-- Terry McAuliffe, marveling at Bill Richardon's apparently 11th-hour deal to push his supporters to Obama
- BIG NEWS:
- David Axelrod
- |
- Barack Obama
- |
- Voting
- |
- Joe Lieberman
- |
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Hey Terry, call the Complaint Line. The number is 1-800-WAA-AAAH.
LOL
This speaks more to Hillary's horrible corporate policies, than to Richardson's loyalty. Moreover, it was Bill Clinton that appointed Richardson, not Hillary. Why exactly does he owe loyalty to her? Because she's his spouse? McAuliffe is assuming that Bill and Hillary are the same unit and interchangeable? Boy, the Clinton camp has run a horrible campaign. If I were Hillary, I'd fire them all and start fresh in eight years. In the meantime, she needs to re-evaluate who she is, and stop trying to vote and be tough like a man. Why would someone vote for her because she's tough? If we want a person who's tough, we'd vote for a man, not for a woman acting like a man. That strategy was a fatal decision on her part, way back when she joined the committee on military affairs. It's too bad, because I really do want to have a female president. Unfortunately, she has no clue who she really is, and her efforts have been calculating to such an extreme that we the voters can't recognize who she really is.
And about this "loyalty" thing, I think it's hypocritical of Terry McAuliffe to say that, as he and Hillary were instrumental in derailing Howard Dean's campaign in 2004, a fellow democrat who really was the heart of the democratic party at that time. Well now Dean is DNC, McAuliffe is out, and Obama wins Iowa. Sweet justice! What's even more satisfying is the fact that Obama came up through Dean's political network. Love it!
Somebody pass McAuliffe the kleenex box!
First Posted: 01- 4-08 11:27 AM | Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM