Did Hillary Clinton Really Support NAFTA? Aides, Biographers Say No

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Did Hillary Clinton Really Support NAFTA? Aides, Biographers Say No stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 02-14-08 01:13 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Hillary Nafta

As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arguing that she was once a supporter of the North American Free Trade Agreement that contributed to the loss hundreds of thousands of American jobs.

"A little more than a year ago," an Obama mailer reads, "Hillary Clinton thought NAFTA was a 'boon' to the economy." The piece goes on to argue that the New York Senator is "changing her tune" now that she's campaigning in the Buckeye State.

The attack is, most observers say, misleading. The "boon" line, a paraphrase lifted from a September 2006 Newsday article, has yet to be confirmed as an authentic quote. But, more importantly, the mailer misrepresents what former Clinton administration officials and biographers say was Hillary Clinton's long-held opposition to the legislation.

"In August in 92, we had to make a decision," Mickey Kantor the former U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Clinton adviser, and free trade advocate recalled for the Huffington Post. "President Clinton had to make a decision as governor, whether or not he would support [George H.W. Bush's] NAFTA, and of course he did... Hillary Clinton was one of the great skeptics in the discussion as to whether he should do. So she was always skeptical beginning in 1992 and onward."

Indeed, as Kantor went on to note, Hillary Clinton long held reservations over the labor and environmental fallouts of the free trade agreement. In addition, she was, at the time, eager to see her health care reform (not NAFTA) pushed through Congress. As such, Clinton biographer Sally Bedell Smith writes in her book "For Love of Politics," her disapproval of the trade agreement was both political and philosophical.

The economic team and other key advisors, including Mack McLarty, Mickey Kantor, and David Gergen, were likewise urging Bill to use his momentum to push or congressional ratification of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)...Liberal Democrats, including Hillary, opposed it primarily because it could take jobs away from American workers. But as an advocate of global economic cooperation, Bill was drawn to its free-trade philosophy.

It fell to Mickey Kantor, the U.S. Trade Representative responsible for implementing NAFTA, to reason with Hillary. One day in August, he sat her down on a bench behind the White House and tried to strike a compromise. "I said, 'If you want to drop NAFTA, we can kill it, but we shouldn't,'" Kantor recalled. "I said, 'The way to do it is to introduce health care, spend a month on it, and then do NAFTA, then go back to health care.'" With misgivings, Hillary acquiesced to the proposed sequence.

Carl Bernstein, another Clinton biographer, echoed much the same tale during a recent appearance on CNN.

"'Bill,'" he recalled Hillary Clinton as saying, "'you are doing Republican economics when you are doing NAFTA.' She was against NAFTA. And if she would somehow come out and tell the real story of what she fought for in the White House and failed in a big argument with her husband she would end up moving much closer to those [John] Edwards followers."

So why didn't we hear such protests from Hillary Clinton during her husband's administration?

Story continues below
advertisement

"The whole time that she was first lady," said Robert Shapiro, the undersecretary of commerce during the Clinton White House years, "she, like everybody else...[was] not supposed to deviate from the position of the administration. There is no freedom of speech in there, and that certainly applies to a first lady."

On the 2008 campaign trail, Clinton has been free of those shackles. And, on many occasions, she has expressed misgivings about NAFTA, although usually she qualifies her statements by saying she supports the underlying idea.

"I believe in the general principles it represented," she said last February, noting that she voted against CAFTA [the Central American Free Trade Agreement] because of a lack of environmental and labor standards. "But what we have learned is that we have to drive a tougher bargain. Our market is the market that everybody wants to be in. We should quit giving it away so willy-nilly. I believe we need tougher enforcement of the trade agreements we already have."

Clinton ``is committed to free trade and to the growing role of the international economy,'' Steven Rattner, a Clinton fundraiser and co-founder of Quadrangle Group LLC, a New York buyout firm told Bloomberg.com. ``She would absolutely do the right thing as president.''

More recently, at the Las Vegas Democratic Debate on November 15, 2007, she offered the following, more concise declaration: "NAFTA was a mistake to the extent that it did not deliver on what we had hoped it would."

As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arg...
As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arg...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
216
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
photo

More on Hillary Clintons views on NAFTA

in 1997
Clinton promoted her husband's trade agenda "The simple fact is, nations with free-market systems do better," she said in a 1997 speech to the Corporate Council on Africa. "Look around the globe: Those nations which have lowered trade barriers are prospering more than those that have not."

Hillary Praises NAFTA In Front Of Free Traders And Slams NAFTA In Front Of Big Labor. “Appearing before free-trade supporters, she [Hillary] has praised the landmark North American Free Trade Agreement, which is loathed by many unions. But speaking to a union audience as a presidential candidate, Clinton said NAFTA hurt workers.” (Peter Nicholas, “On Policies, Clinton Plays It Safe,” The Los Angeles Times, 10/4/07)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 02/14/2008
photo

I am sure if Hillary had asked Bill to veto the NAFTA bill, he would have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 02/14/2008
- TWOSHORT I'm a Fan of TWOSHORT 3 fans permalink

Oh really!!The Clinton's are in it for the money.Story of Bill getting mine contract in eastern europe for rich canda guy.Hushed that up real qik!!!!!!!!!!NOT A MEDIA STORY WHY? Is this the kind of change we will get if the Clinton's get the Whitehouse[MEDIA BLACKOUT-OH EXCUSE ME THAT IS THE BUSH ADM NOW]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 02/14/2008

Carl Bernstein: "Hillary Clinton’s economics, the ones she preached to her husband in the White House are much closer to John Edwards then you would think. She argued with Bill Clinton when she was First Lady, her husband, she said ‘Bill, you are doing Republican economics when you are doing NAFTA.’ She was against NAFTA. And if she would somehow come out and tell the real story of what she fought for in the White House and failed in a big argument with her husband she would end up moving much closer to those Edwards followers."

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/31/carl-bernstein-says-hillary-clinton-fought-against-nafta-when-bill-implemented-it/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 02/14/2008

Agreed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 02/14/2008
- clbrune I'm a Fan of clbrune 2 fans permalink

Oh come on, is there room for "facts" here?

She was opposed to NAFTA and voted against CAFTA?

This is the HuffingtonPost! Don't muddy the waters with facts that don't smear Hillary Clinton!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 02/14/2008
photo

Hillary Clinton flip flops on NAFTA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ0swdRvYgw

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 02/14/2008
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 270 fans permalink

Facts, schmacts... c'mon, people -- we're trying to have a 'movement' here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 02/14/2008

Revisionist history anyone?

unless you owned a US or Mexican factory on day 1 of NAFTA or had the capital to start on day 2, NAFTA was a mess.

It's certainly part of out "illegal immigration" problem..

Trade Agreements are nothing less then a treaty, which as per the US consitution is the responsibilty of the Congress not the President (whether Bush or Bubba).

Obama/Paul 08!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 02/14/2008
- AnninCA I'm a Fan of AnninCA 54 fans permalink

Good to see.

She's taking him to task as we speak over his own votes.

Go Hillary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 02/14/2008

Excuse me but Hillary told us, she and Bill are a package deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 02/14/2008
- AnninCA I'm a Fan of AnninCA 54 fans permalink

baloney

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 02/14/2008
photo

If she wasn't married to Bill Clinton we wouldn't give her the time of day or a second thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 02/14/2008

Yeah, yeah... Well I don't know about you, but if Mickey Kantor told me the sun was shining outside, I'd definitely get to a window and check...

Hillary, whether or not she actually "supported" NAFTA as enthusiastically as her husband did, back then, has certainly defended it since then, only recently stating that it was merely "wrongly implemented"... I suspect her understanding of economics might fit comfortably on the back of a match-cover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 02/14/2008

For the folks who support NAFTA, Hillary was for it -- for the folks who oppose NAFTA, Hillary was against it. This is Clintonlogic -- Hillary is the same as Bill in that regard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 02/14/2008

Did I read your blog correctly? Did you type "the mailer misrepresents what former Clinton administration officials and biographers say was Hillary Clinton's long-held opposition to the legislation"? So those owned by the Clintons are expected to say anything but that on behalf of their candidate? Everyone in the blogosphere is getting a little pathetic with scratching out any bit of nonsense in pathetic gotcha attempts, which is a poorer relfection on the authors/websites than on the candidates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 02/14/2008
- nerakami I'm a Fan of nerakami 14 fans permalink

I dont get how she can claim Bill Clinton years as President as a part of her 35 years experience but when it doesn't suit her, it was her husband and not her that supported the bills he signed....

it's either one or the other lady

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 02/14/2008
- Kim445588 I'm a Fan of Kim445588 4 fans permalink

She can't and those in the educated demographic that are supporting Obama understand that that line of reasonings is a joke. If I have to pretend to buy into 35 years of experience, she gets saddled with Bill's baggage and all the ugliness as well as the good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 02/14/2008

Oh I get it, Shrillary takes credit for her "experience" in Slick Willies admin, but claims she has always been opposed to Slick Willies republican-lite policies. Its just more triangulation and flip-flopping from the Clintons.

it is a fact that Bill Clintons administration joined forces with the republicans to give us NAFTA. They also gave us the 1996 telecom monopoly bill and plenty of other scams and corporate welfare. And now Hillary wants democrats to support her because of her experience back then? No thanks. Hillary deserves to lose, and lose BIG, just like she did here in Virginia. What a relief that people are starting to see through her arrogance and spin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 02/14/2008
- Kim445588 I'm a Fan of Kim445588 4 fans permalink

I think people are starting to feel like it is finally safe to jump ship, particularly those establishment folks who could be stomped into the ground if they find themselves on the wrong side of Clinton if she wins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 02/14/2008
photo

This is bull. She said NAFTA was good for the economy.. Here is the quote from 1998 Factcheck.orgg)
At the Davos Economic Summit, Clinton praised business leaders for mounting “a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA,” adding later that “it is certainly clear that we have not by any means finished the job that has begun.”

This is lazy journalism...
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/hillarys_high-stepping.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 02/14/2008

And according to Politifact.com/Truth-o-meter when Obama brought this up in the 1/21/08 SC debate, they found Obama's statement to be untrue. Their response was: Even before formally announcing her candidacy, Clinton expressed increased skepticism about globalization and was questioning whether other nations were taking advantage of the U.S. liberalized trade policies. In an Oct. 2007 speech in Iowa, Clinton's critical tone intensified and blamed the Bush administration for not vigorously enforcing trade agreements.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 02/14/2008

So she was against it before she was for it, then against it again? How... leaderly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 02/14/2008
- uffa I'm a Fan of uffa 3 fans permalink
photo

Thank you for your research. We need people like you around here. But one also has to wonder, if Mrs. Clinton only kept silent because she was first lady, why is it that it took her another eight years (LONG time,eight years) to finally find her tongue -- of course on the campaign trail. The even bigger question, though, is how Mr. Obama's campaign is supposed to know that what Mrs. Clinton said in 1998 (and there are additional statements in 1996 and 1994) didn't really represent what she secretly felt in her heart? I mean, is the Obama campaign supposed to channel Mrs. Clinton's better angel or what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 02/14/2008
- Plowboy I'm a Fan of Plowboy 25 fans permalink

If she were not Bill Clinton's wife, she couldn't be running for president. Nor, in fact, would she be a US Senator from NY. She wants credit for all that happened in his administration. But whatever you didn't like isn't her fault. I'll bet she didn't support Bush's warmongering either, despite her repeated votes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 02/14/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect