US Troops Reductions May Slow or Stop

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US Troops Reductions May Slow or Stop stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT BURNS | January 29, 2008 08:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, with Vice President Dick Cheney, meets with Joint Chiefs and Combatant Commanders in the Cabinet Room of the White House Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2008. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is sending strong signals that U.S. troop reductions in Iraq will slow or stop altogether this summer, a move that would jeopardize hopes of relieving strain on the Army and Marine Corps and revive debate over an open-ended U.S. commitment in Iraq.

The indications of a likely slowdown reflect concern by U.S. commanders that the improvement in security in Iraq since June _ to a degree few had predicted when President Bush ordered five more Army brigades to Iraq a year ago _ is tenuous and could be reversed if the extra troops come out too soon.

One of those extra brigades left in December and the other four are due to come out by July, leaving 15 brigades, or roughly 130,000 to 135,000 troops _ the same number as before Bush sent the reinforcements.

Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, is scheduled to report to the president and to Congress in April on possible additional cutbacks and any recommended changes in strategy. Petraeus recently said it would be prudent to "let things settle a bit" after the current round of troop cuts is completed in July before deciding whether and when to reduce further.

Majority Democrats in Congress have pressed unsuccessfully to wind down the war quickly, in part out of concern that more firepower should be transferred to Afghanistan, where the security situation has deteriorated. Reluctance by Bush to continue the troop drawdown beyond July is likely to trigger a new round of conflict with the anti-war Democrats, especially with the November elections looming.

Petraeus seems at this point to be inclined to declare a pause in troop reductions after July, although no decisions have been made and there are competing pressures from within the Pentagon. The Army in particular wants additional reductions to enable it to shorten Iraq tours from 15 months to 12 months. The longer tours are among pressures that Army leaders fear could break the force.

Petraeus speaks regularly with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other administration officials to keep them informed of his thinking, although he has not yet made a recommendation to Bush. A senior administration official said Petraeus has made clear he is "concerned about a rush to 10" _ a reference to the 10-brigade force level that some administration officials see as an attractive target to hit by the time Bush leaves the White House a year from now.

The administration official said "it really is not determined" yet whether conditions in Iraq will permit further cutbacks. The official briefed reporters last week at the White House on condition of anonymity.

Story continues below

With months to go before a decision has to be made about troop reductions in the second half of the year, it is possible that circumstances in Iraq will change, for better or for worse, in ways that cannot be foreseen. Thus Petraeus is likely to want as much time as possible before committing himself.

The first sign Bush might endorse a pause in troop reductions came earlier this month when he recounted for reporters his meeting with Petraeus in Kuwait on Jan. 12.

"My attitude is, if he (Petraeus) didn't want to continue the drawdown, that's fine with me, in order to make sure we succeed," Bush said. "I said to the general, if you want to slow her down, fine; it's up to you."

In his State of the Union address Monday, Bush emphasized the risks _ with no mention of the benefits _ of continuing the cutbacks beyond July.

"Any further drawdown of U.S. troops will be based on conditions in Iraq and the recommendations of our commanders," Bush said. "General Petraeus has warned that too fast a drawdown could result in the `disintegration of the Iraqi security forces, al-Qaida-Iraq regaining lost ground, (and) a marked increase in violence.'"

He added: "Having come so far and achieved so much, we must not allow this to happen."

In referring to Petraeus' concern about the risk of a "disintegration" of Iraq's security forces, Bush appeared to be quoting from the general's testimony to Congress in September. In those remarks Petraeus cited a Defense Intelligence Agency report on what might happen if there were a rapid withdrawal of American combat forces, not specifically a cut from 15 brigades to 10 brigades.

Gates has stated publicly several times in recent weeks that he hopes conditions in Iraq will permit the withdrawal of an additional five brigades by the end of the year. That would leave a total of 10 brigades in combat, numbering about 100,000 troops. That compares with today's total of 157,000.

In brief remarks to The Associated Press during a visit to Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Gates gave no indication that he has changed his view.

"I've said I would hope that we would continue the pace of withdrawals and that conditions on the ground would permit the withdrawals to continue in the second half of the year. That's where I still am," he said.

Although Bush regularly cites Petraeus as the adviser on whom he relies for decisions on Iraq, the general is not the only senior official who will have a say in whether to continue with troop reductions.

Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said Tuesday that Gates will offer his views, as will Adm. William J. Fallon, the Central Command chief who is doing his own assessment of Iraq in light of U.S. military requirements elsewhere in the Middle East and in Afghanistan. In addition, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is heading another review with the chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps.

The president met Tuesday in the Cabinet Room with members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and combatant commanders, including Fallon, and later was having dinner with the military leaders and their spouses. Bush said he was going to talk with them about the war on terror and their common desire to protect America.

Petraeus himself is publicly cautious about troop levels in Iraq.

In remarks on CNN on Sunday, Petraeus said he is still analyzing conditions in Iraq and may want to wait until after this current series of troop reductions is completed in July before setting a new course.

"We will, though, need to have some time to let things settle a bit, if you will, after we complete the withdrawal" in July of the five brigades, he said, noting that losing five brigades reduces his total combat power by one-quarter.

"We think (it) would be prudent to do some period of assessment, then to make decisions," he added.

___

On the Net:

Pentagon: http://www.defenselink.mil

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is sending strong signals that U.S. troop reductions in Iraq will slow or stop altogether this summer, a move that would jeopardize hopes of relieving strain...
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is sending strong signals that U.S. troop reductions in Iraq will slow or stop altogether this summer, a move that would jeopardize hopes of relieving strain...
Filed by Will Thomas  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
147
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

While I detest bush and the whole gang. I must say that I am getting very tired of the constant whining from the left.

Face up to the fact that you and every other american wants their computor, their car, their tv their strawberries in december, ad infinitum.

Well unless you are willing to give up this lifestyle, you will need world domination to insure your continued supplies of whatever it is you have been convinced you can't live without.

In reality, it was a crude and unsophisticated way to get it done, but those evil republican neocons have taken the first step to insure that you whiners can turn the heat on during a cold winter night or the ac on a hot summer day.

They are only trying to make sure that you will always have more than abundant food at your whole foods supermarket.

I wish you would fess-up and say that while your very sensitive values are appalled by the carnage of this war and the destruction of the planet by global multi-national corporations,

You want your starbucks in the morning and a mall full of junk to buy.

When you rant and rail as much about those evil americans who demand so much of the earth's resources to make them happy then, perhaps, the multinationals will stop raping the earth to give it to you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 01/29/2008

So everything he said last night was more-or-less bullshit. Glad we got that straightened out so quickly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 01/29/2008

Bush needs a lobotomy. The bastard is pure evil to keep this going. Satan sitting behind him looked just as nauseating. Its time Satan and Gepetto leave office and let someone in (Obamma) to run this country. Perhaps then, our troops would be home before christmas, this war would end, and both men would get thier asses impeached, arrested for war crimes. Anything less is unacceptable. Its time we demand our troops come home NOW. All of them, everywhere. We are in a recession, headed for a depression if it keeps up. Not acceptable. Impeach, and vote Obamma for 08"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 01/29/2008

Oh, please do not worry. before the 2008 election
the republicans will come out with TV ads that will tell the people that war is great. War is wonderful and the people in the military die for the U.S.A and our freedom and GOD. I forgot to say that they will also tell us that if you do not love war and killing you do not love the U.S.A. And will the republicans and the Christians believe this and vote for a republican and for the war?? EVERY TIME

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 01/29/2008
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 56 fans permalink
photo

How things change in just one day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

Now that the surge is surely working, why unnecessarily stress the poor troops with a withdraw? They can get some of that much needed R and R in country. A little rest... a little relaxation... a few plates of sweetmeats...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 01/29/2008

To be the one and only superpower in the world you have to controll the flow of oil out of the middle east, period. 911 was a false flag for this reason. America is addicted to oil. We consume 3 time the amount be produce. Your world, as you know it, would end without the 10 million barrels this country imports everyday.


This always been about oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 01/29/2008
- aristippe I'm a Fan of aristippe 13 fans permalink

we are*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 01/29/2008
- aristippe I'm a Fan of aristippe 13 fans permalink

The whole draw down debate is a JOKE. Every democrat knows that we a NEVER leaving Iraq. Permanent Bases anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 01/29/2008

i think the only person that can give bush a run for his money in his battle to become the most stupid person, is miss south carolina. when bush starts talking about maps for iraq, we should impeach him and elect her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 01/29/2008
- MACS I'm a Fan of MACS permalink

LIE 936???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 01/29/2008
- ultomatt I'm a Fan of ultomatt 13 fans permalink

The only measure of "success" in The Rape of Iraq is the establishment of a permanent military presence in Iraq, and the Middle East in general. Iran is next. And no one, not Obama, Clinton or Edwards will get us out, because the owners of this country won't have it. They want exponential profits, and the only way to that (at least in their pinhole vision of the world) is to drench the Middle East in blood, then the entire world.

The Nazi's would have been mighty proud...actually, since they infiltrated the US government after WW2, I'd say they are mighty proud. Look up Elizabeth Holtzman's work with FOIA and the revealing documents that have proven that many lower echelon Nazi's were folded into the US intelligence community (for their anti-communist intel and zeal). Most (not all) of the leaders of the 3rd Reich were sacrificed to make it look good...but lower level operatives like Reinhard Gehlen were embraced by the morons in the CIA/OSS and others. Many were very dangerous psychopaths who were well aware of human nature, and knew how to string along the arrogant idiots in the US intel community.

http://www.jstandard.com/articles/1159/1/Postwar-U.S.--Nazi-link-revealed
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/germany/intro/gehlen.htm
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/

And how curious that at this time in US history, the grandson of a Nazi financier/traitor/Senator is dragging the world kicking and screaming (ok, some aren't complaining...ZIEG HEIL!) over the cliff of endless world war!? Gee...must be a coincidence, don't ya think? Funny too that his Dad was also President, and Director of CIA. I recall at the time HW took office a comment (in a publication, maybe Rolling Stone) on how his being President was like the USSR having Lavrentiy Beria be Premiere...a very scary thought indeed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavrentiy_Beria

I am agnostic, but there might be something to this "end times" horseshit, as a self-fulfilling prophecy that is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 01/29/2008

Same comment I had on the signing statement headline. It's called a DICTATORSHIP people and they've been planning it since Reagan was elected. Congress allows him to do this and he's got the Supreme Court and a majority of Federal Judges in his pocket. Alito was rewarded for his loyalty and assistance by the nomination to the Supreme Court.

From the Washington Post link below"
"In a Feb. 5, 1986, draft memo, Alito, then deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel, outlined a strategy ... laying out a case for having the president routinely issue statements about the meaning of statutes when he signs them into law.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/01/AR2006010100788.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 01/29/2008
- KOisGod I'm a Fan of KOisGod 346 fans permalink
photo

Here you go war pigs.

Take a long hard look at your "victory".

http://www.chris-floyd.com/march/18.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 01/29/2008

what the hell did I listen to last night? Didn't he say more than once he was drawing down the troops?

There are some many drunk and/or stupid Americans who still believe this guy. Does anyone have any short term or long term memory left? Will the MSM questionthis at all? Well other than keith Olbermann. It's so amazing that it's is beyond all the comprehension I have.

I'm going to go have a scotch on-the-rocks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 01/29/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect