Hillary's Final Strategy: Be Afraid

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Hillary's Final Strategy: Be Afraid stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-29-07 05:55 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Eldridge, Iowa - Barack Obama and John Edwards might want to change the world. But Hillary Clinton wants to protect you against it.

That's the unmistakable message that Senator Clinton is pounding out in this final phase of the campaign to capture the Iowa caucuses. In a world brimming with danger and uncertainty, she argues as she blitzes the Hawkeye State, there's no time to waste daydreaming about pie-in-the-sky promises of reform.

Instead, the American people must choose a leader ready to immediately start fixing the problems that already exist and one who is immediately ready to face the inevitable and "unpredictable" crises looming right over the horizon. And that would be Clinton.

"We know some of the challenges that await the next president," Clinton told a packed crowd at a junior high school Saturday morning. "But no matter how much we know, we can't possibly anticipate all the problems."

The razzamatazz cheerleading, sloganeering style that punctuated her earlier campaign events has now been replaced by a sedate, somber, even grave tone coming from the podium. Clinton never raised her voice, never elevated the mood, and at times sounded like a concerned, responsible parent telling the kids that something terrible was taking place outside the door but not to worry because Mom and Dad - or in this case Hill and Bill- would take care of it.

Becoming president, she said in a hushed tone, is "an awesome responsibility. And it was thrown into relief with the events last Thursday with the assassination of Benazir Bhutto."

"When that person gets into the Oval Office," she said, referring to the next president, "there will be a stack of problems already waiting: a war, another war to resolve, an economy that is faltering, housing values that have dropped 6% in some parts of the country...all of those millions, 47 million of them uninsured."

As is now customary among her leading rivals, Clinton didn't utter the words Obama or Edwards - the two candidates now in a dogfight for the mantle of change- but she drew a bright shining line between her position and theirs. They are the dreamers. She is the doer. All three are locked in a dead heat to win next Thursday's first-in-the-nation caucus.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Everybody running is talking about change," Clinton said, sporting a royal blue blazer over black slacks. "Some people think you bring change by demanding it," she said, referring to Edwards. "Some people think you bring it by hoping for it," she continued in a clear reference to Obama. "And some people think you bring it by working very, very hard everyday. And that's what I've been doing for 35 years."

Even the name of this last-minute, multi-stop, week-long closing swing through Iowa carries the ultra-utilitarian title of "Big Problems, Real Solutions - Time to Pick a President."

Clinton's pragmatic pitch was well-received by the disproportionately elderly audience. And while Obama rallies are fueled with hard rock and Edwards events incline toward country fare, Clinton's rally was preceded by a performance by an accordion-led trio playing the U.S. Marine Corps hymn.

"I went to see Obama give a speech last night and he was inspiring," said Louise Mooney, a Maryland physician volunteering for the Clinton Iowa campaign and who attended Saturday's rally. "Obama is more conceptual. But Hillary's more of a leader, she's more nitty-gritty, more X-Y-Z."

While Clinton has been chided by her rivals for representing the past, she unabashedly touted the "1990s as a time of jobs and prosperity," and joked that "the 90s aren't exactly ancient history." She lauded the accomplishments of the Clinton administration including the 1996 abolition of the federal welfare safety net saying, "You know, the best way to help somebody is prepare them to get a job."

Much as her husband often did as a sitting president, she eschewed any sweeping promises of radical change and, instead, ticked off a long list of bite-sized program applets she would tackle as president: increased Pell grants, expanded tax credits for college tuition, and universal day care for 4 year olds. "And I'm going to eliminate those financial aid forms that parents have to fill out that take hours and hours," she promised.

"The economy was in great shape when her husband was in office," said a woman supporter in a green union T-shirt. "I think she learned a lot from him."

Check out the rest of HuffPost's Iowa coverage.

Report Corrections
 
Comments
1193
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- raptor I'm a Fan of raptor 7 fans permalink

As I recall the final phase of the 2000 election, it came down to 1) who would be the better man for education and 2) who spoke better and more Spanish. Did the average American foresee 9/11, Afghanistan, or Iraq?
Who knows what the future holds? Maybe a candidate will become disabled or die. Some useen challenge will arise. Touting so-so experience or so-so intuition (aka common sense) might not cut it. And Iowa may be too early to tell. Iowa? Does anyone read the Des Moines Register except at caucus time?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 12/30/2007

Your introductory comments on Sen. Clinton's campaign seem cogent, logical, and informative--what one would expect of a potential leader and shaper. What is missing though is how you leap from those examples to your conclusion: She is trying to "make us afraid." Even Evel Kneivell wouldn't attempt that leap. As I recall FDR articulated the problems facing the nation in his inaugural address, no less real or documented than Sen. Clinton's, but he completed his address with one of the resounding statement's of American history: Nothwithstanding all of the problems...."We have nothing to fear but fear itself."
That was the conclusion I reached from HRC's position. To try to project a negative qualification from such evidence is I think a disservice to Senators Dodd, Biden, Clinton, and McCain (although one could point out that McCain has on occasion seems to market fear.) Sen. Obama on the other hand seems to avoid discussion of resolution of specific problems, focusing instead on generic change for its own sake. The other Republican candidates' respective positions are platitudinal parodies and whose only solutions are to cut taxes and borrow from China to fund the Iraq war and any spinoffs which may evolve [The only evolution they would accept.]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 12/30/2007

I hope Hill remembered to send Ghouliana his royalty check for using the trademarked "9/11".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 12/30/2007
- Trittydi I'm a Fan of Trittydi 75 fans permalink
photo

The headline is disingenuous and misleading.

Dear Huffpost, do you have to make your hatred for Hillary so obvious? Don't we get enough of that from the MSM?

She's basically warning us that we need to fear another repiglican administration.

Even if she's the wrong candidate - that doesn't mean her message is wrong. Listen to her and then vote for the candidate of your choice.
*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 12/30/2007
- MSB I'm a Fan of MSB 45 fans permalink
photo

Increasingly, I don't think I will vote for Hillary even if she wins the nomination. She "represents" most everything that is wrong with the Democratic Party. I will likely go third party if she is the nominee.

I think it is funny when people say that voting against Hillary is a wasted vote (if you are a Democrat or Liberal). I think she is more of the same. She doesn't care about the middle-class or lower-class at all. She cares about money. I have no interest whatsoever in making she and Bill richer, or her contributors wealthier. She is selling fear because she has nothing else to sell. Her next fresh idea will be her first.

Some would say not voting for her would be wasting my vote, I'd say why don't they do themselves a favor and switch parties now. She is just a republican without the evangelical support.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 12/30/2007
- SiskoKid I'm a Fan of SiskoKid 6 fans permalink

I love this "progressive" site. She's not using fear at all, only the idea that under all circumstances, bad or good, she'd be the person to handle it. Just like Obama's done and continues to do.

The irony lies in the fact that this article is using fear to scare people into thinking Hillary's a scary person!

This site is absolute trash.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 12/30/2007
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 121 fans permalink

While Bill Clinton was president, the Republicans laughed at his and his cabinet's obsession of fighting Islamic terrorism.

Once Bush got in, they pretended to consider the war on terror oh, so Clintonesque, so passe while at the same time receiving 52 warnings that al-Qaeda was determined to strike. Unfortunately, their ignorance and pig-headedness cost thousands of people their lives. Now they want to use terrorism to sell their brand of "national security."

I ain't buying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 12/30/2007
- rubicon101 I'm a Fan of rubicon101 7 fans permalink

I find that there is more anti Hillary sentiment from the writers on this blog ~ more so than others...so let me pose this question, is the "world brimming with danger and uncertainty"?
I would have to probably have to say a big "YES" on that one..
More so than other times in our history? probably not...yet if we are not in more mortal danger in these times, we are certainly in no less danger...
Yes, we are living in challenging times., so I urge all voters to listen well, pay attention to the words of our candidates.
Vote with your conciesnce and may the best candidate win! Hopefully it will be a great leader that we select because we will need one in these upcoming times.
Happy New Year everyone! Best of health and prosperity to all that read this!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 12/30/2007

Taking into account Bill was a governor of a low population state (slightly over 2 million), he had less experience than a mayor of a major city.

A big fish in a little pond, if you will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 12/30/2007
- MJV135 I'm a Fan of MJV135 7 fans permalink

O.K.

Completely off topic.

I'm watching John Edwards on Cspan and he's doing the Bob Dole thumb pointing thing.

Has that become a requirement now for POTUS? Along with kissing babies and being stalked by a switch blade weilding Tim Russert?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 12/30/2007

Giuliani should sue for copyright infringement!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 12/30/2007
- CindyKay I'm a Fan of CindyKay 17 fans permalink
photo

After Reading All The Comments Below , I Only Have One Thing To Say.

VOTE JOE BIDEN & AVOID ALL THE BULLSHIT!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 12/30/2007

Ah yes, the big brave Democrats. They are going to "protect" us. They don't even have the guts to appear on a FOX News sponsored debate. Boogha, Boogha, Boogha. If you can't handle Chris Wallace, Sean Hannity, etc, how in God's name are they going to face Osama, Taliban and company ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 12/30/2007

Fear based politics. . . Doesn't that remind you of someone else?

Fear can only take a country so far. Fear needs to be tempered by hope. Hope is what lifts mountains and inspire people to greatness.

http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 12/30/2007

Every time Bill opens his mouth it just makes me more determined to NOT vote for Hillary. "Against Iraq before anyone"..."bullying boys swift-boating HRC", "roll of the dice" and now these scare tactics taken right from the Karl Rove playbook! This does not represent the change we so desperately need. The very idea that HRC is a symbol of any kind of "change" is preposterous. Are we really going to fall for this sort of crap again? I hope & pray not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 12/30/2007
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect