US Troops Reductions May Slow or Stop

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US Troops Reductions May Slow or Stop stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT BURNS | January 29, 2008 08:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, with Vice President Dick Cheney, meets with Joint Chiefs and Combatant Commanders in the Cabinet Room of the White House Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2008. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is sending strong signals that U.S. troop reductions in Iraq will slow or stop altogether this summer, a move that would jeopardize hopes of relieving strain on the Army and Marine Corps and revive debate over an open-ended U.S. commitment in Iraq.

The indications of a likely slowdown reflect concern by U.S. commanders that the improvement in security in Iraq since June _ to a degree few had predicted when President Bush ordered five more Army brigades to Iraq a year ago _ is tenuous and could be reversed if the extra troops come out too soon.

One of those extra brigades left in December and the other four are due to come out by July, leaving 15 brigades, or roughly 130,000 to 135,000 troops _ the same number as before Bush sent the reinforcements.

Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, is scheduled to report to the president and to Congress in April on possible additional cutbacks and any recommended changes in strategy. Petraeus recently said it would be prudent to "let things settle a bit" after the current round of troop cuts is completed in July before deciding whether and when to reduce further.

Majority Democrats in Congress have pressed unsuccessfully to wind down the war quickly, in part out of concern that more firepower should be transferred to Afghanistan, where the security situation has deteriorated. Reluctance by Bush to continue the troop drawdown beyond July is likely to trigger a new round of conflict with the anti-war Democrats, especially with the November elections looming.

Petraeus seems at this point to be inclined to declare a pause in troop reductions after July, although no decisions have been made and there are competing pressures from within the Pentagon. The Army in particular wants additional reductions to enable it to shorten Iraq tours from 15 months to 12 months. The longer tours are among pressures that Army leaders fear could break the force.

Petraeus speaks regularly with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other administration officials to keep them informed of his thinking, although he has not yet made a recommendation to Bush. A senior administration official said Petraeus has made clear he is "concerned about a rush to 10" _ a reference to the 10-brigade force level that some administration officials see as an attractive target to hit by the time Bush leaves the White House a year from now.

The administration official said "it really is not determined" yet whether conditions in Iraq will permit further cutbacks. The official briefed reporters last week at the White House on condition of anonymity.

Story continues below

With months to go before a decision has to be made about troop reductions in the second half of the year, it is possible that circumstances in Iraq will change, for better or for worse, in ways that cannot be foreseen. Thus Petraeus is likely to want as much time as possible before committing himself.

The first sign Bush might endorse a pause in troop reductions came earlier this month when he recounted for reporters his meeting with Petraeus in Kuwait on Jan. 12.

"My attitude is, if he (Petraeus) didn't want to continue the drawdown, that's fine with me, in order to make sure we succeed," Bush said. "I said to the general, if you want to slow her down, fine; it's up to you."

In his State of the Union address Monday, Bush emphasized the risks _ with no mention of the benefits _ of continuing the cutbacks beyond July.

"Any further drawdown of U.S. troops will be based on conditions in Iraq and the recommendations of our commanders," Bush said. "General Petraeus has warned that too fast a drawdown could result in the `disintegration of the Iraqi security forces, al-Qaida-Iraq regaining lost ground, (and) a marked increase in violence.'"

He added: "Having come so far and achieved so much, we must not allow this to happen."

In referring to Petraeus' concern about the risk of a "disintegration" of Iraq's security forces, Bush appeared to be quoting from the general's testimony to Congress in September. In those remarks Petraeus cited a Defense Intelligence Agency report on what might happen if there were a rapid withdrawal of American combat forces, not specifically a cut from 15 brigades to 10 brigades.

Gates has stated publicly several times in recent weeks that he hopes conditions in Iraq will permit the withdrawal of an additional five brigades by the end of the year. That would leave a total of 10 brigades in combat, numbering about 100,000 troops. That compares with today's total of 157,000.

In brief remarks to The Associated Press during a visit to Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Gates gave no indication that he has changed his view.

"I've said I would hope that we would continue the pace of withdrawals and that conditions on the ground would permit the withdrawals to continue in the second half of the year. That's where I still am," he said.

Although Bush regularly cites Petraeus as the adviser on whom he relies for decisions on Iraq, the general is not the only senior official who will have a say in whether to continue with troop reductions.

Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said Tuesday that Gates will offer his views, as will Adm. William J. Fallon, the Central Command chief who is doing his own assessment of Iraq in light of U.S. military requirements elsewhere in the Middle East and in Afghanistan. In addition, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is heading another review with the chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps.

The president met Tuesday in the Cabinet Room with members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and combatant commanders, including Fallon, and later was having dinner with the military leaders and their spouses. Bush said he was going to talk with them about the war on terror and their common desire to protect America.

Petraeus himself is publicly cautious about troop levels in Iraq.

In remarks on CNN on Sunday, Petraeus said he is still analyzing conditions in Iraq and may want to wait until after this current series of troop reductions is completed in July before setting a new course.

"We will, though, need to have some time to let things settle a bit, if you will, after we complete the withdrawal" in July of the five brigades, he said, noting that losing five brigades reduces his total combat power by one-quarter.

"We think (it) would be prudent to do some period of assessment, then to make decisions," he added.

___

On the Net:

Pentagon: http://www.defenselink.mil

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is sending strong signals that U.S. troop reductions in Iraq will slow or stop altogether this summer, a move that would jeopardize hopes of relieving strain...
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is sending strong signals that U.S. troop reductions in Iraq will slow or stop altogether this summer, a move that would jeopardize hopes of relieving strain...
Filed by Will Thomas  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
147
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 (5 pages total)
- tompoe I'm a Fan of tompoe 26 fans permalink

"The indications of a likely slowdown reflect concern by U.S. commanders that the improvement in security in Iraq . . . "

Where did this come from? The author obviously has been drinking the Bush Kool-Aid again. There has been no improvement in security in Iraq. There has, though, been ethnic cleansing in Baghdad, which, prior to our occupation enjoyed a 65% Sunni population in the city. Today, 75% of the city is Shia populated. Coupled with banning of automobiles, and violence is shifted to other parts of Iraq. Security is zilch to none, and maybe we can send the author over to show us what he is trying to say. He could hang around the park for a few hours, eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 01/29/2008
- beekeeper I'm a Fan of beekeeper 24 fans permalink
photo

NO shit this prick does not care

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 01/29/2008
- BobSF94117 I'm a Fan of BobSF94117 12 fans permalink

He won't stop until the military is completely broken. Me? I'm gonna invest in weapons contractors...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

Here's something most Americans have NO IDEA about: Within 72 hours he'll retract what he said during the SOTU address. Keep your eyes peeled for the press release. Don't expect to hear about it on the news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 01/29/2008

Imagine that! A contrary little failure monkey. Who'd a thunk it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

You suckers didn't actually believe the Chimp did ya?

Some folks never learn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 01/29/2008
- researcher I'm a Fan of researcher 119 fans permalink

blood for oil the american way even hillary claps when announces that the terrorists are on the run in iraq.

the tough on terror girl.

the goldwater girl comes thru again. she just is on the wrong ticket but no matter most demos are too dumb to notice. especially the reagan demos.

and before you get all upset about demos being dumb remember it was demos that elected nancy and reid.

you want war mongering or spineless. take your pick in this election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

You suckers didn't actually believe the Chimp did ya?

Some folks never learn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 01/29/2008
- GarsLuber I'm a Fan of GarsLuber 12 fans permalink

Just keep paying the tribal warloads more millions of taxpayer dollars.

Cash has been far more effective than troops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

This lying bastard knew last night what was on the table for today.

Worst of all, he and his Butt Buddies don't care that we know this.

If we challenge them on another, of a string of lies, it will be GFY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 01/29/2008
- kennedy I'm a Fan of kennedy 19 fans permalink

I think Bush is hitting the bottle again and again and again and again. Laura needs to take it away and smash it over his head. WAKE UP BUSHEE!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 01/29/2008
- SubparDude I'm a Fan of SubparDude 9 fans permalink

:
'Tis a War to Last the Ages!

Good vs. Evil, Fool vs. Fool,

Where the Winning's in Progress,

and I'm just a Tool.
:

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 01/29/2008
- desmirl I'm a Fan of desmirl 9 fans permalink

What did Bush say in yesterday's SOTU? And what is he saying today. Maybe he just doesn't know WHEN he's lying because it always happens when his mouth is moving. Bush in pushing us toward the abyss of breaking the Army and the Marines by involving us in a war based on 935 documented lies. And the Dems still won't IMPEACH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 01/29/2008

Was I imagining things last night when I heard Bush say--to thunderous applause--that 20,000 troops were coming home? That was less than 24 hours ago!

He can't open his mouth without lying, can he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 01/29/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect