Well, given the horrific casualties, and the fact that Iran has not attacked another country for about 250 years and poses virtually no threat whatsoever to Israel either now or in the future, I would say that it would be in the US's best interest to prevent Israel from making such a move under ANY circumstances.

Frankly, though, I don't think that there is even the SMALLEST possibility that Israel will ever do something so insane.

This is just more Neocon wetdreams, and those guys have lost ALL their gravitas both here and in Israel long ago.

The ugly venom spewing from some of the posts on this forum is a very good example of why we should all be very worried about the future of this planet.

I strongly suspect, and, given enough time, might actually prove that boobaloo is in fact posting from Gaza. Or a similar place - Tehran, Cairo, Damascus - take your pick.

This dude used to have many other incarnations on Huffpost although his lexicon never changes, since he posts only pre-approved shit. When he does add his own words, there is also a certain pattern, easily discernible and betraying a limited English vocabulary.

Give it up dude.

Well, that certainly kills the Christmas cheer.

Just read the "report" and let's just say there are holes in the "analysis" big big enough to drive a truck bomb through.

Gee, why would a "respected think tank" (who respects them? hmmmmm) from Washington sit around and try to figure that out. Don't sit around and try to figure out their question, ask why they asked that question in the first place.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Center_for_Strategic_and_International_Studies

Any country that knowingly launches a nuclear war which will releases huge quantities of radioactive material into Earth's atmosphere is an irresponsible and dangerous rouge nation and rightfully deserves to be ground completely to dust.

Any nation.

Nuclear war is a war on the entire planet and anyone who thinks otherwise is simply a stupid fuck.

So George, did you have someone tell you about this? I don't believe the story that you read a lot. This article understates what would happen. The size of nuclear attack that would kill this many Iranians would devastate the entire middle east unless you can get the wind to blow straight up for a long time. Americans are used to a large country with miles and miles to any where. The middle east is a bunch of tiny countries that are smaller then most of our states. Good by oil industry. Chavez is king of the world. I suppose you plan to own Venezuela. Then that would make you king. Is this your middle east foreign policy?

"It estimates that a nuclear war would last approximately three weeks and ultimately end with the annihilation of Iran, based on Israel's alleged possession of sophisticated and powerful nuclear weapons."

If Israel were to launch such an attack, that would surely be the END of ISRAEL. They would become a pariah nation in the world community.

That wouldn't stop practitoners of the religion of peace; they would rationalize that since they were killed in a conflict with infidels that they would all go to heaven as martyred jihadis and recieve the 72 virgin reward.

Well, this article is pretty stupid and blatant war propaganda because Iran does not have nuclear weapons and wouldn't think of going after the fourth powerful military in the world.

We know that Israel is the only country there with nuclear capabilities and because they have a psychotic history of invading others, they are not going to allow its nuclear monopoly to be threatened.

This is a country that is illegally occupying the natural inhabitants of their land and won't hesitate to invade it's neighbors and kill millions in the process.

The world would have two less states with an official religion.

If America stopped funding Israel's war machine, this would put a damper on Israel's war tendency.

The Israelis would use their Jericho missiles, not planes.

So will I get better millage in my giant SUV with radioactive gasoline?