What Ron Paul Will Do With His Cash Haul

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - What Ron Paul Will Do With His Cash Haul stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-17-07 06:25 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Ronpaul

Congressman Ron Paul's presidential campaign has been defined by exceeded expectations. During debates, the Texas Republican has separated himself from the GOP pack with unrelenting criticism of the Iraq War. On the Internet, his supporters have flooded discussion forums with such ferocity that several websites have barred their participation. And in the world of political fundraising no one, not even Sens. Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama have had single day successes that approach Paul's cash hauls.

The latest of these occurred yesterday, when the Paul campaign took in a record $6 million in a 24-hour period. The total, which came a month and a half after supporters - independent of the candidate - brought in $4.2 million dollars on a single day, eclipsed the record $5.7 million that Sen. John Kerry raised after he received the 2004 Democratic nomination.

The money is indeed impressive and has made Paul the envy of some in the GOP field.

"We have friendly relationships with a couple of the other campaigns," Jesse Benton, Paul's spokesperson told the Huffington Post. "I joke with the [Mike] Huckabee campaign. We wish we had their poll numbers and they wish they had our cash."

But, as Benton acknowledges, with surveys showing Paul well behind in Iowa and trailing in New Hampshire, the question remains, what can the campaign do with their stuffed coffers to generate growth in the polls.

Apparently, a lot. Already preparations are being made to build infrastructure in the February 5th primary states, signifying that Paul plans to stay in the race no matter how the early elections go.

"Our immediate focus is Iowa and New Hampshire," said Benton. "But what is great about having this money now is that it allows us to step back, hire staff and get some paid media for the February 5th primary. We still need to do well in New Hampshire and Iowa to prove that we can continue to grow and maintain momentum."

Paul's team will also be promoting what it calls the "Christmas Vacation" program, which involves paying the room and board expenses of college students who want to help out in the first two states during the winter break.

Story continues below

But it's not just college kids who are coming on board. Within the next few days, the Paul campaign says they will hit 200 employees nationally with roughly half of them based in Iowa.

"We are hiring people so fast it's hard to keep track," said Benton

In addition, Paul will be devoting more money to advertisements, with a fifth campaign commercial set to be released soon in both New Hampshire and Iowa. And yet, for someone who has profited so bountifully of the web, little in terms of Internet innovations is being planned.

"We will go as far as the web wants us to go," said Benton. "We don't do anything magical on the web. It's just that the message is so powerful that it goes viral and spreads."

Real change for the Paul campaign, however, may not be something that the candidate or his staffers can possibly affect. As Benton notes, the perception of Paul as a fringe candidate (even after all the cash hauls) remains ingrained in the media psyche.

"We still have a ways to go," he said. "To get into the earned media cycle you have to earn it. More and more people are talking about Ron and mentioning him as a candidate. The talk about him being nice and having loyal fans but no chance of winning is finally fading out... These fundraising events have given us a megaphone to say there is a lot of support for us out there."

And indeed, other Republican candidates are starting to take notice. Even if Paul doesn't win the nomination, his fundraising efforts have made him a remarkable political weapon. As an aide to a rival campaign said, when asked what he would like to see the Texan do with all his money: "I'd like to see him spend it on Huffington Post web ads."

Congressman Ron Paul's presidential campaign has been defined by exceeded expectations. During debates, the Texas Republican has separated himself from the GOP pack with unrelenting criticism of the I...
Congressman Ron Paul's presidential campaign has been defined by exceeded expectations. During debates, the Texas Republican has separated himself from the GOP pack with unrelenting criticism of the I...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
429
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

HumeSkeptic says, "There is no 'Social Security/Medicare time bomb'. Therefore, nothing would go boom."

Just saw a piece from AP about it reported today- here's part of it:
----------------
When the gap in funding social insurance programs is added to other government commitments, the total shortfall as of Sept. 30 represented $53 trillion, up more than $2 trillion in just a year, the report said.

"Our government has made a whole lot of promises in the long-term that it cannot possibly keep," Comptroller General David M. Walker, the head of the Government Accountability Office, said Monday.

Members of Congress said the increase in the unfunded liability for Social Security and Medicare underscored the critical urgency to do something in light of the looming retirement in coming years of 78 million baby boomers.

"The longer we delay action on the issue of entitlement reform, the more difficult the solution will become," said Sen. Judd Gregg, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.

Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Tenn., said ... "If we don't take action now, it threatens to destroy our social safety net and ruin our economic prosperity."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 AM on 12/18/2007
- Qbear I'm a Fan of Qbear 51 fans permalink

You know ALL you Ron Paul voters could prove me wrong...by having your candidate in either Iowa's or New Hamshire's top 5 candidates.

I bet you can do it,,,go caucus ...possums

But if you can't show a blip on a REAL ELECTION..shut the F*CK UP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 12/18/2007

Nellies and friends,
You can never embarrass me..
Yes, I happen to be that odd type that do not easily embarrass and like to speak my mind, if I want to...

You have wrecked the thread and people were here having a good time until you all came here..

Im sure many others agree..
You dembots are the reason we are where we are..
Your leaders express who you all are..
Its sad,
whimps.

very, very, sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 12/18/2007

Here are some more gems from one of the intellectuals supporting Ron Paul on this thread:
(I am not an intellectual, but thanks for thinkin it so!!!)
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

(1) Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

I already told you to back the fuck up off me...

I have looked at your friends and you have the most fucked up labels out there...

If your smart you will stay away from me..

GOT IT?

(2)
Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

We were all here having a nice conversation until you two fools came in and spammed the thread..

FUCK OFF!

-------------------------------

As one reads more comments from "Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul", one begins to get a pretty good picture of what the core Ron Paul base is about. Read on. And it's not just Galvestonian.

Of course, it is wrong to judge Ron Paul only by the "intellect" of his supporters, but that can be an indicator.

Another indicator is that Ron Paul has been endorsed by David Duke. Again, that's none of Ron Paul's doing, but it is another piece of relevant information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 12/18/2007

Qbear
My Gay followers don't like me exposing how they love my gay asshole!

Get the federal government out of abortion decision. (Nov 2007)
Delivered 4000 babies; & assuredly life begins at conception. (Sep 2007)
Sanctity of Life Act: remove federal jurisdiction. (Sep 2007)
Nominate only judges who refuse to legislate from the bench. (Sep 2007)
Save "snowflake babies": no experiments on frozen embryos. (Sep 2007)
No tax funding for organizations that promote abortion. (Sep 2007)
Embryonic stem cell programs not constitionally authorized. (May 2007)
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother"s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
No federal funding of abortion, and pro-life. (Dec 2000)
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
that's OK they don't like me, I loathe them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 12/18/2007
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1669 fans permalink
photo

Here are some more gems from one of the intellectuals supporting Ron Paul on this thread:

(1) Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

I already told you to back the fuck up off me...

I have looked at your friends and you have the most fucked up labels out there...


If your smart you will stay away from me..

GOT IT?

(2)
Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

We were all here having a nice conversation until you two fools came in and spammed the thread..

FUCK OFF!

-------------------------------

As one reads more comments from "Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul", one begins to get a pretty good picture of what the core Ron Paul base is about. Read on. And it's not just Galvestonian.

Of course, it is wrong to judge Ron Paul only by the "intellect" of his supporters, but that can be an indicator.

Another indicator is that Ron Paul has been endorsed by David Duke. Again, that's none of Ron Paul's doing, but it is another piece of relevant information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 12/18/2007
- Qbear I'm a Fan of Qbear 51 fans permalink

Ron Paul followers don't like me exposing how this Libertarian of theirs can't KEEP HIS G*D DAMN nose out of women's wombs and gay's bedrooms.

Get the federal government out of abortion decision. (Nov 2007)
Delivered 4000 babies; & assuredly life begins at conception. (Sep 2007)
Sanctity of Life Act: remove federal jurisdiction. (Sep 2007)
Nominate only judges who refuse to legislate from the bench. (Sep 2007)
Save "snowflake babies": no experiments on frozen embryos. (Sep 2007)
No tax funding for organizations that promote abortion. (Sep 2007)
Embryonic stem cell programs not constitionally authorized. (May 2007)
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
No federal funding of abortion, and pro-life. (Dec 2000)
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
that's OK they don't like me, I loathe them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 12/18/2007

HUMESTUPID and Saviormachine.

I think before you run your mouths, you should READ up on Ron Pauls 6 or7 books he wrote on economic freedom, and currencies.
Yes, besides being an OBGYN and a flight surgeon in the Army, he has authored around 10 books and has been married for 50 years to the same woman and has 5 educated children. Using NON federal loans or grants for any of their education.
They werent allowed.
He has also been elected 10 consecutive times to his seat in the house.
Never with a defeat.
NEVER.
Why dont you listen to Jim Cramer from Mad Money and hear what he says and how he receives Paul..
I suppose after you watch this youll have something to say about Cramer, but watch anyway..

This was friday.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=608494794

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 12/18/2007

What to do? How about winning the nomination?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 12/18/2007
- Qbear I'm a Fan of Qbear 51 fans permalink

In that same book, written as the AIDS crisis was laying waste to the American gay male population prompting the rise of activist groups demanding research and drugs, Paul attacked AIDS sufferers as "victims of their own lifestyle." And in a statement that gives a glimpse of the ruling-class tyranny of individualism he asserts that AIDS victims demanding rushed drug trials were impinging on "the rights of insurance company owners."

Paul also opposes equal pay for equal work, a minimum wage, and, naturally, trade unions. In 2007, he voted against restricting employers' rights to interfere in union drives and against raising the federal minimum wage to $7.25. In 2001, he voted for zero-funding for OSHA's Ergonomics Rules, instead of the $4.5 billion. At least he's consistent.

http://www.monthlyreview.org/mrzine/wolf111207.html

Ron Paul = same hate as Huckabee one less blimp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 12/18/2007

Poor HUMESTUPID IS WORRIED!!!!

BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!! BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

He'd better be!!!
The good Dr. is in..
And he has written the prescription.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 12/18/2007
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1669 fans permalink
photo

I just glance through some of the posts by Ron Paul supporters. Here are some examples:

--------------------

(1)Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

Must you always show one of your homosexual heads at every thread?

(2)Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

Ron Paul would arrest Black water and place them on trial if there is any evidence of breaking the law..Otherwise they will be disbanded and so will the CIA!
Regardless of what Duhbya says from his jail cell.

(3)Pdubya (See profile | I'm a fan of Pdubya)
i don't think you realize how many "peacenicks" are behind dr. paul's medical positions. there is alot of compassion built into his views and the constitution. shaklee, dr. mercola, lots of folks...

(4)
Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul (See profile | I'm a fan of Galvestonians for Dr. Ron Paul)

HUMESTUPID has already been addressed and DEBUNKED by several users on here..
Its cut n paste posts are not even issues...
It uses the same 3 or 4 NONISSUE topics, to run its invalid mouth!

FUMESEPTIC is worried!

...
-------------------

If this is representative of his base, does any sane person reading this get a warm feeling about Ron Paul?

Combine that with some of of Ron Paul's positions on important issues that I have presented in other posts on this thread, and decide what Ron Paul is all about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 12/17/2007

Contrary to what some are writing here, Ron Paul has the only plan I've seen that will actually stop the Social Security/Medicare time bomb form going "boom" - without massive tax increases or huge benefit cuts.

To deal with the baby-boomers, big changes are needed, but the rest of the candidates skirt the issue or fudge the numbers.

Dr. Paul's approach is to end our massive spending on maintaining a global military empire, bring that money home, and take care of our domestic problems.

The SS/Medicare crisis is nearly upon us and Ron Paul's approach is the only one that will actually work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 12/17/2007
- stop7997 I'm a Fan of stop7997 6 fans permalink

Jeez, I wonder what all you Ron Paul supporters will do for cash after giving him all your drug and porn money? Guess you'll have to climb out of the basement and ask your parents for an advance on your allowance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 12/17/2007
- LITU I'm a Fan of LITU 106 fans permalink
photo

The wife's calling. Gotta go to bed now. It's been fun.

Go Dodd! The ONLY one of the candidates who speaks for the masses and not a BASE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 12/17/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect