iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bloomberg And Hagel Holding Regular Calls

Hagel And Bloomberg

First Posted: 03/28/08 03:45 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:20 PM ET

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel have been conducting regular, private phone conversations over the past few months in an effort to "feel each other out" for a possible presidential run, sources have told the Huffington Post.

The development feeds speculation that the two men could mount a third-party White House ticket. And while the maverick Republican and the independent mayor have met in the past, the ongoing conversations provide the clearest indication yet that they are considering such a move.

Sources with knowledge of the conversations say they are done in private, and so the topics of discussion remain unclear. But one high-ranking aide confirmed that the two have discussed Hagel joining the presidential campaign should Bloomberg decide to run.

"It has to come from Bloomberg because Hagel can't really do anything," said the source, before adding that there was no indication that the two have declared a political alliance. A decision on whether to run will likely be made once the Democrats and Republicans have settled on a nominee.

The Bloomberg-Hagel presidential rumors began after the two had lunch together last May. Days later, Hagel appeared on CBS' Face the Nation and remarked that he would consider running on an independent ticket with Bloomberg, presumably, at the head. A few months later, the Washington Post's David Broder, wrote a flattering piece about the possibility of the two men mounting a run at the White House. As recently as a few weeks ago the pair reunited for a dinner in New York City.

"We didn't make any deals," Hagel said after the meal. "But I think Mayor Bloomberg is the kind of individual who should seriously think about this. It's a great country to think about - a New York boy and a Nebraska boy to be teamed up leading this nation."

Apart from Hagel, Bloomberg has made several political moves that suggest he is interested in running for the White House. Early in 2007 he switched his party affiliation from Republican to Independent. And in late November, the Huffington Post reported that the mayor has been receiving foreign policy briefings from Nancy Soderberg, a Clinton administration official who was U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Echoing media reports, a recent Bloomberg dinner companion told the Huffington Post that the mayor "discusses the permutations of his entering the presidential race all the time."

Mayor Bloomberg's office and Senator Hagel's office both declined to comment.

The dynamics of a Bloomberg-Hagel ticket are unique if not at times incongruous. Both men share objections to President Bush's policies in Iraq and have shown outward willingness to buck the two-party system. But on domestic affairs, and especially social policies like abortion and gay marriage, their stances are drastically different. Still, those in favor of a third-party ticket see enough similarities to create the framework for at least a portion of a White House cabinet.

"As you build a unity team, one of the things you, of course, take into consideration is what are the strengths and weakness of each person on that team," said Doug Bialey, co-founder of Unity08, a group supporting an independent presidential ticket in 2008. "It may not be necessary. It may be that there is a member of the team that wouldn't be a great vice president but would be great to have on the team."

And indeed one of the chief purposes of the private phone conversations, sources say, is to help build the personal and political gap should Bloomberg choose to run with Hagel by his side.

"The [conversation] are not always political," an aide speculated. "They are often just the two of them getting to know each other."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel have been conducting regular, private phone conversations over the past few months in an effort to "feel each other out" for a po...
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel have been conducting regular, private phone conversations over the past few months in an effort to "feel each other out" for a po...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 701
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConnieInCleveland
One Lonely Voice trying to make a difference
10:16 AM on 01/01/2008
My first correction for '08! I humbly apologize to Mayor Bloomberg for speaking out against his effort to form a 'Unity' party. I assumed he was positioning for himself. I assumed wrong. I heard Mayor Bloomberg tell a reporter last night he is not running for President. If his intention is to help America Unite as Americans, not democrats or republicans, I humbly apologize for my wrong assumption! We need leaders who are willing to look into the future and see what is needed for change. We as Americans need to participate in the process of deciding who leads us into the future. Parties should not decide the direction of America. Americans should decide using our voices and our votes.
12:35 PM on 12/24/2007
My guess is that if Edwards is not the nomination, we may see both a Hagel/Bloomberg run AND a Paul/x

If Hillary or Giuliani gets the nod we are almost assured.

Also, the unlikely ghouli nomination might mean a futher christian split-off.

In a huck or Mccain vs. hillary - the paul or hagel/bloom ticket could throw all bets off.

their might be a real 4 way - especially if Paul can get over the 10% hump quickly. And frankly he might get MORE respect as a Lib. or I.
05:05 PM on 12/21/2007
I'm at a complete loss as to why they would not run as Republicans. It's not too late is it?

Enter now, apologize(ish) to the early states, win super Tuesday as (R) not (I).

I mean.. As Ghouliani's name recognition fades and people are less impressed by the size of Romey's piggybank, we get "Huckabee Surges", "McCain Comeback".

OMFG, Are you kidding me?

The only way this makes sense to me is a late entry as (R).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fernando
My Micro-bio is empty? Really?
01:30 PM on 12/21/2007
Bloomberg heading this ticket will siphon votes mainly from democrats in the blue states they rely on. A "republican" in name only like Bloomberg has no shot outside New England.
photo
speakingtruth2power
Not motivated by fear & loathing
12:55 PM on 12/21/2007
The idea that a third or fourth party entry may draw equally from both majors is Bushit.
Nader hurt Gore, Pierrot hurt Bush, etc. The entry of Hagel and Bloomberg will hurt the very slim chance, any GOP ticket could muster.

The only competition that matters is between Hillary and thew rest of the Democratic field. The best thing that could happen is a quick pairing of Edwards and Obama being marketed as the Tag Team from Camelot.

No politician is perfect nor can an administration save the country from the post war recession, globalization or our massive debt BUT America needs to believe in hope, fairness and their government.

There is no way that Hillary can deliver that kind of optimism, volunteerism and faith. Her second term scandals are already part of the grand scheme of GHWB who wants to continue the BCBCB dynasty leading US to JeeBush and the Norte American Fascist Union.
photo
PlanetK27
Architect
12:53 PM on 12/21/2007
if Bloomberg chooses Hagel as his VP for a run in 08, would they as a team be called "Bagel"?
12:51 PM on 12/21/2007
I think Bloomberg and Hagel would be a much better choice for those in the center or leaning a bit Republican. They're both decent men of conviction with good heads on their shoulders. I'm ready for them to jump into this race.
12:46 PM on 12/21/2007
Spoiler alert! Guess we didn't learn enough from Ralph, eh? Get ready for President Huckabee.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BobSF94117
12:24 PM on 12/21/2007
How anyone can even consider handing the executive branch to the GOP for another four years is beyond me. Bush has been a catastrophe, but it's absurd to think that all that has happened has been directed by him personally. His administration merely unleashed the desires of the GOP to do to this government and to the country what far too many of them have wanted to do for a long, long time. From the top of the party down to the lowest blowhard at Townhall.com, the party is sick. Let the good Republicans -- who, I hope, still constitute a majority of the party -- fix their party first, then seek national office.
11:15 AM on 12/21/2007
Sam Stein wrote: "Both men share objections to President Bush's policies in Iraq"

Um, not exactly, well, actually precisely the opposite. Bloomberg has been far more enthusiastic for the Iraq war than his possible future colleague, Chuck Hagel, has ever been. For example, here's a quote from Wikipedia:

"Initially, Bloomberg strongly supported the war in Iraq and the rationale for going in. He stated, "Don't forget that the war started not very many blocks from here" alluding to Ground Zero. In regard to the global War on Terrorism including Iraq he said, "It's not only to protect Americans. It's America's responsibility to protect people around the world who want to be free."...Bloomberg expresses criticism about Democrats in Congress who want to set a timetable for withdraw from Iraq calling them, "irresponsible." [45]"

You can read the full text at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg .

Though I'm now a Democrat, I've voted independent myself at times, Perot in 92, Richard Lamm in 96. However I'm strongly opposed to the war, and sentiment turned against the war among independents in 05, which means that any credible third-party/independent presidential ticket must have clear credentials in opposition to this lunatic, immoral, and illegal war before they would stand a chance of challenging the two-party system. On those grounds alone, Bloomberg just wouldn't qualify.

The war, and the criminal pre-emptive foreign policy on which it is based, is one of the two pre-eminent issues of our time (global warming being the other). On both of those issues, about half of the current Democratic candidates are unambiguously on the right side, which means that, barring a disaster like a Hillary nomination, I'll be voting Democrat this year. And Mike Bloomberg running as an independent will just make me more determined to do so.

Bloomberg's flacking for the war is something that just won't work for today's history, sort of like a politician still flirting with slavery after Lincoln abolished it.
10:49 AM on 12/21/2007
Looks like 2008 has found its own Ralph Nader.

Tailor-made for the people who go into a eyes-red rage at the mention of the name Hillary.

Here he comes....President Giuliani.
10:16 AM on 12/21/2007
Anything put out by Sam Stein is subject to a credibility check. He appears to be just a hack of yellow journalism. That may be why A. Huff&Puff hired him.
10:06 AM on 12/21/2007
As a past Democrat and now independent thinker I would vote for Bloomberg/Hagel without a second thought if Hillary gets the Dem. nomination and Rudy, Mitt, Huckster get the repub nom. Religious zealouts scare the hell out of me. Where are the statesmen of old when we need them. America has lost its way, I am afraid for my Children and Grandchildren's future. I must admit to liking Ron Paul only because he believes in the constitution our fore fathers were able to draft.
photo
FloaterBall
The future ain't what it used to be
09:30 AM on 12/21/2007
All of you hardheaded fools who won't vote for Hillary under any circumstances: Its name is Mitt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ajax2
09:09 AM on 12/21/2007
I don't see Bloomberg running unless a populist or progressive was leading. That would be his job to stop them from getting the WH, or even from getting nominated.