Not just support, David Wilhelm said on Larry King Live that he is going to work on the campaign. Specifically on Ohio (ads).

Hillary Clinton famously took Senator Obama to task as a "naive" newbie to foreign relations for stating he'd be willing to meet with our adversaries.

But in this little nugget from a NYT piece on her "35 year resume" seems to show that she's smart enough to realize Senator Obama was correct.

QUOTE She praised Gen. Wesley K. Clark, then the NATO commander, and Mr. Holbrooke, the administration"s envoy on the Balkans, for socializing and drinking with Serbia"s leader, Slobodan Milosevic, as a means of gauging his strengths.

"He"s there " you don"t learn something about him by pointing at him across the ocean," she said. "If you do have to engage in a bombing campaign, you"re going to have a much better idea of how much pressure it"s going to take to finally break him." UNQUOTE

He is a traitor. Period.

It is just possible that what Wilhelm (and I) saw to support in 1992 isn't visible in the Clinton we have now.
Can you say "Breakfast with Murdock"?
Can you say "Lobby money"?
Can you say "Support for war"?

"Who's Pimping Out The Sen Clinton Donor List to InfoUSA?

Err...Heads up to anyone donating to Sen. Hillary Clinton... This is not good for you.... Info you provided may be "rented out" By the Clinton campaign to InfoUSA

Clinton InfoUSA Ties Scrutinized

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18958566

Political campaigns spend thousands, even millions of dollars to acquire good mailing lists.

Last year, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton took the unusual step of renting out some of her lists. The transaction once again highlights the Clintons' connections to a businessman who now faces questions from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18958566

So many Clintonites are jumping on the bandwagon.

Pretty soon, Hillary, Bill, and Chelsea (and maybe Lanny Davis) will be the only people riding on their little wagon.

Hillary Clinton underestimated Barack Obama.

Go Obama!

Why is it that everybody has a different count of Delegates, et al? Seems something this crucial ought be counted correctly from the outset and everyone should have the same numbers. Obama and Clinton campaigns announcing they are each winners seems like a math (not miracle) problem someplace.

Wonder who is more upset...Hil or Slick? Looks like the chickens are coming home to roost on this corrupt duo!

McCain Votes Against Waterboarding Ban

The Senate brought the Intelligence Authorization Bill to the floor, containing a provision from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) that establishes one interrogation standard, requiring the intelligence community to abide by the same standards as articulated in the Army Field Manual and banning waterboarding.

Just hours ago, the Senate voted in favor of the bill, 51-45.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), a former prisoner of war, voted to preserve waterboarding.

WHEN IS HILLARY GOING TO SHOW HER TAX RETURN? - OBAMA SHOWED HIS. INSTEAD SHE HANDED OUT A VERY GENERALIZED FINANCIAL BLURB. WHAT IS SHE HIDING?

I've posted this before, but based on some of the inane personal attacks on Hillary & Bill Clinton I've read today, I would like to ask the question again...and believe me, I'm a liberal who has nothing against Obama and will vote for him if he is the nominee:

Why are so many people so terribly negative about the Clintons (and we ALL know Bill and Hillary are joined at the hip when it comes to political decisions, etc.) when it's a fact that the Clinton administration brought America the following:

1. A booming economy
2. Over 22 million new jobs
3. Almost full employment
4. No serious wars or loss of American life through terrorism or invasions, and when we were attacked in 1993, the culprits were found and convicted within months of the attack. Oh, and we weren't attacked again on American soil until 9/11.
5. Our President and First Lady were revered throughout the world, versus the revulsion we see now.
6. Welfare decreased.
7. Teen pregnancies decreased.
8. Clinton policies helped pay off a massive deficit created by the previous Republican administration.
9. Clinton policies left us with a massive surplus.

Yet, suddenly have Obama touted as the new savior of the universe, a man who has a resume that is limited at best, constantly shouts to the heavens that he "would have voted against the war"...if he indeed had actually been able to do so...which he wasn't (hindsight), and now tells the world that he will create policies that will "change" America forever.

Based on what???

This one really hurts Clinton. Right after Obama goes 8-0 too.

Everyone take a couple of minutes to read Joe Wilson's endorsement of Hillary Clinton. It's actually posted on HuffPost - nearly hidden under the title "Battle Tested". As everyone knows, Joe and his wife Valerie Plame have survived the Rove-Bush-Cheney attack machine and survived. Just like Hillary.

This is a man who knows how government works and more importantly how is SHOULD work. It is probably the most important and thought provoking endorsement during this election cycle and should be read and considered by anyone who has not yet voted. It's not too late to bring sanity back into the Democratic party.

With all due respect to the Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and their supporters, I believe that David Wilhelm is making a point at least worthy of your consideration.

So, for those of you that are willing (which will include the rational and exclude anyone that [understandably this year] has a strong emotional commitment to Hillary), please allow me to respectfully submit the argument as I see it.

In the mid-20th century, the Democratic Party retained a series of rolling majorities and executive rule through most presidential terms. Our majorities were strong and resulted in the ability to pass progressive legislation. Our political philosophy, a manifestation of our generations-long majority, became known as the "vital center," a general political agreement that led to a stable environment that fostered unprecedented and unrepeated economic growth.

In short, the years of the "vital center" in American politics were the years during which our grandparents could go to work at a factory and earn a sufficient income to buy a home, raise a family, send their kids to school and retire securely - via pensions NOT 401K's or slender Social Security checks.

Then, "identity politics" destroyed our party. Reagan - a man of "ideas" - reaped the rewards of APPEALING TO OUR BASE and linking that appeal to a malignant agenda that redistributed wealth upward while destroying unions and smashing the heart of our industrial economy.

We have not recovered. For, the triangulation and controversies of the 1990's led to a stalemate in government - one not broken up to this moment.

Most political scientists and politicians agree that the ONLY way to break that stalemate is via a strong majority.

CONTINUED BELOW . . .

Obama is untested.

Hillary has stood up and withstood all the attacks from the GOP and from the media.
Obama has yet to be tested. The GOP is rubbing their hands in glee awaiting our side to name our candidate and doing what they can to ensure its Obama.
Commenter Voltaire has given us a list of what I have seen on many GOP websites.

While most of us expect the upcoming swiftboat attacks from the GOP, what disturbs me most is the gender attacks provoked by the Obama crowd against Hillary. Commenter Jay illustrates this with his lame "who is it that let themselves fly off at the mouth and then ended up putting hubby back in the doghouse while she had to paper over as sweetness and light." What a lame, idiotic, petty attack. And this from a supporter of the "Dream of Unity?" Come on.