iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kerry Blasts Clinton Camp's "Negative, Petty" Attacks

Kerry And Clinton

First Posted: 03/28/08 03:45 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:20 PM ET

Sen. John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, took aim at Hillary Clinton on Monday, saying her criticism of Barack Obama's stance on the Iraq war was "not founded on accuracy." He also ripped into comments made by Clinton surrogates hinting at Obama's past drug use, calling the remarks "negative in the worst, petty way," especially in the light of Bill Clinton's admitted use of marijuana.

"That kind of discussion," Kerry said, "from a campaign where the former president made famous the words 'I did not inhale' is to make something an issue that they themselves acknowledged shouldn't be."

In an interview with the Huffington Post, the Massachusetts Democrat touted Obama as a unity leader with a deft political touch who could, if elected, lead a "transformational presidency." But he also warned that should Obama end up the Democratic nominee, he, like Kerry, would face a tidal wave of opposition. Obama has argued that, unlike in 2000 and 2004, he could enter an election without "half the country already not wanting to vote for Democrats."

"He hasn't yet had 100 millions of dollars of negative advertising dumped on him," said Kerry. "So let's wait and see. But certainly you start out [with support from more than just Democrats] and hopefully the campaign will do well... I do think the Republicans and the Republican attack machine is very adept at branding and framing and we are going to have to be equally adept at taking lessons we've learned in the last years."

Kerry spent much of the interview taking Clinton to task for her recent, more aggressive criticism of Obama. Asked to respond to Clinton's contention that Obama has been more rhetoric than substance on Iraq -- speaking out against the war before entering the Senate, but voting for funding resolutions while in office -- Kerry said the attack was baseless. Yet he would not go so far as to compare it, as Sen. Dick Durbin has, to the "swift-boating" of his Vietnam war record in 2004.

"If you're criticisms and/or your attacks are not founded on accuracy, that's an unfortunate tactic under any circumstance, whatever you call it," said Kerry. "The fact is Barack Obama - and I know this because I'm the one who invited him to speak at our convention in 2004 and I campaigned with him out in Illinois - was against the war. And in his answer to a question he diplomatically tried to avoid creating a confrontation with John Edwards and John Kerry, the two nominees of the party, when he came to Boston [for the convention]. But he did say in my judgment - this is a quote at that time - that the case was not made."

When pressed to discuss how two presidential frontrunners differed on the war since Obama entered the Senate, Kerry did not cite a speech, policy, or vote. Indeed, he acknowledged their virtually identical voting records, but emphasized Obama's ability to "change the perception of the United States" internationally and "speak with an enormous amount of ability and gravitas."

"I think that he essentially -- in many ways as you go along the road, the votes we've had, they have paralleled each other on the votes," said Kerry. "But I think Barack has been very clear -- I mean they've both been clear that they are going to try and end the war in a way that is responsible. There is a great similarity in their articulation since then."

"My decision," Kerry went on, "is based [as much] on the war component as it is on the larger issues as to who has the ability to unite the country around these decisions... I want to emphasize that I think Hillary Clinton is a very talented and capable person. And if she is the nominee I'm going to work my heart out for her. But I think Barack Obama has the best opportunity to be able to unite the country and create, what I would call, a transformational presidency."

Since Kerry announced his support for Obama following the Illinois Democrat's loss to Clinton in the New Hampshire primary, rhetoric between the two candidates has grown increasingly heated. In recent days, debate has centered over comments made by Clinton, her husband Bill, and their surrogates, that were perceived to be racially insensitive. Clinton's campaign has argued that Obama took the remarks out of context and -- pointing to an Obama campaign memo -- sought to capitalize on them for political gain.

Most recently the issue of Obama's past drug use has resurfaced, with BET founder and Clinton supporter Robert L. Johnson alluding to it during a Sunday campaign stop. Johnson insisted he was referring to Obama's work as a community organizer. But Kerry was clearly upset with the tone and implication of the remark.

"I thought that was uncalled for," said Kerry, not even waiting for the question to be finished. "I thought it was negative in the worst, petty way. I thought it was unfortunate. And if it is done in surrogacy for the campaign itself then it is really wrong... I think [Obama's] proven record as a public person stands as a significant knock down to whatever youthful transgressions somebody might have had. And who in the world hasn't had some transgression of some kind?"

In 2004, Kerry himself admitted having smoked marijuana.

The former presidential nominee said his decision to endorse Obama came before Obama's win in the Iowa caucus. "I thought it was better to wait until the campaign felt there was a reason," he said of holding off the announcement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Sen. John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, took aim at Hillary Clinton on Monday, saying her criticism of Barack Obama's stance on the Iraq war was "not founded on accuracy." He also r...
Sen. John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, took aim at Hillary Clinton on Monday, saying her criticism of Barack Obama's stance on the Iraq war was "not founded on accuracy." He also r...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 950
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
02:59 PM on 01/17/2008
OBAMA IS THE ANTI-CHRIST!
03:07 PM on 01/16/2008
Did you all hear Oprah is getting her own TV NETWORK, OH HAPPY DAY! NOW SHE CAN BE EVEN A BIGGER RACIST, CAN NOT WAIT, GOODY, GOODY!
07:38 AM on 01/16/2008
HAVE YOU ALL HEARD ABOUT OBAMA AND OPRAH'S CHURCH AND HOW RACIST IT IS? THESE PEOPLE REALLY WANTING US TO VOTE FOR THEM AND WATCH THERE SHOW! NOT ME!
ONLY IF YOU WANT THEM TO BE FOR BLACKS ONLY! I COULD NOT BELIEVE WHAT I WAS READING! CHECK IT OUT! THIS DAY AND AGE UNBELIEVABLE!
www.tucc.org/about.htm BOTH OF THESE PEOPLE ARE RACIST FUCKS!
10:49 PM on 01/15/2008
Senator Obama is lucky to have Senator Kerry's support. Mr. Kerry brings not only access to his 3 million plus e-mail list, but his own experience and advise, if asked for (both of the good and bad) of his 2004 run for the Presidency. And, as is evident from this article, Senator Kerry will be an outspoken and strong defender of Mr. Obama’s policies and positions. I have been swayed towards supporting Senator Obama because of John Kerry's endorsement. And, I like what I have seen so far. I trust the judgment of our 2004 candidate who was right when he warned us about what was to come in Iraq and whose ideas and plans the other Democratic candidates have carried forth and are running on in 2008. Senator Kerry is a true leader, patriot and a class act.
07:24 PM on 01/15/2008
I was disappointed that Kerry endorsed Obama so soon after Iowa since I am a Edwards supported. But I am glad he is such an able and effective defender of Obama against the Clinton surrogates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tpagy
A Middle Age Gay Man Being A Witness to History!
07:10 PM on 01/15/2008
Mr Kerry you sir are an Enbarassment you let millions of people who some stood in line for hours to vote for you and what did they get someone who would not stand up for them let alone yourself and for that reason I cannot support your choice you have long sense lost credibility and now have tarnished Senator Obama.
06:09 PM on 01/15/2008
Hey, all you people who are now "so disappointed" in John Kerry, I'm just wondering...what do you think of when Kerry had his botched joke incident and Clinton knifed him in the back by joining the Repubicans in demanding that he apologize to the troops? Were you "so disappointed" in her then? I SURE WAS!

video of disloyal backstabbing right here, just 46 seconds long:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk1k0nUWEQg
05:49 PM on 01/15/2008
Very disappointed in Kerry. What position was he promised in an Obama administration to support someone with such a lightweight resume?
This is not the time for on the job training that Obama needs. I have lived long enough to see the screwups of novice presidents, including the current one. Obama has mesmerized many with his oratory skills, but if Obama gets the nomination, I may have to consider voting Republican for president(ugh). Add some more years of experience to his resume and I would be more than happy to vote for Obama.
05:41 PM on 01/15/2008
Mr. Kerry - please get lost. I saw you at a campaign event in 2004... you made all the kids your organizers packed into the front row stand there in he hot sun for over an hour. When you finally appeared and they started cheering, I thought to myself "Too bad we don't have a candidate really worth cheering." Your campaign through 2004 was insufferable. It was so bad that WaPost cartoonist Oliphat penned a cartoon of you as RIP VAN WINKLE, _SLEEPING_ through the entire summer and fall campaign season... and he was correct. In the 3rd presidential debate Bush sneered into national TV cameras "My opponent is a FLIP-FLOPPER."
You just stood there like a punching bag, too cowed, or corrupted to reply the obvious: That Mr. Bush had ALOT OF NERVE calling you a "flip-flopper", when on the rubble of 9-11 HE PLEDGED "to get Osama bin Laden DEAD OR ALIVE," and not only did he later (at a 2002 WH press conference) say "bin Laden DOESN'T CONCERN ME THAT MUCH ANYMORE",
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
but Bush even used binLaden SENDING America VIDEOS on eve of election'04 as "proof" that he, Bush, was the better war-on-terror leader!
Mr. Kerry, "TIME FOR CHANGE" is a PATHETIC, WEAK, & aenemic way to say "THROW THE BUMS OUT for GROSS INCOMPETENCE, ABUSE OF POWER, and CORRUPTION." You, sir, are COMPLICIT with that gross abuse of power. You wouldn't know how to LEAD a FILIBUSTER of Republican criminal conduct if your and your wife's fortunes depended on it. (Well, maybe then you might come down from your arrogant, high-holy insufferble elitism, but only if your fortune was at risk.)
You, sir, TOOK OUR DONATIONS, PROMISED to fight a hard campaign, PROMISED you would "FIGHT UNTIL THE LAST VOTE IS COUNTED"... and then you THREW IN THE TOWEL before the race had even begun. (Much less first thing on election night.) To you, campaign pledges and democracy are only something for the "little people."
05:17 PM on 01/15/2008
http://www.newsmax.com/kessler/Obama_Church_Racism/2008/01/07/62285.html
I just received this in my e-mails and after reading am concerned as to what next will come out about Obama. I think the republicans will be looking into everything he has done, I know this is one of the tactics they use against anyone they are running against. They leave no stone unturned. That is one reason I am fearful when a great many of them are singing Obamas praises now. Can't help but wonder what they know that the rest of us don't as of yet.
04:38 PM on 01/15/2008
'Kerry makes an attack' about, Hillary's attack.

Two wrongs do NOT make a right.

Edwards/Dodd '08!
04:11 PM on 01/15/2008
John Kerry is being petty. He thought enough of John Edwards to choose him as a running mate in 2004. I suppose it's more important that HE was the one who asked Obama to speak at the convention. John Kerry should have remained neutral, for the good of his party. Is this an endorsement for Obama or against Edwards? I also agree with PssttCmere. The Abrams Report last night was great and spot on. Dan Abrams is one of the few who really understands how inane and insane this process has become.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caywen
04:05 PM on 01/15/2008
I think Kerry is right and Hillary supporters here are just sore losers. If things were reversed, you'd sing him praises. Hypocrites!!
04:05 PM on 01/15/2008
Wow, Kerry is such bonesman: ignore the rigged 2004 election, enable JFK re-investigation coverup, and now support an unelectable boob.
04:01 PM on 01/15/2008
Why is it somehow a racial issue to raise questions about Senator Obama's self proclaimed history with "blow"? Cocaine is a Class A narcotic, possession of which is a felony in most jurisdictions. In Senator Obama's book, he describes how he was using "Pot... and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though," and later goes on to say that by the age of 20 this was all behind him. This doesn't sound like passing around a joint at a party to me. This sounds perilously close to a habit. There are 18, 19 and 20 year old soldiers risking their lives in Iraq at this very moment, yet we are expected to give Senator Obama a free pass on his admitted drug use at that same age by writing it off as a youthful indiscretion? What about all those young men in prison right now who weren't as lucky as Senator Obama was at their age, and who got caught with the "little blow" they could "afford". What does he have to say to them? They can't ever run for President as felons. It seems to me that raising questions about this troubling period in Senator Obama's past only becomes a racial issue if you assume, as most people do, that all angry young black men have the same problems with illegal drugs, and therefore, Senator Obama's former dalliance with cocaine is to be written off as another symptom of our racially biased society. But maybe all those young black men are so angry because they don't all use drugs like Senator Obama did, yet society assumes they do. Am I the only one who thinks that equating questions about the Senator's former drug use with racism only serves to reinforce those racially motivated stereotypes we are all supposedly trying to overcome? And why is it that he can admit to this years later and nobody cares, but an 18 year kid caught today with a gram of cocaine faces hard time and people think he gets what he deserves? Hypocrisy, that's why.