 percent and John Edwards' 21.2 percent -- just over 5 points in her favor.

Since the start of summer, both Clinton and Obama have made gains against the former Iowa frontrunner, John Edwards, who throughout last spring held first place in the state and who hoped a good showing in Iowa would turn his campaign around.

As Edwards' standing in Iowa nosedived over the summer and fall, his staff investment has also been eclipsed by Obama. In an October analysis of third-quarter reports to the Federal Election Commission, the Des Moines Register reported that Obama had more staffers in Iowa - 145 - than any of his competitors, with Edwards at 130 and Clinton at 117. Clinton's new hiring is likely to eradicate Obama's personnel advantage.

The emphasis on Iowa this year -- and the plowing-in of resources -- marks the third election in a row in which the Hawkeye state is playing a key role in the Democratic nomination process. It has not always been this way. The salience of the Iowa caucuses has varied from election to election.

Since 1972, when Iowa first became a critical test of strength in a presidential race, the caucus has at times been key to the outcome, and at other times irrelevant.

In 1976, 2000 and 2004, Iowa victories by Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and John Kerry put them on the path to becoming the party's nominee. In 1972, 1988 and 1992, victories by Edmund Muskie, Richard Gephardt, and Tom Harkin proved to have zero lasting value. On the GOP side, Gerald Ford, Bob Dole (1996), George W. Bush (2000) won in Iowa and won their party's nomination. It is worth noting, however, that over the past 25 years, of the 13 winners of contested Iowa caucuses, eight won the nomination, but only two - Carter and George W. Bush - went on to win the White House.

Report Corrections
 
Comments
271
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 162 fans permalink

Hillary Clinton has an agenda. Problem is, we may not know what it is until it's too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 10/28/2007
photo

Her agenda is the same as the bush agenda..and the NWO agenda; are you all idiots?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

are you sleeping maxdeen?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 10/28/2007

WAKE UP. Hillary is a bad choice.

Hillary and the DLC backed Lieberman,
Until she felt the heat and wielded out of all out support.
She voted for the War and continued funding of it.
She voted for the Patriot Act. TWICE
She voted a NV for the Credit Card and Banking Bill which Equaled a Yes in a Republican Congress.
She voted for the REAL ID ACT.
She would renew NAFTA.
She is a Corporatist.
She is not a Democrat.
She is part of the problem.

NO MORE CLINTONS

NO MORE CLINTONS

NO MORE CLINTONS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 10/28/2007
- jlxn I'm a Fan of jlxn 2 fans permalink

You are a fool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 10/28/2007
- naschkatze I'm a Fan of naschkatze 105 fans permalink

It says a lot about YOU to make that remark. Use reason in your arguments much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 10/28/2007

and you are just what hillary needs... someone who won't look closely at her record or her funders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 10/28/2007

It's sad to see HufPo become like Fox Noise -- the choice of words are telling and biased. She is going for "the kill" in putting workers into Iowa and Obama is becomming "aggressive". It would be nice if there was an editor that could work on these reports to make them reportage and not an attack. This is the only case. The bias against Clinton is unrelenting and turning me off to the site. I want information. I want to see equal attention to all the candidates and their histories and issues -- not the repetition of things like "Clinton is ambitious" as if no other politician is or the she plays politics with politics -- give us a break -- they all do it. The crap that I've seen posted here you'd have to wonder about Clinton as the Corporate Communist Socialist Stooge who is detirmined/ambitious, thoughtful/calculating.....and so on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 10/28/2007
- NotGuilty I'm a Fan of NotGuilty 8 fans permalink
photo

Clinton bothers you because he was a success.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/28/2007
- AKJM I'm a Fan of AKJM 20 fans permalink
photo

NotGuilty, please list an accomplishment of the Clinton Presidency. (balanced budget doesn't count because of the peace dividend)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 10/28/2007
- MPeter I'm a Fan of MPeter 25 fans permalink

A success? Maybe at chasing skirts. Nothing much to show except scandals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

NotGuilty. The American economy performed well during the Clinton years, based largely on factors outside of a president's control or influence. In what other ways was Clinton a "success." He sold influence to the highest bidders and delivered on it: NAFTA, Chinese trade and miliary secrets. And he managed to debase the presidency and distract the nation with his personal baggage more than ANY president in history. That will be his legacy. And if Hillary is elected, every bit of that baggage and their Soap Opera marriage will be back in the White House and the headlines.

We'll be hearing from all of Bill's "successes". Paula Jones AND
Harsha Scott, Linda Jones, Sally Perdue, Kathleen Wiley, Gennifer Flowers,Dolly Kyle Browning, Juanita Broaddrick, Monica Lewinsky, Susan McDougal, numerous White House staffers (wink, wink), Denise Rich, Beth Dozoretz, Belinda Stronach, Segolene Royal, an unnamed "forty-something divorcee in Chappaqua, N.Y" AND...

As one biographer has noted: "Bill Clinton's behavior pushed an unfortunate human tendency to a pathological and blatant extreme. [He] seemed to tempt fate about what others treated with some degree of discretion, necessitating a first ever presidential 'bimbo eruptions unit'", a function now transferred to the 'Hillary for President' campaign. How will Hillary manage Bill, if she's president? I don't want to find out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 10/28/2007
- arethabaez I'm a Fan of arethabaez 3 fans permalink

MLKs, JoanBaezs and RalphNaders don't win presidetial elections unfortunately. Corporatist compromisers do.
CLINTON IS BETTER THAN A REPUBLICAN
CLINTON IS BETTER THAN A REPUBLICAN ETC.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 10/28/2007
- sammy333 I'm a Fan of sammy333 4 fans permalink

.. but the above reasons is exactly why she is so popular and so backed by the media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 AM on 10/29/2007
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 162 fans permalink

Why does HRC need 22 consulants?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 10/28/2007
- jfh I'm a Fan of jfh 8 fans permalink

Why does Obama need 56 consultants?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 10/28/2007

I wouldn't have a problem with more consultants if they were focused on policy issues and had insight from related experience and issue-specific knowledge. I'm guessin' these are POLITICAL consultants, so I wish the focus were more on good policy if that were the case. Anyone know the makeup of these consultant groups? I think politics, and 'candidate funder' enfluence, take precedence over good policy and good governance all too often.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 10/28/2007
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Progressives and Liberals: You have a candidate to support, but many of you don't seem to have the courage to support him.

You want clarity of thought? You want principles? You want straight answers?

Here, listen to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSbGUOOQCpU

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 10/28/2007
- VivaZapata I'm a Fan of VivaZapata 64 fans permalink
photo

So, I'm buying a hamper at BB&Beyond and the clerk says, "Don't you think it's time to have a woman in the white house?" and I said, "Yeah if it was the right woman." and she asked, "well what about Hillary?" and I said, "I can't support her; she voted yes to a bush initiative (yeah yeah Kyl/Lieberman, my ass) to proclaim the Iranian revolutionary guard a "terrorist" organization which will allow him to sneak his way into a war with Iran; same crap he and hillary did with Iraq." and she asked, "she did?" then she wanted to know who I was for but the names I mentioned didn't ring a bell, so I said that I could live with Obama or Edwards. She seemed curious. Get out and talk to people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 10/28/2007

Oh for sure. I was talking to a guy in the hardware store, where I was picking up a new garage door opener.

Before too long there were three of us in the discussion and we all agreed that Hillary can beat any republic contender into the ground.

So, I guess they realized the "bush initiative" mentions only the Iranian revolutionary guard, which is not affiliated with the Iranian army in any way, and is actually a terrorist organization. I mentioned this

The "initiative" is one that Obama carefully didn't vote for or against. I mentioned that. They mentioned it back to me, and we mentioned it for about 1/2 hour.

Tomorrow I'll take a trek to city hall and mention a lot of this stuff to every lawyer I can find, so they know their profession prevents them from ever running for president.

Wouldn't want an American who knows the law to ever be in the white house, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 10/28/2007
- VivaZapata I'm a Fan of VivaZapata 64 fans permalink
photo

true. republicans would rather have lawyers making all the decisions. the point of the initiative is not whether or not the Iranian revolutionary guard is a terrorist organization but whether or not it will be used as an excuse to engage in yet another military struggle. it's all about trusting Bush. I don't. re pube snivel obviously does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 10/28/2007
- jlxn I'm a Fan of jlxn 2 fans permalink

"Wouldn't want an American who knows the law to ever be in the white house, right?"

Yeah, we need more men like G.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan in the White House. Dumbass men always trump intelligent well educated women.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 10/28/2007

Obama voted for the same amendment in a different bill earlier in the year. The media is not fully reporting things

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

The only defense Hillary supporters ever offer for her terrible judgment is that someone else also did it. Is she a leader or a follower? She says she is the MOST qualified candidate, but she follows the polls, panders to all sides on all issues, and defends her lack of good judgment by saying "I wasn't the only one." Now that's presidential.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 10/28/2007
- prscnt1 I'm a Fan of prscnt1 8 fans permalink

Yesterday, she sent out old Bill to cover up 9/11 by "HOW DARE YOU?" stunt. Basically, Hillary will continue the war, as it is a war of righwing elitists, and Clintons dare not piss them off.

Look at the profits of war: middle east is screwed for two generations; China and India are constrained by high energy prices; nearly two trillions of dollars are pumped in oil states and defense industries; all the oboslete war machinary is expended and we are free to build "new and modern stuff keeping the least productive industry in full employment.

Now we need to expand the war, so let us bomb Iran, who but a boob to do this!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 10/28/2007

"nearly two trillions of dollars are pumped in oil states and defense industries; all the oboslete war machinary is expended and we are free to build "new and modern stuff keeping the least productive industry in full employment. "

---------------------

and guess who is the receiving the most campaign money from the weapons industry?

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/19/4672/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 10/28/2007

Yesterday? That was last Tuesday, but I digress.

Everything you posted has nothing to back it up. Our treasury was raped by Bush, when Clinton left office there was a balanced budget for the third straight year, and billions of dollars in surplus.

Did Hillary hire the hecklers? You have any proof? Do you actually believe they have to run stunts like that?
In 1993 President Clinton inherited the deficit spending problem and did more than just talk about it; he fixed it. In his first two years and with a cooperative Democratic Congress he set the course for the best economy this country has ever experienced. Then he worked with what could be characterized as the most hostile Congress in history, led by Republicans for the last six years of his administration. Yet, under constant personal attacks from the right, he still managed to get the growth of the debt down to 0.32% (one third of one percent) his last year in office. Had his policies been followed for one more year the debt would have been reduced for the first time since the Kennedy administration.


http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 10/28/2007
- prscnt1 I'm a Fan of prscnt1 8 fans permalink

This is not about Bill Clinton's presidency, it is about what is the future for us. Obviously Hillary wants to continue the war as it deprives the whole world of the resources; and, also keeping poor, poor world over. More and more, the war is becoming many factionalized religious wars, and there is no end in sight.

Only if he would have kept his dick in certified a humidor, he would have been a great President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 10/28/2007
- ming099 I'm a Fan of ming099 7 fans permalink
photo

....to all you 'naysayers' who are coming down on Hillary with both feet ....and more.....
.......Obama is a young man with a head full of good ideas whose time hasnt come yet....and he will have another opportunity....in eight years.......
....Edwards is a fluffy head of hair that has his wifes condition on his plate already....I am sorry she is sick,I hope she can get her disease under control get better and live a long happy life, but Elizabeth AND John should both be in NC,having her devote ALL her strength and energy to coping with her disease.....if it becomes worse Mr. Edwards, like a good husband should,will become sidetracked and there is no way he can run the country and be there for her too, as he should.......
....Joe Biden is NOT even on the radar he is so far back in the pack and a basic rehash of ideas that didnt get him in in the past WONT get him in now....
.....Richardson,Kucinich,Gravel, et al all have enormous popularity deficits to overcome to even challenge Hillary......

....so....we are left with the ONLY viable Democratic candidate who can defeat the Republicans next fall and that is Hillary.....
.....the fact that she was First Lady and sat next to the seat of power for eight years and was most likely involved in every major policy decision made during that time will bode well for her .....


....now the catcalls, booing and hissing can start........but IMHO.......Hillary is going to be the Democratic candidate and she is going to beat the Republican challenger as if they were an unruly child.........



....remember where you read it and who wrote it...............you may begin now...........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 10/28/2007
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 162 fans permalink

I voted for Bill Clinton four times. Twice in the primaries and twice in the general elections. I am sick to death of the Clintons, the DLC. The "Third Way". And NAFTA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/28/2007
- NotGuilty I'm a Fan of NotGuilty 8 fans permalink
photo

NAFTA was Oldbush's ugly mess. It was passed by Congress, then signed into law by Clinton.

Another controversial action was the support of Bush for the formation of the North American Free Trade Agreement. While NAFTA would not become reality until the presidency of Bill Clinton, Bush worked closely with Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney to lay the groundwork and do much of the preparation for the agreement.
http://www.wisegeek.com/who-is-george-h-w-bush.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 10/28/2007
- AKJM I'm a Fan of AKJM 20 fans permalink
photo

So you are saying that Clinton was a dope, incapable of thinking for himself and innocently diddled the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

You should also be sick of the inferior, uninspected and dangerous Chinese products that have flooded out nation based on Bill Clinton's leadership to relax trading regulations with China. He did it, in part for his Arkansas buddies now billionaire Walton Family. WalMart is China's largest trading partner, making billions off of an international import strategy devloped while Hillary was a well-compensated WallMart Board member. Does her campaign biography mention that board post? No no no. Does the media? never.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 10/28/2007
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 162 fans permalink

In our society there are 'producers'. And then there are lawyers. Hillary is a lawyer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 10/28/2007
- kj593 I'm a Fan of kj593 4 fans permalink

What's interesting is that Edsall is pushing the HRC position of what's happening here: that she's going in for the kill. Really? She's visited Iowa less than 40 times, far fewer than any other candidate. She's refused (or refuses) to take question from the audience. She held a Rural Farmers forum in the DC offices of Monsanto's lead lobbyist. All around a bad week.
Now she's hiring 100 new staffers from DC no less and this is evidence of her going for the kill? No statements about her increasing her visits to Iowa. No statements about her committing to get out and meet more Iowans. Nope, just hiring more DC staffers. Definitely, going for the kill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 10/28/2007
- naschkatze I'm a Fan of naschkatze 105 fans permalink

I don't like the Iowa set-up. It's not a secret ballot. Clinton hires 100 people who have to put out signs, have to get the hundreds of relatives supporting Clinton. I remember 2004 and how Kerry put on all kinds of feeds (even saw alcohol on the table). After accepting this buying of votes, for that's what it is, the Iowans get together openly in their caucuses and vote. If you've accepted something in exchange for your vote from a candidate, how can you then publicly vote your conscience if you really don't think that person is worth the vote? Yet this is the state in which the die is supposedly cast!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 10/28/2007
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 162 fans permalink

No more Bushes. No more Clintons. No more lawyers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 10/28/2007

No more republics, no more Bush, no more max denn, troll

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 10/28/2007
- maxdenn I'm a Fan of maxdenn 162 fans permalink

Don't think I'll take the bait.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 10/28/2007
- serialcoma I'm a Fan of serialcoma 123 fans permalink
photo

Amen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 10/28/2007

There' little hope for a country where Sonny Bono can be a Senator.. and THEN elect his f-ing wife as a sympathy vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 10/28/2007
- NotGuilty I'm a Fan of NotGuilty 8 fans permalink
photo

Bono was a Congressman.
His wife was appointed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 10/28/2007
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

Yeah. Don't you just hate wives who assume they are qualified just because their husband held the office. Oops. The name Clinton seems to fit as well as Bono.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 10/28/2007

Oh, and by the way, do Clinton's new hires for Iowa get to keep their orange hats?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 10/28/2007

Obama just made a statement to the effect of he would take Hillary on but not take her down at the knees.

I believe this has always been the plan. Never actually, seriously damage her or she might not ask him to be VP.

I contend Obama has always been running for VP and Hillary will offer it to him simply because he is black and viable. Even if he doesn't win a single primary she will still give it to him.

And that's why Obama will do nothing to really offend Hillary...he knows he can't beat her, he knows he can't go to the Whitehouse unless he makes her happy in the way he runs against her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 10/28/2007

Here's the question, stevedoor...

Who the hell cares what YOU think of Obama or Hillary Clinton? Your opinion, as the stupid troll you are, isn't of interest to anybody who posts here.

Wish I could critique the entire idiotic slate of fools running for president on republic "values"...on one single right wing website. But no, nobody is allowed that pleasure.

You "contend"? How droll.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 10/28/2007

You seem very angry and hurt by what I said, I hope I haven't offended you.

I have said from the start (many months back) that Hillary has a lock on this thing and that Obama would never really try to take Hillary down Because after she wins...she would not ask him to be her VP.

And sure enough, here we are, the people who really support Obama with their money are angry that Obama is not willing to fight Hillary for the nomination. And if Obama wants to keep raising all that lovely money he now has to toss the people who support him a bone and PRETEND he's trying to do what it takes to beat Hillary.

But even then, he sent her a signal..."I'll not take you down at the knees"...."I'll not deliver a fatal blow...pick me, Obama, for your Vice President side-kick".

This is just the way I see it. How do you see it? I mean, I'm not "trolling" or even attacking you....as you have attacked me.

How about you talking about this issue. Obama and Hillary and who wins this race? It's not about me, it's about them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 10/28/2007

Run, Al! Run!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 10/28/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect