Clinton Co-Chair Attacks Obama Over Past Drug Use

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Clinton Co-Chair Attacks Obama Over Past Drug Use stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-12-07 06:56 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Obamadrug

Just a day after Hillary Clinton's communication director declared that the campaign would not raise the issue of Barack Obama's acknowledged cocaine use, her New Hampshire co-chair, Billy Shaheen, warned that Republicans will capitalize on Obama's drug history if he wins the Democratic nomination.

"The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight," Shaheen told the Washington Post, "and one of the things they're certainly going to jump on is his drug use."

In the Washington Post interview published Dec. 12, Shaheen said Obama's own willingness to discuss his past drug use would "open the door" for the GOP: "It'll be, 'When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?'....There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It's hard to overcome."

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe denounced Shaheen's comments: "Hillary Clinton said attacking other Democrats is the 'fun part' of this campaign, and now she's moved from Barack Obama's kindergarten years to his teenage years in an increasingly desperate effort to slow her slide in the polls. Senator Clinton's campaign is recycling old news that Barack Obama has been candid about in a book he wrote years ago, and he's talked about the lessons he's learned from these mistakes with young people all across the country."

An earlier Huffington Post article from Dec. 11 described secretive efforts by the Clinton campaign to promote the Obama-cocaine issue. In the HuffPost article, Howard Wolfson, Clinton's communications director, contended that the campaign has not tried to make use of Obama's past cocaine use and that it would not attempt to do so in the future. "Candidates personal lives should not be a part of this campaign," Wolfson said.

Responding to Shaheen's comments, Wolfson said today, "These comments were not authorized or condoned by the campaign in any way."

Allies of the Clinton campaign had sent emails to reporters and Democratic activists with a link to an Iowa Independent story by Douglas Burns headlined "The Politics Of Obama's Past Cocaine Use."

Burns' article on Obama posed a question that Clinton has been unwilling to raise herself and that has received little attention during the Democratic primary battles: If Barack Obama becomes the nominee, will the GOP be able to turn his acknowledged cocaine use into a debilitating issue?

Story continues below
advertisement

Burns cited two June polls, one by Scripps Howard, the other by the New York Times. Both found that strong majorities of respondents believe that voters would not be willing to support a presidential candidate who admitted cocaine use. "What will be fascinating to watch is whether Americans' views on cocaine will play out in the election booths as a defining factor or anything close to that. If it does, that could spell trouble for Obama," Burns wrote.

"Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man," Obama wrote in his book Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. "The highs hadn't been about that, me trying to prove what a down brother I was. Not by then, anyway. I got high for just the opposite effect, something that could push questions of who I was out of my mind, something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory."

Elsewhere in the book Obama writes, "We were always playing on the white man's court . . . by the white man's rules . . . . If the principal, or the coach, or a teacher . . . wanted to spit in your face, he could, because he had the power and you didn't. . . . The only thing you could choose was withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage. And the final irony: should you refuse this defeat and lash out at your captors . . . they would have a name for that too. Paranoid. Militant. . . . Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it."

Sources pointed out that in 1992, Bill Clinton complained when President George H. W. Bush tried to capitalize on Clinton's marijuana use. The Los Angeles Times reported in Oct. 1992:

Bush broached the marijuana issue by questioning whether Clinton could be believed when he makes campaign promises. "This guy couldn't remember in detail that he didn't inhale 20 years ago, and he can't remember what came out of his mouth 20 minutes ago," the President said as he stumped for votes in Florida, a state critical to his reelection hopes. It was the first time Bush had so directly brought up a problem that dogged the Arkansas governor in the spring -- his acknowledgment that he had tried marijuana while studying at Oxford University in Britain, but that he had not inhaled. [...] Clinton, responding to the day's attacks on him, told a reporter that he felt "sorry" for Bush. "I think that that sort of demeaning talk doesn't do him any good and only shows the American people how desperate he is to hold onto his job," Clinton said as he attended a dinner in Washington, D.C.

Allegations of drug use have become increasingly common in recent elections, including charges, denied by George W. Bush, that he was arrested for cocaine possession in 1972.

Just a day after Hillary Clinton's communication director declared that the campaign would not raise the issue of Barack Obama's acknowledged cocaine use, her New Hampshire co-chair, Billy Shaheen, wa...
Just a day after Hillary Clinton's communication director declared that the campaign would not raise the issue of Barack Obama's acknowledged cocaine use, her New Hampshire co-chair, Billy Shaheen, wa...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
530
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- plages I'm a Fan of plages 17 fans permalink

We believe that the majority of Americans have used a legal and or illegal drug in their life time, isn't that true mister president! Keep pushing Hillbilly, and you'll lose more than the presidency. "I did not have sex with that woman . . . and "I didn't inhale!", and "I was against bushes war, before I was for it," but then again, "Hillary didn't even read the draft resolution to go to war!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 12/12/2007
- ltyr2002 I'm a Fan of ltyr2002 12 fans permalink

I'm tired of this National Enquirer Democratic primary.

That's why I want a person who is actually prepared to be PRESIDENT, not a flashy candidate.

I SUPPORT JOE BIDEN!

Enough of this stupid dance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 12/12/2007

kudos, Obama for your honesty. I wonder how many skeletons hilary has in her closet. This is conventional politics at its best, the slimy kind. It doesn't matter how hillary try to smear Obama, he still has my vote. I am suprised that this campaign will stoop this low. They are down in the polls and they will do and say anything to bring to bring hillary up in the polls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 12/12/2007
photo

I'm still NOT an Obama supporter(yet), Thomas, but I WILL say that NOT ONLY do I consider him FAR more honest than I EVER considered Bill Clinton or the preznutz on THIS subject, but this it's actually a BIG plus in my mind.

OUR country MUST stop destroying lives through imprisoning people for drugs and help them EXACTLY like WE do for alcoholics(if they wish it). Prisons rehabilitate NO ONE of drug use, nor do these incarcerations actually help OUR society IN ANY WAY. There is, in fact, great evidence it has the opposite effect. And, to deny terminal and critically ill people WHATEVER help they might be able find because 'lobbyists' from pharma, textile AND/OR energy convinced enough of CONgress with campaign donations that their industry might HAVE TO someday compete with new products(oh no), ...IS JUST INSANE!

Since he's obviously more honest with himself than Bill or the preznutz about this, Barack Obama is likely going to be MUCH better at dealing with all this f~cked-up drug war shnitz - than ANY others have been yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 12/12/2007
- musetta I'm a Fan of musetta 3 fans permalink

Anyone seriously considering Obama should read the last paragraph above. Written by a man who was educated in the finest schools in the country and yet is filled with rage to the point where he needs a little booze, smoke and blow to tolerate his "captors??????"

There is something seriously, seriously, seriously wrong with someone who writes this crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 12/12/2007
- brog I'm a Fan of brog permalink

Strategically, the admission of drug use allows Obama to say, later, should he get the nomination, 'listen, this stuff has all been brought up in the past; it's old news.' Quite Clintonian, as it were. Probably Americans have moved past pot use as a deal killer. That older demographic, voting in heavy numbers, will find it bewildering. Cocaine, my God! But I'm with others: coke was so prevalent in the eighties, you would have been an oddball not to have tried, or at least shouldn't be dismissed for having done so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 12/12/2007
- Plus15 I'm a Fan of Plus15 5 fans permalink

Not too long ago a Presidential candidate was unelectable if he'd ever been divorced. Today the high divorce rates make that an impossible consideration. The massive experimentation in and continued use of various illegal drugs, in particular marijuana and cocaine, and the broad use of painkillers and mood altering substances make this Clinton or future Republican attack on Obama's drug use of only limited value. It's not even about heavy usage by America it's about the "experimentation". Too many people have knowlege and have moved on.

It really dates the messenger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 12/12/2007

This really illustrates the low-down non-ethics of the Clinton machine. Bill's nose was a Coke Machine when he was governor. Read the book "Barry & the Boys" about DEA/CIA smuggler Barry Seal and his dealings with Bubba in Mena, Arkansas during the Contra-wars. Barry watched Clinton snort lines and roll joints right in his state owned limo. The Clintons are the lowest of the low to even bring this up. The only defense is to expose the Clinton/Bush Mena Coke connections from his Governorship days to the light of day. Hillary is also a major player in the coverups of 911. As NY Senator, she knows damned well the WTC towers were bombed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 12/12/2007
- bodi1313 I'm a Fan of bodi1313 2 fans permalink

I Listen to Sean Hannity's radio show every afternoon. It is gut churning. He is positively giddy over the prospect of Barack Obama becoming the nominee. He despises the Democrats, yet everyday is pushing for Obama. Now why do you think that is? Why is Karl Rove giving Obama tips on how to defeat Hillary?
The Republicans know they can slaughter Obama in the General election. Implications that his 'brain is affected by his past cocaine use'. He come from Muslim roots and secretly is trying to help the Muslims take over the world. Or how about this, "Do you trust a man with only two years on the National political stage?" "America has big problems, Do you trust a guy with so little experience?
It doesn't matter if these things are true or not, it works.

John Kerry, a four term Senator, and winner of the Purple Heart; made to look like a flip-flopper and lying, coward. Max Cleland of Georgia, lost 3 limbs fighting in Vietnam; the Republicans had him looking like he worked for Saddam Husein. John McCain lost to Bush in the 2000 primary; his own party accused him of having a 'black baby.'

The Democrats always go for 'hope' and 'change,' and they always lose.
In spite of the unpopularity of the war, you put Obama up there, and the Republicans will win the election.
I live in Georgia, Evangelical Heaven. Rudy Gulianni could say he supports public abortion, free at your local supermarket and he would win the General Election over Obama.

Hukabee is having his little surge right now, but at the end of the day, it will be Rudy. And you put Rudy "hero of 911" against Obama "inexperieced Muslim supporter". Which 'soundbite' do you think will resonate with the general population?
How many times do the Democrats have to lose to get it? BE RIGHT AND LOSE should be our motto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 12/12/2007

check shaheens record

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 12/12/2007
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 266 fans permalink
photo

A couple of things come to mind ...

First, Obama admitted to using drugs, right? If someone admits to drug use does that still qualify as a scandal? There's hope for all stoners if you can be taking bong hits and still wind up as the President of the Harvard Law Review.

Secondly, Hillary went from supporting Conservative Republican Barry Goldwater in 1964 to supporting Anti-War Democrat Eugene McCarthy in 1968. Tell me, is that kind of dramatic transition possible without dancing to "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" at some point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 12/12/2007

the majority of Americans have used an illegal drug, the others use prescription drugs,some use both

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 12/12/2007
- Ginzaman I'm a Fan of Ginzaman 12 fans permalink

To everybody who attacks Obama over past drug use, pay attention.

If you use any of these things, you're doing drugs:
caffeine
nicotine
alcohol

So instead of attacking him because he's an African American or this will maintain your moral superiority, get f*****g real. Human beings have done drugs for thousands of years and always will. Besides, if electing a druggie is so terrible why the f**k is psycho Bush in the White House?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 12/12/2007

a little bit early for desperation

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 12/12/2007
- research I'm a Fan of research 257 fans permalink

When does indulgence cross over into addiction? People have used alcohol, pot, peyote, and countless other drugs for 1000's of years. The oldest building every found is a brewery. So let's call addiction anything that the "addict" want to quit. Fine, give people educational and therapeutic help as part of the Medicare for all.

But the core problem with the drug war is dishonesty.

First the drugs war was against the black jazz musicians drugging our good white women into sin, then it was to DuPont wanting to sell it's new Nylon by outlawing Hemp(pot), then it was convenient to FBI founder J Edgar Hoover and crook Nixon to suppress liberals, specially hippies. Now it's just another excuse to take away our liberties.

The drug war continues to "work".

Pardon, Legalize, regulate and tax.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 12/12/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect