Study: Afghanistan Could Turn Into A Failed State

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Study: Afghanistan Could Turn Into A Failed State stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANNE FLAHERTY | January 29, 2008 09:03 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Afghan women clad with burqas leave a gathering for releasing the kidnapped American aid worker in Kandarhar province south of Kabul, Afghanistan on Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2008. About 500 Afghan women gathered in a rare mass protest Tuesday against the kidnapping of an American aid worker. (AP Photo/Allaudddin Khan)

WASHINGTON — Afghanistan risks sliding into a failed state and becoming the "forgotten war" because of deteriorating international support and a growing violent insurgency, according to an independent study.

The assessment, co-chaired by retired Marine Corps Gen. James Jones and former U.N. Ambassador Thomas Pickering, serves as a warning to the Bush administration at a time military and congressional officials are debating how best to juggle stretched warfighting resources.

The administration wants to re-energize anti-terrorism efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where al-Qaida is regenerating. But the U.S. still remains heavily invested in Iraq, and officials are sending strong signals that troop reductions there will slow or stop altogether this summer.

"Afghanistan stands at a crossroads," concludes the study, an advance copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press. "The progress achieved after six years of international engagement is under serious threat from resurgent violence, weakening international resolve, mounting regional challenges and a growing lack of confidence on the part of the Afghan people about the future direction of their country."

A major issue has been trying to win the war with "too few military forces and insufficient economic aid," the study adds.

Among the group's nearly three dozen recommendations: increase NATO force levels and military equipment sent to Afghanistan, decouple U.S. management of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, establish a special envoy to coordinate all U.S. policy on Afghanistan, and champion a unified strategy among partner nations to stabilize the country in five years.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he was not familiar with the study's findings, but he struck a more optimistic tone on Afghanistan's future.

"I would say that the security situation is good," Gates told The Associated Press. "We want to make sure it gets better, and I think there's still a need to coordinate civil reconstruction, the economic development side of it."

Story continues below
advertisement

Gates said more troops are needed in Afghanistan, but "certainly not ours." When asked how many more NATO troops might be needed, he said that number should be determined by ground commanders.

Sen. John Kerry said it was "past time for wakeup calls" and that a "comprehensive, thoughtful approach" in Afghanistan was urgently needed.

"The same extremist group which plotted the attacks of 9/11 are reconstituting themselves on the Afghan border and grow more organized by the day, making the stakes higher and higher," said Kerry, D-Mass., a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

The Jones-Pickering assessment, slated for public release on Wednesday, says the U.S. should rethink its military and economic strategy in Afghanistan in large part because of deteriorating support among voters in NATO countries.

If international forces are pulled, the fragile Afghan government would "likely fall apart," the report warns.

The study was a voluntary effort coordinated by the Center for the Study of the Presidency, a nonpartisan organization in Washington, as a follow-on to the Iraq Study Group. That study group was a congressionally mandated blue-ribbon panel hailed as the first major bipartisan assessment on the Iraq war since the 2003 invasion.

While the Afghanistan study has not created the same buzz as the Iraq assessment, the center's latest findings still are likely to wield political clout because of those involved.

Last year, Jones led a high-profile study on Iraq security forces, which was used by lawmakers to challenge President Bush's own assessments. Most recently, the retired Marine Corps general, known for his outspoken independence, was tapped to advise Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on security aspects of the new Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

Pickering was a longtime U.S. ambassador and a former undersecretary of state.

Panel members include Charles Robb, a former Democratic senator who served on the Iraq Study Group, and David Abshire, who helped organize the Iraq study. Abshire is president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency.

According to the report, the center decided to initiate the study after ISG discussions made clear that Afghanistan was at risk of becoming "the forgotten war."

"Participants and witnesses pointed to the danger of losing the war in Afghanistan unless a reassessment took place of the effort being undertaken in that country by the United States, NATO and the international community," the study states.

Similar problems were identified in two other assessments also due for release Wednesday, including one by the Atlantic Council in Washington, which Jones chairs. A separate study, led by Harlan Ullman, an adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the National Defense University, included specific proposals to rejuvenate Afghanistan's agricultural sector.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee was expected to be briefed Wednesday on Afghanistan by intelligence officials. On Thursday, the panel will convene an open hearing, featuring testimony from Jones and Pickering. Also testifying Thursday will be Richard Boucher, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia.

WASHINGTON — Afghanistan risks sliding into a failed state and becoming the "forgotten war" because of deteriorating international support and a growing violent insurgency, according to an indep...
WASHINGTON — Afghanistan risks sliding into a failed state and becoming the "forgotten war" because of deteriorating international support and a growing violent insurgency, according to an indep...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
81
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
photo

re: Afghanistan risks sliding into a failed state and becoming the "forgotten war"

Is this proof Cryonics actually works and these people have been in suspended animation for the last six years?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 01/30/2008
- cornflower I'm a Fan of cornflower 6 fans permalink


Has it occurred to absolutely anyone at all in the MSM that conducts our campaigns to ask the candidates what they plan to do about the other war, the one in Afghanistan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 01/30/2008
- Mutex I'm a Fan of Mutex 9 fans permalink


We live in an age when language is used to disguise things rather than provide clarity.

Isn't it convenient that we have a term like 'terrorism' to denote everything we are against but never feel the need to define what we really mean?

The CIA in a recent National Intelligence Estimate (in an effort to profile future 'terrorists') concluded that "the transformation of an individual to a terrorist is triggered by oppression, suffering, revenge, or desperation."

Why are the oppressed, suffering, desperate people of the world our enemies rather than the rich, powerful and corrupt?

Why does the United States provide economic and military support to corrupt dictators around the world if our mission is truly to spread 'freedom and democracy'?

What would you do if an imperialist power invaded your country and tried to install a puppet government?

Would you become a 'terrorist' or a collaborator?

I know, I know. We are good and 'they' are evil and beyond that there is nothing to discuss.







    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 01/30/2008
- javaman I'm a Fan of javaman 5 fans permalink

Turn into?????? Bwahahahah­ahahaha!!!

these fucking morons in the media and in washington need to read the fucking papers. It's a fucking narcostate!!! 63% of their GDP last year was fucking poppy production!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 01/30/2008
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

Our Multi-lateral Partners are failing us miserably. We have taken care of their sovereignty for so long, they no longer can do it themselves with any effectiveness. Our 'freedom' partners (NATO) depend on our strength to do anything, i.e. Bosnia. If Afghanistan fails, so does NATO as an effective organization. Putin is laughing his ass off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 01/30/2008

A non-state cannot become a failed state, and Afghanistan has never, in it's long, long, history, been a state, though it did make a pretty good province for Persian Indian empires that were wise enough not to challenge the authority of tribal leaders.

Islam was the only force that established any kind of centrifugal force to the thing.

Khabul has been something of a nation-state in is time, mainly as a safe place for trading along the Silk Road. The British, and then the CIA and the Russians, destroyed all that, and now Humpty Dumpty will never be put back together again - and certainly not by this pathetic "coalition of the willing".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 01/30/2008
- helonias I'm a Fan of helonias 229 fans permalink
photo

Waiting for you because of Bushco is a strung out heroin addict who will stab your loved one for their purse or wallet to get their next fix.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 01/30/2008
- tumblewind I'm a Fan of tumblewind 2 fans permalink

This is the biggest reason why war is not the answer for terrorism! Because war does not change ideologies! It doesn't change the basic problems that have brought people to indulge in terrorism. It doesn't change cultures that have brought about such problems. It isn't the answer for any problem!
I am not really certain why Bush chose to go to war in Afghanistan rather than going after the people who planned and executed 9/11 the way Bill Clinton did. Being in a foreign country has never stopped the CIA from kidnapping and bringing a person back to the US for trial. So why he didn't take that route is a mystery. It would have been a whole lot cheaper in the end.
But, Bush chose to live up to the neocon heritage and kick ass! Except he didn't kick ass...his ass is getting kicked in Afghanistan and Iraq both. A rag tag bunch of terrorist's have shown him that fancy equipment doesn't make you superior! Having a billion dollar budget doesn't mean you are going to win in the end. So this adventure of Bush's has been the same kind of disaster that Iraq has become.
We need to get out of Afghanistan too! Bush had no plans of going after Bin Laden when he invaded Afghanistan. All it was a lead up to his primary goal Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 01/30/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 118 fans permalink

A failed state that grows lots of heroin poppies. Mission Accomplished, CIA!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 01/30/2008
photo

Well, it's not ALL failure. Under US stewardship Afghanistan has regained its status as the #1 producer of heroin--something like 92% of the world's supply. Nice work, George!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 01/30/2008
photo

Slightly off-topic but:

I just heard on the radio a minute ago that, when the wall came down the other day and all those people flooded out of Gaza into Egypt, you know who Hosni Mubarak picked up the phone and called? Bush? No. Sarkozy? No. Gordon Brown? No. It was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I don't know how close the US is to becoming a failed state, but our standing in the eyes of world leaders has certainly plummeted a long way in the last seven years. How did that happen? What is it about the last seven years that could have caused those who were once our allies to abandon us? I wonder...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 01/30/2008

Is it ok to ask why we are trying to build nations?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 01/30/2008

One can say the same thing about the United States.

To expect a country to long survive when that country was artificially created to serve as buffer between the British and Russian empires and one in which various ethnic groups who have had a long mistrust of one another have been grouped is simply preposterous.

Unless they are planning on bring back the King who was deposed in 1973 Afghanistan has little chance of remaining one cohesive entity. I wrote extensively just a few days ago about the problems in Africa. Afghanistan suffers from the same basic problem: it is a legacy of colonialism and its boundaries are artificial and group ethnicities that want differ things. The sooner we let people live their own lives the better off we will be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 01/30/2008
- gcallaghan I'm a Fan of gcallaghan 52 fans permalink
photo

Republicans = Military Failure

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 01/30/2008
- raptor I'm a Fan of raptor 7 fans permalink

How's that Trans-Afganistan Pipeline (TAP) going?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 01/30/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect