Barack Obama, barack obama nevada, culinary workers, Culinary workers Local 226, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton Nevada, Nevada Caucus, Nevada culinary workers, Nevada Union Lawsuit
Barack Obama, barack obama nevada, culinary workers, Culinary workers Local 226, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton Nevada, Nevada Caucus, Nevada culinary workers, Nevada Union Lawsuit

Judge Dismisses Nevada Caucus Challenge

KEN RITTER | January 17, 2008 10:02 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

stumbleupon :Judge Dismisses Nevada Caucus Challenge   digg: Judge Dismisses Nevada Caucus Challenge   reddit: Judge Dismisses Nevada Caucus Challenge   del.icio.us: Judge Dismisses Nevada Caucus Challenge

LAS VEGAS — A union with ties to Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton failed in court Thursday to block the state party's plans to hold caucuses at special precincts inside casinos on the Las Vegas Strip.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge James Mahan was presumed to be a boost for rival Barack Obama in Saturdays Democratic presidential caucuses because he has been endorsed by the union representing many of the shift workers who will be able to use the precincts.

"State Democrats have a First Amendment right to association, to assemble and to set their own rules," Mahan said.

Nevada's Democratic Party approved creation of the precincts to make it easier for housekeepers, waitresses and bellhops to caucus during the day near work rather than have to do so in their neighborhoods.

The state teachers union, which has ties to Clinton, brought the lawsuit against the special precincts after local 226 of the Culinary Workers Union endorsed Obama for the Democratic nomination. The union is the largest in Nevada, with 60,000 members. The Clinton campaign said it was not involved in the suit.

The suit contended party rules allowing the precincts gave too much power to the casino workers and violated federal equal protection guarantees.

But the judge said, "We aren't voting here, we're caucusing. That's something that parties decide."

He said it is "up to the national party and the state party to promulgate these rules and enforce them."

The Democratic National Committee ratified the state party's rules in August.

Campaigning in San Francisco, Obama welcomed the judge's decision, saying, "Any alternation would have disenfranchised maids, dishwashers, bellhops, people who work on the Strip. Some of the people who set up the rules apparently didn't think that we would be as competitive as we were and tried to change at the last minute."

Nevada State Education Association President Lynn Warne denied the case was linked to the Clinton campaign and said there would be no appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

In a statement, Clinton's campaign noted that other voters won't receive the same advantages as the bellhops and waitresses along the Strip.

"Make no mistake," the statement said, "the current system that prohibits some shift workers from being able to participate, while allowing others to do so, would seem to benefit other campaigns. More importantly, it is unfair."

Opinion polls find Clinton, Obama and John Edwards in a statistical dead heat in the Nevada race. Each has made a vigorous bid for union support.

Opponents of the Strip precincts said they could be more valuable in the delegate count than some sparsely populated counties, giving them too much clout. The Culinary Union said the suit was an attempt to disenfranchise its members. "Backers of Hillary Clinton are suing in court to take away our right to vote in the caucuses," a union flier said.

Under the rules, the nine at-large precincts will be open to any shift employee working within 2.5 miles of the Strip. By one estimate, more than 700 of the roughly 10,000 delegates to the state party's presidential nominating convention could be selected at the casino caucuses, depending on turnout.

Obama has also collected the endorsement of the Nevada chapter of the Service Employees International Union. The close nature of the contest and the logistics of caucuses created an intense struggle for labor's support, given its ability to organize and mobilize.

___

Associated Press writer Kathleen Hennessey contributed to this report.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
Comments
147
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

I retract my comment about Bill C. yesterday. It turns out his fight with the press was smart. Today the real issue is clearer to everyone, and it has to do with giving the strip caucus a decided advantage in number of delegates of 5 to 1 over other caucus attendees.

The follow-up story with the teacher's union stated that because the caucus system is new, most union workers didn't realize that this was how it was going to be.

What I'd love to hear about from someone involved in Nevada is "What's THAT all about?"

Why do the strip employees get so many more delegates?

Takes 50 in other places to get 1 delegate. 5 on the strip?

Makes no sense. There must be some rationale to this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 01/18/2008

Great...all the drunks and hedonists who wanted to support barockstar but chose to carouse instead will now be able to do both!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 01/17/2008
photo

Frankly, anything that can be done to get people to participate in the election process is a plus. It should be standard procedure in any caucus type situation for folks to establish caucus sites near where they work providing there are enough affected people to warrant such an effort.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 01/17/2008

There ya go! Good. Now it's a done deal.

A judge has visited the subject - ruled - case closed.

Here's hoping the candidates --and their minions-- keep it in their pants and stick to what's important.

Kumbaya. ;o)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 01/17/2008

The Republicans want to run against Hillary Clinton so badly, that they have sent all the kings horses and all the kings men to support Hillary in her bid for the nomination. The more the Democrats pull away from Hillary, the more support she gets from the neocons like Pat Bucannon, Karl Rove and Newt. In case no one recognizes it, these are really Greeks bearing gifts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 01/17/2008
photo

Judge James C. Mahan of Las Vegas, a popular state judge who joined the federal bench in 2002 after his nomination by President Bush.

Go Figure

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 01/17/2008

Union intimidation?:

***MyDD diarist Izaradar, who belongs to a union, says union endorsements are more problematic in caucus than primary states:

What's the big deal, you might ask? The union leadership can't force a member to honor the endorsement of Senator Obama. If a member wants to vote for John Edwards, or Senator Clinton, they're free to do so. This is a democracy, right? The secret ballot protects our identity and our choice. Well, that's a problem.

This is an open caucus. Union members will be standing in the same room with other union members. Or maybe even their shop steward. Or their foreman. Or possibly even a union official. Everyone will know which candidate you're backing. And if you're a member of Culinary Workers Local 226, and you don't caucus for Senator Obama??? That could make for a long shift on Monday***

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/1/16/212612/950

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 01/17/2008

Ding dong, the neocon witch is dead...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 01/17/2008

The Clinton News Network, AKA CNN reported this on the footnotes only.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 01/17/2008

There's a good article on this in the Christian Science Monitor. In fact, it makes the most sense of anything I've read yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 01/17/2008

Why couldn't the Sex Industry Workers Union sue to have the caucus meet at their place of work. Sort of a combination caucus and lingerie show - democracy in action!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 01/17/2008

What sweet and poetic justice it would be if John Edwards wins Nevada. Though one would barely know from reading the Huffington Post or other mainstream media, he's in a dead heat with the two anointed ones. And his biggest support seems to be coming from working folks--like the ones who change beds and scrub dishes in casinos, the ones who got the go ahead to caucus where they work; the ones Obamaniacs assume will be supporting Barack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 01/17/2008

I don't think a lawsuit works in this situation

In Washington State - we too have our caucus on a Saturday...the Sabbath

There were huge amounts of discussion when these decisions were made by the state party.

Democrats are all about PC and not interfering with religious beliefs...

So my advice...get involved in party decisions early on so you can be a part of the discussion. Bring your friends...It's a democratic process - setting caucus dates..so the more voices on your side...the more likely you'll affect the decision.

But trying to get the courts to alter the Democrat Party decisions -

Do we want the courts telling us when we can choose our leaders and when we cannot...

This isn't the same as voting rights...It's a private party...

Nevada decided that creating additional caucus locations - empowered more democrats to participate..

This is why despite Saturday being the Sabbath - Washington State has it's caucus on a Saturday..more people work 9-5 Mon-Friday and we wanted as many people to be able to caucus as possible.

The caucus process has it's downside...and perhaps primaries are the best...

So again, get involved early on...and you too can have a say in your state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 01/17/2008

Open Letter to Bill Clinton:

Whatever legacy you had, you have lost. Finally, you've shown your true colors. It's not about democracy. It's about you and your wife, at any cost, voters be damned. You've become a small man. We don't need narrowness and antiquated politics in the White House for another eight years. It's time for you to move on.

Triangulate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 01/17/2008

What encourages me is that the machinations behind the legal challenge against the casino caucuses has been clearly put forth by the media. Print and television reporters have actually explained the issue so that people can understand the truth of the matter. It's clear that the Clintons are surprised by the willingness of the media to go beyond their side of the story for the whole set of facts. The Clintons consider the truth to be 'unfair' if it happens not to be in agreement with their positions and objections. Clinton supporters blamed the media - the Clintons always have to have someone to blame - for airing the the issue of race baiting. But the American public, at long last, deserve a media that corrects false premises put forth by candidates. Mitt Romney was confronted by a reporter today over something he said about not having a lobbyist deeply involved in his campaign. I applaud that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 01/17/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect