dick cheney surveillance, surveillance law, Vice President Dick Cheney, War on Terror, Warrantless Wiretapping, wiretapping, wiretapping surveillance dick cheney
dick cheney surveillance, surveillance law, Vice President Dick Cheney, War on Terror, Warrantless Wiretapping, wiretapping, wiretapping surveillance dick cheney

Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded

TOM RAUM | January 23, 2008 03:34 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

stumbleupon :Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded   digg: Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded   reddit: Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded   del.icio.us: Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded

WASHINGTON — Vice President Dick Cheney prodded Congress on Wednesday to extend and broaden an expiring surveillance law, saying "fighting the war on terror is a long-term enterprise" that should not come with an expiration date.

"We're reminding Congress that they must act now," Cheney told the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The law, which authorizes the administration to eavesdrop on phone calls and see the e-mail to and from suspected terrorists, expires on Feb. 1. Congress is bickering over terms of its extension.

On Tuesday, Senate Republicans blocked an effort by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to extend the stopgap Protect America Act without expanding it, raising stakes for an expected showdown in the Senate later this week on a new version of the law.

"This cause is bigger than the quarrels of party and the agendas of politicians," Cheney said. "And if we in Washington, all of us, can only see our way clear to work together, then the outcome should not be in doubt."

Congress hastily adopted the stopgap act last summer in the face of warnings from the administration about dangerous gaps in the government's ability to gather intelligence in the Internet age.

Administration allies in Congress not only want the expiring law made permanent but amended to give telephone companies and other communications providers immunity from being sued for helping the government eavesdropping and other intelligence-gathering efforts.

Cheney said such providers "face dozens of lawsuits."

"The intelligence community doesn't have the facilities to carry out the kind of international surveillance needed to defend this country since 9-11. In some situations, there is no alternative to seeking assistance from the private sector. This is entirely appropriate," Cheney said.

At the White House, press secretary Dana Perino defended the proposal to protect phone companies from liability. "These are companies who helped their country right after 9-11," she said. She also criticized Democratic plans for a one-month extension of the current law. "Look, there's been six months to hash out the differences. Actually, there's been a whole year-and-a-half worth ... And there was robust debate, a hearty debate back in August when we got the bill that we have now."

At the heart of the controversy is whether the government's wireless surveillance program violated provisions of the original FISA law that requires warrants for wiretaps whenever one of the parties involved in the communication resides in the United States.

Cheney also said the administration "feels strongly that an updated FISA law should be made permanent, not merely extended again. ... There is no sound reason to pass critical legislation like the Protect America Act and slap an expiration date on it."

Reid plans to bring to the Senate floor on Thursday competing versions of the legislation.

If a bill is not approved then, Reid said he would require the Senate to work through the weekend to get a bill passed.

The original FISA law requires the government to get permission from a special court to listen in on the phone calls and e-mails of people in the United States. Changes in communications technology mean many purely foreign to foreign communications now pass through the United States and therefore require the government to get court orders to intercept them.

The Protect America Act, adopted in August, eased that restriction. Privacy and civil liberties advocates say it went too far, giving the government far more power to eavesdrop on American communications without court oversight.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
893
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)

NO, NO, NO more sping without a court order, I want my rights back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 01/24/2008

Doe anyone believe Dick Cheney is really concerned about stopping the terrorists?
We have never heard of any terrorist plot interrupted as a result of the wiretapping surveillance.
Yet, everytime they catch some losers who want to blow up the Sears Tower or shoot up Fort Dix, there are several press conferences with a dozen people from the FBI and the DOJ explaining in detail what they've uncovered.
Can't explain why I don't trust this man to be concerned about anything but oil and control. When we learn the real reason for the wiretapping it propably won't have anything yo do with terrorism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 01/24/2008

I turned in my next door neighbor as a terrorist. I know he is because he says he don't believe in the Jesus and he said he do believe in the global warming of Al Gore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 01/24/2008

Cheney's ideas are pure lunacy. He's going more and more off the deep end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 01/24/2008

I want my Constiution back...the whole thing...habeas corpus...4th Amendment against warrantless searches..co equal branches..the whole thing.
And you can take that immunity deal for phone companies giving info to the government and roll it up reeeal tight, and.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 01/24/2008

If Reid brings ANY version to the floor he is a TRAITOR! Oh that's right, he has elready established that, so he must have a back pocket pardon from Bush also. Now Nancy, how about you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 01/24/2008

Grow a Spine Democrats!

Impeach this monster!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 01/24/2008

Hurry up and die you worthless piece of garbage!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 01/24/2008

We don't need increased spying on the American public..... we need increased spying on Dick Cheney.

What Americans need is "Cheney Care".... the same level of health care that Dick Cheney gets from our government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 01/24/2008

From Dina Pepperoni, "These are companies who helped their country right after 9-11." She needs to rephrase that as, ""These are companies who helped us spy on our citizens before 9-11." Just b/c "these companies" helped "your Misadministration" break the law doesn't mean that we should reward them now.
DP: Every time she opens her mouth she adds credance to the term "ditzy blonde."

Peace!
Mark

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 AM on 01/24/2008

Someone should tell Dick(less) Cheney to stay at his undisclosed bunker location and not come out until Jan 20, 2009, when we get his miserable butt off the taxpayers rolls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 01/24/2008

And do you believe that congress will listen to the people it has sworn to represent? Those days are gone. Get Cheney off the screen, we are sick of him and his lies. "Go Cheney yourself" should be the new mantra!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 AM on 01/24/2008

Write or call your congress persons and demand legislation granting immunity for you personally, as an individual, for any future laws that you may or may not break at the behest of the executive branch. We should all be protected, no ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 AM on 01/24/2008

Cheney is a liar. He lied, he lies, he will lie.

Impeach. Or muster a firing squad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 AM on 01/24/2008

WHY CAN'T WE IMPEACH ' CHENEY ' EVEN WHEN HE LEAVES OFFICE ( 900 PROVEN LIES ) WHILE IN OFFICE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
HE HAS REACHED " HIGH CRIMES "
" BUSH TO "
4,000 PLUS U.S DEATHS
24,000 PLUS U.S. WOUNDED

ALL ON A PACK OF LIES OR IS THERE A TIME LINE ON AMERICAN DEATHS ? MURDERS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 01/24/2008

OK Dick, you first. Let's see all your e-mails and energy task force documents. After all, if you've done nothing wrong you've got nothing to hide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 01/24/2008

Over 214,000 Americans have already signed Congressman Wexler's petition for Cheney impeachment.

Won't you please join us?

http://wexlerwantshearings.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 01/23/2008

Whatever Mona wants, Mona gets. I think that is a song, replace Mona , with Big Dick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 01/23/2008

So let me get this right. Originally, Bush didn't need the permission of Congress or the FISA court to eavesdrop on domestic communications because the power is inherent as his role as President. But, we need a new FISA law with this expanded authority just in case it's not really an inherent power. And if we need a new law, then that means the behavior was in violation of the previous law (which wasn't really valid anyway) but the private companies didn't violate any law and therefore need immunity from lawsuits for violating laws which either didn't apply or weren't valid.

I know they say Washington is insulated from reality, but you wouldn't know from their behavior that the vast majority of Americans and legal scholars are absolutely against pretty much everything this administration does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 01/23/2008

What this country really needs is a way to deal with the two traitors, Bush and Cheney. Oh, wait, two nooses will work very nicely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 01/23/2008

sorry - "acquisition OF" - and
esp. to correct: Peolsi put IT (meaning IMPEACHMENT) off the table.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 01/23/2008

This is Cheney's main agenda, besides the Iraq war and acquistion to oil wealth in Iraq and Caspian Sea Basin - setting up proto-fascist executive power - getting it embedded in law. He rears his ugly head again - we forget how stupefying it is that Pelosi put if "off the table", when the evidence would be relatively easy to produce.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 01/23/2008

Cheney knows this as nothing to do with fighting terrorism. Nada. This is about looking to see who is or who can out Bush, cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld for their misdeeds. Its about taking people regardless of thier actual guilt, changing thier words to appear as if they are terror threats. This is how they plan to go after those who dare oust them. Did anyone bother to read the memo to cheney about rights to privacy and what he plans to do is a violation of the law, civil liberties, the constitution? Yo, republicans, its your rights he plans to violate as well. People who have to esort to this kind of caca are desperate. He is out to shut down the internet. What too much info slipping out about them? Damn time. Cheney can eat this, as this is tantamount to his impeachment. Oh yes, its coming, and its carrying a baseball bat and is mad as hell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 01/23/2008

Cheney said:
"The intelligence community doesn't have the facilities to carry out the kind of international surveillance needed to defend this country since 9-11. In some situations, there is no alternative to seeking assistance from the private sector. This is entirely appropriate,"

Appropriate? Maybe if you have no regard for the rule of law. It's obvious that this administration doesn't. "Since 9-11?" Don't forget, dear readers, the Sept. 11 attacks have been cited by the government as the main impetus for its warrantless surveillance efforts. HOWEVER, the NSA approached Qwest more than six months BEFORE the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks for their participation in a warrantless surveillance program to gather information about Americans' phone records. Qwest declined, citing concerns about the legality of doing so. Cheney should be IMPEACHED for "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" according to the rule of law.

The FISA law requires warrants for wiretaps. Giving the government power to eavesdrop on American communications without court oversight is a violation of our 4th Amendment rights as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 01/23/2008

Cheney needs impeachment.. NOW.

Congressman Wexler: Case for Cheney impeachment 'far stronger than Watergate.'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orkmjB_LHTE

See Congressman Wexler call for Cheney impeachment on the floor of the US House of Representatives.

Just because there's a media blackout doesn't mean that impeachment isn't happening.

http://wexlerwantshearings.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 01/23/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com