Hillary Goes For The Kill

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Hillary Goes For The Kill stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10-27-07 04:44 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The decision of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign to send 100 or more new staffers into Iowa demonstrates that she and her aides have determined to their own satisfaction that she can cripple Barack Obama in the first-in-the-nation caucus.

2007-10-27-hil.jpgIowa is the only state where current surveys show Obama to be within shooting distance of Clinton. In late August, Clinton took a small lead of 5.2 percent in a poll of likely Democratic caucus goers. That lead, the smallest Clinton holds in any early primary or caucus state, has held up through seven of the eight most recent polls, increasing the willingness of the Clinton team to gamble on a new offensive.

The Obama campaign has already described the January 3 Iowa contest as a must-win event. Clinton's burst of hiring is a declaration that she intends to go for a knockout punch.


There clearly is some risk for Clinton in this strategy: if her campaign is perceived as laying down the gauntlet in Iowa, a defeat would become all the more damaging. Clinton aides remain unwilling to discuss the significance of the upgraded Iowa staffing, resolved to dodge high expectations.

Until now, Clinton has pointedly maintained a comparatively low-key Iowa operation, spending substantially less money than Obama on in-state television, and maintaining a smaller contingent of local campaign workers.

Clinton's calculatedly discreet Iowa staffing commitment was designed to provide the candidate with cover in the event of a loss. Her slim advantage in Iowa polls now allows her to adopt a more aggressive strategy. The campaign hopes to do much of the new hiring on Sunday and Monday.

As recently as a month ago, Obama's campaign acknowledged publicly that Iowa would be crucial to the viability of the Illinois Senator's drive for the White House. "Iowa will make the difference," Michelle Obama said campaigning in Davenport on September 26. "If Barack doesn't win Iowa, it's just a dream, but if we win Iowa, then we can move the world as it should be."

Likewise, Obama's manager, David Plouffe, told the New Republic, "Iowa: that's the whole shebang."

Now, in the spin wars, Obama operatives contend that Clinton is the candidate who cannot afford to lose.

Story continues below

"She's in a tough spot, she needs to win Iowa, and every state, or her aura of inevitability is shattered," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.

At the moment, Clinton holds double-digit leads in every state that hosts an early caucus or primary -- except Iowa. There, an average of the five latest polls shows her with 28.8 percent to Obama's 23.6 percent and John Edwards' 21.2 percent -- just over 5 points in her favor.

Since the start of summer, both Clinton and Obama have made gains against the former Iowa frontrunner, John Edwards, who throughout last spring held first place in the state and who hoped a good showing in Iowa would turn his campaign around.

As Edwards' standing in Iowa nosedived over the summer and fall, his staff investment has also been eclipsed by Obama. In an October analysis of third-quarter reports to the Federal Election Commission, the Des Moines Register reported that Obama had more staffers in Iowa - 145 - than any of his competitors, with Edwards at 130 and Clinton at 117. Clinton's new hiring is likely to eradicate Obama's personnel advantage.

The emphasis on Iowa this year -- and the plowing-in of resources -- marks the third election in a row in which the Hawkeye state is playing a key role in the Democratic nomination process. It has not always been this way. The salience of the Iowa caucuses has varied from election to election.

Since 1972, when Iowa first became a critical test of strength in a presidential race, the caucus has at times been key to the outcome, and at other times irrelevant.

In 1976, 2000 and 2004, Iowa victories by Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and John Kerry put them on the path to becoming the party's nominee. In 1972, 1988 and 1992, victories by Edmund Muskie, Richard Gephardt, and Tom Harkin proved to have zero lasting value. On the GOP side, Gerald Ford, Bob Dole (1996), George W. Bush (2000) won in Iowa and won their party's nomination. It is worth noting, however, that over the past 25 years, of the 13 winners of contested Iowa caucuses, eight won the nomination, but only two - Carter and George W. Bush - went on to win the White House.

Report Corrections
 
Comments
271
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- jeanruss I'm a Fan of jeanruss 9 fans permalink

John Edwards will be a great President AND can soundly beat EVERY Republican-This drum beat from the media for Clinton is astounding-It just shows how media consolidation has truly hurt this country-Most of the media is just a mouthpiece for Wall Street and has created a class war-I don't believe Iowa is for sale-Hillary just wants more war like Bush snd Cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 10/28/2007
- THISTLE I'm a Fan of THISTLE 63 fans permalink

John Edwards could NOT EVEN WIN HIS HOME STATE
in 2004. He DID NOT RUN for the Senate for a
2nd term, because he could NOT WIN.
Why Edwards is even in this again, makes him a
3-time loser. And he is and Obama are the 2
biggest phonies running...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 10/28/2007
- maxfusion I'm a Fan of maxfusion 12 fans permalink

I love the photo of these two sweeties. I can see the voice caption now:

"You win me Ohio honey, and I'll make sure she's in your hotel room by ten."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 10/28/2007
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 293 fans permalink
photo

Let's not be coy here, Hillary Clinton is not qualified to be President.

She has never been Governor of a State, or the Mayor of a City. As junior Senator from New York, what meaningful legislation can be attributed to her?

Her experience comes as a Corporate Lawyer, a former member of the Board of Directors of WalMart, and as First Lady of the United States of America.

As for her time as First Lady, it is alluded that she was somehow a "Partner" in the Presidency of her husband, but all documents related to her time in the White House are under seal and not available for evaluation.

So we don't know if Hillary Clinton was a First Lady in the Eleonor Roosevelt mold or the Imelda Marcos mold ... we just don't know.

As we observe the National Train Wreak of Hillary Clinton ascending to Democratic Nominee and ultimately President of the United States, we are not observing a victory of American Democracy in action, but the craven success of a Dynastic Political Machine firing on all cylinders.

And her supposed strong point, her history making opportunity to be the First Woman President of the United States is a ruse as well ...

Hillary Rodham Clinton is not a woman ... it's a Political Machine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 10/28/2007
- MaxxEliot I'm a Fan of MaxxEliot 6 fans permalink

"So we don't know if Hillary Clinton was a First Lady in the Eleonor Roosevelt mold or the Imelda Marcos mold ... we just don't know." by Fogbelter

Not to be coy...but why not try opening a book...there are certainly enough out there on the subject.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 10/28/2007
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 293 fans permalink
photo

Sure there are a lot of books on the subject, but I want to see the records from the Clinton years come out. Propaganda has no value for me.

If she was such an asset to Bill in the White House, why doesn't she allow that information on her influence to be reviewed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 10/28/2007

This post is the best of the lot. Not one single fact with a backup, just anti Hillary swill.

You are not a serious student of political history, you have an agenda that you further with accusations and blather.

IOW, you're a second rate troll.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/28/2007

Poor wittle repug dribble gets here witty bitty panties all twisted into a big knot whenever someone criticizes her heroine.


Hillary will kill your children in the desert in Iran in the Clinton wars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 10/28/2007
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 293 fans permalink
photo

"This post is the best of the lot. Not one single fact with a backup, just anti Hillary swill."

Cite the State she was Governor of. Cite the City she was Mayor of. Cite the Legislation that defines her tenure as Senator of New York.

Was she not a Corporate Lawyer? Was she not on the Board Of Directors of WalMart? Was she not First Lady?

Has she not alluded to her being an active member of the White House? Is she not using her time as First Lady as an example of her experience?

Are not the records pertaining to her activities within the White House during the Clinton Years not under seal? Outside of the very public failure of her Universal Healthcare plan, do we have any other example of her having "experience" gained through her time as First Lady?

Oh right, she and Chelsea visited India, I guess that underscores her foreign policy experience.

My "AGENDA" is for the betterment of the United States of America in one of the darkest periods of its History ... and I don't see Hillary Rodham Clinton as the answer.

Finally, in my political opinions I am a Free Agent, not affiliated with any political Camp, Party, or Organization. I am not on anyone's payroll either ...

Can you say the same?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 10/28/2007
- ebbtide I'm a Fan of ebbtide 16 fans permalink

It must be obvious by now. It is really Bill running with his running mate Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 10/28/2007
- Darwinita I'm a Fan of Darwinita 18 fans permalink
photo

I love how the unconsciously illiterate emphasise their writing with Capital Letters to Make Sure Readers Don't Miss the Point. Or, they will "use quotation marks" to add an air of "False Gravitas."


zzzzzz. amateur hour.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 10/28/2007
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 293 fans permalink
photo

Thanks for the English Lesson ... care to clean out my gutters now, Tinhorn?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 10/28/2007
- jlxn I'm a Fan of jlxn 2 fans permalink

The last time you encountered coy was in the restroom of the Minneapolis airport.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 10/28/2007
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 293 fans permalink
photo

So, I suppose the proper response to this comment would be something along the lines of ...

"I know you are, but what am I?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 10/28/2007
photo

No coronation folks--she is a good candidate, but not the best choice. Sorry, Hilary, Joe Biden has my vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 10/28/2007

Mine too Sooner!

I've listened to them all here in Iowa and Biden is the one that makes sense for this country at this time. No one else has the political capital to lead us to a recovery -- our only alternative to a nasty decade of decreasing relevance.

The Dems are mostly sales-worthy, but with a couple of exceptions, they're pretty weak as Presidents. The Republicans would be a tragedy after a disaster.

Get your heads out of the TV screen folks. Read. Think. Make your most important choice. Mine's Joe Biden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 10/28/2007
- Lisette I'm a Fan of Lisette 39 fans permalink
photo

I am waiting for Hillary to fall down the rabbit hole. She will not make a good President and besides I don't want to go down that Clinton road again. Once was more than enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 10/28/2007
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 37 fans permalink

"I am waiting for Hillary to fall down the rabbit hole. She will not make a good President and besides I don't want to go down that Clinton road again. Once was more than enough."

yeah, god save us from 8 years of peace, prosperity, economic growth, and international respect and acclaim like we had under the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 10/28/2007
- Lisette I'm a Fan of Lisette 39 fans permalink
photo

EinChicago
That was then and this is now--besides she is not him--I voted for him but wouldn't give a plug nickel for her--she will not be a good pres.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 10/28/2007
- ebbtide I'm a Fan of ebbtide 16 fans permalink

Huh? Under the "Clintons"? We were being governed by Hillary, when no one elected her? err--well there was that little catastrophic health care proposal that the first lady that we did not elect, was intimately involved in

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 10/28/2007
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 39 fans permalink

Hope you like Bush's secret government, because if Hillary is elected, Carl Bernstein thinks that's unlikey to change:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-wiener/carl-bernstein-hillary-w_b_69583.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 10/28/2007
- MaxxEliot I'm a Fan of MaxxEliot 6 fans permalink

Good Grief....what planet do you live on? The Clinton’s are the quintessential power couple.
They were open about it when he ran in 92 but then she was vilified for her co-presidency role. It is more than common knowledge that they are each others most trusted advisors. He, Bill Clinton, has stated publically that he would never have been president without Hillary. So please stop pretending as if this former first lady just stayed home and baked cookies. And if I could suggest a few books on the Clinton’s try the latest by Sally Bedell Smith or Carl Bernstein’s look into this amazing partnership. Both are fair and balanced when read with an open mind. You may first need to find someone with an open mind who you trust to give you an objective summation .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 10/28/2007
- slobone I'm a Fan of slobone 6 fans permalink

I live in Iowa, and I can tell you Hillary has been spending plenty of money here already. Not a week goes by I don't get some glossy mailing, including a DVD. No potholders yet, though.

And you can see from the polls how much good it's done her. You can't win in Iowa unless you show up in person, and I mean you have to go to every little town. That's how Kerry won in '04.

But these 100 "Iowans for Hillary" -- good luck. I was thinking that at least they would give her another 100 votes, but it turns out they're not even going to be Iowa residents. The "job fair" to recruit them is going to be held in -- drumroll -- Arlington, VA!

So these carpetbaggers will be about as effective as all the Deanites who came here from Seattle or wherever in '04 to share their superior wisdom with us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 10/28/2007

How about posting a link to your poll? You DO know that anecdotal "evidence" doesn't mean a damned thing, don't you?

Apparently not. Good thing there are no republic "carpetbaggers" doing their dog and pony shows in Ioway.

I'm looking forward to reading those polls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 10/28/2007
- slobone I'm a Fan of slobone 6 fans permalink

Huh? Every poll shows Hillary's edge in Iowa is smaller than anywhere else in the country. It's been all over the news -- do your own Googling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 10/28/2007

Who do you like?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 10/28/2007
- slobone I'm a Fan of slobone 6 fans permalink

Not sure yet.

If I were voting my conscience, I'd go for a candidate who says: I promise not to take military action against any foreign countries unless they pose an immediate and tangible threat to the US. Hmm, I guess that means Kucinich or Gravel.

Last time around, a lot of Iowa Democrats got fooled into voting for Kerry, who nobody particularly liked, because at least he could "beat Bush". Guess again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 10/28/2007

Hillary might need to pay a little more attention to her home turf:
her " 'homecoming' rally" in Harlem yesterday was somewhat bedraggled. Didn't make the Times, despite the fact that there was pre-rally advertising in Crain's http://www.crainsny.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071024/FREE/71024003

MSNBC noted that they managed to fill the Abyssinian Baptist church to 'near capacity' -- for a free rally, this is hardly an impressive show of support.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21502355/

Daily news: more about the endorsers than the crowd, though it opines that she "shined."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/10/28/2007-10-28_hillary_clinton_shines_at_harlems_abyssi.html

Evidently they resorted to busing in supporters from the outer boroughs:

""We support her and we support her ideas," said Leroy Gadsden, one of a busload of supporters from Queens' Guy R. Brewer Democratic Club."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/10/27/2007-10-27_hillary_clinton_shines_in_harlems_abyssi.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 10/28/2007

Well then, Rhydder, you should be ecstatic. You have nothing to worry about, since Hillary Clinton doesn't have anybody in her corner.

Happy trails to you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 10/28/2007
- Lisette I'm a Fan of Lisette 39 fans permalink
photo

Much too much time, money and energy is spent on these elections. There has to be a better way to do this. And, frankly I am sick of all of them by now and I almost don't care who wins--lets just get it over with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 10/28/2007

Yes, TOO MUCH MONEY i.e. too much selling and buying, in other words too much bribery going under the counter. In other words, we are a rotten nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 10/28/2007
photo

nice attitude. if you do not care, please do not vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 10/28/2007
- KBAR I'm a Fan of KBAR 28 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 10/28/2007

What are you people afraid of... A strong woman, a large prosperous middle class? Health Care for Everyone??? A stable economy?

A win for Hilary is a win for the majority of American. I personally have had enough of the extremes and would be happy to have a more balanced middle candidate.

I for one am tired of Conservative and Liberal weeping and complaining. Lets find some compromise and rebuild this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 10/28/2007

I love the "if you have a problem with Hillary" insults! Since you're using Karl Rove's campaign strategy, can you tell me when Penn is going to start with the "if you're not with us, you're against us" talking points so I can just skip ahead to that chapter?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 10/28/2007
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 39 fans permalink

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 10/28/2007

I am neither Liberal or Conservative. I am a middle of the road African-American Democrat who supported Wes Clark in 2004. This notion that the only people against Hillary and Bill are right wing republicans or Nader herd Liberals is just not the case. Some of us are Democrats who "went along" with all the stuff surrounding the Clintons. All of these folk who were on the inside aren't lying. And there is enough about them we all know without the inside information from insiders to know they are "INTEGRITY CHALLENGED". "THE ENDS DOESNOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS! They have done and will continue to do whatever is necessary to stay in power. The politics that have been in place will remain in place. We already see the big money lining up behind them. You know "Lobbyists are people too". Sorry but the majority of American continue to lose under the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 10/28/2007
- laurenc I'm a Fan of laurenc 2 fans permalink

Lets reject this conventional wisdom!! Edwards is gaining traction in Iowa by critiquing Hillary's YES vote to the Lieberman/Kyle endorsement of Bush's eagerness for yet ANOTHER potential war. Regular Americans love John Edwards when they actually meet him. Iowans do as well. Hillary will doom the Democrats to lose the White House.
Millions of us are not willing to take that chance with such a flawed candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 10/28/2007
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 37 fans permalink

So you rsolution is to go with the proven loser in Edwards? He lost it once as VP, so he can lose it even better qas Prez?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 10/28/2007
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

The Clintons are BIG Bussiness against the middle class!
And there are enough stupid middle class people that will vote for them to screw us again with more trade deals like NAFTA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 10/28/2007

Amen!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 10/28/2007
- MrClean I'm a Fan of MrClean 14 fans permalink

My motto is ABH!!

Anyone BUT Hillary!!

We can't have another corporate WHORE in the White House!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 10/28/2007
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

The Clintons are BIG Bussiness against the middle class!
And there are enough stupid middle class people that will vote for them to screw us again with more trade deals like NAFTA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 10/28/2007

Hillary = Bush-lite!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 10/28/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect