benchmarks, iraq, Iraq benchmark report, iraq surge, Iraq war, success of the surge, War in Iraq, warwire
benchmarks, iraq, Iraq benchmark report, iraq surge, Iraq war, success of the surge, War in Iraq, warwire

One Year Later, Surge Accomplishes 3 Of 18 Benchmarks

Center For American Progress   |   January 25, 2008 09:45 AM


stumbleupon :One Year Later, Surge Accomplishes 3 Of 18 Benchmarks   digg: One Year Later, Surge Accomplishes 3 Of 18 Benchmarks   reddit: One Year Later, Surge Accomplishes 3 Of 18 Benchmarks   del.icio.us: One Year Later, Surge Accomplishes 3 Of 18 Benchmarks

On the one year anniversary of President Bush's State of the Union address justifying his "New Way Forward" in Iraq, it is clear that the surge has failed to meet its objectives. One year ago, the president pledged that "America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced." Despite the fact that the Iraqi government has only met three of the 18 benchmarks laid out last year, an end to U.S. military and financial commitment is nowhere in sight.

The purpose of the surge was to provide the "breathing space" for political reconciliation to occur. Yet over one year later, political progress has been scant, and what progress has been made is not durable. The Iraqis have not made the difficult political compromises necessary for national reconciliation, and an indefinite U.S. presence in the region will not inspire them to do so. Despite the best efforts of our military men and women in creating a temporary lull in violence, substantial advancement toward a sustainable and independent Iraq has not been made.

In order to motivate Iraq's political leaders, the United States must set a date certain for withdrawal. Only then will the Iraqis make the difficult political compromises necessary for national reconciliation. While redeploying our forces over the next 10-12 months, the United States must initiate a diplomatic surge to ensure that all of Iraq's neighbors are involved constructively in Iraq's future. Only by implementing a Strategic Reset in Iraq will the United States be able to take control of its own national security interests in the country and the greater Middle East.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
3
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- SmellyOne See Profile I'm a Fan of SmellyOne permalink

Well, the economy is looking much better as of late in Iraq.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/International/Story?id=4159193&page=1

The linked story is from ABC News. You can find the video of the story on their website, too.

Too bad so few will read this, because HuffPo has decided the war isn't worth covering on their front page anymore. I guess it's not politically expedient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 01/27/2008
- ReasonIsMyReligion See Profile I'm a Fan of ReasonIsMyReligion permalink

Wowza!

Three of eighteen is more than twice as good as I predicted!

Ain't spin grand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 01/25/2008
- getoffmedz See Profile I'm a Fan of getoffmedz permalink

And 3 of 18 is even an exaggeration. lol

The Surge has been such a waste the Commander of the Surge is being reassigned to NATO. Basically a symbolic assignment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 01/25/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in