Edwards once again shows that he is a true gentleman!

John Kerry was a pathetic excuse for a candidate in 2004. I believe that Howard Dean would have won that election had not the press "killed" his chances with its coverage of his over-zealous screaming episode ~ just like the MSM jumped all over Hillary for tearing up on Monday. Kerry looked like a cadaver and acted like he should have been cast in "Weekend at Bernie's ~ the Race for the White House," yet I supported him and voted for him only because he was running against Dubya. Obama should take that endorsement and put it aside very carefully: it is the kiss of death.

Look, I like John Kerry, but Edwards doesn't want his endorsement, nor does Edwards care if Kerry endorses Obama.

Let Obama carry Kerry's political baggage; at this point, Obama has no choice. Edwards doesn't want ANY part of it.

Edwards/Dodd '08!

Kerry wants attention and this certainly is getting it for him. This election is HOT! and he wants in.

http://www.cafepress.com/cp/moredetails.aspx?showBleed=false&ProductNo=211037842&colorNo=1&pr=F

NCYvonne: Your unsubstantiated ranting is getting old. John Edwards gets it. More than the war or any other issue, what is destroying this country is corporate influence that decides everything with lobbying and funds. Big oil, insurance, etc. tells our representatives how things will be done because their funds got them elected - corporations run this country. John Edwards not only doesn't take any corporate funds but is vowing to take that corporate influence out of politics and he knows how to do it. I'm glad he's angry with the status quo. So are many of us - very angry. John Edwards is being blackballed by the MSM because main stream media is owned by corporations. John Edwards scares them because they don't want change they want business as usual. John Edwards is the most qualified of all of the democratic runners and is only losing because MSM isn't covering his platform. They're doing the same thing to Kucinich and Ron Paul. So John Edwards tells a story about his son? That makes him unqualified to run for President?

"the country needs a President who will fight aggressively to end the status quo and change the Washington system and to give voice to all of those whose voices are ignored in the corridors of power."


Go ahead and sit around and whine, or get UP and support this man!

I stood in Copley Plaza for the Kerry rally on Election Night 2004 and waited, in the rain for hour after hour. Senator Botox never came out to so much as thank his supporters. It was John Edwards who came out and tried to keep spirits high. I'll file the Kerry endorsement under "W" for "Who give a flying fart."

i dont know what is more pathetic? someone who votes to back up bush's decision to take us to war in iraq and not being sorry for it but yet she manages to tear up becuase she saw her chances to grab power almost evaporated? or someone who keeps on saying he was against the war from the beginning and yet kept on funding it from the first voted he casted related to it? america is going down the drain and especially those two are not going to do sh!t about it...

Kerry disappointed me when he didn't fight back at the Swift Boaters and when he didn't didn't fight back about voting irregularities.

Go Edwards!

P.S. A surge is an escalation. By using the term "surge," we're buying into the Bush administration's semantic spin.

Just heard from the Kucinich campaign that they are considering launching a re-count of the NH primary results.

John Kerry was such a disappointment in 2004. He was not my choice for nominee, but I voted for him in November. He made it tough to argue with co-workers who supported Bush. Even in Alabama, the swift boat ads ran constantly. It was humiliating. I really wish he'd keep a low profile this year.

Edwards/Obama '08

or

Obama/Edwards '08

I think it should be Edwards/ Obama- 08!'
not Obama/Edwards...
But oh well, either way will work, when you think of the changes we really need.

John needs to get a crew-cut, - tell all those sissy rethuglicans to go back to their bathroom stalls and STFU!!

As usual, Edwards responds with grace and intelligence. What a difference between the two men! Kerry is petty and vindictive, wanting to blame others for his own failure; Edwards is decent and honorable. Too bad Edwards wasn't the nominee last time instead of Kerry.

I'm sure Kerry called Edwards beforehand.

If not, that was absolutely chicken-shit. But I believe there is too much going on underneath that Kerry would not have a whole lot up his sleeve about it.
He definitely should be stating that he did in fact talk to Edwards beforehand, for the plain fact that this way it would not make him look like a backstabber and then would not resonate on Obama taking an endorsement from a chump backstabber in that manner...
Also I would expect that there is some kind of process where things have been understood... By that I mean it would not surprise me if Obama has agreed to let Edwards be his VP, because that would make his ticket unstoppable. Edwards would bring in votes from the south which is what Obama will really need.

This way Edwards knows the what and the why, and is not really bothered by it.

It's really key what Edwards has to say about it all- and check it out, he's not bothered by it!


That's it!!
Its gonna be Obama/Edwards- 08!!!

YOu heard it here first..