Sam Stein

BIO

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

Dem Iraq Funding Bill Is Most Aggressive Pursued Thus Far

November 9, 2007 03:32 PM


stumbleupon :Dem Iraq Funding Bill Is Most Aggressive Pursued Thus Far   digg: Dem Iraq Funding Bill Is Most Aggressive Pursued Thus Far   reddit: Dem Iraq Funding Bill Is Most Aggressive Pursued Thus Far   del.icio.us: Dem Iraq Funding Bill Is Most Aggressive Pursued Thus Far

House Democratic leaders are slated to introduce the toughest-worded war funding resolution since taking office, one that would appropriate money only for a drawdown of troops from Iraq, according to a copy obtained by the Huffington Post. As a sign of cohesion within the party, moreover, Senate Democrats are likely to follow suit with virtually identical legislation.

But neither measure is expected to overcome a veto from the President or even a filibuster from the Republican minority. And Congress will more than likely have to resume Iraq legislative battles early next year.

"[Leadership] is committed to pushing this as far as it can go," said one Democratic aide. "But it will get filibustered or vetoed. Regardless, this will be the last funding bill in 2007."

The emergency Defense Department appropriations bill is set to be introduced to the House on Wednesday. A draft obtained by the Huffington Post reads: "Within 30 days after enactment of this Act, the President shall commence an immediate and orderly redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq." Additionally, the draft states, "It is the sense of Congress that the war in Iraq should end as safely and quickly as possible and that our troops should be brought home."

The legislation would also require President Bush to provide Congress with a plan to complete the redeployment by December 15, 2008. It would prohibit deployment of forces to Iraq who are not fully trained, and change the strategy of U.S. forces in Iraq to diplomatic missions, force protection, and counterterrorism operations.

Finally, the supplemental language reaffirms that they won't be considering any additional war funding beyond this bill until early next year

"The amounts appropriated by this Act are sufficient to fully meet the immediate needs of the United States Armed Forces deployed to Iraq," the legislation concludes. "Congressional action on additional funding shall be deferred until [February 1, 2008]."

Comments for this post are now closed

 
Comments
184
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Bravo Dems. The gut shot right before Christmas. That's what you have been waiting for.

The campaign this Christmas to have our troops home by next Christmas. Wow.

Repugs: This is the beginning of what will be the final stomping out of you. Merry Christmas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 AM on 11/14/2007

Hmm... lots of aggressive-sounding air-talk, but when NASA/DOD wants $600 billion to put bombs in space, the bill was quietly signed by both houses and sent on to the President.

oink.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 11/12/2007

Indeed the bill is the most "aggressive" for Nancy but wait a minute.

1 - This is a 'draft' meaning by the time it's final & voted upon look for watering down (much watering down) of those weak illusory 'demands' to end the conflict.

2 - I loooove the 'should drawn down' & such language. One party wages war and shoves 170,000 troops in another country, killing, pillaging, 4000 american dead etc... The other gets most agressive by telling 'you should drawn down silly boy'. And that's when they're "aggressive!" Hahaha! Llllove it.

3 - Republicans can start drawing down, say 3 soldiers a month, still technically fulfilling the resolution.

One could go on about various laughable elements in the draft 'complete redeployment by dec 2008'. A redeployment is a shuffle, musical chairs. Demanding pulling the troops OUT is something else.

You do not have to approve the funding Pelosi, you got the power. Surprise your disillusioned constituency, Pussycat Nancy! Do it! Get pissed. Lose your temper. STAND for something real and stick with it. PLLLLLEEEAAASE.

Matt

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 11/12/2007

The Dems need to keep pounding. Bush/Cheney and Co. are bankrupting this nation in all respects with their No Win-Dead End, Borrow & Spend WAR!! Curses on those that create perpetual debt!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 11/12/2007

Why are they funding the war at all...who could go through 611 billion..cmon..if you can't beat a veto.Don't bring the funding bill to the table...do like you did with Kucinich's bill send it to committe to die; who's side are these senators and congress people on

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 AM on 11/12/2007

Of course this has no meat in it. It's even a weak showing. I think by now the everyone knows the dem's want this war as much as bush does.
They could care less about what the American people want. It's clear

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 11/12/2007

BFD. Give Pelosi, Reid, Clinton and the rest of the DLC corporatists 10 minutes, and they'll cave again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 11/11/2007
photo

Oooo. Nancy's getting aggressive. Pretty scary, eh, Chucklenuts? Any day now, Nancy will.... frown. Then she'll call a recess. Then she'll wag her finger at Cheney. Now that's pretty risky, but Nancy's got balls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 11/11/2007
photo


so why don't the Dumocrats filibuster the Repugs until hell freezes over? ah sucks, ah shucks, another senior moment.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 11/11/2007

Nancy has proven she needs her butt kicked out of office by Cindy Sheehan. Nancy has neither the backbone or intelligence to do what is needed to be done and she has proved too many times that she backs down to gw bush. Until Cindy kicks her butt out of office, the democrats need to replace her as leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 11/11/2007
photo

Wasn't hard to get tougher than nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 11/11/2007

Nothing will come of it.

"Impeachement off the Table" Pelosi is a worthless bitch. If she spent as much time going after the criminals that infest Congress and the white house as she did getting plastic surgery, the US would be in good shape.

The Day the whorebag good for nothing Pelosi took Impeachment off the table is the day the US ceased to exist as a Republic.

End game is near. Can you guess which American city Dick Cheney will Nuke ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 11/11/2007

Yeah, I saw that car driving around yesterday
carrying the signboard with the state message
where they were having a special poll in our
state to evaluate public opinion on continuing
the war...I remember it like, like...like it
never happened 'cause they really don't give
2 shits what the public thinks anymore. When's
the fan-dance over, anyway?


http://www.impeachbush.org

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 11/11/2007

"House Democratic leaders are slated to introduce the toughest-worded war funding resolution since taking office"

oh...tough words...wow! how about some tough action????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 11/11/2007

yawn, can't wait until January '09. All this posturing by the dems, obstructionism by the reps and idiocy of Bush Co. is really really getting old.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 11/11/2007
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect