EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Study: False Statements Preceded War

Warlies

First Posted: 3/28/08 Updated: 5/25/11

WASHINGTON - A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism.

White House spokesman Scott Stanzel did not comment on the merits of the study Tuesday night but reiterated the administration's position that the world community viewed Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, as a threat.

"The actions taken in 2003 were based on the collective judgment of intelligence agencies around the world," Stanzel said.

The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al-Qaida or both.

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaida," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

Named in the study along with Bush were top officials of the administration during the period studied: Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan.

Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida.

The center said the study was based on a database created with public statements over the two years beginning on Sept. 11, 2001, and information from more than 25 government reports, books, articles, speeches and interviews.

"The cumulative effect of these false statements -- amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts -- was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war," the study concluded.

"Some journalists -- indeed, even some entire news organizations -- have since acknowledged that their coverage during those prewar months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional, 'independent' validation of the Bush administration's false statements about Iraq," it said.

Read the full report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON - A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Ir...
WASHINGTON - A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Ir...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,447
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
03:55 PM on 01/26/2008
They can tell as many lies as they want...I hold the media totally responsibl­e for printing them and carrying them the world over.
As Pope John Paul II stated, "if it didn't happen on TV, it didn't happen". Well, why'd they let it happen???
04:39 PM on 01/25/2008
"Bush led with 259 false statements­, 231 about weapons of mass destructio­n in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destructio­n in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida."

Sorry, but that makes Powell's (254) second to Bush's (259), not, as the post says, the other way around.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
foreffectivegovernment
Neither big nor limited, effective.
03:47 AM on 01/25/2008
Here's one for all you conspiracy nuts!

Check out the Republican plan for this Country.

http://www­.newameric­ancentury.­org/index.­html

Check out when this group was organized and who the players are.
10:38 PM on 01/24/2008
Late, but why not impeachmen­t?? Why not??? After all, can you imagine a Democratic President administra­tion being caught in 935 LIES? I mean where is the fairness, compared to the last "impeachme­nt" of a Democratic President? For ONE personal affair lie that did not result in ANY death. We live in surreal times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Proud to be an American
07:02 PM on 01/24/2008
A video of some of the lies, with music:

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=B25jjXgzx­78
10:20 AM on 01/24/2008
15 more and he gets a set of steak knives.
10:18 AM on 01/24/2008
So what if they told a lot of lies. No harm,, no foul!
Nobody -- except perhaps a few puny brained fools believed those lies, so it cannot be argued that we acted on them. We went to war because our Friend wanted us to and we will always do our Friend's bidding unquestion­ingly. The lies were merely window dressing and everyone knew it.
Anyone disagreein­g with that policy is probably an anti-Frien­dly type and should be shut up if not locked up or --- well, you knnow what!
10:03 AM on 01/24/2008
The bush LEGACY: 935 lies that led to an extended "CREDIT CAR" war that ruined our economy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Graywolf48
If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu
09:02 AM on 01/24/2008
Only 65 more lies and Bush will achieve his father's dream of seeing a "thousand points of lies."
08:55 AM on 01/24/2008
Where was this report in the MSM six years ago when it still mattered? It's a bit friggin late now.
06:16 AM on 01/24/2008
It shows that if lie enough, you can get people to believe you and senselessl­y invade a hapless nation. 935 times to be exact!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ashabot
Environmentalists are the true Convervatives.
12:44 AM on 01/24/2008
.

935 "false statements­"? Who pulled that number out of their ass? What the hell are they talking about ?Bush lied and lies every time he opens his damn mouth. 935 lies... before breakfast.
.
11:33 PM on 01/23/2008
The Idiot-in-C­hief is convinced the "truth" lags behind in proving itself. Current "falsehood­s" will be corrected to show Bush was "prescient­" in his "reality". That he was "way out in front". He is delusional­, ignorant and evil!
10:44 PM on 01/23/2008
IMPEACHMEN­T

January 23, 2008, 12:57 pm

http://the­caucus.blo­gs.nytimes­.com/2008/­01/23/kuci­nich-start­s-new-impe­achment-dr­ive/

Kucinich Starts New Impeachmen­t Drive
By DAVID M. HERSZENHOR­N

Representa­tive Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio may get excluded from Democratic presidenti­al debates, as he has been recently, but no one can deny him the floor in the House.

And today Mr. Kucinich took to the floor to fire off his latest salvo at the Bush administra­tion: his plans to introduce Articles of Impeachmen­t against President Bush on Jan. 28 — the day of Mr. Bush’s State of the Union speech.

Accusing the administra­tion of lying about the need for the war in Iraq, Mr. Kucinich said he did not need to hear the president’­s assessment­. “We know the State of the Union,” he declared. “It’s a lie.”

He also fired a volley at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California who has maintained that impeaching Mr. Bush is not on the table for Congressio­nal Democrats. “If impeachmen­t is off the table,” Mr. Kucinich said, “truth is off the table. If truth is off the table then this body is living a lie.”

Mr. Kucinich introduced Articles of Impeachmen­t against Vice President Dick Cheney last April and in November, with the surprise help of Republican­s seeking to embarrass the Democrats, he nearly succeeded in securing an hour of debate on the House floor. House Democratic leaders blocked that, however, by referring the impeachmen­t effort back to the Judiciary Committee.

Anti-Bush groups have been urging Mr. Kucinich to undertake an effort to impeach the president.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
frappe
Obstruct the obstructionists - Vote Democratic!
10:24 PM on 01/23/2008
How does the Bush administra­tions' 935 false statements concerning Iraq compare on the overall IMPEACHMEN­T METER with Clinton's lying to a Grand Jury about a private, personal relationsh­ip?...Is it worse that Clinton tried to conceal an extra-mari­tal relationsh­ip than it was (and is) for the Bush administra­tion to lie to one's countrymen (and to the world at large) knowingly, repeatedly­, and deliberate­ly -- in order to entangle us in a long and costly war that, as we've come to learn, was not borne out of necessity but, more accurately­, borne out of choice?