New Hampshire Will Be Key Battle In GOP Civil War

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - New Hampshire Will Be Key Battle In GOP Civil War stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 01- 4-08 04:38 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gop New Hampshire Winter

Manchester, N.H. -- As the pared-down field of presidential candidates returns to battle today in preparation for next Tuesday's primary, the GOP faces the prospect of two struggles: one, an intra-party conflict to determine who is going to be the Wall Street/national defense establishment candidate; and, two, a civil war in which the winner of the first conflict takes on Mike Huckabee, the Iowa victor who is leading a right-populist/evangelical insurgency.

The initial GOP contest is to determine whether John McCain, leader of the national defense wing, will defeat Mitt Romney, who now carries the mantle of anti-tax, economic conservatives, to become the overall choice of the party's mainstream - or whether Rudy Giuliani will stage an improbable comeback.

Whoever takes the New Hampshire Republican contest on January 8 will face what is likely to be a far more divisive challenge from Huckabee in the next round of primary and caucus states. This fight threatens to fracture the Republican party - recalling the schism engendered by the 1964 Rockefeller-Goldwater battle.

* * *

Across the aisle, the struggle within the Democratic coalition pits two candidates and their staffs squarely against a third, each one representing competing bases of the party.

Barack Obama has mobilized a powerful coalition -- the core of which is made up of young, well-educated voters enraged by the war in Iraq -- to win against Hillary Clinton's supporters, concentrated among women, those over 65, the less affluent (she won among $15-$30,000 income voters), and those seeking an experienced candidate. [See caucus breakdowns here.

John Edwards, in turn, has mobilized the not-insignificant constituency of voters viscerally angered by job-cutbacks, declining wages, and corporate high-handedness.

The new Democratic front-runner, Obama, has the current advantage of pulling in independent voters crucial not only to the primary contest here, but to the general election next November.

Obama faces the prospect of severe and hostile vetting from his primary opponents, however. Upon her arrival in New Hampshire this morning, Hillary Clinton signaled that she intends to play on Obama's as yet unexploited political weaknesses: "Who will be able to stand up to the Republican attack machine?" she asked at an appearance in Nashua.

Story continues below

Hillary's aides point to Obama's extremely progressive record as a community organizer, state senator and candidate for Congress, his alliances with "left-wing" intellectuals in Chicago's Hyde Park community, and his liberal voting record on criminal defendants' rights as subjects for examination.

Along the same lines, ABC reported that Clinton aides gave the network various examples, of Obama's controversial stands. The aides cited Obama's past assertion that he would support ending mandatory minimum sentences for federal crimes, pointing to a 2004 statement at an NAACP-sponsored debate: "Mandatory minimums take too much discretion away from judges."

Edwards' staff also immediately began to take shots at Obama: Appearing on MSNBC this morning, Edwards' manager David Bonior described Obama as a sellout to corporate America: "Barack Obama's kind of change is where you sit down and you cut a deal with the corporate world."

For his part, Obama told reporters on his 7 am flight from Iowa to New Hampshire that he has no intention of changing strategy: "It's not broken. Why fix it?"

* * *

On the Republican side, the immediate consequence of Huckabee's crushing nine-point defeat of Romney in Iowa has been to give a major boost in New Hampshire to John McCain, the "maverick" libertarian-authoritarian who has been vying for the lead among voters in this state. For many in the establishment-wing of the GOP, Romney's failure to win Iowa after spending record sums there - a loss stemming in part from voter perception that he is a moderate running in conservative wolves' clothing -- means that McCain is now very likely to become the banner carrier for the party's mainstream.

McCain's rise is an uncomfortable development for social-values voters; for those opposed to immigration; for those critical of McCain's support for campaign finance reform; and for those disturbed by his votes against Bush's tax cuts.

In the longer term, however, McCain's difficulties with these factions are minor compared to the dangers posed by Huckabee's explicitly populist challenge to the authority of the Republican Party's power brokers.

Huckabee has demonstrated a willingness to defy party leaders, whom he dismissed as a "wholly-owned subsidiary of Wall Street," a statement that goes beyond heresy to apostasy. Moreover, he has used that message to turn what had been a loyal Republican constituency -- white evangelicals -- into a rebel force.

Since the election of Richard Nixon in 1968, the GOP has successfully avoided the divisive internal conflict that debilitated the Democrats through much of the past four decades, subordinating the inherent tensions between values-oriented Christian voters, segregationists, sexual traditionalists, those opposed to womens' rights, and market-oriented pro-business Republicans under a common goal of opposing intrusion by the federal government.

The Huckabee candidacy has the potential to tear the strained "big tent" asunder.

* * *

The GOP establishment -- Republicans who run the party apparatus - now faces a dilemma. The ideal outcome for this interest group would be to have the contest turn into a battle between Romney and McCain, with Huckabee slowly pushed aside.

The problem is that if the support of party regulars remains split between McCain and Romney, Huckabee's bid remains credible, and likely to be significantly enhanced in the latter half of January when the primary struggle heads away from the North to South Carolina and Florida, two states that Huckabee could win.

The challenge Huckabee represents is reflected in his fights with the GOP's leading anti-tax organization, the Club for Growth, which the former Arkansas Governor has dismissed as the "Club for Greed."

If the Republican presidential nomination turns into a McCain versus Huckabee contest, the Club for Growth would face the repugnant reality of having to choose between Huckabee, whom the Club calls "a habitual tax hiker," and McCain, whose "overall record is tainted by a marked antipathy towards the free market and individual freedom," according to the Club.

New Hampshire, by all accounts, will be one of Huckabee's weakest states, with a relatively small fundamentalist-evangelical community. The states that follow New Hampshire - Michigan, South Carolina and Florida - are far more attractive for his Christian-based candidacy, especially insofar as his religiosity is compatible with the positions of mainstream and even left-liberal denominations.

Michigan will be hard for Huckabee to win, but in 1988, televangelist Marion (Pat) Robertson scored second in the state's caucus, and the Christian right is very active in the state. Huckabee has already shown strength in Florida and South Carolina polls.

"We only have a few days to close the sale, but I think the momentum coming out of Iowa is going to be good for us," Huckabee told reporters this morning. "Then we're on to South Carolina and Florida where we're running first in the polls. We're going to have a great month."

Huckabee now faces the prospect of a much more exhaustive examination of his own eccentricities and vulnerabilities. He is the author of an unusual collection of books including "Digging Your Grave With A Knife And Fork" and a contributor to "Living Beyond Your Lifetime;" by his own account, Huckabee has struggled with obesity all his adult life, and is arguably obsessed with dieting; although he is an ordained Baptist preacher, and a graduate of Ouachita Baptist University in Arkadelphia, Arkansas, he spent only a year at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth Texas, dropping out before completing his degree; and while Governor of Arkansas, he faced numerous allegations of ethics violations.

An extended fight pitting Huckabee against another leading Republican candidate would very likely leave GOP with scars difficult to heal by November 2008.

Manchester, N.H. -- As the pared-down field of presidential candidates returns to battle today in preparation for next Tuesday's primary, the GOP faces the prospect of two struggles: one, an intra-par...
Manchester, N.H. -- As the pared-down field of presidential candidates returns to battle today in preparation for next Tuesday's primary, the GOP faces the prospect of two struggles: one, an intra-par...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
98
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

The more interesting question, will Wall Street abandon the Evangelical Republican party next week when the Peronist-Bloomberg party officially forms?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 01/05/2008

Too bad that most of the candidates mentioned in your article are also listed on JudicialWatch website. Also you fail to mention that all of the candidates mentioned in your article, with the exception of Huckabee, are members of that prestigious cabal known as the Council on Foreign Relations.

What the American People need is a breath of fresh air, someone we can trust to uphold the order of law. Your article fails to mention that the Ron Paul obtained more than twice the votes than Guiliani.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 AM on 01/05/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 158 fans permalink

Oh my God!
The populist candidates are surging, democracy is working the way it is supposed to, and the elitists in both parties are worried silly!
Maybe there is actually a chance for a change?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 01/05/2008
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 50 fans permalink

This is rich. The irony of the USA's establishment destroying both parties to prevent the candidates chosen by the people from running for POTUS in '08 is delicious. One hopes that radicals of all stripes fill the void left by the establishment destroying the Republican Party & the Democratic Party with multiple new parties which back every radical scheme known to humankind. The possibility that the USA could become a democracy will leave the wretched creatures who form the so called establishment livid with impotent rage. The establishment deserves that fate, richly deserves it.
On the other hand the people have earned & deserve a democracy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 01/05/2008
- AxelDC I'm a Fan of AxelDC 94 fans permalink
photo

A more likely scenario for the GOP is a 3 or 4 way race that stretches well into the summer. This could mean a convention with no nominee, just like the Good Ole Days. Instead of an informercial on the glories of tax-cutting for Jesus, we could be watching 23 rounds of voting as each of this nasty wannabe emperors fights for the nomination.

Meanwhile, Obama could have Clinton buried and mourned by Valentine's Day, and spend the next six months preparing for his party and reminding us how George W. Bush screwed over the country and his own party with his arrogant stupidity. All this ignores the fact that we may be on the brink of a recession cresting just as election polls open.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 01/04/2008

Enough of this already!

Last night, when Ron Paul got 10% of the vote in Iowa, on their visuals, CNN did not show his name. On regular old media stories, commentators studiously avoid mentioning Dr. Paul's name.

And now you're supposed to be writing about the battle in Iowa, and Ron Paul simply doesn't exist?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 01/04/2008
photo

What if Edwards and Obama teamed up early? Not as running mates, but with the idea that they wouldn't campaign against each other and Edwards would get the AG nod. He'd make a great AG, and, historically speaking after the 43 administration, would have the ability to stand as tall as the first black president. What could be better than a black man full of hope and a white man full of anger: that's a recipe for change.

And Edwards, rather than being confined by the "duties" of being VP (or left out in the cold) could embrace his passion and do some trust busting.

Finally, with the two of them at least not campaigning against each other, Clinton would be buried.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 01/04/2008
- Miket53 I'm a Fan of Miket53 2 fans permalink

Hillary met her match. Her previous attitude of being the #1 candidate and she "wasn't concerned about losing" is real embarrassing now. She(and McCauliffe and Bill) have a HUGE problem with the black vote. Obama's numbers will sky rocket if it appears that everyone is trashing him. Plus Obama won women...won youth...all mainstays of the Clinton machine. She is doomed.

On the Republicans...I still think you will see Thompson's numbers(he's my favorite) go up gradually until South Carolina where he can win. It will be a horse race between Huckabee and Thompson down the road.
http://mtaricani.blogspot.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 01/04/2008
- Coyote2 I'm a Fan of Coyote2 85 fans permalink
photo

Thomas B. Edsall:
A great blog. I loved every word! Erudite criticsm full of hope for a renewed America!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 01/04/2008
- Coyote2 I'm a Fan of Coyote2 85 fans permalink
photo

“or whether Rudy Giuliani will stage a slimy comeback. “

Ha ha ha

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 01/04/2008

NHampshire won't be defining anything about Reverend Huckabee. Huckabee will be beaten like adrum there. The race will be to see if Romney or McCain will be the standard bearer for the GOP. NHampshire voters can cross party lines so it is a question of whether Obama has the big "mo" or McCain.

The author is correct about the schism within the GOP. The extremely vocal Revival Tent Republicans whine and demand all the perks that come with winning an election. They erroneously think that they alone have caused the win. They are entitled to a seat at the table and that's it. But they are not entitled to the surf and turf while everyone else is eating rubber chicken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 01/04/2008

Got to say, as a Brit all this primaries business is a bit confusing.

Interesting to observe though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 01/04/2008

Some civil war,

John McCain - lost independents when he gave W that big bear hug in 04 after Rove attacked his family in the SC during 2000 primary and Republicans hate him trust me on this one. My Republican in-laws just hate the guy.

Romney - changes his position more than his magic underwear, now he’s a change candidate and he can finance his own campaign a plus, since the GOP is broke.

Rudy - one talking point “9-11” only and the neo-con’s favorite son.

Huckabee - the conservative establishment and the neo-cons hate him.

I just heard that Ron Paul who is tied with Fred sleepwalker Thomson has not been invited to a Fox sponsored GOP debate, because his numbers are to low, what? A decision is being contested by the NH Republican party, I guess Murdock feels he can’t bribe Paul with a book deal. Will Keyes be there to serve as the GOP's token black man? This guy just shows up when the GOP needs to do the diversity thing.

Can't you just feel the love?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 01/04/2008

mccain/romney/guiliani in nh...huckabee just has to have a decent finish...then he can bombard the northerners down in dixie...stay tuned...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 01/04/2008

"Barack Obama has mobilized a powerful coalition -- the core of which is made up of young, well-educated voters enraged by the war in Iraq -- to win against Hillary Clinton's supporters, concentrated among women, those over 65, the less affluent (she won among $15-$30,000 income voters), and those seeking an experienced candidate." "John Edwards, in turn, has mobilized the not-insignificant constituency of voters viscerally angered by job-cutbacks, declining wages, and corporate high-handedness."
These "young, well-educated voters" have determined my candidate for me and I don't like it. When you vote, select the candidate that supports your situation and not someone who, by Party policy, does not have your best interest at heart.
Vote for the candidate that can and will fight for these things instead of "Hope" for them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 01/04/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect