Momentum Builds For Dodd Run At Majority Leader

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Momentum Builds For Dodd Run At Majority Leader stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-19-07 09:55 AM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Chris Dodd Msnbc

As the political season reaches its Iowa caucus climax, momentum is building for Sen. Chris Dodd to parlay his presidential campaign into a bid to challenge Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, for Majority Leader.

Almost all of the support for this effort now comes from the netroots, much of which favors such a move. But talk of Dodd making a run at the post has slowly crept into the corners of Capitol Hill as well. And in light of the Connecticut Democrat's successful filibuster threat this week over granting immunity to telecommunications firms that conducted warrantless surveillance, some in the progressive community see the framework for a potential shakeup.

"Dodd is an effective legislator, he is practiced and experienced and is articulate," said Joan Claybrook, president of the nonprofit group, Public Citizen. "He also knows how to make the process work. I think Harry Reid has an entirely different style and likes to work things out behind the scenes. He's had to be a negotiator and people don't like that sometimes. They want to see someone take a stand and win, but that is hard in this Congress and with these issues."

Claybrook, it should be noted, made no endorsement. And Dodd's campaign and close advisers insist that he is not focused on anything other than the presidential race.

"Senator Dodd and his campaign supporters, staff and family are 100 percent focused on the Iowa caucus and winning this nomination," Dodd's spokesperson Colleen Flanagan told the Huffington Post.

And yet, after Dodd forced reconsideration of the surveillance legislation - by arguing for eight hours and threatening to go longer - he left many prominent bloggers yearning for more.

"I like Harry Reid enough, but it's clear that we live in a climate in which the type of leadership we need is better provided by Chris Dodd," Markos Moulitsas of DailyKos told the Huffington Post. "Republicans have been laughing at us all term, refusing to compromise because they know the inevitable capitulation on any given issue is always just a couple of days away. Those Republicans need to be re-taught how to negotiate, and step one is to have a Democratic caucus that will tighten the screws when necessary. Yesterday, that person wasn't our leader, it was Chris Dodd."

Similar sentiment has been exhibited at other prominent progressive blogs like FireDogLake.

Story continues below

Still, a major obstacle for a Majority Leader Dodd remains: Senate Democrats are, by and large, happy with the work of Reid. Many note the difficulties in working with a one-vote majority and say he has done the best with the hand he was dealt. In the wake of an April 2007 Washington Post column that was highly critical of Reid's leadership on Iraq, every single member of the Senate Democratic Caucus signed a letter to the paper, challenging its assertions.

"If it were to happen, the pressure would have to come from the outside," said an aide to a prominent senator, not from Dodd's office. "I haven't heard of anyone being upset with Reid. There has been, in fact, an awful lot of support."

Claybrook said of Dodd, "On some issues he's fantastic and on other issues not as much. I'm fond of him and have known him for many years but I also have great respect for Harry Reid."

The process of choosing a new Majority Leader in the Senate is not a difficult parliamentary procedure. Every two years, when a new Congress is sworn in, leadership holds an election. The sitting leader has the traditional advantages of incumbency -- he or she can dole out committee assignments and set the voting agenda to appease fellow members. As such, intra-party leadership struggles do not frequently take place. In 1970, Sen. Ted Kennedy, coming off only one term as Majority Whip, lost his reelection to Sen. Robert Byrd.

Dodd has run for a top-ranking post before. In 1994, as a 14-year Senate veteran, he took on then-Sen. Tom Daschle, D-SD, for Minority Leader and lost. This, observers say, will likely weigh in his mind should he choose to mount another challenge.

"Dodd has tried for leadership positions before and he has lost races," Jennifer Duffy, Senior Editor at the Cook Political Report, told the Huffington Post. "He is not going to just jump into this. I don't think he will announce anything like that without counting noses first. And when he does, he might find that the votes aren't there."

Of course, if Dodd were to try once more for the Democrat's top Senate job it would mean that his aspirations for the White House had met an unsuccessful end. Currently, his poll position in Iowa and New Hampshire leaves substantial room for improvement. But his name has been floated around as possible cabinet member. And his campaign insists that, even in the wake of the FISA victory, they have only the oval office on their minds.

"This [FISA victory] speaks to the kind of leadership he would have as president," said Flanagan.

As the political season reaches its Iowa caucus climax, momentum is building for Sen. Chris Dodd to parlay his presidential campaign into a bid to challenge Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, for Majority Leader.
As the political season reaches its Iowa caucus climax, momentum is building for Sen. Chris Dodd to parlay his presidential campaign into a bid to challenge Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, for Majority Leader.
Report Corrections
 
Comments
244
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- Cathexis I'm a Fan of Cathexis 7 fans permalink

I'm a former Republican, turned Independent when the party went veering Right. These past several years, I have been (for all extents and purposes) a Democrat.

With leaders like Chris Dodd, that continues, with enthusiasm.

With Dem leaders who merely sit back and enable the wingnuts ... who don't fight for Law & Constitution ... I'll have no use for either party.

A large part of why I have been ferverently supporting Dems is in the expectation they'll defend what's right and make a stand to stop the Rightwing Extremists. I suggest a large part of Congress' low approval ratings is exactly their failure to do so (at least, as a cohesive body).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 12/19/2007
- Fez I'm a Fan of Fez 30 fans permalink
photo

If every one of the Democrap senators signed a letter supporting reid, then every one of them must go. Clean house. Anyone elected to Congress is an a priori criminal greedhead asshole. A rising tide may raise all boats but a shitstorm of public outrage wipes out the bacterial infection that is Congress. Send a proctologist to Congress. He'll put his finger right on the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 12/19/2007

What makes Sen. Dodd's achievement so amazing is that, on the same day, he pushed thru the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act thru the Senate and House with unanimous consent, despite Admin objections to the bill.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Sudan-Divestment.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Anybody out there remember any Democrat accomplishing that in recent history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 12/19/2007

I like Harry Reid and have much respect for him, but, I think the atmosphere that the GOP has wrought by not taking the Bush administration to task for what they have done, could have been turned around with Chris Dodd in the drivers seat. Dodd would have gone public and I think maybe the American public would have then applied more pressure on the GOP to do the right thing.

I would very much support Dodd in the Majority Leader post - I would also thank Harry Reid for all the long nights and the work he has done as leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 12/19/2007

But I just read that there was no thought of replacing helpless Harry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 12/19/2007
- glitzqueen I'm a Fan of glitzqueen 17 fans permalink
photo

Dodd has earned the gratitude of every American who respects the Constitution. Reid should take a lesson from him or get out of the way.

With Dems like Reid and Pelosi, who needs Republicans?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 12/19/2007

TO: Senator Chris Dodd,Presidential Candidate December 19, 2007

President Thomas Jefferson liked the poor and wanted to help them. Pres. Jefferson was known as a friend of the people. President Thomas Jefferson stated,"In a Free Nation the rich people should not do all the ruling and the poor should vote and hold office." Historian notes Pres. Jefferson wisely said this. From America's Own Story by Vanza Devereaux '54.

Senator Chris Dodd, I'm told Welfare in Connecticut is only 6 months. In a winter environment this would be cruel. The Welfare Reform Bill of 1996 Time Limit is bad too. Florida no Welfare Albert Sanchez 97 ltr to me. Wisconsin no Welfare from Sfc KGO radio news report. Shelters cruelly unacceptable and unsafe. Here in Bay Area Welfare is only 3 months in six counties. Welfare delegated to the States who violate the 5 years Federal Law of 5 yrs. Why have you not exposed this violation of Law? One needs longer time to find work. Crime,Discrimination against races. I quit evil,corrupt jobs. The mentally ill should not be thrown into the street either.


We must always keep the Giving and compassionate spirit of Christmas going. Roger Williams whose brave pioneer work of theory of government which ultimately found itself in our U.S. Constitution was loved by others for his humane policies. Silent night. Holy night. Jesus came to redeem and Save all even the homeless. Eva Hart Christian Army 62-70 670 Eddy St. Sfc 94109

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 12/19/2007
- LVLefty I'm a Fan of LVLefty 7 fans permalink

I am a Harry Reid supporter in Nevada. I don't agree with all of his moves as a senator or a leader, but I have been grateful for as long as I can remember to have him in Congress. And while I greatly respect and admire Chris Dodd, and probably will support him in the Nevada caucus, the criticism of Reid is wrong-headed and based on a simple problem: the netroots don't know from their hinds to a hole in the ground about how the Senate works. What is happening to our side in the Senate is nothing new. We did it several times to Republicans--not enough, because we believe in reason and decency, and if Republicans did, they wouldn't support George W. Bush. Whatever has gone wrong for us in Congress has not been the fault of Harry Reid. Perhaps it would help his critics to learn that it takes 60 votes to get legislation to the floor, and the jackbooted thugs across the aisle have united.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 12/19/2007
- kevenseven I'm a Fan of kevenseven 501 fans permalink
photo

Guys,

I was speaking yesterday with the Legislative Director of a congressman on the house judiciary committee. We discussed many things, including FISA and amnesty.

He expressed concern that the senate would again take up this FISA bill at a point on the calendar so close to the expiry of the current law, that there would not be time for a proper conference committee.

I TRUST you all know that Pelosi and the house passed the RESTORE act (she delivered your pony on that occasion), which is nearly perfectly unoffensive to civil libertarians. It is surely better than anything that Bush wants.

Y'all know what a conferece committee does? The process by which bills from the house and senate are reconciled?

Now is yet again the time to get after your congressman and senators on this, as the window to effect change once the senate reconvenes will be very brief. Please do a bit of research so that you sound informed when you call in or as you write your letters.

And your congressman will be available in your district, call his/her office and find a town-hall event to speak with him.

If yours is a troglodyte, I'm afraid you will have a harder time of it. You need to know the name of the challenger and say "BillyBob" woluld vote my way, I will be looking closely at your vote on this as I decide who I am going to work for in the campaign." or some such.

Nobody said this is easy, certainly not me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 12/19/2007
- mellene I'm a Fan of mellene 10 fans permalink

Chris Dodd would be an incredible, forthright leader with more values than Reid. Reid needs to go now. I think he's been bought off by the big media and other corporations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 12/19/2007

Why are Democrats so firm behind Reid? While the Democrats in congress still have a higher approval than the Republicans in congress, their ratings are still poor. Reid totally blew it on Macasy, allowing for a quick vote. And he's about the most boring speaker out there, I mean he makes John Kerry look charismatic by comparison.

Dodd deserves a lot of props for his effort to stop telecom immunity and I'd definetly like to see him as the next Majority leader. It's unlikely to happen. I think if Hillary Clinton doesn't get the Democratic nomination she will be much more likely to be the next Senate Majority leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 12/19/2007
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 52 fans permalink
photo

he evidently knows what it means to be the majority leader unlike Reid. LEADING SOMETIMES MEAN YOU HAVE TO STAND ALONE EVEN WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IS GIVING INTO FEAR.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 12/19/2007

There are no good reasons to leave Reid or Pelosi in their current leadership positions. They have displayed nothing but gutless incompetence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 12/19/2007
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 165 fans permalink

Dodd at least would be effective. At this time when we are forfeiting our civil liberties and the various departments of government, such as the Justice Department, are acting extralegally, we need someone willing to take principled stands and risk defeat. Pelosi and Red have acted too genteelly to Republicans, who would roll them over without a thought. Why did senate Democrats agree that they needed a 60 vote majority to bring certain bills to the floor? If Republicans threaten a filibuster let them stand on the floor for hours on end and filibuster. To preserve our rights, Democrats need to work from the same playbook the Republicans use to dismantle these same rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 12/19/2007
- stlrfan I'm a Fan of stlrfan 2 fans permalink

Chris Dodd gets defending the Constitution. Harry [folds like a lawn chair] Reid does not. Dodd might actually display some leadership.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 12/19/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect