MSNBC has become a huge disappointment to me. It has all but abandoned any intelligent discourse on politics. I am no longer impressed with most of the hosts, male or female, or with most of their guests. Most of the talk focuses on what various journalists think who is ahead; who is behind; who is slipping, falling and/or who has momentum? Why does matter what Andrea, Joe S. or Keith or any of the others think about who is winning? How could it possibly make any difference to me whether or not Chris Matthews likes Obama?

What happened to the issues? Why can't we find out more details about how the various candidates differ on the vital issues of the day? What happened to Iraq? How do the candidates feel about qualified or unqualified support for Israel? South American trade issues? Cuba? It is an unfortunate state of affairs when there is so much talk on the part of these personalities, with so little to show for it.

Words are important! Obama is so weak, his followers have to carry him. He's their savior, so they don't mind.

Well - The Democratic Party can't afford "to carry" Obama. He can never beat McCain, not even as a democrat. We've got to drop him FAST!

Stand on your own feet Obama. Speak your own words.

I wouldn't piss on Chris Matthews if he was on fire. He is one worthless pile of dog crap.

John Edwards - Please sue MSNBC for not giving the VOTERS a level playing field. Obama has received so much affirmative action, it has undercut the voters say. I want a new Voters Rights Act where the internet users cannot control the outcome of our Democratic Party primary.

MSNBC timed Obama's surge perfectly so that the voting results are not accurate.

In media Matters, there is a seperate site of Mathews watch, for his inappropriare remarks againt Hillary.
I do not watch him, my questions is to the advertisers, why they still continue to sponsor his show ?

Again, why was Don Imus fired from MSNBC ? He is a radio shock jock, while Mathews is on prime time , and claims to be giving us news, instead is a hatemonger, and spews out his venom on air, day in and day out, and has been doing it for years !

I urge MSNBC, to take him off the air.

I remember that time Matthews said he finally had evidence of criminality coming out of the Cheney office because he posited that Cheney's office wa trying to muzzle him. I wonder, will he spout the same next time he is drunk and shoot back the HRC is a criminal?

What's this bullshit with the media engaging in Free Speech and Freedom of the Press.

That crap isn't allowed in hillary land.

Now everybody out on your Hillary Mask, your Nazi brown shirts and go burn the books.

Anybody caught not using HillarySpeak will be forced to spend the night with Sick WIllie

America is not free under Bush.

It won't be free under a Clinton White House.

What happened to Freedom of the Press?

Are we a Democracy or a Dictatorship?

I have watched Mr Matthews for years now but I've noticed that within the past few years he has really changed and not for the better. He fawns and gushes over powerful male figures and he is very misogynistic regarding female political figures. HIs latest comments regarding Sen Obama are the creepiest yet. He said and I quote, "I have to tell you, you know, it's part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama's speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often."
Good grief how uncomfortably creepy is that? Jung would have a field day with comments like that.

so much for tolerance in our (democratic) party. irrelevant because he obviously supports a democratic candidate? so let's shove him to the republican side? have you forgotten his roots? his switch-over (from repub to dem) during the anti-vietnam war movement? his service in the peace corp?

who are you to decide who is irrelevant and/or should or shouldn't comment?

where is free speech and tolerance? have we (democrats) gone mad?

either candidate (H or O) will be preferable to another 4 years of a republican. get off your high horse & act like the tolerant party we are supposed to be.

The first, last and only thing I have in common with the Clintons is I complain about that useless, self absorbed, loudmouth asshole Mathews too. And I agree with the substance of his Hillary criticisms.

So today, he's calling the Clinton press people kneecappers? What is it with Matthews? No one ever reeled him in when he was at his worst . . . and now as it's finally catching up with him - he calls foul? There were nights when I felt he was thoroughly unchecked, bating, stuck on a point that no one wanted to address as though the panel was embarrassed at his inference (usually about Bill's prowess) but it was during the time of the campaign when the crowds were responding well to Bill. Then it tipped the other way and Bill was getting criticized and pulled back - I felt there was absolutely a correlation. Chris was part of stirring it up, saying again and again and again - "can she get a leash on him, can she control him, what will happen in the Whitehouse?" He was out of line and now refusing to self examine? He wants to be what, Limbaugh, Matthews style?

Why is everybody in here complaining about the Clintons, but nobody complains about an entire NETWORK devoted to Bushit lies and spin 24/7 for several years now? THAT is ok? You hypocrits make me sick.

Nobody cared when he spent the last seven years bolo punching W.

Reading so many Clinton haters who, like loyal FOX News watchers, can't see beyond their on bais to be objective, I've reminded of something Bill Maher said recently:

"I mean, you may not want Hillary Clinton for president, but there is absolutely no reason anyone has a – would ever have to hate this person. You may not say she inspires you, but there is nothing hate-able about Hillary Clinton. If you hate Hillary Clinton, it is so about you."

As well as Paul Krugman's column the other day:

"What’s particularly saddening is the way many Obama supporters seem happy with the application of “Clinton rules” — the term a number of observers use for the way pundits and some news organizations treat any action or statement by the Clintons, no matter how innocuous, as proof of evil intent."

I wonder how this people will react in the fall when the MSM, who they are now defending for unfairly trashing the Clintons, start telling glowing tales of Saint John McCain while swiftboating Senator Obama.