The people behind this "group" must be disgusting examples of humanity. How would they like it if someone called one of their mothers that word? In the end we will all be facing our own mortality; what a thing to look back on, that they called a hard -working decent woman one of the most awful names on the planet. I support Obama but admire Hillary too. And no woman deserves this treatment!!
And I also object to the misleading headlline that seems to drag David Shuster into this. He should sue HuffPo.

FYI

Err...Heads up to anyone donating to Sen. Hillary Clinton... This is not good for you.... Info you provided may be "rented out" By the Clinton campaign to InfoUSA

Clinton InfoUSA Ties Scrutinized

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18958566

Political campaigns spend thousands, even millions of dollars to acquire good mailing lists.

Last year, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton took the unusual step of renting out some of her lists. The transaction once again highlights the Clintons' connections to a businessman who now faces questions from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18958566

....

Do women have a slang word about men that is as offensive to men as cu*t is to women?

.

I don't think I'll be back at this site anytime soon, it is off my favorite list for good.
Bye bye and my vote will still go to Hillary.

he thinks of Hillary as a C U N _?

I guess the other question besides your headline would be "why is the Huffington Post giving credence to this group and to tabloid-journalism lovers by naming the group in this headline"?

You guys are really starting to disgust me.

And I can't stand Hillary. For her politics, not her gender.

Here's a better question. Why is HP posting such a misleading headline?

The headline says "Why is David Shuster e-mailing with an anti-Hillary group named C**T?"

This suggests that David Shuster is a part of, or associates with, some vulgar anti-Hillary Clinton group.

If you read the article, it turns out the opposite is true. This group contacted Shuster and he essentially told them to go f**k themselves.

This is really piling on in two ways. The first is to suggest that Shuster is some rabid vulgar anti-female anti-Hillary pig, when there is no evidence to support that. And the second is to find any excuse, no matter how flimsy, to put the word "c**t" in a headline.

My view is that the word "c**t" should never be used by anyone, ever, under any circumstances. It is often the last word out of a man's mouth before he punches some poor woman in the face. It is a violent word, a disgusting word, a threatening word. We don't need HP spread that word. Or finding flimsy excuses to do so.

Everyone take a couple of minutes to read Joe Wilson's endorsement of Hillary Clinton. It's actually posted on HuffPost - nearly hidden under the title "Battle Tested". As everyone knows, Joe and his wife Valerie Plame have survived the Rove-Bush-Cheney attack machine and survived. Just like Hillary.

This is a man who knows how government works and more importantly how is SHOULD work. It is probably the most important and thought provoking endorsement during this election cycle and should be read and considered by anyone who has not yet voted. It's not too late to bring sanity back into the Democratic party.

Its a misleading title. Shuster defends yet the title suggest he was calling her a cunt. How ridiculous.

On that note, I wonder how many ways CUNTon can "pimp" this issue. How much free press will she get out of it.

Huffington Post has outdone itself! It really is a matter of putting the Clinton name and the word cunt together. Shame on you HP. We all know division sells and HP is just another entity that needs to sell itself at all costs. I personally will leave the country if Hillary is elected (if we aren't under martial law). With that said, think about this. Why get all jacked up about the word cunt? Men, since any of us can remember, think about little else but cunts. They covet them, they want to get next to one, sleep with one, pet one, and have one for their very own. They would like two or three of their own actually, but can't unless they have lot's and lot's of money, or don't mind losing the ones they have and getting new ones all the time which is a lot of work. Don't get insulted by the word or give it any negative power. Why, without cunts, those who like to use the word would not even be born to use it! Hooray for cunts! Hillary is not good enough for the word! And clearly, her husband would stay home if she was one!

sounds like something jung would come up with

Did I mention that moonbats get punked regularly?

Why was a journalist from the Weekly Standard, invited to sit in on a planing meeting? Presumably, it was because they thought they could get some favorable coverage, though it's hard to understand how, even the Weekly Standard could stoop that low.

As an Obama supporter, who is no big fan of Hillary, I'm appalled.

This isn't about Hillary. It's about the Republican Party and the fact that it hasn't changed its mode of operation since 1972. They still can't win on the issues so they need crap like the Swift Boat Veterans or this little deal. It's also about MSNBC's gas bags. Matthews, flat hates Hillary. In his case its a case of penis envy.

I am offended by this name C.U.N.T. so typical of fearful little males to use this hate filled word. Why dont we call them all tiny rotting penis?

I am outraged