Rebate Checks in the Mail by Spring

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Rebate Checks in the Mail by Spring stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA | February 13, 2008 11:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, second from right, greets, from left, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif. and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Md., in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2008, during the signing ceremony for the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. is at right. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

WASHINGTON — The checks aren't in the mail, but they will be soon. President Bush signed legislation Wednesday to rush rebates ranging from $300 to $1,200 to millions of people, the centerpiece of government efforts to brace the wobbly economy. First, though, you must file your 2007 tax return.

More than 130 million people are expected to get the rebates, starting around May. Congress, Bush, the Federal Reserve and Wall Street are hoping the money will burn such a hole in people's pockets that they won't be able to resist spending it. And the spending is supposed to give an energizing jolt to a national economy that is in danger of toppling into a recession if it hasn't already.

Whether people actually spend the money remains to be seen. A recent Associated Press-Ipos poll indicates most people have other plans. Forty-five percent said they planned to pay off bills, while 32 percent said they would save or invest it. Only 19 percent said they would spend their rebates.

The measure Bush signed _ a $168 billion rescue package passed with lightning speed by Congress last week _ includes not only rebates for individuals but also tax breaks for businesses to spur investment in new plants and equipment. That, too, would help bolster U.S. economic activity. The package also contains provisions aimed at helping struggling homeowners clobbered by the housing collapse and the credit crunch refinance into more affordable mortgages.

The emergency plan marked a rare moment of cooperation among political rivals fearful that an ailing economy during an election year would invite voter retaliation.

Bush, who called the measure "a booster shot for our economy," praised the bipartisan cooperation. "We have come together on a single mission _ and that is to put the people's interests first," he said.

Who gets a rebate? Most people who pay taxes or earn at least $3,000, including through Social Security or veterans' disability benefits. Singles making more than $75,000 and couples with income topping $150,000, however, will get smaller checks, up to the top limits for any rebate: incomes of $87,000 for individuals and $174,000 for couples.

To get any rebate, you must file a 2007 tax return and have a valid Social Security number. If you already filed your 2007 return, the IRS says you don't need to do anything extra.

Story continues below

Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples, with an additional $300 for each child.

People earning too little to pay taxes but at least $3,000 _ including elderly people whose only income is from Social Security and veterans who live on disability payments _ will get $300 if single, or $600 if a couple.

The IRS will send out rebates _ by mail or by direct deposit into your bank account _ through the late spring and the summer. The rebates come in addition to any regular tax refund.

To pay for the rebates _ which are estimated to cost about $117 billion over the next two years _ the government will have to borrow more money, enlarging the budget deficit.

The Bush administration and some private economists are hopeful the rebates, tax breaks and aggressive interest rate reductions by the Federal Reserve will help the country narrowly dodge a recession. An increasing number of economists, however, believe the country has already fallen into its first recession since 2001, and they are simply hopeful the rescue package will limit the damage. Most people _ 61 percent _ say the economy is now in a recession, according to the AP-Ipsos poll.

"I do think this will give the economy a shot of adrenaline," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

The National Bureau of Economic Research, a private research organization, looked at what people did with their 2001 rebates. The study found that "households spent about 20 to 40 percent of their rebates on nondurable goods" _ which can include things like food and clothing _ in the first three months. They spent roughly another third in the following three months.

With the current stimulus, the economy will log growth in the range of 2.25 percent to 2.50 percent in the second half of this year _ roughly one full percentage point higher than without the bracing tonic, Hoffman estimated. That would be closer to a more normal rate of around 3 percent, he said.

That in turn should encourage businesses to step up hiring. Nervous employers cut 17,000 jobs in January, the first nationwide loss of jobs in more than four years.

Edward Lazear, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, predicted, "The stimulus will have the effect of increasing jobs by about half a million above the number that would have been the case in the absence of that."

Still, even with the rescue efforts, some analysts fear the economy could backslide and flirt with recession again in 2009.

To help the severely depressed housing market, the stimulus package would raise temporarily to $729,750 the limit on Federal Housing Administration loans and also raise the cap on loans that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy.

Raising those limits, should provide relief in the market for "jumbo" mortgages _ those exceeding $417,000. The credit crunch hit that market hard, making it very difficult, if not impossible, for people to get those loans. That has plunged the housing market even deeper into turmoil.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California said the provisions will provide "families a second chance at the American dream of homeownership by helping them refinance their mortgages and avoid foreclosure."

WASHINGTON — The checks aren't in the mail, but they will be soon. President Bush signed legislation Wednesday to rush rebates ranging from $300 to $1,200 to millions of people, the centerpiece ...
WASHINGTON — The checks aren't in the mail, but they will be soon. President Bush signed legislation Wednesday to rush rebates ranging from $300 to $1,200 to millions of people, the centerpiece ...
Filed by Michelle Kung  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
151
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

Ooo! Make my check out for 14 Billion, please!
I can do a lot of stimulating with that.

What a crock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 02/13/2008

Note the glaring absence of proposals to bring back manufacturing sector jobs and service sector jobs, to "stimulate the economy."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 02/13/2008
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 126 fans permalink

Passing out bribes to the voters in an election year is pretty savy. Although a better way to help the economy is to cut all the wastefull spending and making the Bush tax cuts permanent. I thought those Democrats were going to be the ones to stop the "earmarks". Oh well, I guess the American public have short memories. I good bribe will make them forget.

I do have one question. Why do they call it a "tax rebate" when many people who don't pay taxes are getting them and the "rich" folks who pay the most taxes are getting nothing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 02/13/2008
- andyboy I'm a Fan of andyboy 78 fans permalink

Why don't you give us a real breakdown on the numbers instead of lying? And why would rich folks need a rebate? Wouldn't that be wasteful?

Are the rich hurting mark?

I sure hope you don't plan on taking any money mark. Wouldn't it be more patriotic to send it back to help with war on terror?

I think everybody who is against the plan for any reason should opt out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 02/13/2008
- msmaggie I'm a Fan of msmaggie 10 fans permalink

I don't believe the purpose of this is to help anyone from "hurting"; it's designed to stimulate the economy, the people getting the $$ are simply the conduit for a one time shot in the arm for WalMart and other corporates.

It's all rather lame IMO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

Slow day at the glory hole again, Markie?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 02/13/2008
- msmaggie I'm a Fan of msmaggie 10 fans permalink

Well a lot people aren't getting the $$$, and I certainly wouldn't call an income in excess of $60k rich.

Those getting the $$$ have paid FICA taxes so saying that "many people who don't pay taxes are getting them" is not correct.

And by the way, this puppy is W's initiative, so don't dump it all on the Dems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

2/13/08
7:57pm
Alexandia, VA

The "stimulus package" includes the "tax rebate" for people who did not pay taxes, but that's because they couldn't think of a better term than "tax rebate." Saying you got a "stimulus check" doesn't sound good.
I certainly wouldn't object to gettting any kind of a check, but I didn't earn enough money. Darn it.
You would think that the poorest people would have been given the biggest checks. Too logical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 02/13/2008
- msmaggie I'm a Fan of msmaggie 10 fans permalink

I don't get your meaning. If you implying that wealthy people who loop hole their way out of their fair share of taxes will nonetheless get a check, that's not true. If your income as a single tax payer is over $60,000, you get nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 02/13/2008
- Annette I'm a Fan of Annette 15 fans permalink

Not real clever are you ohiomark. The economy is in the dumper, mostly due to Bushies wasteful spending enabled by the GOP for 6 years. The tax cuts are currently in force and the countries economy is in bad shape. So your reccomendation is that we need more of it. The rich do not need the tax cuts and almost certainly will not spend them. Thus the rebates will not reverberate throughout the economy.
I love all the sympathy you have for the well off. Do not give much of a damn about injured Vets, and senior citizens who are the non taxpaying people getting the rebates. Yep you GOPers sure love the vets, as long as they are on their feet fighting. When they are no longer fighting. "Tough it was their own fault they knew what they were getting into." Can't really have much respect for a guy who wants the wealthy to get tax rebates at the expense of the wounded vets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 02/13/2008
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 126 fans permalink

I just knew this would turn into a class envy thread.

You are right about the wastefull spending of Bush and the GOP. That's why we voted them out. Trouble is that the Dems are worse. Just look at what Hillary or Obama have in store if they get elected. Over 200 billion a year in new government programs. That will not help the economy.

By the way, tax cuts actually bring in MORE revenue to the government. Just check with the Treasury Dept if you don't believe me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 02/13/2008
- wcfar I'm a Fan of wcfar 5 fans permalink

Bush, take the check and cram it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

Send my check to a dead Marine's kid, George.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 02/13/2008
- robotfog I'm a Fan of robotfog 23 fans permalink
photo

Bush is an incompetent loser.

But, oh well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

Most of you are going to whine about it however if Hillary was handing out the checks (with her face on them) you would be happy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

Your point, Feebo?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 02/13/2008

Bushit

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 02/13/2008
- Annette I'm a Fan of Annette 15 fans permalink

Nope it would be every bit as stupid then. But I doubt if she would be so dumb.

I find it amazing that there are still a few who think they can deflect from Geogies blundering by saying "but, but but Clinton. I had no idea that anyone who likes Georgie would really want to bring up the ecenomy and then say Clinton. Georgie has prsided over an economy which has been circling the drain ever since he got his bloodstained hands on it. And the little whiner always has an excuse for his failure. Can't even take responsibility, Oops sorry... He is a Repub, they don't do that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 02/13/2008

No, she's not that dumb, you are right. She would package it in some other way, possibly saying it is " A Universal economic progress package" and you would buy into it, hook, line and sinker.

And BTW- I am not a fan of Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 AM on 02/14/2008
- ptarantino I'm a Fan of ptarantino 9 fans permalink

anastasiabeaverhousen,

You have to be kidding me. Huckabee stole that right from Ron Paul's mouth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

If the media had covered anything Ron Paul said, I might have heard it from him. Instead, I heard it from the squirrel eating hucklefudd. I'll take your word for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 02/13/2008
- ptarantino I'm a Fan of ptarantino 9 fans permalink

Where is this money coming from?

GWB defict just got bigger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 02/13/2008
- Sneaky I'm a Fan of Sneaky 15 fans permalink

Supposedly, us. Most of that money was ours anyway. Note how the "loss" would be fairly easily mitigated by the fact that you MUST file a return to get this, which means many folks who "owe" the gov't are going to end up feeding it more than it would be giving away. Hm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 02/13/2008
- truthskr I'm a Fan of truthskr 9 fans permalink

China, where all of our money comes from. The US is owned almost outright by China, Japan, and the Middle East. And we think that we're the most powerful country in the world...we just the stupid, spoiled brats who keep holding our hands out for more allowance from all of our foreign daddys. Borrowing our way to the bottom, it's the USA way, from the the sub-prime morgage all the way up to the massive, crippling national deficit.

But this all does remind me - looking at this picture of Bush with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and remembering how excited everyone (including myself) was to get a Dem Congress, a Congress that has since failed to accomplish anything of any real substance - not to get to excited in thinking anything will REALLY change with either Obama or Clinton in the WH. Yes, it will be about about a million times better than Bush, but all of the big issues such as the economy, health care, and the War on Terror will continue to languish under the weight of our hapless, lobbyist-funded, corrupt government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 02/13/2008
- truthskr I'm a Fan of truthskr 9 fans permalink

To clarify, I meant to type mortgage mess. Sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 02/13/2008
- iPolitics I'm a Fan of iPolitics 33 fans permalink

"Oil sold for $22.81 the year before the war was launched against a country with the world's second-largest holding, and the average price last year was almost three times that, at $64.20."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/aboard-the-condoleezza-ri_b_86364.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 02/13/2008

The certified pig fucker Bush is trying to buy a legacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 02/13/2008
- msmaggie I'm a Fan of msmaggie 10 fans permalink

So where does one go for pig fucking certification? And what is considered proof--affadavits from the pig in question? Inquiring minds want to know...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 02/13/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

Call your local farmer for accreditation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 AM on 02/14/2008
- KOisGod I'm a Fan of KOisGod 347 fans permalink
photo

Me US Goberment, me want to make people laugh, happy. Me print money, me not have nothing to back it - opps, lots of jets, go boom boom, take THAT IslamoFascist!

Me want people to remember me as benevolent daddy, me give them MONEY, buy STUFF, CEO get bump, workers, restock shelves, China worker make stuff, ship stuff, cheap - to rich 'merican, who just got CHECK - to buy more STUFF.

Me 'merican man, want check, need check, to pay for taxes, that help make people HAPPY, because Goberment send people CHECK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 02/13/2008

This is about giving tax breaks to businesses and our democratic representatives know it.

What do you believe a 25% tax break means to business, for every $100,000 they receive $25,000 do you really believe Bush or the senators were concerned about you and me,,, H.. No...

This military-industrial complex which has taken control of our government, is tighting the rope a lot more every single day, and now it is starting to choke the Americans citizens to death.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 02/13/2008
- beck I'm a Fan of beck 3 fans permalink

I hope this is not going to be like "the check is in the mail" rescue he gave the Katrina victims.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

Somehow I don't understand how adding 168 Billion dollars to our national debt is good for the economy!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 02/13/2008
photo

Damn, the $1690 I owe on my 2007 Federal taxes is due on April 15th.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 02/13/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect