Thomas B. Edsall

BIO

Thomas B. Edsall

The Huffington Post

Proposed Anti-Obama 527 Stirring Controversy

January 8, 2008 10:02 PM


stumbleupon :Proposed Anti-Obama 527 Stirring Controversy   digg: Proposed Anti-Obama 527 Stirring Controversy   reddit: Proposed Anti-Obama 527 Stirring Controversy   del.icio.us: Proposed Anti-Obama 527 Stirring Controversy

The leaders of Emily's List, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), have become ensnared -- through their own actions -- in the complexities of federal campaign law.

Emily's List, an organization that backs Democratic women candidates who support abortion rights, and the two labor unions, have each set up independent expenditure (IE) subsidiaries for this election cycle to be able to finance thousands of dollars worth of television ads in support of Clinton.

Under the federal election law, these 'IEs' must completely sever all communication with their parent groups. The staff running the Emily's List IE is barred from talking to Ellen Malcolm and all other leaders of Emily's List. The same rules apply to AFT and AFSCME.

After Clinton came in third in the Iowa caucuses on January 3, staffers working on the three pro-Clinton IE operations not only discussed creation of an anti-Obama 527, the Huffington Post has been reliably told, but even went to the extent of broaching the idea to a number of Democratic operatives to see if any of them would be interested in running such a 527.

IE staffers did not discuss the 527 proposal with officials of Emily's List, AFSCME or AFT. To do so would have put them at risk of criminal prosecution for violating federal election statutes.

Now, after publication of a report earlier today by the Huffington Post on the proposed pro-Clinton, anti-Obama 527, AFSCME president Gerald McEntee and AFT president Edward J. McElroy -- ignoring the distinction between the 'parent' groups they head, and their separately regulated IE 'offspring' -- have asked the Huffington Post to clarify this matter.

McEntee and McElroy may or may not have had any idea as to what their IE sub-organizations -- financed by them, but independent of their control in the arcane world of campaign finance rules -- are up to. If they were to engage in strategy coordination they would have broken the law. No one has come forward to make that allegation, and Huffington Post did not report that anyone had.

Spokespersons for both organizations have made statements that neither McEntee nor McElroy have talked to staff hired to run the two labor IEs.

Ellen Malcolm of Emily List said through spokesperson that no member of the parent organization had conferred with the staff of the Emily's List IE.

The Huffington Post stands by its story, which accurately reported:

"Three groups conducting independent expenditure campaigns in behalf of Clinton - Emily's List, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) - have explored the possibility of trying to put together a multi-million dollar effort privately dubbed the Anybody-But-Obama 527 Committee, but they have run into problems finding any Democratic operative willing to become the director of a campaign against the man who now is the odds-on favorite to become the party's nominee."

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
91
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- glesslib See Profile I'm a Fan of glesslib permalink

My sister called me after the last debate to say that all the male candidates were "piling on" Hillary Clinton. My reply is that she was the front runner at the time, though by a hair, and they always go after the front runner. Secondly, if women want to play with the boys in what has usually been a boy's game in this country, we can't have it both ways. Hillary needs to figure out a way to show that she's the most capable and strong. It's a hard balancing act for women. You can't seem to be a wimp or a b***buster.

Good luck, Hillary. I want the best candidate to win, whether it's you, Obama or Edwards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 01/09/2008
- sebocd See Profile I'm a Fan of sebocd permalink

"THEIR ALIVE!" Bonnie and Clyde heading back to the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 01/09/2008
- extravatrek See Profile I'm a Fan of extravatrek permalink

All of this Hillary Hate is mind boggling.

I respect her all the more because of her ability to absorb/deflect this abuse.

She's been in one crosshair after another since '92.

And all are the spawn of Rush Limbaugh.

I'd be proud to have a woman president named Clinton.

I'd be proud to have a black president named Obama.

I'd prefer Edwards, but I don't think his pitch resonates with younger voters.

I'm sick of Arianna's Hillary Hate as well. The last time she mattered, politically, she was married to a gay Republican running for Governor. 'Talk about poor judgement...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 01/09/2008
- chin075 See Profile I'm a Fan of chin075 permalink

Looks like many Obama haters are very ignorant. I mean, it's one thing to say, "I don't know about him... I'm not convinced", or that you like another candidate better. It's quite another to say, "there's no substance", "what do we know about him", etc. when there is PLENTY of information out there, if one would but bother to read his books, look around his website, research media reports (the accurate ones), etc... That reactionary attitude is typical of fundamentalist Christians who oppose and condemn books and movies they've never read or seen.... absolutely ridiculous!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 01/09/2008
- IkeChicago See Profile I'm a Fan of IkeChicago permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 01/09/2008
- CornBred See Profile I'm a Fan of CornBred permalink

Anyone notice Obama's 100 point rating from Illinois Planned Parenthood? One-hundred. A perfect rating. On top of that, unions in Illinois LOVE this guy.

This attacking Democratic candidates like this in the primary just to get the Clinton's back in the WH is just unbelievable. Slightly sick actually.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 01/09/2008
- BrianZ See Profile I'm a Fan of BrianZ permalink

What's the problem, Edsall? Did you cause something of a dustup there at the HuffPo, pissing off enemies of Obama but of people Arianna might need to make use of later? Ohhh I think you did.

... did you happen to do Sam, I mean teach of course, while he was at Columbia? It would certainly put a new flavor on both your posts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 01/09/2008
- Roshi98 See Profile I'm a Fan of Roshi98 permalink

I would take anything Mr. Edsall "reports" on this topic with a grain of salt. He, like many HuffPo pundits, has demonstrated an unvarnished preference for Obama and a clear dislike of Hillary since the campaign began over a year ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 01/09/2008
- piranhica See Profile I'm a Fan of piranhica permalink

Which, ironically, is why I just sent money to Obama, will support him in NY, and will vote AGAINST Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 01/09/2008
- wsblake See Profile I'm a Fan of wsblake permalink

Here it comes. Bush is a criminal, we all know that. but guess what- the Clinton's are no better. They are , and always have been ruthless, self-aggrandizing and Korporate financed and controlled. They have no real consciences, morality or any agenda other than to win at all costs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 01/09/2008
- seamusnh See Profile I'm a Fan of seamusnh permalink

You wanted the McCain-Feingold bill, you got it...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 01/09/2008
- brwnizofmine See Profile I'm a Fan of brwnizofmine permalink

If the Clintons play dirty, they will lose the black vote. If they play fair, they may be able to split the black vote. Was it fair or unfair for Bill to blast Obama yesterday, as if New Hampshire would be crazy to vote for a black man, come on now, "Give Me A Break!" I don't know, but it left a dirty taste in my mouth, and smells a little bad. There could not have been a more gracious person than Obama in congratulating Hillary. Never none of the dirty stuff that we've seen with the Clintons. Maybe he just will not sell his soul to the devil!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 01/09/2008
- Mutineer See Profile I'm a Fan of Mutineer permalink

See, this is why I say Hillary will lose 40 states. I have not voted for a Republican since 1988 (she was a family friend running for state office). But I WILL NOT vote for this woman. The Clintons have done some great things, but they are rotten at the core.

Those who plot Obama's demise should be careful what you wish for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 01/09/2008
- nofltwlt See Profile I'm a Fan of nofltwlt permalink

I wish the DNC could get together with Clinton and Obama to offer a Clinton, Obama ticket in 2008. We dems need to oust the repugs in order to prevent them from destroying our democracy.

This ticket would provide Obama with the experience he lacks and sixteen years of democratic presidency, eight for Clinton and then eight for Obama.

The main thing is to take the WH, fix all the harm done by Bush and his handlers. Part of the fix would be to jail all those who committed crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 01/09/2008
- HanFeiTzu See Profile I'm a Fan of HanFeiTzu permalink

Oh let's face it -- Clinton is no different than Bush. We need REAL CHANGE that can only be provided by Obama (partial), Edwards (more-than-partial) and Kucinish (Full and honest).

Clinton will provide us with more drama befitting the Jerry Springer show.

If that happens; God help us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 01/09/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPolitics Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More


Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More
Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Jason Linkins is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, covering media and politics. He's based in Washington, DC. Previously, he wrote for HuffPo's Eat The Press, and has also contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Seth Colter Walls is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is News Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More