More

Campaign Thorns: Obama's NH Lobbyist Vs. Clinton's Lead Paint Spokeswoman

First Posted: 03/28/08 03:45 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:20 PM ET

Hillary Obama Ethics

During Saturday night's Democratic debate at Saint Anslem's College in Manchester, New Hampshire, Sen. Barack Obama was criticized by his rival Sen. Hillary Clinton for having a registered lobbyist as his New Hampshire co-chair even as he denounced the lobbying industry.

The exchange demonstrates that even on the Democratic side - where talk of ethics reform is a stump speech staple - no one is 100 percent pure.

"Candidates can't vet every single person who has any contact with the campaign," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington. "That's why we have seen a lot of problems already. It's clear that this will be happening over and over. Campaigns get involved with a lot of people some of whom will have issues."

Indeed, the Huffington Post has learned that a key Iowa campaign figure for Hillary Clinton served previously as one of the chief spokespersons for the lead paint industry.

Towards the end of her Iowa effort, Clinton turned to an old acquaintance to help argue her case to potential caucus voters. Bonnie Campbell, a former attorney general of Iowa and a leading voice on women's issues, stayed close to the Senator's side, even appearing on stage with Clinton during the night of the election.

Yet in 2006, Campbell represented several of the industry's top companies in arguing that property owners, not lead pigment manufactures, were responsible for keeping their properties free from lead paint hazards.

"Common sense also tells us that lawsuits against companies that made lead pigment used in paint long ago are not the way to protect children from lead hazards today," Campbell wrote, "those who rent unsafe houses to unsuspecting families need to be held accountable."

Of course, Clinton has other surrogates with professional backgrounds that have caused public relations headaches. Mark Penn, her chief strategist and pollster has a lengthy lobbying record for companies that have been accused of union busting.

For his part, Obama denied the claim that his campaign's New Hampshire co-chair was a lobbyist - "That's not so," he mouthed on camera - but the facts bore out otherwise. Jim Demers, who helps runs Obama's Granite State shop, heads the lobby firm of his own name, The Demers Group, and has advocated on behalf of several major pharmaceutical companies.

When presented with the evidence, the Obama camp said it had committed no foul because Demers lobbied only on the state level. "A ban on lobbying money and PACs is far from perfect," Obama communications director Robert Gibbs said. "There is a difference between a college football player and professional football player," he added.

Former Sen. John Edwards, too, has been plagued by his personal and fundraising ties to the hedge fund Fortress Investment. The North Carolina Democrat took a job there following his failed bid for president and vice president in 2004. Four years later, the Fortress connection persuaded Dennis Kucinich to urge his supporters to back Obama over Edwards in the Iowa caucus.

"It is hard to run any major political campaign without some lobbyists getting involved," said Massie Ritsch, spokesperson for the Center for Responsive Politics. "They are among the most politically active, politically motivated people on this earth. They are by nature political animals and extremely well connected."

But, as Ritsch notes, the issue of lobbyist connections to the campaign may prove thornier for Obama than for the other candidates. In addition to Demers, another Obama state co-chair, Jim Hodges in South Carolina, is a registered lobbyist (both instate and federal).

But mainly, it's because Obama's situation is different than his competition's. Unlike Campbell, Demers serves in a high-ranking role and remains a registered lobbyist within New Hampshire. And unlike Clinton, Obama has ascended to the top of the Democratic heap by positioning himself as someone who has battled lobbying interests throughout his career.

"Obama and [Sen.] John McCain are the two people most subject to that kind of criticism and Edwards is also in the anti-Washington anti-lobbying group," said Sloan. "And so they do have to be more careful. But by the same token everyone will have issues and it is a risky area to be throwing stones in because everyone lives in a glass house."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:48 PM on 01/09/2008
Rahm Emanuel takes credit for winning in the 2006 elections.
The DLC Half the democrats agree,
The DLC democrats think you and I getting pissed off at BushCo and the war had nothing to do with it!

That's why “impeachment if off the table”.

http://www.dlc.org/

How do we tell them How Wrong they are?
The people told them we wanted to end the damn war, so they SAID they would, with not intention of doing so. Because they are

Republicans in DINO suits.

"centrists" Half Way to Hell.

HRC and Obama are both DLC Dems.

Lieberman DINO's.

Kucinich is sweeping the online polls.

You know: the informed voters. The blogosphere: US!

http://www.dennis4president.com/go/resources/polls/
01:46 AM on 01/08/2008
If we are to get a great president, we need to stop playing hopscotch with the facts, skipping over the stuff that is debunked in a desperate attempt to try to make the rest of the smear stick.

This was an attempt to smear Obama by a candidate who is feeling the pain of a poorly run campaign, in which she tried to use "the assumptive close" on us, failing to realize it is up to us to choose, not up to her to be told who is good for us.

It is unreasonable to expect that lobbyists be no where near anyone's campaign, yet it is intolerable that we be expected to let this corporate avarice rule us for another eight years.

Sadly, I thought Clinton might have been sincere last night with her emotionalism, she had me for a moment, but today she tried to turn it into a new campaign theme as she turned her almost believable reprise of her great emotionalism moment into another snap at Obama. Watch it on tape. You can see the transition.

We see through the crap now. It's not working, especially not the fear-mongering thing today that we should fear an attack if anyone but Clinton is elected. Shameless. Manipulative. So over.

Let's get a real president.
11:03 PM on 01/07/2008
Hillary deserves the all the wrath she's earned by showing zero leadership against this disastrous war and now calling out Obama for lobbyist connections. We all don't need to look very deep into her organization to find the likes of Howard Wolfson who, when not playing a key role in Hillary's campaign, is a partner in the Glover Park Group - a lobby firm posing as an advertising agency taking on clients and causes which totally contradict Senator Clinton's so called vision of government free of special interests.

She is a fraud.

Her war-enabling votes and silences prove her a dangerous politician (see: Diane Feinstein/Joe Lieberman et.al.) who puts her finger to the political wind and ear to corporate needs before taking a compromised position making sure it is Hillary and those who've paid for her that are served first.

Those who believed in her be damned.

America, now more than ever, needs new voices, new energy, and we should not tolerate the likes of this tired insider and those like her.
10:57 PM on 01/07/2008
I'm a neurotic mother terrified of lead paint, pesticides and all things toxic but, I think the lead paint story is a crock. Paint companies used to use lead paint when it was legal, now they don't. A homeowner has to deal with residual lead paint. Unless it is proven that the paint companies knowingly used a toxic product, I think the attorney was right.

I'm not a Hillary fan because of her involvement in this war, her stance on Iran and her seemingly overt corporate ties but, the lead paint story seems like an unnecessary stretch and makes me question the motives behind the story.
10:50 PM on 01/07/2008
"And, if you can, tell me why you are now the second largest recipient of health industry payola after Hillary. You now take more money from the people committed to stopping universal health care than any of the Republican candidates."

That's Michael Moore right here on Huff Post and he is addressing Obama.
10:09 PM on 01/07/2008
Even though I have been supporting Obama all along, I have to say that I will not join the bandwagon to attack Hillary indefinitely.

Still she is a human being who deserves her dignity.

Many of the comments here go overboard.

I don't think we need to support Obama at the expense of destroying Clinton's dignity.

I am sorry I will not be part of the echo chamber. The way of your descriptions of Hillary is full of hatred, not objective, not fair-minded and not fact-based.

You are committing a mass hysteria of hatrd. I will not be part of this.
10:04 PM on 01/07/2008
: Mainstream media is the most snobbery crowd.

When Clinton's poll looks good, nobody dares to raise voice to challenge her.

Now, everybody is in a hurry to join the Hillary-attack bandwagon.

Now, it is in vogue to praise Obama highly--it seems like he can do no wrong. Is Obama really that great? Everybody becomes so blind.

The bottom line is that no matter how much you want to admire Obama; Obama is still a politician who is in the game to grab the power. He is lucky. He is fresh and without baggage. So he doesn't need to go negative to win. As a result, he can easily make his rival look bad. Sometimes, I can detect certain arrogance in him.

I honestly feel Hillary has been unfairly attacked from all sides. C'mon, even though you may not like her, stil she hasn't done anything worse than any other politicians.

I only hope we can all have some perspective knowing that this primary season just starts. We should give all candidates a fair amount of opportunity to prove themselves. Otherwise, we only do ourself a disservice by loving Obama blindly and too passionately and by hating Hillary too ruthlessly without recognizing that she is still only a human being.

Anyway, I decide not join the echo chamber to verbally assassinate Hillary, even though I have criticized her so much before. I can sense at this very moment how much pressure she is under. We attack her now is almost like we attack someone who is just hit by the car and we are more than eager to give the person the final blow.
09:41 PM on 01/07/2008
16 Century: Marie-Antoinett "Let them eat cake"

21 Century Hillary Clinton "Let them eat lead paint".
09:30 PM on 01/07/2008
The choice for Democrats in New Hampshire is clear:

Honesty/integrity vs. lack of honesty/lobbyist's dream

Experience in life vs. experience in Washington

Fresh/inspirational vs. stale/canned

Trust in the people vs. trust in well-paid retainers/hangers-on

Vision vs. self-centeredness

Learns from tough breaks vs. perpetual claims of victimhood

Happy warrior vs. sense of entitlement

Ernestness vs. arrogance

Decent family life vs. ... well, you know ...

(Who do you think your children would find inspirational? Who would you want for a role model for them?)

Martin Edwin Andersen
Churchton, Maryland
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelO
Occupy America
09:17 PM on 01/07/2008
The vagueness in his answers for the lobbying issue better not spill over to his 100 + non-votes, but 'present' in the Senate. Change came come from anybody (see: Bush); sweeping bipartisan change, however, requires the 'genuine article'. Obama should learn fast that all it takes is one slip (driver's licenses for illegal immigrants for Hillary) to turn gigantic and derail the Hope Train Express. If anybody else remembers, Obama's speeches were very dismal and flat during the summer; pray his seasons don't repeat themselves for next summer against the Republican hit machine.

A young supporter of Obama's was asked recently, "What views do you share with Obama on policy and give an example." Her example was his 'approach'. Ladies and gents, that's not a policy. That is acting. He needs to be evaluated on his substance now that HE is the man to beat and held to the same fire that's burned Hillary up so far. No matter how good he looks, sounds, or engages people, he doesn't get a free ride to the White House; that's already happened fairly recently and it would be a disservice to not only Americans, but to Obama as well if he is not properly tested and just thrown into the job.
08:54 PM on 01/07/2008
The co-chair in N.H. is a STATE lobbyist. Barack promised no FEDERAL lobbyist will work in his administration. He also promised not to take money during the campaign from FEDERAL lobbyist. This is not a lie. Stop distorting the facts. Barack explained it on Good Morning America this morning.

The co-chair in S.C. is a former Democratic governor of S.C., the only Dem governor of that state in 25 years. What, we Dems no longer want former Dem governors working for our candidates' campaigns? This is stupid. Why isn't the headline, "Obama S.C. co-chair is former governor."?

Yes, the guy is a registered lobbyist, but he lobbies for one client and its for FHA home loans.

"It deals with federal home loan banks, so it's not exactly one of those that's been controversial," Hodges told The Associated Press after making his endorsement. "It's a program to try to get more liquidity to community banks."

The Center for Responsive Politics shows Hodges Consulting Group is registered to lobby for Hillenbrand Partners, a Chicago-based company that does business with the Federal Home Loan Bank in Atlanta.

http://www.goupstate.com/article/20080102/APP/801020688

Agreed, its not sparkling clean, and I prefer it was, but it seems that everyone who was a politician or worked in campaigns has been a lobbyist or is one, its a revolving door thats been revolving for decades. Its sad, but its also sad that a former S.C. governor endorses you and wants to be your co-chair, which would give you a great organizer and fund raiser in a crucial state, but you can't hire him because he lobbies for a company that does business with Federal Home Loans, which happen to be loans given to first time home buyers, veterans, or the poor? Come on, seriously.

Take a deep breath people, and come back to reality. This is a non-issue, a desperate attempt to bring Obama down.
08:44 PM on 01/07/2008
As a committed Obama supporter who was on the ground in Iowa, it does disappoint me that Senator Obama has the aforementioned connections with lobbyists that he does.
*********************************************
http://www.Interracialconnect.com ---a niche interracial dating
site.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
freespeach
08:32 PM on 01/07/2008
What about Moses Mercado?

He is a lobbyist and a key member of Obama's team.
He was employed to lobby on behalf of......

The NRA

The Carlyle Group.

For those who don't know, the Carlyle Group worth $billions, is made up of Bush's BinLadens, a who's who of Republican and neocons and is heavily involved in all aspects of the Military Industrial complex.

I would be happy to be corrected on this point, but all I can see on line is confirmation of Obama and Mercado together with no information to the contrary.....

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/28/385600.aspx

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/09/28/mercado_mosk.html

http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=5954

Why is the "change" man tight with a lobbyist for Poppy Bush?
08:30 PM on 01/07/2008
Obama never said he would ban state lobbyists from helping in his campaign. State lobbyists do not influence Congress or the Administration. Demer is a co-chair and a volunteer. Some references indicates he is retired and a well known and long time democratic strategist.

Hillary is the one who is spinning this, to insinuate that Obama is corrupt.
07:56 PM on 01/07/2008
I am a deomcrat but it's a sad sad day in our party history. Hillary Clinton will lose this election but our party will take a major hit in the upcoming elections. I like our we have "BIG DREAMERS" in the party. This is why the republicans have been so sucessful against our party the last couple of years. I'll warn the BarackObamaPost aka the huffington post enjoy the ride terrible ride you have help put our party on. I'll post again in November when a republican wins the election and the Obama craze is over with. When a columnist like Bob Novak praises Barack Obama you better watch out for the republican spin machine in the upcoming election. Barack Obama will never be president of the United States not because of his race it's because of his lack of knowledge on how our government works. He promises a lot of things but I study all the candidates and havent seen one major bill or cause he fought for that made a tremendous impact.