EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Unionists Slam "Hypocritical" Leaders for Anti-Obama Mailer

First Posted: 3/28/08 Updated: 5/25/11

Clinton And Mcentee

Union members in Illinois and Iowa are denouncing their national leaders as hypocrites for sending out a deceptive campaign mailer aimed this week at Barack Obama. They are livid that the political arm of their 1.4 million member American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) financed a mailer to Iowa voters slamming Obama for opposing individual health care mandates - the same sort of mandates long opposed by the union.

"This is definitely hypocritical, absolutely," said Carter Woodruff, an activist with Iowa AFSCME and a former official of the union state council. "It's a desperate attempt to attack [Obama] for unfounded reasons. It's a shame they stooped so low."

The union's direct mail flyer was written in a disguised manner that suggested it came from the John Edwards campaign and not from AFSCME and it slapped Obama for taking what it called "the timid way out, offering yet another band-aid solution."

AFSCME's national leadership endorsed Hillary Clinton last October and is expected to spend millions on her behalf if she wins the nomination.

Woodruff along with Henry Bayer, Executive Director of Illinois-based AFSCME Council 31, spoke to reporters on a conference call organized by the Obama campaign. Council 31, representing 75,000 Illinois public employees, endorsed Obama this month. "Senator Obama has fought like hell for working people," said Bayer. "His health care plan is most in line with that of our national union."

The dissident union members, indeed, pointed out that AFSCME's national health care resolution passed earlier this year declared that individual mandates are "incompatible" with the principles and interests of the union membership.

And in congressional testimony last April, AFSCME President Gerald McEntee also denounced individual mandates as they would force families to "pay much higher prices" for health care policies.

But AFSCME President McEntee is a long-time loyal supporter of the Clintons and though his union went through an extended process of internal consultation before acting it was a foregone conclusion that it would eventually put its heft into Hillary Clinton's corner. He was an early supporter of President Bill Clinton's candidacy and emerged as the most important pro-Clinton labor leader during the 1990's.

Hillary Clinton has recently targeted Obama's rejection of universal health care mandates claiming that it would leave 15 million Americans un-insured. Mandates, of the sort supported by Clinton, would require every American family to purchase a health care plan with subsidies offered to those with lower incomes. Obama, by contrast, has argued that the problem with health insurance is precisely that it is unaffordable and that mandates would only aggravate the problem.

The Edwards campaign, which shares the Clinton position on health care mandates, nevertheless denounced the AFSCME mailer as unprecedented in its deception. "There have been a lot of misleading tactics and tricks in the last few weeks, but we've just never seen anything like this before," said Edwards' Iowa state director Jennifer O'Malley Dillon in a statement. "Either they are trying to trick people, or they've realized that on health care, John Edwards is the candidate who speaks honestly about what it really costs and what will be required to have truly universal coverage."

McEntee's office did not reply to requests to respond to today's denunciation by the Illinois and Iowa members.

Check out the rest of HuffPost's Iowa coverage.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Union members in Illinois and Iowa are denouncing their national leaders as hypocrites for sending out a deceptive campaign mailer aimed this week at Barack Obama. They are livid that the political a...
Union members in Illinois and Iowa are denouncing their national leaders as hypocrites for sending out a deceptive campaign mailer aimed this week at Barack Obama. They are livid that the political a...
 
  • Comments
  • 253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
02:30 PM on 12/26/2007
If AFSCME members had the right to directly elect their national union president -- which they don't -- McEntee would have been turned out of office years ago. It shouldn't be any surprise that he would ignore his union's own positions to endorse Hillary Clinton. After all, in the 1990s he was willing to see members of his union lose their jobs rather than say anything bad about Clinton's welfare reform plan. What did McEntee get out of sucking up to the Clintons? Rides on Air Force One, invitation­s to hang out at the White House and watch TV, etc. What did AFSCME MEMBERS get from the union backing Clinton? N O T H I N G !
06:14 AM on 12/25/2007
Obama inches by Hillary in new poll: http://ap.­google.com­/article/A­LeqM5jubur­dSSdigTLtm­Cg6Ez87e67­L_gD8TN79T­00
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
campaignman
12:01 AM on 12/25/2007
Obama can beat the GOP by winning independen­ts.

He inspires Americans and the rest of the world will view America as a truly changed nation.

A fresh start is what we need and Obama is the one!

Do you really want four (or eight) more years of lies and distortion­s from the Clintons? Aren't we sick of that by now?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
campaignman
11:59 PM on 12/24/2007
Hillary has pissed off Obama's supporters and already has half the nation stating they would never vote for her. Sounds like the perfect person to nominate for President. She'll make John Kerry look like a brilliant idea!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lastams
07:13 PM on 12/23/2007
Union members are comming out for Obama?
Well no wonder, let's see, his vote on the Nafta Peru extention was ... oh wait, OBama didn't make that vote did he?
But that's ok, none of the Senators currently running for President voted on the measure.
Not one.
There WAS one current member of Congress who came out against the fast-track­ed anti-Ameri­can worker trade deal. I'll give you a clue. His name starts with a K.
06:40 PM on 12/23/2007
I only have on hope. Clinton's keep it up! Every time they attack Obama, it backfires. Look for her to come in third in Iowa. Either Obama or Edwards coming in first and second will hurt her. If Obama takes Iowa and New Hampshire the long national nightmare of two family domination will be over.
04:56 PM on 12/23/2007
Your headline is misleading­. Union members overwhelmi­ngly support John Edwards. He's been endorsed by the Steelworke­rs, Mine Workers, Carpenters & Joiners, and 10 state chapters of the SEIU, among others. He has 3 million union members supporting him across the country. And it's because he opposes trade agreements that take good paying union jobs away and replace them with fastfood/'­mart minimum wage jobs. John Edwards will win the primaries that bring the most delegates to the convention­s. Get ready to welcome back the middle class.
03:05 PM on 12/23/2007
Union people are "JUST PEOPLE" and can make up their own minds about who they should support.
HOWEVER we union people do not disregard the "OFFICIAL" union opinion.
No amount of back and forth of attacks and slurs on both sides will change my opinion. I have made up my mind just as I made up my mind about George Bush about seven years ago. I was, and am, not clarvoyant but I knew he was no good for our country. I voted against him each time. How many here voted against George? How many of those trying to change our minds here voted for this atrocious man who has wrecked havoc with our country and other people's countries?
Obama is being foisted on us here on this blog site, but I still believe in Hillary.
Her decency and discipline would bring back the principal of working together - in this country - across the isle.... and around the world.
Better be careful who you put in their folks.
I hope I don't lose my vote again, as I would like to see my country coming back from evil and our world heading in the right direction again.
12:05 PM on 12/22/2007
They should concentrat­e on showing voters why they should support their chosen candidate, rather than attacking the other candidates­.

This is one reason people are tired of the "same old politics."

http://oba­mabarack.b­logspot.co­m/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GV97
Song Bird
09:31 AM on 12/22/2007
Every day something negative comes out of the Clinton campaign ! Are we getting a little nervous? It's disgusting­!!
Clinton WANTS Edwards to come in first .....
OBAMA coming in first is a disaster for her.
07:43 AM on 12/22/2007
"Unionists Slam "Hypocriti­cal" Leaders Over Hillary Mailer"

Marc Cooper -This may well be the worst piece of fake journalism I have ever read. You zealots over at HuffPost are beyond pathetic.

Let me see if I have this straight. AFSCME leadership sent out a mailer critical of an Obama health care plan. They used an accurate quote of Edwards to illuminate the basis of their concern. Now according to you it was a dastardly black flag operation by Hillary to attack Obama and blame Edwards.

This is pure speculatio­n on your part with no facts, just empty, vapid, speculatio­n. The only basis for this is the AFSCME leadership supports Hillary. And maybe, as John Edwards says, "they've realized that on health care, John Edwards is the candidate who speaks honestly about what it really costs and what will be required to have truly universal coverage." You don't even indicate that Hillary had anything to do with the mailer. Why? Because that is probably the truth. Yet you have half of the idiot readers here commenting as if Hillary personally wrote the mailer and licked the stamps on the way to the post office.

Why don't you write a piece about how Hillary supporters are furious about that antiHillar­y GOP produced movie, featuring Obama's diatribe against her. You know, that it was actually secretly written and produced by the Obama campaign. The GOP support Obama. Its all falling into place. Lets face it, the movie only serves one master at this time and that man is Obama.

Marc Cooper...y­ou should be forced to turn in your laptop and not be allowed to write another word for two years. You damage yourself and the Huffpost with this pap.
03:03 AM on 12/22/2007
Why does Hillary Clinton think she can get away with such dirty tricks? Her attempt at heavy handed machine politics is just that, heavy handed. We don't need the likes of her in the White House. We do need someone whose best interest is that of the people, and that is John Edwards.

Karita Hummer
01:24 AM on 12/22/2007
Whenever the Clinton campaign pulls dirty tricks, Clinton loses major points because she exposes her deepest flaw--what people view as ruthlessne­ss and entitlemen­t.

Edwards has run a remarkably clean campaign by comparison­, and people notice.
01:02 AM on 12/22/2007
Hypocrite? Did somebody mention Hillary?
12:19 AM on 12/22/2007
Obviously the Clinton Campaign is threatened by Edwards, so they resort to dirty tricks to try to bring Edwards down. They know that Edwards is going to win Iowa.

Edwards is our best hope--he is the only one speaking out against the corruption in both parties, he has fought for us "little guys" his whole life, and he is the most electable of the Democrats, as shown consistent­ly by general election polls, including last week's CNN poll.

Edwards will win it all. He will be "Our Friend in the White House."