"He's Transformative And Restorative": New York Observer Endorses Obama

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - "He's Transformative And Restorative": New York Observer Endorses Obama stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post
First Posted: 01-22-08 09:43 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
New York Observer To Endorse Obama

The New York Observer has endorsed Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for the upcoming Feb. 5 Democratic primary, The Huffington Post has learned. The Observer writes that the fact that he has "risen too quickly for his opponents' taste" is "nothing less than a recommendation."

Below is an excerpt of the Observer's endorsement, that hit the paper's Web site this morning.

Obama for America:
We Back Barack in Democratic Primary
Yes, He's Transformative And Restorative as Well


The New York Observer urges New York Democrats to support Mr. Obama in the state's presidential primary on Feb. 5.

New Yorkers might ask why they should not pull a lever for our junior senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton. While Mrs. Clinton is an extraordinary United States senator for New York, we believe that Mr. Obama can be a great president for the United States of America.

Most of the other candidates have absorbed, assimilated or appropriated Mr. Obama's issue of change.

But a great deal of the argument for Mr. Obama's candidacy is about one great issue in American life: Restoring American democracy.

It is difficult to remember the last national candidate who has charged and jazzed the democratic system as Mr. Obama has. Partly as a result of his candidacy, college campuses have remembered why they are proud of the United States, kids are going door to door, runners are handing out leaflets on weekends, racial lines have been culturally melted and the electoral approach to presidential campaigning has been reborn.

And, as more than one commentator has said, America is being reintroduced to the world.

Story continues below
advertisement

Mr. Obama stands the best chance of restoring the essential relationship between power and the American people. He is not flanked and blocked by an existing, entrenched power structure; his words are not muddied by layers of handlers; he still says what he means.

Mr. Obama would also be the most formidable Democrat in the general election. He has demonstrated a capacity to energize young people and attract new voters, and is the only candidate in the Democratic Party who attracts independents, who are the fastest-growing part of the electorate. His refusal to demonize the Republican Party as a right-wing attack machine will appeal to those independents as well as moderate Republicans.

As far as experience goes, when George W. Bush was driving a bleary, shocked nation into war with bait-and-switch deceptions in 2003, where was our experienced leadership? Meanwhile, in the west, an Illinois state senator-who has since served two years in the Senate, the same Congressional period that a fellow Midwesterner, Abraham Lincoln, had served when he sought the presidency-rose to exhibit courage and public judgment on that deceptive adventure, stating, "I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars."

Now we have paid the price many times over, and there are no clear paths in Baghdad. But there may be one in Washington. Mr. Obama is the emblem of a new America.

He has risen too quickly for his opponents' taste; that fact is nothing less than a recommendation.

His relationship to truth and plain speaking and public transparency is the first step toward reviving democracy in the United States of America.

Barack Obama of Illinois is the future. New York's Democrats should embrace him.

The New York Observer has endorsed Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for the upcoming Feb. 5 Democratic primary, The Huffington Post has learned. The Observer writes that the fact that he has "risen too quic...
The New York Observer has endorsed Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for the upcoming Feb. 5 Democratic primary, The Huffington Post has learned. The Observer writes that the fact that he has "risen too quic...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
478
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- darcy I'm a Fan of darcy 27 fans permalink

What a bunch of crap. The newspaper obviously wants a Dem candidate to run who will lose. How low can the press go? The media are reaching new heights of lowness!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 01/23/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

BILL CLINTON'S OBAMA STRATEGY according to Bill's ex-attack guy, Dick Morris

"WHY is Bill Clinton courting such intense publicity, in evitably much of it negative?

Is he crazy? Crazy like a fox.

He has two goals and is achieving them both spectacularly.

First, he wants to be the same kind of lightning rod for Hillary that she was for him during his run for the presidency.
In the days before Iowa and leading up to New Hampshire, Hillary was the prime topic of political discussion.

Now, she rarely gets hit anymore. They're hitting Bill instead.

The other method behind his madness is that Bill wants to suck up all the oxygen in the room and dominate the coverage of the Democratic contest. By doing so, he cuts Obama out of the news, pushes him off the front page, and usurps the headlines.

His tactics now are reminiscent of those he used to black out John Kerry during the lead-up to the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

By scheduling book signings and speeches in Boston, he effectively took the coverage away from the prospective Democratic nominee, a man who would have eclipsed Hillary's presidential ambitions had he won the election.

Ultimately, the Clintons are playing a game of jujitsu with Obama, using his own strength against him.

By challenging Obama for the black vote - by promising to go door to door in South Carolina in minority neighborhoods, for example - Bill is highlighting the question: Will Obama carry the black vote? Of course, he will. He leads, 4 to 1, among African-Americans now.

But by making that the central question, Obama's South Carolina victory will be hailed as proof that he won the African-American vote. Such block voting will trigger the white backlash Sen. Clinton needs to win.

Once whites see blacks voting en masse for a black man, they will figure that it is a racial game and line up for Hillary. Already, she carries white voters by 2 to 1.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 01/23/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

BILL CLINTON'S OBAMA STRATEGY according to Bill's ex-attack guy, Dick Morris

"WHY is Bill Clinton courting such intense publicity, in evitably much of it negative?

Is he crazy? Crazy like a fox.

He has two goals and is achieving them both spectacularly.

First, he wants to be the same kind of lightning rod for Hillary that she was for him during his run for the presidency.
In the days before Iowa and leading up to New Hampshire, Hillary was the prime topic of political discussion.

Now, she rarely gets hit anymore. They're hitting Bill instead.

The other method behind his madness is that Bill wants to suck up all the oxygen in the room and dominate the coverage of the Democratic contest. By doing so, he cuts Obama out of the news, pushes him off the front page, and usurps the headlines.

His tactics now are reminiscent of those he used to black out John Kerry during the lead-up to the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

By scheduling book signings and speeches in Boston, he effectively took the coverage away from the prospective Democratic nominee, a man who would have eclipsed Hillary's presidential ambitions had he won the election.

Ultimately, the Clintons are playing a game of jujitsu with Obama, using his own strength against him.

By challenging Obama for the black vote - by promising to go door to door in South Carolina in minority neighborhoods, for example - Bill is highlighting the question: Will Obama carry the black vote? Of course, he will. He leads, 4 to 1, among African-Americans now.

But by making that the central question, Obama's South Carolina victory will be hailed as proof that he won the African-American vote. Such block voting will trigger the white backlash Sen. Clinton needs to win.

Once whites see blacks voting en masse for a black man, they will figure that it is a racial game and line up for Hillary. Already, she carries white voters by 2 to 1.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 01/23/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

BILL CLINTON'S OBAMA STRATEGY according to Bill's ex-attack guy, Dick Morris

"WHY is Bill Clinton courting such intense publicity, in evitably much of it negative?

Is he crazy? Crazy like a fox.

He has two goals and is achieving them both spectacularly.

First, he wants to be the same kind of lightning rod for Hillary that she was for him during his run for the presidency.
In the days before Iowa and leading up to New Hampshire, Hillary was the prime topic of political discussion.

Now, she rarely gets hit anymore. They're hitting Bill instead.

The other method behind his madness is that Bill wants to suck up all the oxygen in the room and dominate the coverage of the Democratic contest. By doing so, he cuts Obama out of the news, pushes him off the front page, and usurps the headlines.

His tactics now are reminiscent of those he used to black out John Kerry during the lead-up to the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

By scheduling book signings and speeches in Boston, he effectively took the coverage away from the prospective Democratic nominee, a man who would have eclipsed Hillary's presidential ambitions had he won the election.

Ultimately, the Clintons are playing a game of jujitsu with Obama, using his own strength against him.

By challenging Obama for the black vote - by promising to go door to door in South Carolina in minority neighborhoods, for example - Bill is highlighting the question: Will Obama carry the black vote? Of course, he will. He leads, 4 to 1, among African-Americans now.

But by making that the central question, Obama's South Carolina victory will be hailed as proof that he won the African-American vote. Such block voting will trigger the white backlash Sen. Clinton needs to win.

Once whites see blacks voting en masse for a black man, they will figure that it is a racial game and line up for Hillary. Already, she carries white voters by 2 to 1.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 01/23/2008
- lynn1219 I'm a Fan of lynn1219 6 fans permalink

Obama is the first candidate to champion change. C'mon. John Edwards started that years ago before he even announced. Edwards has led on every single issue, and Obama and Clinton have followed. More of the media's irresponsible reporting!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 01/23/2008
- truelie I'm a Fan of truelie 8 fans permalink

Brilliantly said. America needs Barack Obama RIGHT NOW. There is not a moment to waste. There is One United States of America and there is One Barack Obama at this moment in history. Fellow Americans, let's rise to the occassion and write a new chapter in our history and the history of the world. Let's get this brilliant man to the White House in 2008.

In Obama We Believe!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 01/23/2008

If Obama gets the nomination, the question will be whether his vague but brilliant "Politics of Hope" routine will have a shelf life, or whether the GOP candidate will be able to force him to get specific.

Obama's voting record and specifics on the issues (per his website) are solid, pure leftist. His message, then, is not "we all need to come together," it is, essentially, "we all need to come together and move left." But you sure as hell won't see him saying that.

The GOP candidate's only chance will be to expose this fact and hope the electorate buys it. But Obama's soft and fluffy "Politics of Hope" will probably trump that.

Nothing has changed. The Dems will pick up more congressional seats in November, and the Democrat Presidential candidate will probably win. The only question is how far left America is about to move.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 01/23/2008
- MR I'm a Fan of MR 7 fans permalink

Maybe the New York Observer wants to see the Democratic party be tranformed into a Reagan loving bunch of Republican conservatives and wants to make nice with the most destructive political ideology in history and maybe they agree with Obama that the Republicans were the party of ideas but I'll skip that kind of transformation. I dont know what they mean by restorative but when someone uses vague obtuse language to try and make a point they usually dont have one.If what they mean by transformed has to do with Obama's race, then they themselves have too much soul searching to do to have their point of view taken seriously. This is not about race.And I find Obamas Republican appeasment the last thing in the world I want to see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 AM on 01/23/2008

Obama is the future of the Democratic party. The 21st century. The Clintons -the hill and bill show are so yesterday. They had their day in the 20th century.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 01/23/2008
- keriheb I'm a Fan of keriheb 6 fans permalink

Wow, a lovely well thought out editorial. If this is what Obama would stimulate in the US, we all need such stimulation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 AM on 01/23/2008

Of late, I'm seeing such lazy thinking - even in a poli-engaged-phase America (& the world thanks to our number 1 export of Mc'D-ization of debate, analysis, historical perspective) - that I'm close to leaving the assembly line of standard, non-thinking, pattern, choose-your-camp-so don't have to truly process a competitior's stance before trashing - then I simply paste to all posts & comments regardless of item's merit.
The level of discourse has so deteriorated - that I think that the, 'blame the media, system, world' - (as it's always the rest of the world) has become a crutch for taking our amazing system for granted. Irony check - in a world where people are being slaughtered for truly addressing issues - here we are in the model for free debate - regurgitating our choice candidate's talking points w/out digesting & not processing opponent's args fully so we can be fastest to oppose & post - even when we know we haven't read carefully once much less twice.
In all this 'quick-dra­w-I-can-be­st-that-in fewer-word­s-before-n­ext-commen­t' drivel - we're losing sight of how fortunate we are to be able to duel. Let's make it mean something other than the pre-schooler 'my guy/gal is better than yours just cuz I said so'. I used to say a mental piss-off to those who thought this accelerated blog push was dimminishing discourse - now I'm not so sure.
Anyone?!? To those who just repeat same talking points to comment on every post no matter subject - Think for just a few more secs before writing - you'll be so much more persuasive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 AM on 01/23/2008

Wooooo! big paper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 AM on 01/23/2008
- Kane I'm a Fan of Kane 13 fans permalink

Two excellent articles recently offered by The Observer:

Hillary's Iraq Story Is Kind of Fairy Tale, Too
http://www.observer.com/2008/hillarys-iraq-story-kind-fairy-tale-too

Once Again, a Clinton Muddies the War Issue
http://www.observer.com/2008/once-again-clinton-muddies-war-issue

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 AM on 01/23/2008

United Farm Workers Union Endorses Hillary (1-23-08).

A new Field Poll in California had Clinton leading Obama among likely Democratic and non-partisan voters by 39 to 27 percent, with former senator John Edwards trailing on 10 percent (1-23-08).

----------­----------­----------­----------­-------
If it was OBAMA, these two headlines would be in big neon lights here. Of course since it is Hillary, ObamaPost will never mention a thing, perhaps only as a footnote somewhere nobody can find. "Unbiased" my ass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 01/23/2008

Limousine liberals love Obama, but he can't connect with the working man. He is John Kerry with a tan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 01/23/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect