Department of Homeland Security, FBI and immigration, immigration, immigration background checks, immigration policy
Department of Homeland Security, FBI and immigration, immigration, immigration background checks, immigration policy

Huge Amount Of Immigrants To Get Permanent Residency Without Completed Background Checks

Mcclatchy dc   |   February 11, 2008 10:54 AM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

In a major policy shift aimed at reducing a ballooning immigration backlog, the Department of Homeland Security is preparing to grant permanent residency to tens of thousands of applicants before the FBI completes a required background check.

Those eligible are immigrants whose fingerprints have cleared the FBI database of criminal convictions and arrests, but whose names have not yet cleared the FBI's criminal or intelligence files after six months of waiting.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
Comments
67
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Nice, for a 2nd there I thought we were going back to the Japanese interrment camps of yesteryear, substitute Pakistani, Iraqi, Nigerian, Hispanic, Italian, Irish, Asian, Saudi, etc etc. Nice to see we've learned something as a nation since then, or maybe, all we've learned is that we can't lock everyone up in our nation,yet. Get a grip, stop the xenophobia, and get these people into the system so they aren't shadows anymore and we can get a handle on our borders & population.
A terrorist in the US doesn't need to be a citizen to do harm folks, the more anonymous they are the easier their task. Think for a second instead of doing the angry mob scene.

"Investigators believe that some of the 19 suspected hijackers may have stolen the identities of law-abiding Middle Easterners, further complicating the probe."

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/LOS%20ANGELES%20TIMES_FBI%20Chief%20Raises%20New%20Doubts%20Over%20Hijackers'%20Identities.htm

"In 2002, al-Attas admitted that he lied to the FBI to conceal Moussaoui's name, lied to the FBI to conceal Moussaoui's jihadi and anti-American beliefs, lied to conceal his own jihadi tendencies, lied to conceal that Moussaoui had been trying to convince him to become more active in the jihad, and lied to conceal the names of other Middle Easterners who were taking flight lessons in Oklahoma.""He holds a master's degree in International Business from South Bank University in London, having enrolled in 1993 and graduated in 1995"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zacarias_Moussaoui

You still want to leave these people in the shadows? Out of our database systems? Out of our tax agencies? Of our ID systems? Untraceable to our communities and law enforcement except through bureaucratic immigration agencies with backlogs up the kazoo? Some folks have been waiting 20 years for their citizenship. Hello???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 02/11/2008

(cont)
Our 1st step should have been to secure our borders and identify all citizens in the US. It took this administration this long to do it, why? Because Iraq, and oil, took priority.We've been lucky until now. If you continue to grab your shotguns and "send 'dem there Mexeecans back" you are perpetuating an ignorant position out of scapegoating and racism (who else does that? Oh yeah, Rethugs) that does nothing to make our nation safer.

These people need to be in the system, particularly the educated immigrants (most of the 9/11 hijackers were not dummies you know.)

Unless you shut down business travel, the US WILL be issuing Visas for such purposes, so we better get a system in place that WORKS to track and investigate the real threats to national security, not "the Mexeecans" who haven't even bothered with immigration, so they aren't even the ones backlogging it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 02/11/2008

Issue free id's to all visitors, unidentified and anyone who wants it. Take finger prints, photo and name and put it on a internet database. Once in the internet, the ID itself is irrelevant. Employers will then have no excuse for not checking employees legal status. That's why the corporatists will fight it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 02/12/2008
photo

Seven years later and GW Bush still doesn't understand how the 9-11 hijackers entered the country. GW Bush a miserable failure from birth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 02/11/2008

Absolute truth you speak there. We put a moron in the WH at the worst possible time in history. Unravel all of the lies and cover ups that serve to protect Bushco and the solutions will be found and done.

We are an amazing nation, I don't care who says otherwise. We can do this. Under competent, patriotic and intelligent leadership there is nothing we can't do.

Cross your fingers that is what we will get in January.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 AM on 02/12/2008

What a plan for forever war!

Invade a country, occupy it and piss off people, then bring them to the USA so you can blame the dems when some of them turn out to be terrorists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 02/11/2008

Bush wanted a Homeland Security Department anf the Republican Congress gave him one.

Now the Homeland Security Department finds that it can not and does not want to do its job.

Just where is all of the security we have paid for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 02/11/2008

The dems gave it to us along with the TSA. Bush was pulled into it. He did not fight hard though because like ALL politicians he knew he could spend more tax money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 02/11/2008

as long as they have to take their shoes off, have shampoo leaking in their luggage and are occasionally felt up by some gay guy or lesbian then let them all in. i feel safe from these turrrists because the TSA has made me so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 02/11/2008

What the story doesn't say is that Homeland Security and FBI have deliberately delayed the background checks as a stalling tactic for anyone from the 13 "special registration" countries, Morocco, Egypt, Jordan , Saudi, Syria, Algeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc.

Some of the delays have been 6 years or more.

It doesn't take 6 years to do a fingerprint check.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 02/11/2008

Your tax dollars at work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 02/11/2008

Just how does this practice make us a safer nation? Just how is the government going to locate people who knowingly beat the criminal background check and, thus, entered this country illegally?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 02/11/2008

"Adding to the backlog, a surge of applications flooded Citizenship and Immigration Services last year, prompted partly by the announcement of fee increases."

This statement is a complete lie. The surge in applications was because the department of state opened the immigrant floodgates by changing a key cutoff date to "current" from sometime in 2002. Therefore absolutely everyone who was in the country (for years and years) could apply for the green card, instead of waiting for their date to come up.

Remember, these are LEGAL immigrants, following the rules. This is FBI who checks finger prints and are too lazy/not funded to check their names with the foreign government of the country of origin.

These are people with families LIVING IN THE UNITED STATES. Their families are allowed to take advantage of all government provided services, but are not allowed to work and pay taxes. Sound logical? I think not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 02/11/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri permalink

"Remember, these are LEGAL...".

How can you be so sure? Remember, some of these could be LEGAL sleeper-cell terrorists or sympathizers posing as immigrants. Always looking on the bright side, are you not? And it is good to look on the bright side.

Personally, as an American traveling abroad for the last year, I find it shameful the way The TSA operates in granting visas. Government, more specifically the corporations hired by government, cannot seem to get their act together. Develop a centralized database using names. And then match the names.

To complex for the corporations with a fat contract. Ineptitude is in their nature. If the system does not work, the corporation gets another contract to game the system. And the government ends up looking incompetent. After that, you beg for smaller government.

Wishful thinking that Corporate-Government IT can get their collective act together. After all, have to keep the government teet for fat profits.

-"Move along, Citizen. Your name does not appear in the government's dissident database."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 02/11/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri permalink

Oops. Not the TSA, INS. TSA just hassles honest people under the illusion of security. Let us call this security "Bush Fear Security".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 02/11/2008

They are living IN the United States. If they were a sleeper cell, a green card won't hold them back from carrying out terrorism.

The point being, the FBI has to get off their ass a start clearing names.

These people are HERE. They have already got past immigration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 02/12/2008

Call me crazy but maybe this should be the Huffpo headline on the main page instead of Hillary changing campaign people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 02/11/2008
photo

I agree, it should be at the top of the main page. Maybe it's here on this page so that not too many people will see it and wonder why both Hillary and Obama haven't said anything about it. Oh, I forgot, both of them want the latino vote. Wouldn't be prudent to say anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 02/11/2008

Let's see. I can go online to Amazon or to any airline, type in my credit card number and within seconds make a purchase--from a small amounts to thousands of dollars--that involves a credit check. There are millions of these transactions a day. But the FBI can't compare 2 data bases containing the names of "tens of thousands" of immigrants over a six month time frame???

WTF????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 02/11/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri permalink

Corporate contracted government IT. They build it, the FBI cannot use it. So, the corporation must "build" it again. Look what happens when you get a smaller government. Replaced by corporations whose sole interest is the continued flow of your tax dollars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 02/11/2008
photo

This is a really bad idea. And as always suspected, the DHS is a merely a dodge for the administration to bypass the authority and expertise on time-honored non-partisan agencies when they won't fall into line.

Could it be that major corporations and industries who exploit illegal immigrants are pestering the administration? Spring is coming?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 02/11/2008

You got it. BTW-DHS is the most bloated, useless waste of money the Feds have ever scammed taxpayers with. THEY DO NOTHING BUT COLLECT TAX $!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 02/11/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri permalink

Congress came up with this boondoggle. And Democrats voted for it. Blame Congress and The Party - both Democrats and Republicans.

DHS is designed to be incompetent and to spend tax-payer dollars. F*ck security. Another mismanaged corporate-government "smaller is better" example.

Congratulations. Republicans want smaller government. Well, corporations are their to fit your budget and mismanage the situation. All without oversight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 02/11/2008
photo

And, if any of these people are found to be involved in any way with the next 'security happening' that's looked forward to after May 10 (the Virgin Jenna's wedding date - Laura's demanded that NOTHING, NOTHING will interrupt her dear daughter's nuptials.)- WELL - DOES THAT MEAN THE DHS WOULD BE FINANCIALLY AND LEGALLY LIABLE FOR AIDING AND ABETTING WITH THEM?

Just a thought......just a .......thought

http://www.infragard.net/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 02/11/2008

H Nedjar Looper is turning over in her grave at 13,000 rpm. Not to worry. An undocumented cemetary worker will hose her grave with cold water if it starts smoldering. The FBI will send 4 special agents to guard her grave every 6 hrs & hose down her smoldering grave.
The FBI never admitted it couldn't do a job when she was director. OK, OK- red diaper kids called the FBI, Fumbling, Bungling, Incompetent in the 1930's & 40's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 02/11/2008

The system is pretty screwed up anyway. My wife and I were married for two years and she was still made to jump through hoops (basically, travel for hundreds of miles and obtain papers and pay hefty fees) just to get an immigration visa. Then, she was made to go through the same process once she got here in the US. Only an idiot would design such a system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 02/11/2008
photo

You would probably have saved yourself some trouble by obtaining the visa prior to the marriage. That's the way I did it and while it wasn't a walk in the park, it was pretty smooth sailing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 02/11/2008
photo

Well a bunch of idiots designed it and the trade policies of this country exacerbated an already fucked up system. Most people don't remember anything about NAFTA except that it sent jobs overseas - basically to Mexico. The transfer of work to Mexico was intended to build strong industry in Mexico (yes at the expense of American workers but also to stem the tide of immigration - if Mexicans had good jobs there - there would be no need for them to come here). A funny thing happened between the lip and the cup. US companies went to Mexico and set up in the maquiladora area across the Rio Grande and paid workers as little as $4.00 per day. Without labor or environmental laws to hinder them in their rush to profits the workers from central Mexico who would have benefitted from a truly fair NAFTA (the pay was so low in the maquiladora they wouldn't even go there)the only ones benefitting were (SURPRISE!!) American corporations. If Mexicans are here "illegally" then maybe we should put the blame a little closer to home than the poor Mexicans who were also robbed by American companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 02/11/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri permalink

NAFTA - written by corporations for corporations. This is what happens if the Republicans get their "smaller government". Corporations screwing you.

Say, did not Bill Clinton do this boondoggle of a "free-trade agreement". You bet he did. Corporate whore, no different from Republicans. And all of those hoping for a Hillary win... more of the same.

Poor people like you who support Hillary... well, you will remain poor. After all, poor people do not start revolutions. You only do the dying. By the way, how much debt do most of you owe? And you thought you were middle class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 02/11/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect